Can an anorectal abscess be treated without surgery?
In adults presenting with an anorectal (perianal) abscess, does treatment with antibiotics alone, compared with surgical incision and drainage, achieve comparable rates of abscess resolution, recurrence, and subsequent fistula formation?
Compiled 2026-10-05 · checked 2026-10-05 · next 2026-11-05 · automated review, how it works
What the evidence says
Bottom line
No — for most adults, antibiotics alone are not a proven substitute for having the abscess drained.
The one randomised trial that tested this directly in adults found the abscess came back about three times more often when treated with a needle draw-off plus antibiotics than when it was cut open and drained. Other adult studies disagree with each other, which is why this is rated low certainty rather than settled.
How certain
Low
One well-conducted randomised trial addresses this question directly. The studies disagree with one another, so the overall certainty is lower than any single one of them.
What it shows
Signal of harm
A well-conducted study in people reported harm.
- studies found
- 72studies found
- randomised trials
- 2randomised trials
- people studied
- 11,312people studied
- reviews of trials
- 4reviews of trials
- years covered
- 2008–2026years covered
Read this first
- Case reports describe adults whose abscess got worse on antibiotics alone, with spreading infection that then required urgent surgery.
- Choosing antibiotics instead of drainage may mean the abscess simply comes back, meaning another doctor visit and another procedure later.
What the research shows
Resolution of the abscess without a repeat procedure
In the one trial that tested this directly, treating the abscess with antibiotics and a needle draw-off (instead of cutting it open) led to the abscess coming back far more often — 41% versus 15%.[1]
No improvement shown
Need for a later surgical drainage
People who started with antibiotics instead of a full cut-and-drain procedure were more likely to need a procedure later anyway.[1]
Possible harm
Possible harm
Time to pain and fever going away
No study in adults measured how fast symptoms cleared with antibiotics alone versus surgical drainage.
Not studied
Pain scores
No adult study reported pain scores comparing antibiotics alone against draining the abscess.
Not studied
What it may help with
- In the one trial, draining the abscess with a needle plus a week of antibiotics did work for some adults and let them skip a bigger cutting procedure — it just failed noticeably more often than standard surgery.[1]
Important limitations
- The only randomised trial on this question in adults had just 98 people — a small group for measuring something like recurrence of an infection.[1]
- Most other adult evidence is retrospective (looking back at medical records, not a planned trial) and comes from specific, unusual groups — people on dialysis, people with leukemia, people with Crohn's disease — whose abscesses may not behave like a typical abscess in an otherwise healthy adult.[1,2,3]
- A large share of the research on skipping surgery for an abscess was done in infants and young children, whose bodies and abscesses heal differently than adults'. Those findings cannot be assumed to carry over to grown adults.[1,2,3,4]
What the studies found
- Found a benefit16 · 22%
- Found no clear effect9 · 13%
- Mixed or unclear42 · 58%
- Found possible harm5 · 7%
What kind of studies
- Case series27 · 38%
- Retrospective20 · 28%
- Narrative review12 · 17%
- Guideline3 · 4%
- Systematic review3 · 4%
- Randomised trial2 · 3%
- Prospective cohort2 · 3%
- Meta-analysis1 · 1%
- Registry1 · 1%
- Animal study1 · 1%
The studies that decided it
Sørensen et al. 2021
Needle aspiration treatment vs. incision of acute simple perianal abscess: randomized controlled study
Needle draining failed more often than surgery.Randomised trialModerate quality
98 people52 weeks
abscess recurred much more often after needle aspiration (41%) than after incision drainage (15%)
- Who was studied
- adults with an acute simple perianal (anorectal) abscess
- What they received
- needle aspiration of the abscess plus a week of antibiotics (clindamycin)
- Compared with
- conventional surgical incision and drainage
- Main outcome
- whether the abscess came back (recurrence)
- Quality
- it was a randomized trial across three centers, but had under 100 patients and only one scheduled follow-up timepoint set per abscess type
- Limitations
- abstract does not report blinding; relatively small sample size
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
adults with acute perianal abscess
- intervention
needle aspiration and postoperative antibiotics
- comparator
conventional surgical incision drainage
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcome was abscess recurrence.
- result
The recurrence rate was 41% in needle aspiration and 15% in incision drainage, with HR of 3.033 (p = 0.014).
- n
A total of 98 patients were included.
- followUp
follow-up at 2, 12, and 52 weeks postoperatively
Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 33447866 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Stokes et al. 2020
Management of perianal abscesses in infants without general anaesthesia: a systematic review of the literature
Most infants healed without surgery.Systematic reviewLow qualityRelated question
1,049 people2020
75.3% healed completely without further treatment; 23.2% had recurrence or progressed to a fistula; only 5.6% eventually needed general anaesthesia
- Who was studied
- infants younger than 24 months with perianal abscesses
- What they received
- treatment of the abscess without general anaesthesia (antibiotics, baths, needle drainage, local anaesthesia drainage, etc.)
- Compared with
- later need for drainage under general anaesthesia
- Main outcome
- number of infants who ended up needing general anaesthesia after being treated without it first
- Quality
- The evidence comes mostly from retrospective case series with no randomized trials, so the findings are not very reliable.
- Limitations
- No randomized controlled trials; mostly retrospective cohort studies with varied treatments and lack of standardized care.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
infants less than 24 months old
- intervention
management of perianal abscesses without GA in infants less than 24 months old
- comparator
The primary outcome was the number of patients requiring GA following initial management without GA.
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcome was the number of patients requiring GA following initial management without GA.
- result
A total of 790 (75.3%) healed primarily without further intervention. A total of 243 (23.2%) were documented to have a recurrence or progression to FIA.
- result
Of these, 59 (5.6%) were documented to subsequently require a general anaesthetic.
- n
Nine studies, involving 1049 infants less than 24 months old met inclusion criteria.
- limitations
There were no randomized control trials.
- quality
Despite the lack of well-designed prospective studies, existing evidence supports management of perianal abscesses without initial GA in infants
Pediatr Surg Int · PMID 32785778 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Hsieh et al. 2019
Epidemiology and outcomes of anal abscess in patients on chronic dialysis: a 14-year retrospective study
Found no benefitRetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
43 peopleone-year
no significant difference in hospital stay, one-year survival, or recurrence between surgical and nonsurgical groups, but a trend toward better in-hospital survival with surgery
- Who was studied
- chronic dialysis patients hospitalized for a first-time anal abscess
- What they received
- antibiotic treatment alone (no surgery)
- Compared with
- surgical treatment for the abscess
- Main outcome
- in-hospital death, one-year death, and one-year recurrence
- Quality
- small retrospective study with only 43 patients, not randomized, so differences between groups could explain the results rather than the treatment itself
- Limitations
- retrospective chart review, small sample size, specific to chronic dialysis patients, and a non-significant trend favoring surgery (p=0.082) that could reflect chance
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
43 chronic dialysis patients with first-time anal abscess were enrolled
- population
chronic dialysis patients
- intervention
16 (37.2%) received antibiotic treatment alone
- comparator
27 (62.7%) received surgical treatment
- primaryOutcome
The endpoints of this study were in-hospital mortality, one-year mortality and one-year recurrence.
- result
there was no significant difference in hospital stay, one-year survival or recurrence rate between the surgical group and nonsurgical group. However, there was a trend toward better in-hospital survival in patients who received surgical treatment (p=0.082).
Clinics (Sao Paulo) · PMID 30916172 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Wright 2016
Infectious Diseases Perspective of Anorectal Abscess and Fistula-in-ano Disease
Antibiotics alone don't replace surgery usually.Systematic reviewLow quality
size not given2016
antibiotics added to surgery did not speed healing or lower recurrence for common cases, but antibiotics alone worked well for rare pathogen infections
- Who was studied
- patients with anorectal abscess and fistula-in-ano, mostly from common gut bacteria but some from unusual infections
- What they received
- antibiotic therapy combined with surgical incision and drainage, or antibiotics alone for unusual infections
- Compared with
- surgical incision and drainage alone
- Main outcome
- healing time and recurrence rate
- Quality
- this is a review of mostly retrospective studies and case series rather than controlled trials, so the evidence is weak.
- Limitations
- Abstract states data are derived primarily from prospective and retrospective trials and institutional case series, providing only an 'evidence level opinion' rather than controlled comparisons.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Most patients are diagnosed with cryptoglandular disease but unusual infections raise difficult antimicrobial management challenges.
- intervention
The use of antimicrobial therapy in combination with surgical incision and drainage in the treatment of cryptoglandular disease
- comparator
Surgical incision and drainage is the main treatment for anorectal abscess and fistula-in-ano
- primaryOutcome
has failed to improved healing times or reduce recurrences or both
- result
The use of antimicrobial therapy in combination with surgical incision and drainage in the treatment of cryptoglandular disease has failed to improved healing times or reduce recurrences or both.
- result
For patients with unusual infecting pathogens (eg, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Actinomyces species and Chlamydia species) outcomes are favorable with selected antimicrobial therapy agents of various durations.
- limitations
data derived primarily from prospective and retrospective trials as well as institutional case series to provide an evidence level opinion
Am J Med Sci · PMID 27079352 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Chen et al. 2013
Clinical and microbiological characteristics of perianal infections in adult patients with acute leukemia
Surgery trend fewer recurrences, not significantRetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
74 people2013
patients who had surgery tended to have fewer recurrences, but this was not statistically significant
- Who was studied
- adult patients with acute leukemia who developed perianal infection
- What they received
- surgical treatment of the perianal infection/anal fistula
- Compared with
- non-surgical (medical) management of the perianal infection
- Main outcome
- recurrence of perianal infection
- Quality
- this is a single-center retrospective review with a small subgroup comparison that just missed statistical significance, so it can't reliably show whether surgery helps.
- Limitations
- retrospective design, single center, surgical vs non-surgical comparison was not significant (p=0.067), and patients are immunocompromised leukemia patients rather than the general population with anorectal abscess
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Twenty-five (34%) of 74 patients received surgical intervention.
- population
The prevalence of perianal infection was 6.7% (74 of 1102) in adult patients with acute leukemia.
- intervention
Acute leukemia patients with surgically managed anal fistulas tended to have fewer recurrences (p = 0.067).
- comparator
neutropenia and bleeding tendency are relatively contraindicated to surgical intervention
- primaryOutcome
Twenty-three (31%) of the 74 patients had recurrent episodes of perianal infections.
- result
Acute leukemia patients with surgically managed anal fistulas tended to have fewer recurrences (p = 0.067).
PLoS One · PMID 23577135 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Afşarlar et al. 2011
Perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano in children: clinical characteristic, management and outcome
No difference: surgery vs. no surgery.RetrospectiveLow quality
158 people10.6 ± 8.6 months
no significant difference in recurrence or fistula formation between incision/drainage and spontaneous drainage groups, but antibiotics reduced fistula formation
- Who was studied
- children with perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano, median age 7.2 months
- What they received
- incision and drainage of the abscess, with or without antibiotics
- Compared with
- spontaneous drainage with local wound care, with or without antibiotics
- Main outcome
- recurrence of abscess and development of fistula-in-ano
- Quality
- This was a retrospective chart review without randomization, so differences between treatment groups could be due to other factors rather than the treatment itself.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, not randomized, and follow-up period was relatively short and variable (mean 10.6 ± 8.6 months).
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A total of 158 children (146 males, 12 females) treated for perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano with a median age of 7.2 months (ranging 16 days to 18 years) were eligible for the study.
- population
A total of 158 children (146 males, 12 females) treated for perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano with a median age of 7.2 months (ranging 16 days to 18 years) were eligible for the study.
- intervention
Primary treatment was incision and drainage (I/D) for the fluctuating perianal abscess (73.5%)
- comparator
and local care for the spontaneously (S/D) drained abscess (26.5%) with or without antibiotic therapy.
- primaryOutcome
Recurrence rates (27% in I/D and 30.6% in S/D, p > 0.05) and development of fistula-in-ano (20% in I/D and 27.8 in S/D, p > 0.05) were not significant I/D and S/D groups.
- result
Recurrence rates (27% in I/D and 30.6% in S/D, p > 0.05) and development of fistula-in-ano (20% in I/D and 27.8 in S/D, p > 0.05) were not significant I/D and S/D groups.
- followUp
The mean follow-up period was 10.6 ± 8.6 months.
Pediatr Surg Int · PMID 21785979 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Ezer et al. 2010
Perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano in children: aetiology, management and outcome
High fistula rate despite treatment.Case seriesLow quality
39 people2010
85% of abscess patients went on to develop a fistula regardless of initial treatment, only 15% healed without fistula
- Who was studied
- children with perianal abscess and/or fistula-in-ano
- What they received
- incision and drainage with antibiotics, or antibiotics alone (non-surgical) for perianal abscess
- Compared with
- surgical treatment (fistulotomy or fistulectomy) for the resulting fistula
- Main outcome
- development of fistula-in-ano after treatment of perianal abscess
- Quality
- small retrospective case series without a control group, so it can't reliably show whether avoiding surgery works.
- Limitations
- retrospective design, no comparison group, some patients lost to follow-up
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
The study consisted of 39 patients (36 boys)
- population
perianal abscess and/or fistula-in-ano in children
- intervention
local care with antibiotic therapy was given to four patients
- intervention
The primary local treatment of perianal abscess with or without fistula was incision and drainage (with or without antibiotic therapy) in 21 patients
- comparator
Thirty-three patients with fistula-in-ano underwent surgical treatment either through a fistulotomy or through a fistulectomy.
- primaryOutcome
Of 20 patients with perianal abscess, 17 developed fistula-in-ano and three healed.
- result
Treatment of a perianal abscess either through incision and drainage with antibiotics or through antibiotics alone resulted in a high rate (85%) of fistula formation.
J Paediatr Child Health · PMID 20105258 · Read it on PubMed ↗
What actually helps, on this site
More about the condition:
All 72 studiesEvery study that answered the question, with its design, size and result.
The other 65 studiesEverything else the search returned, including anything retracted.
Yuan et al. 2026
Age-stratified management of pediatric perianal abscesses: a proposed framework integrating the "Developmental Healing Axis"
Non-surgical care often works in young children.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2026
conservative management often works well in infants and young children, while surgery may raise fistula risk especially in older children
- Who was studied
- children with perianal abscesses
- What they received
- conservative treatment with antibiotics and observation
- Compared with
- surgical incision and drainage
- Main outcome
- healing, recurrence, and fistula formation
- Quality
- This is a narrative review summarizing other studies and opinions rather than presenting new controlled data.
- Limitations
- The abstract does not report specific study designs, patient numbers, or statistical results; it is a conceptual synthesis rather than original research.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Pediatric perianal abscesses represent a frequent yet underrecognized condition
- intervention
conservative strategies including antibiotic therapy and observation are often effective in infants and young children
- comparator
Surgical interventions such as incision and drainage offer rapid symptom relief but may increase the risk of fistula formation, particularly in older children
- primaryOutcome
optimize recovery, minimize recurrence, and prevent fistula development
- result
conservative strategies including antibiotic therapy and observation are often effective in infants and young children, reflecting their superior regenerative capacity
Front Pediatr · PMID 42221001 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Eldesouki et al. 2026
Comparison of Ustekinumab and Vedolizumab Effectiveness in Perianal Crohn's Disease: A Retrospective Propensity Matched Cohort Study
No difference in abscess drainage ratesRetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
1,872 people1 and 2 years
ustekinumab had lower rates of fistula surgery and combined surgical events than vedolizumab, but incision and drainage of abscess and diversion procedure rates were not significantly different between the two drugs
- Who was studied
- adults with perianal Crohn's disease
- What they received
- ustekinumab (a biologic drug)
- Compared with
- vedolizumab (a biologic drug)
- Main outcome
- need for perianal procedures such as fistula surgery, abscess incision and drainage, diversion surgery, or antibiotics
- Quality
- This is a retrospective database study comparing two drugs, not a trial testing surgery versus no surgery for abscess, so it can carry little weight on this specific question.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design using a health records database, propensity matching cannot remove all confounding, and the study compares two biologic drugs rather than directly testing whether abscess can avoid surgery.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
adults (18 y or older) with PCD
- intervention
ustekinumab (UST)
- comparator
vedolizumab (VDZ)
- primaryOutcome
Outcomes were perianal-specific clinical events, including definitive fistula surgery, incision and drainage, diversion procedures, and antibiotic use (metronidazole or ciprofloxacin), assessed at 1 and 2 years after biological initiation.
- result
UST was associated with significantly lower risk of definitive perianal fistula surgery (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50-0.89; P<0.01), and composite surgical events (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.54-0.87; P<0.01) compared with VDZ at 1 year. Rates of antibiotic use, incision and drainage of perianal abscess, and diversion procedures were numerically lower but not statistically significant.
- n
After PSM, 936 patients were included in each cohort.
- followUp
assessed at 1 and 2 years after biological initiation
J Clin Gastroenterol · PMID 42213056 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Sagar et al. 2026
Diagnostic insight into recurrent perianal abscess caused by Cutibacterium avidum: A case report
Recovered after drainage plus targeted antibiotics.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 people2026
after targeted antibiotic treatment following surgical drainage, the patient recovered fully with no further abscesses
- Who was studied
- 53-year-old man with repeated perianal abscesses
- What they received
- targeted antibiotics after surgical drainage, guided by identifying the bacteria
- Compared with
- previous repeated incision, drainage, and empiric antibiotics that didn't work
- Main outcome
- recovery without recurrence of abscess
- Quality
- this is a single patient case report, so it cannot show whether avoiding surgery works in general and it actually involved surgical drainage plus antibiotics, not antibiotics alone.
- Limitations
- single case report; surgical drainage was still performed alongside targeted antibiotics, so it does not test treatment without surgery
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
a 53-year-old male with recurrent perianal abscesses
- population
a 53-year-old male with recurrent perianal abscesses unresponsive to repeated incision, drainage, and empiric antibiotics
- intervention
Targeted therapy following surgical drainage resulted in uneventful recovery and no recurrence
- comparator
recurrent perianal abscesses unresponsive to repeated incision, drainage, and empiric antibiotics
- primaryOutcome
resulted in uneventful recovery and no recurrence
- result
Targeted therapy following surgical drainage resulted in uneventful recovery and no recurrence.
Indian J Med Microbiol · PMID 42191117 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Dermuth et al. 2026
Scrotal abscesses in perianal Crohn's disease: a retrospective cohort study of clinical presentation, management, and outcomes
Describes outcomes, not surgery-avoidance.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
40 people12 months
All patients got antibiotics, with some having bedside drainage and others operative drainage; 40% had recurrence within a year, 20% needed treatment escalation, 35% required fecal diversion, and 20% underwent proctectomy
- Who was studied
- men with Crohn's disease who developed abscesses in the scrotum
- What they received
- antibiotics with or without bedside or operative drainage of the abscess
- Compared with
- different drainage approaches (bedside incision and drainage versus operative drainage) within the same group
- Main outcome
- recurrence, need for escalation of therapy, fecal diversion, or proctectomy after treatment
- Quality
- This is a retrospective, descriptive study of a rare complication without a control group comparing surgery to no surgery, so it can't show whether avoiding surgery works.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, no comparison group, and focuses specifically on scrotal abscesses rather than anorectal abscesses in general.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
retrospective cohort study of male patients with Crohn's who developed scrotal abscesses
- n
A total of 40 patients were identified.
- intervention
All patients received antibiotics; 30% underwent bedside incision and drainage, and 37.5% underwent operative drainage.
- comparator
30% underwent bedside incision and drainage, and 37.5% underwent operative drainage
- primaryOutcome
recurrence within 12 months occurred in 40%, and escalation of advanced therapy in 20%
- result
Hospital admission was required in 60%, recurrence within 12 months occurred in 40%, and escalation of advanced therapy in 20%. During follow-up, 35% required fecal diversion (72% or 25% overall), and 20% underwent proctectomy.
- followUp
recurrence within 12 months occurred in 40%
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 42120818 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Gadepalli et al. 2026
Antibiotic Utilization for Perianal Fistulizing Complications among Young Patients with Crohn's Disease
More antibiotics used, no surgery data.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
5,277 people2026
Patients with perianal fistulizing complications received significantly more days of antibiotics than those without, with 90% more dispensing after adjustment
- Who was studied
- Children and young adults with Crohn's disease, some with perianal fistulizing complications
- What they received
- Antibiotic prescriptions/dispensing patterns
- Compared with
- Patients with Crohn's disease but without perianal fistulizing complications
- Main outcome
- Number of days of antibiotics dispensed
- Quality
- This is a retrospective claims-database study describing antibiotic use patterns, not a trial testing whether antibiotics can avoid surgery for abscess.
- Limitations
- Retrospective administrative claims data; studies Crohn's disease-related perianal fistulizing complications in children, not simple anorectal abscess in a general population; no data on surgical avoidance or abscess resolution outcomes.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Five thousand two hundred seventy-seven patients were included
- population
children with Crohn's disease and perianal fistulizing complications (PFCs)
- intervention
Antibiotic dispensing was common, 83% had at least 1 antibiotic prescription.
- comparator
Patients with PFC had more antibiotic days (median 67 days, IQR 26-138) compared with those without PFC (median 27 days, IQR 10-63; P = .001).
- primaryOutcome
Multivariable negative binomial regression evaluated predictors of days of antibiotics dispensed.
- result
In an adjusted model, patients with PFC had 90% more antibiotic dispensing than those without PFC.
J Pediatr · PMID 42105935 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Kristjansdottir et al. 2026
[Perianal tuberculosis]
TB-caused abscess healed after surgery plus TB drugs.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 people2026
the perianal wound healed well following anti-tuberculosis treatment after initially healing poorly post-surgery
- Who was studied
- a healthy 41-year-old man diagnosed with a perianal abscess
- What they received
- surgical drainage followed by a six-month course of anti-tuberculosis medications
- Compared with
- none reported (single case report)
- Main outcome
- healing of the perianal wound
- Quality
- This is a single patient case report, so it cannot show whether abscesses in general can be treated without surgery.
- Limitations
- Only one patient described; the abscess was surgically drained before the underlying tuberculosis was found and treated, so it does not test avoiding surgery.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
a healthy 41-year-old man diagnosed with a perianal abscess
- population
a healthy 41-year-old man diagnosed with a perianal abscess
- intervention
required examination and surgical drainage under general anesthesia
- intervention
The patient received a six-month course of anti-tuberculosis medications
- comparator
This report describes a healthy 41-year-old man diagnosed with a perianal abscess
- primaryOutcome
The wound healed poorly over the following months
- result
The perianal wound healed well following treatment
Laeknabladid · PMID 41733318 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Cohen-Mekelburg et al. 2026
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Inpatient Management of Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Expert Review
Guideline, not surgery-avoidance evidence.GuidelineVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2026
guideline advises that intra-abdominal abscesses in Crohn's disease be treated with drainage and antibiotics, with further medical or surgical management decided individually, but does not report whether anorectal abscess can be treated without surgery
- Who was studied
- hospitalized adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
- What they received
- abscess drainage and systemic antibiotics, with medical or surgical management decided case by case
- Quality
- This is an expert consensus guideline without a systematic review of evidence or original patient data, so it cannot establish whether surgery can be avoided.
- Limitations
- Not a systematic review; based on expert opinion; focuses on intra-abdominal abscess and perianal symptoms in IBD patients generally, not specifically anorectal abscess treated without surgery.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
hospitalized adult patients with IBD
- intervention
treatment should include infection control with abscess drainage (depending on size and location) and systemic antibiotics, as well as decision making regarding further medical or surgical management
- result
In hospitalized adult patients with Crohn's disease and an intra-abdominal abscess, treatment should include infection control with abscess drainage (depending on size and location) and systemic antibiotics, as well as decision making regarding further medical or surgical management.
- result
Hospitalized adult patients with Crohn's disease and active perianal symptoms should have a multidisciplinary treatment approach involving both medical and surgical care.
- qualityWhy
Because systematic reviews were not performed, these Best Practice Advice statements do not carry formal ratings of the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations.
Gastroenterology · PMID 41579011 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Mersal et al. 2026
Beyond the Knife: A Contemporary Review of Subcutaneous Abscesses
Surgery still needed; antibiotics help, packing doesn't.Narrative reviewLow qualityRelated question
size not given2026
Adding antibiotics after drainage improved short-term cure and reduced new lesions for ordinary skin abscesses; for perianal abscesses, trial results conflicted though pooled data hinted at a modest benefit from antibiotics in preventing fistula; packing the wound gave no benefit and increased pain
- Who was studied
- patients with subcutaneous and perianal (anorectal) abscesses
- What they received
- post-drainage care strategies such as antibiotics, wound packing, drains, irrigation, or primary closure after incision and drainage
- Compared with
- incision and drainage alone or with packing versus without packing
- Main outcome
- cure rates, recurrence, fistula formation, and pain after treatment
- Quality
- This is a narrative summary of other studies without a described systematic search or pooled statistical analysis, so its conclusions carry less certainty.
- Limitations
- The abstract does not describe its own search methodology, does not separate results clearly by abscess type for all claims, and treats incision and drainage as the assumed first step rather than testing whether surgery can be avoided.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Subcutaneous abscesses are among the most common soft-tissue infections encountered in acute surgical and emergency practice
- population
particularly relevant to perianal abscesses
- intervention
whether adjunct antibiotics improve cure rates or prevent recurrence, whether packing the cavity provides any advantage, and whether modern alternatives such as primary closure, drains, or irrigation offer superior outcomes
- comparator
Perhaps the clearest evidence-based shift is against routine packing
- primaryOutcome
whether adjunct antibiotics improve cure rates or prevent recurrence
- primaryOutcome
the risk of developing a fistula-in-ano is substantial
- result
adding a short course of MRSA-active antibiotics to I&D improves short-term cure and reduces new lesions
- result
the trials conflict, pooled estimates hint at a modest benefit from antibiotics
- result
routine packing, as it offers no outcome advantage and clearly increases pain
ANZ J Surg · PMID 41420370 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Alam et al. 2025
Does antibiotic therapy for anal abscess reduce the risk of fistula surgery? A retrospective study
Antibiotics after drainage may lower recurrence.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
109 peopleapproximately 30 months
absence of antibiotic therapy after incision was linked to higher recurrence (univariate OR 0.44 for antibiotics), but this was not confirmed in multivariate analysis due to insufficient data
- Who was studied
- adults with a first-time perianal (anal) abscess treated by incision under local anesthesia
- What they received
- antibiotic therapy given after incision of the abscess
- Compared with
- no antibiotic therapy after incision
- Main outcome
- rate of patients needing fistula surgery and/or abscess recurrence
- Quality
- This was a small retrospective study with only univariate analysis (no multivariate confirmation), so the antibiotic effect is uncertain.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, no multivariate analysis possible due to insufficient data, and all patients still underwent incision rather than avoiding surgery entirely.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
all patients presenting in 2019 with a first perianal abscess treated by incision under local anesthesia, with or without antibiotic therapy post-incision
- intervention
post-incision antibiotic therapy
- comparator
absence of antibiotic therapy post-incision
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcome was the rate of patients requiring fistula surgery and/or experiencing abscess recurrence
- result
Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed smoking and absence of antibiotic therapy post-incision as predictive of recurrence with (OR 0.44) were predictive of recurrence.
- result
Multivariate analysis was not conducted due to insufficient data.
- n
109 were included
- followUp
The mean follow-up for patients with incision alone was approximately 30 months
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol · PMID 41047078 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Salimi et al. 2025
Comparative Approaches of Antibiotic Therapy and Surgical Intervention in Managing Recurrent Perirectal Abscess in Children Under Two Years Old
Antibiotics alone had fewer recurrences.RetrospectiveLow quality
336 people2025
Antibiotic-only group had the lowest recurrence rate and symptoms resolved in 3-10 days (average 6 days), while spontaneous drainage had a 37% recurrence rate
- Who was studied
- Children under two years old with perianal (perirectal) abscesses
- What they received
- Antibiotic therapy alone
- Compared with
- Spontaneous drainage or surgical incision and drainage
- Main outcome
- Recurrence of the abscess and time to symptom resolution
- Quality
- This was a retrospective, non-randomized study where group differences (like abscess size and location) could bias the results.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design without randomization; groups differed in abscess size and location, which could affect outcomes.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
This retrospective cohort study analyzed 336 medical records of children under two years old with perianal abscesses
- population
children under two years old with perianal abscesses
- intervention
antibiotic treatment only
- comparator
spontaneous drainage, and incision and drainage
- primaryOutcome
treatment outcomes (recurrence, fistula formation)
- result
The spontaneous drainage group had a significantly higher recurrence rate (37%). Antibiotic type distribution was similar across groups. The antibiotic-only group showed symptom resolution within 3-10 days, averaging 6 days.
Middle East J Dig Dis · PMID 40994801 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Acker et al. 2025
Management of Perianal Abscesses in Infants: A Systematic Review From the APSA Outcomes and Evidence-Based Practice Committee
Similar outcomes with or without surgerySystematic reviewLow qualityRelated question
size not given2025
About 37.5% of non-surgical treatment failed initially, and recurrence/fistula rates were similar whether treated with non-surgical care or incision and drainage
- Who was studied
- infants with perianal abscess or fistula-in-ano
- What they received
- non-operative management (hygiene, sitz baths, systemic antibiotics)
- Compared with
- surgical drainage (incision and drainage) or direct fistula surgery
- Main outcome
- failure, recurrence, and fistula formation rates after treatment
- Quality
- The review is based only on lower-quality (level 3-4) studies with no randomized trials, so the comparisons are uncertain.
- Limitations
- Included only level 3-4 evidence, no randomized trials, and findings may not apply beyond the infant population studied
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Management of infant perianal disease, including perianal abscess and fistula-in- ano (FIA)
- intervention
nonoperative management (NOM) strategies (such as hygiene, sitz baths, and systemic antibiotics)
- comparator
operative intervention for abscess only (incision and drainage (I&D)) or direct surgical management of the FIA (e.g. upfront fistulotomy)
- primaryOutcome
Initial failure of NOM is approximately 37.5 %. Recurrence rate after initial success with NOM or I&D is approximately 21 % and 24 %, respectively.
- result
Initial failure of NOM is approximately 37.5 %. Recurrence rate after initial success with NOM or I&D is approximately 21 % and 24 %, respectively. The rate of FIA development is approximately 21 % after NOM and 20 % after I&D.
- quality
Systematic Review of level 3-4 studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.
J Pediatr Surg · PMID 40983150 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Callisperis et al. 2025
Necrotizing Fasciitis Treatment With Chlorine Dioxide: A Case Report in an Immunocompromised Patient
Survived abscess, but surgery still usedCase seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 people2025
the patient survived after receiving surgical removal of infected tissue, antibiotics, chlorine dioxide, and intensive supportive care
- Who was studied
- a 48-year-old man with poorly controlled diabetes, liver cirrhosis, and kidney disease who developed a perianal abscess that progressed to severe tissue infection (Fournier's gangrene)
- What they received
- chlorine dioxide treatment added to standard care
- Compared with
- no separate comparison group; outcome described before and after treatment
- Main outcome
- patient survival and recovery from severe infection
- Quality
- this is a single patient case report, so it cannot show whether treatment works in general or whether surgery can be avoided.
- Limitations
- single case, surgery was still performed alongside the experimental treatment, no comparison group, cannot isolate effect of chlorine dioxide
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
a 48-year-old male with multiple comorbidities, including decompensated liver cirrhosis, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease, who developed a perianal abscess complicated by Fournier's gangrene
- intervention
innovative treatment with chlorine dioxide
- comparator
surgical debridement, targeted antimicrobial therapy, innovative treatment with chlorine dioxide, and intensive supportive care
- primaryOutcome
the patient survived
- result
the patient survived following surgical debridement, targeted antimicrobial therapy, innovative treatment with chlorine dioxide, and intensive supportive care
- n
a 48-year-old male
Cureus · PMID 40861634 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Rodríguez-Lago et al. 2025
Spanish Working Group in Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) position paper for the management of non-perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease
Not directly studied here.GuidelineLow qualityRelated question
size not given2025
the abstract does not evaluate anorectal abscess treatment; it discusses non-perianal fistulas and states that drainage or surgery remains essential in certain severe or treatment-resistant cases
- Who was studied
- people with Crohn's disease who develop fistulas not in the anal area
- What they received
- medical and interventional treatments (supportive care, antibiotics, biologic drugs)
- Compared with
- percutaneous drainage or surgery
- Main outcome
- best way to manage non-perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease
- Quality
- This is an expert position paper about a different condition (non-perianal fistulas), not a study testing non-surgical treatment of anorectal abscess.
- Limitations
- Abstract explicitly states evidence in this area is limited and guidelines lack specific recommendations; it does not address anorectal (perianal) abscess specifically.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Fistulas that do not involve the perianal region (entero-enteric, entero-urinary, or entero-cutaneous)
- intervention
general supportive measures to the use of antibiotics or, frequently, advanced therapies
- comparator
percutaneous drainage or surgical intervention remains essential
- primaryOutcome
provide a comprehensive overview of non-perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease, addressing its epidemiological, clinical, and therapeutic aspects
- result
in cases of certain septic complications or those refractory to medical treatment, percutaneous drainage or surgical intervention remains essential
Gastroenterol Hepatol · PMID 40250758 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Wang et al. 2025
Comparing surgical and conservative treatment approaches for perianal abscess in patients with hematologic malignancies: a comprehensive analysis
Similar healing, surgery had fewer recurrences.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
53 people60-day follow-up period
no significant difference in cure rates between groups; recurrence rates also not statistically different, though surgery group had numerically lower recurrence; conservative group recovered faster
- Who was studied
- patients with hematologic malignancies who developed perianal abscess
- What they received
- conservative (non-surgical) drug treatment for perianal abscess
- Compared with
- surgical treatment for perianal abscess
- Main outcome
- symptom improvement/cure and recurrence within 60 days
- Quality
- This was a small retrospective study without randomization, so it cannot reliably separate true differences from chance or bias.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, small sample size, specific to patients with hematologic malignancies rather than the general population.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
In total, 53 patients were enrolled in this study, including 19 cases with surgical intervention, and 34 cases with conservative treatment.
- population
Perianal abscess (PA) is a complication of infection in patients with hematologic malignancies.
- intervention
34 cases with conservative treatment
- comparator
19 cases with surgical intervention
- primaryOutcome
a significant improvement of symptoms or complete resolution was observed in 48 patients (90.5%)
- result
the cure rates between the two groups showed no significant difference (p > 0.05)
- result
there was no statistically significant disparity in recurrence rates (10.4% vs. 23.6%, p > 0.05)
- result
Patients with conservative treatment showed significantly shorter recovery time compared to patients with surgical treatment (p = 0.048).
- followUp
During the 60-day follow-up period
BMC Gastroenterol · PMID 40217138 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Blondin et al. 2025
Antibiotic use during the first episode of acute perianal sepsis: a still-open question
Antibiotics linked to fewer fistulas.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
276 people1 year
fistula formation occurred in 54.0% of patients who received antibiotics versus 75.0% of those who did not (P<0.001), remaining significant after propensity weighting (odds ratio 0.53)
- Who was studied
- patients having their first episode of acute perianal sepsis (abscess)
- What they received
- antibiotic therapy
- Compared with
- no antibiotic therapy
- Main outcome
- development of fistula in ano at 1 year
- Quality
- This is a retrospective study without randomization, so it can show a link but not prove antibiotics actually cause fewer fistulas.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design; authors state a causal relationship could not be established; no information on whether surgical drainage was performed instead of or alongside antibiotics.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
This study included 276 patients.
- population
patients experiencing their first episode of acute perianal sepsis
- intervention
with and without antibiotic therapy
- comparator
with and without antibiotic therapy
- primaryOutcome
compared the incidence of fistula in ano in patients experiencing their first episode of acute perianal sepsis
- result
fistula formation was identified in 65.6% of all patients, 54.0% of those who had received antibiotics, and 75.0% of those who had not (P<0.001)
Ann Coloproctol · PMID 39895142 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Palma García et al. 2026
Continuous endoscopic manual suturing for colorectal anastomotic fistula closure
Nonsurgical closure failed, needed surgery.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
size not givenone month of hospitalization
the opening reopened and the abscess did not fully resolve, so surgery was planned
- Who was studied
- a man with a fistula and abscess near the rectum after prior rectal cancer surgery
- What they received
- endoscopic manual suturing of the fistula opening after argon treatment
- Compared with
- earlier attempts with antibiotics and vacuum-assisted closure
- Main outcome
- closing the fistulous opening without surgery
- Quality
- it is a single patient case report, so it cannot show whether this approach generally works.
- Limitations
- single case, no comparison group, and the condition was a post-surgical anastomotic fistula rather than a typical anorectal abscess
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
underwent a low anterior resection in 2015 for rectal adenocarcinoma
- population
perianal abscess in the left posterior gluteal region, with a palpable internal fistulous orifice 3 cm from the anal margin
- intervention
we proceeded with continuous manual suturing after argon application
- comparator
Vacuum-assisted closure was attempted but was unsuccessful due to technical difficulties and the small size of the cavity
- comparator
Despite initial antibiotic therapy with amoxicillin/clavulanic and poor clinical response
- primaryOutcome
achieving complete closure of the fistulous opening
- result
A follow-up colonoscopy showed persistence of the fistulous orifice with suture material, although radiologically there was a clear decrease in the abscess
- result
after one month of hospitalization with a stable fistula but no definitive resolution, a planned surgical intervention was decided
Rev Esp Enferm Dig · PMID 39784726 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Takakazu Ribas Asato et al. 2024
Intestinal Tuberculosis With Recurrent Gluteal Abscesses and Perianal Fistulas: A Case Report and Literature Review
Fistulas improved with TB drugs, not surgery.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 people2024
Fistulas progressively improved with antituberculous and antimicrobial treatment after repeated surgical treatments had failed to prevent recurrence
- Who was studied
- A 45-year-old man with chronic buttock abscess and perianal fistulas, later diagnosed with intestinal tuberculosis
- What they received
- Standard antituberculosis drugs (rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol) plus antibiotics and antifungals, after prior surgical treatments had failed
- Compared with
- No comparator; single patient followed over time with prior surgical treatments that had failed
- Main outcome
- Improvement of fistulas and prevention of abscess recurrence
- Quality
- This is a single patient case report, so it cannot reliably show whether this approach works in general.
- Limitations
- Single case report; underlying cause was intestinal tuberculosis, not a typical anorectal abscess; no control group; outcome described only as 'progressive improvement' without detailed follow-up data.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A 45-year-old male patient presented with a chronic abscess in the left buttock lasting for two years
- population
A 45-year-old male patient presented with a chronic abscess in the left buttock lasting for two years, characterized by spontaneous purulent drainage and multiple recurrences despite surgical and clinical treatments.
- intervention
Treatment included a standard antituberculous regimen (rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol), along with antibiotics and antifungal agents for secondary infections.
- comparator
multiple recurrences despite surgical and clinical treatments
- primaryOutcome
Adherence to treatment was satisfactory, with progressive improvement in the fistulas.
- result
Adherence to treatment was satisfactory, with progressive improvement in the fistulas.
Cureus · PMID 39734561 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Neville et al. 2025
Non-operative Versus Operative Management of Perianal Abscess in Infants: A 10-year Retrospective Study at Two Centres in the United Kingdom
Non-surgery had more recurrence.RetrospectiveLow quality
116 people3 (IQR 2-6) months
Recurrence was significantly higher with non-operative management (53% vs 23%), and operative management was linked to lower recurrence risk; further surgery was also more common after non-operative treatment, though fistula rates were similar between groups
- Who was studied
- Infants aged 12 months or younger with perianal abscess
- What they received
- Non-operative treatment (antibiotics and/or aspiration under local anaesthetic)
- Compared with
- Operative treatment (incision and drainage under general anaesthesia)
- Main outcome
- Recurrence of perianal abscess and need for further surgery
- Quality
- This is a retrospective study without randomization, so differences between groups could be due to other factors rather than treatment choice.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, management based on surgeon preference, short median follow-up of 3 months
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
116 infants were identified
- population
infants aged ≤12 months presenting with PA
- intervention
non-operative treatments, such as antibiotics and/or aspiration under local anaesthetic
- comparator
incision and drainage under general anaesthesia
- primaryOutcome
Recurrence occurred in 49/116 (42 %)
- result
Recurrence occurred in 49/116 (42 %) at a median time of 1 (IQR 0-3) month and was significantly higher in the non-operative compared to the operative group (39/73 [53 %] versus 10/43 [23 %], p = 0.001)
- followUp
Median follow-up was 3 (IQR 2-6) months
J Pediatr Surg · PMID 39693822 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Wessendorf et al. 2024
Butyricimonas faecihominis: an atypically resistant bacterium implicated in abscess formation - a case report
Case report, surgery still needed.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 peoplesix months later
Patient improved after switching to meropenem and underwent surgery, discharged after 40 days
- Who was studied
- 50-year-old man with perianal abscess, history of cocaine abuse and bilateral hip replacements
- What they received
- antibiotics (meropenem) plus surgery including protective transversostomy
- Quality
- This is a single patient case report, so it cannot show whether surgery can be avoided.
- Limitations
- Single case report; patient required surgery (transversostomy) in addition to antibiotics, so it does not test non-surgical treatment alone; no comparison group.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
a perianal abscess in a 50-year-old man with a history of cocaine abuse and bilateral hip replacements
- intervention
The immediate switch to meropenem led to a significant improvement in the patient's condition
- intervention
requiring intensive care unit admission, surgery including protective transversostomy
- result
The patient was discharged after 40 days of hospitalization in good general condition and the reversal of the transversostomy was performed six months later.
- n
We present the case of a perianal abscess in a 50-year-old man
BMC Infect Dis · PMID 39004725 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Singh et al. 2023
Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging spectrum of complex perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease: A cohort study from northern India
Mostly medical therapy, not surgery.RetrospectiveVery low qualityRelated question
27 people2023
Most patients were managed with medical therapy alone; only about one in five also had surgery, and abscess outcomes after treatment were not reported separately
- Who was studied
- adults with Crohn's disease who had complex perianal fistulas
- What they received
- combination medical therapy (biologics plus antibiotics/immune-suppressants) for perianal fistula, with or without surgery
- Compared with
- patients who received surgery (non-cutting seton, fistulectomy, fecal diversion) in addition to medical therapy
- Main outcome
- clinical and MRI characteristics of complex perianal fistula, including presence of abscess and treatment received
- Quality
- This is a small, descriptive cross-sectional study without a comparison group or reported outcomes for abscess treatment specifically.
- Limitations
- Single-centre, cross-sectional design with only 27 patients, all with Crohn's-related complex fistula rather than simple anorectal abscess, and no outcome data on abscess resolution with or without surgery.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
27 (15.42%)
- population
patients with fistulizing perianal CD, who underwent pelvic MRI between January 2020 and December 2021, was performed
- intervention
Combination therapy with biologics and antibiotics/immune-suppressants were the most commonly prescribed medical therapy.
- comparator
Six (22.22%) patients underwent combined medical and surgical (non-cutting seton, fistulectomy, fecal diversion) treatment.
- primaryOutcome
The clinical (age, sex, disease duration, disease location and behavior, disease activity [Perianal Disease Activity Index, PDAI] and treatment received) and radiological (number and location of fistulae, extensions, number and location of internal and external openings, fistula activity, presence or absence of perianal abscess and associated proctitis) characteristics of complex perianal fistula
- result
Six (22.22%) patients underwent combined medical and surgical (non-cutting seton, fistulectomy, fecal diversion) treatment.
Indian J Gastroenterol · PMID 37548863 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Dalili et al. 2023
Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection and Platelet-Rich Fibrin Glue Insertion for the Treatment of Extensive Supralevator Anorectal Fistula: A Case Report
Fistula healed after platelet therapy.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 people11-month follow-up
after treatment, no voiding dysfunction, constipation, diarrhea, or fistula infection at follow-up
- Who was studied
- a 59-year-old man with a deep anorectal abscess and subsequent fistula
- What they received
- platelet-rich plasma injection and platelet-rich fibrin glue for fistula closure
- Compared with
- none (single patient, before/after own treatment course)
- Main outcome
- fistula healing and symptoms like voiding problems, constipation, diarrhea, or infection
- Quality
- this is a single patient case report, so it cannot show whether this treatment works in general.
- Limitations
- single case report; abscess was treated with surgical drainage and debridement first, and the platelet therapy was used later for the resulting fistula, not as an alternative to surgery for the abscess itself
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A 59-year-old man was admitted with pelvic pain and fever.
- population
A 59-year-old man was admitted with pelvic pain and fever.
- intervention
Platelet-rich plasma was injected around the fistula into the tissue, and platelet-rich fibrin glue was introduced to the fistula tract.
- comparator
He was managed with antibiotics, abscess drainage, repeated radical surgical debridement, and necrosectomy.
- primaryOutcome
At the 11-month follow-up, the patient did not have voiding dysfunction, constipation, diarrhea, or fistula tract infection.
- result
At the 11-month follow-up, the patient did not have voiding dysfunction, constipation, diarrhea, or fistula tract infection.
World J Plast Surg · PMID 37220581 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Jwa et al. 2022
Gluteal and Presacral Abscess Due to Crohn's Disease with Multiple Fistulas
Antibiotics alone failed, needed surgery.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 people2022
Antibiotics alone failed and the abscess got worse with fever; surgery to drain the abscess resolved the pain and fever
- Who was studied
- Young man with Crohn's disease who developed abscesses near the buttock and lower back area
- What they received
- Antibiotics alone (piperacillin/tazobactam) first, then surgical drainage
- Compared with
- Antibiotics alone versus surgical drainage
- Main outcome
- Whether the abscess resolved and symptoms (pain, fever) went away
- Quality
- This is a single case report of an unusual, more complex abscess type (not simple perianal abscess) due to Crohn's disease, so it can't show whether typical anorectal abscess can avoid surgery.
- Limitations
- Single case, unusual abscess location tied to Crohn's disease complicated by fistulas, not a typical isolated anorectal abscess.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A 21-year-old male was admitted with right buttock and lower back pain
- population
A 21-year-old male was admitted with right buttock and lower back pain with a duration of 3 months. He had a history of CD in the small intestine diagnosed 10 months previously.
- intervention
Treatment was started with piperacillin/ tazobactam antibiotic but patient developed a fever and abscess extent was aggravated. Therefore, surgical incision and drainage was performed and 4 Penrose drains were inserted.
- comparator
Treatment was started with piperacillin/ tazobactam antibiotic but patient developed a fever and abscess extent was aggravated. Therefore, surgical incision and drainage was performed
- primaryOutcome
Patient's pain and fever were resolved following surgery.
- result
Treatment was started with piperacillin/ tazobactam antibiotic but patient developed a fever and abscess extent was aggravated. Therefore, surgical incision and drainage was performed and 4 Penrose drains were inserted. Patient's pain and fever were resolved following surgery.
Korean J Gastroenterol · PMID 36567440 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Orellana Olmedo et al. 2022
Perianal Abscess Following Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy in an Immunocompetent Patient
Drained abscess with antibiotics, resolvedCase seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 people2022
the patient was successfully managed with incision and drainage with antibiotics
- Who was studied
- 44-year-old man with no immune problems who developed a perianal abscess after hemorrhoid surgery
- What they received
- incision and drainage of the abscess plus antibiotics
- Main outcome
- whether the abscess resolved after treatment
- Quality
- this is a single patient case report, so it cannot show whether avoiding surgery works in general.
- Limitations
- single case report, no comparison group, and the treatment used (incision and drainage) is itself a surgical procedure rather than a non-surgical alternative
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
44-year-old immunocompetent male
- population
a 44-year-old immunocompetent male with grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease who underwent excisional hemorrhoidectomy that was complicated with perianal abscesses
- intervention
The patient was successfully managed with incision and drainage with antibiotics
- primaryOutcome
The patient was successfully managed with incision and drainage with antibiotics
- result
The patient was successfully managed with incision and drainage with antibiotics
Cureus · PMID 36514644 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Simsek 2022
Perianal Infections in Patients With Hematologic Malignancy: The Risk of Fournier's Gangrene Leading to Mortality and Irreversible Organ Damage
Severe infection often needed surgery anyway.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
4 people2022
one of four patients died despite antibiotics and surgery; one needed testicle removal
- Who was studied
- adults with blood cancer who developed perianal infection that progressed to Fournier's gangrene
- What they received
- antibiotics first, then surgical debridement (with diverting ostomy in most cases)
- Compared with
- no comparator, single-group case series
- Main outcome
- death
- Quality
- This is a tiny retrospective case series of only 4 patients with a severe, different condition (gangrene, not simple abscess), so it cannot show whether surgery can be avoided.
- Limitations
- Very small sample (n=4), retrospective, no control group, and focuses on a rare complication (Fournier's gangrene) in immunocompromised cancer patients rather than typical anorectal abscess.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
4 adults with hematologic malignancy who developed perianal infection progressing to FG
- intervention
A broad-spectrum antibiotic regimen was administered as initial empiric therapy at onset of fever and was de-escalated based on the culture results and clinical response.
- intervention
All patients underwent surgical debridement, and diverting ostomy was performed in 3 cases.
- comparator
The data of 4 adults with hematologic malignancy who developed perianal infection progressing to FG between January 2010 and December 2018 were reviewed retrospectively.
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcome was mortality.
- result
One patient died of overwhelming sepsis (25%), and 1 patient required orchiectomy (25%).
- n
Four male patients with a mean age of 36.75 years
Wounds · PMID 34928812 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Dosis et al. 2021
Perianal Actinomycosis: A Surgeon's Perspective and Review of Literature
Needed both antibiotics and surgery.RetrospectiveVery low qualityRelated question
5 people2021
all identified perianal actinomycosis cases required both prolonged antibiotics and surgical treatment
- Who was studied
- patients with perianal actinomycosis infection (a rare bacterial cause of anorectal disease)
- What they received
- prolonged antibiotic therapy plus surgery
- Compared with
- no comparator group; description of treatment used in these cases
- Main outcome
- whether infection was eradicated with treatment
- Quality
- This is a tiny retrospective case series (5 relevant patients) of a rare specific infection, not a controlled study of typical anorectal abscess.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, very small number of perianal cases, no control group, and findings specific to a rare bacterial cause (Actinomyces) rather than typical anorectal abscess.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Primary perianal actinomycosis is rare and challenging for the colorectal surgeon.
- n
Five cases of perianal actinomycosis were identified requiring prolonged antibiotic and surgical therapy.
- intervention
requiring prolonged antibiotic and surgical therapy
- comparator
The site of infection and treatment strategy were examined.
- primaryOutcome
An extended course of antibiotic therapy (months) is required for eradication in certain cases.
- result
Five cases of perianal actinomycosis were identified requiring prolonged antibiotic and surgical therapy.
Ann Coloproctol · PMID 34731938 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Sun et al. 2021
Coinfection of Clostridium perfringens and Escherichia coli in gas-producing perianal abscess diagnosed by 16S rDNA sequencing: a case report
Needed surgery despite antibiotics.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 people27 days of admission
the patient required two surgical debridements along with antibiotics before recovering and being discharged
- Who was studied
- a 53-year-old patient with a gas-producing perianal abscess
- What they received
- antibiotics (ceftizoxime and ornidazole, later meropenem and vancomycin) plus debridement and drainage surgery
- Compared with
- none reported
- Main outcome
- resolution of infection and successful identification of causative bacteria
- Quality
- this is a single patient case report, so it cannot show whether avoiding surgery works in general.
- Limitations
- single case, no comparison group, and the abscess was a rare gas-producing clostridial/coli coinfection rather than a typical anorectal abscess.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
a 53-year-old patient who was admitted to the hospital for a gas-producing perianal abscess
- intervention
The patient was managed with ceftizoxime and ornidazole and then received debridement and drainage at the lesion on the second day after admission
- intervention
The patient was then successfully treated with meropenem and vancomycin
- comparator
CASE PRESENTATION
- primaryOutcome
Timely pathogen identification is critical for treating gas-producing perianal abscess
- result
a second debridement and drainage were performed 4 days after the primary operation
- result
was discharged at 27 days of admission
- n
a 53-year-old patient
- followUp
was discharged at 27 days of admission
Gut Pathog · PMID 34645489 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Ali et al. 2021
Multidrug Resistance and Flaring up of Manifestation in Fistulizing Crohn's Disease after Surgery on a Perianal Lesion
Found harmCase seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 people2021
developed delayed wound healing with highly drug-resistant bacterial infection after abscess surgery
- Who was studied
- 48-year-old woman with Crohn's disease and a perianal abscess
- What they received
- surgical incision and drainage of the abscess
- Compared with
- none reported
- Main outcome
- wound healing and infection after surgery
- Quality
- This is a single patient case report, so it cannot show whether surgery or non-surgical treatment is better for most people.
- Limitations
- Single case report with no comparison group, so findings may not apply broadly; the abstract itself calls for surgery rather than testing an alternative.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
a 48-year-old woman
- population
48-year-old woman with known case of Crohn's disease who presented with massive swelling in the perianal region
- intervention
surgical incision and drainage
- comparator
Antibiotics and surgical incision and drainage have been successful in treating perianal disease.
- primaryOutcome
culture sensitivity was done due to delayed wound healing and passage of greenish discharge
- result
it revealed highly resistant bacteria Proteus mirabilis, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococci
Case Rep Gastroenterol · PMID 34616267 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Schwandner 2021
Stem cell injection for complex anal fistula in Crohn's disease: A single-center experience
Fistula healed in two-thirds; abscess still occurred in some.RetrospectiveVery low qualityRelated question
12 peoplemean 14.3 (range: 3-30) mo
66.7% (8 of 12) of fistulas healed, but 33.3% of patients later needed surgery again for a new perianal abscess
- Who was studied
- adults with complex anal fistula caused by Crohn's disease, without active disease or abscess
- What they received
- local injection of stem cells (darvadstrocel) into the fistula after seton removal and surgical preparation
- Compared with
- none - single group before/after comparison
- Main outcome
- fistula healing rate
- Quality
- Only 12 patients were studied without a comparison group, and the data were looked at after the fact, so the results could easily be due to chance or selection.
- Limitations
- small number of patients, retrospective analysis, no control group, and patients with abscess were excluded from treatment
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
All patients with complex anal fistulas associated with Crohn's disease who were amenable for definite fistula closure within a defined observation period were potential candidates for stem cell injection
- intervention
Local injection of darvadstrocel was performed as a standardized procedure under general anesthesia including single-shot antibiotic prophylaxis, removal of seton drainage, fistula curettage, closure of the internal openings and local stem cell injection.
- comparator
Data were retrospectively analyzed.
- primaryOutcome
Data collection focusing on healing rates, occurrence of abscess and follow-up was performed on a regular basis of quality control and patient care.
- result
a healing rate was documented in 66.7% (8/12); mean duration to achieve healing was 12 (range: 6-30) wk. Within follow-up, 4 patients required reoperation due to perianal abscess (33.3%).
- n
12 patients (6 females, 6 males) with a mean age of 42.5 (range: 26-61) years underwent stem cell therapy.
World J Gastroenterol · PMID 34239275 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Ohzu et al. 2021
Anorectal Abscess in a Patient with Neutropenia and Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: To Operate or not to Operate?
Surgery helped when antibiotics failed.Case seriesVery low quality
1 peopleday 21 (fever resolution); patient later died of leukemia progression
antibiotics failed; surgery (fistulotomy with debridement) eventually controlled infection and fever resolved
- Who was studied
- man with neutropenia and acute myeloid leukemia with an anorectal abscess
- What they received
- surgical treatment of abscess (incision and drainage, later fistulotomy with debridement)
- Compared with
- initial antibiotic treatment alone
- Main outcome
- resolution of abscess and fever
- Quality
- This is a single patient case report, so it cannot reliably show whether surgery works better than non-surgical treatment.
- Limitations
- Single case report with no comparison group; patient had multiple confounding treatments including chemotherapy.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A 56-year-old man presented with an ischiorectal abscess.
- population
A 56-year-old man presented with an ischiorectal abscess. Preoperative laboratory test results revealed leukocytopenia and anemia. He was diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia.
- intervention
followed by fistulotomy of the abscess with extensive debridement of cellulitis on day 6
- comparator
Antibiotic treatment was ineffective, and fever persisted.
- primaryOutcome
The patient's fever resolved on day 21.
- result
Surgical treatments can prevent fatal progression of anorectal abscess, even during neutropenia.
Am J Case Rep · PMID 34218249 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Vuyyuru et al. 2020
Long-term outcomes in perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease in a resource-limited setting: A cohort analysis
Looked at fistula surgery, not abscess careRetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
65 peoplemedian duration of follow-up of 45 (IQR, 24-66) months
complete response rates were 25% with immunomodulators, 42.8% with fistula surgery, 39.5% with biologicals, and 45.4% with diversion, but relapse was highest after surgery; absence of an abscess predicted long-term complete closure
- Who was studied
- patients with perianal fistula due to Crohn's disease
- What they received
- medical therapy (immunomodulators and biological drugs)
- Compared with
- fistula surgery or fecal diversion surgery
- Main outcome
- complete closure of the perianal fistula
- Quality
- This is a small, retrospective, single-setting cohort of Crohn's fistula patients, not a controlled study of abscess treatment itself.
- Limitations
- Retrospective record review, resource-limited single-center setting, and the study addresses fistula management in Crohn's disease rather than treatment of anorectal abscess as the primary question.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
65 were included in the final analysis
- population
We retrospectively analyzed records of patients with perianal fistulizing CD who were prospectively followed from January 2005 to December 2018
- intervention
Complete response rates with immunomodulators, fistula surgery, biologicals, and diversion were 25%, 42.8%, 39.5%, and 45.4%, respectively
- comparator
Complete response rates with immunomodulators, fistula surgery, biologicals, and diversion were 25%, 42.8%, 39.5%, and 45.4%, respectively
- primaryOutcome
The absence of perianal abscess was associated with complete fistula closure
- result
Complete response rates with immunomodulators, fistula surgery, biologicals, and diversion were 25%, 42.8%, 39.5%, and 45.4%, respectively. The relapse rate was highest after fistula surgery (52.6%)
- result
Absence of perianal abscess predicts long-term complete fistula closure
- followUp
median duration of follow-up of 45 (IQR, 24-66) months
Indian J Gastroenterol · PMID 33040321 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Mohamedahmed et al. 2021
Incision and drainage of cutaneous abscess with or without cavity packing: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials
Packing didn't help after drainage.Meta-analysisLow qualityRelated question
485 people2021
no significant difference between packing and no packing for recurrence, fistula, or need for a second procedure
- Who was studied
- patients with cutaneous abscess (including some with anorectal abscess) who had incision and drainage
- What they received
- incision and drainage of the abscess followed by packing of the cavity
- Compared with
- incision and drainage of the abscess without packing of the cavity
- Main outcome
- abscess coming back, need for a second procedure, or forming an abnormal tunnel (fistula)
- Quality
- it pools only eight trials with 485 patients and the authors' own additional analysis says the results are not conclusive and could be missing a true difference.
- Limitations
- Trial Sequential Analysis showed the meta-analysis was not conclusive and recurrence results were subject to type 2 error; both groups still underwent surgical incision and drainage rather than a non-surgical treatment.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Eight RCTs reporting a total number of 485 patients who underwent incision and drainage of cutaneous abscess with (n = 243) or without (n = 242) packing of the abscess cavity were included.
- population
all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing incision and drainage of cutaneous abscess with and without packing were included
- population
The results remained unchanged on sub-group analyses for ano-rectal abscess, paediatric patients, adult patients, and the use of antibiotics.
- intervention
incision and drainage of cutaneous abscess with and without packing
- comparator
incision and drainage of cutaneous abscess with and without packing
- primaryOutcome
Abscess recurrence at maximum follow-up period, need for second intervention, and development of fistula in-ano were the evaluated outcome parameters for the meta-analysis
- result
There was no significant difference in the risk of recurrence (risk ratio (RR) 1.31, P = 0.56), fistula-in-ano (RR 0.63, P = 0.28), and need for second intervention (RR 0.70, P = 0.05) between two groups.
- limitations
The Trial Sequential Analysis demonstrated that the meta-analysis was not conclusive, and the results for recurrence were subject to type 2 error.
Langenbecks Arch Surg · PMID 32740696 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Bałaż et al. 2020
Perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano in children - evaluation of treatment efficacy. Is it possible to avoid recurrence?
Surgery beat minimally invasive treatment for recurrence.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
24 people2020
patients treated with fistulotomy had no recurrence or incontinence, while those previously managed with incision and drainage elsewhere had more severe disease, needed further surgery, longer antibiotics and hospital stay
- Who was studied
- infants and children with perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano
- What they received
- minimally invasive treatment (sitz baths, antibiotics, or incision and drainage) without definitive fistula surgery
- Compared with
- fistulotomy and fistulectomy surgery to treat the underlying fistula
- Main outcome
- recurrence of perianal abscess and fecal incontinence
- Quality
- This is a small, retrospective study with only 24 patients and no randomization, so the comparison between groups may be biased.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, small sample size, and comparison groups defined by where patients were first treated rather than random assignment.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano are common findings in infants and children.
- n
The retrospective study included 24 infants with perianal abscess treated at our center between 2013 and 2015.
- intervention
Minimally invasive approach (sitz baths, antibiotic therapy, puncture or incision and drainage of the abscess) appears tempting due to its simplicity and lack of need for general anesthesia, but it is associated with a high recurrence rate.
- comparator
Fistulotomy and fistulectomy, which are slightly more invasive procedures, significantly reduce the recurrence rate of fistulain- ano and perianal abscess.
- primaryOutcome
No fecal incontinence or recurrence of perianal abscess were observed in any of our patients.
- result
In group II, the disorder was associated with severe inflammation, some patients underwent an additional surgical intervention, such as incision and drainage of an extensive buttock's abscess; patients required longer antibiotic therapy and prolonged hospitalization.
Pol Przegl Chir · PMID 32312918 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Zhu et al. 2019
The pathogens and curative effects analysis of perianal abscess of infants under 3 months
Surgery plus antibiotics recommended, not non-surgical treatment.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
66 people2019
after incision, 6.6% of infants developed an anal fistula compared with 60.3% of adults, a significant difference
- Who was studied
- infants under 3 months old with perianal (anorectal) abscess
- What they received
- surgical incision of the abscess along with antibiotics matched to the bacteria found
- Compared with
- adults with perianal abscess treated the same way (historical comparison group)
- Main outcome
- rate of anal fistula complication after abscess incision
- Quality
- this is a small retrospective chart review comparing infants to a historical adult group, with no comparison to non-surgical treatment and no randomization.
- Limitations
- retrospective design, no control group treated without surgery, comparison to adults rather than to a non-surgical approach
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
66 cases of perianal abscess of infants under 3 months
- intervention
simple surgical intervention and synchronous sensitive antibiotic administration are suggested as the optimal management
- comparator
60.3% in the adult group
- primaryOutcome
the complication rate of anal fistula was 6.6% in infants under 3 months and 60.3% in the adult group
- result
After abscess incision, the complication rate of anal fistula was 6.6% in infants under 3 months and 60.3% in the adult group. There was significant difference P<0.01.
- n
66 cases of perianal abscess of infants under 3 months
Turk J Pediatr · PMID 31559720 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Samuk et al. 2019
Perianal abscess in infants: Amenable to conservative treatment in selected cases
Most avoided surgery with antibiotics.Case seriesLow quality
19 people22.4 months
76.4% of infants avoided surgery, though 15.7% eventually required surgical drainage and recurrence occurred in some
- Who was studied
- infants under 2 years old with perianal abscess
- What they received
- conservative treatment (antibiotics, without surgery) for selected abscess cases
- Compared with
- surgical drainage (historical/alternative approach, not a formal comparison group)
- Main outcome
- whether surgical drainage was ultimately needed
- Quality
- This was a small, retrospective review of selected patients without a control group, so it can't reliably prove conservative treatment works as well as surgery.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, small sample, selection of 'suitable' cases only, two patients lost to follow-up, high recurrence rate
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Data of 19 patients aged <24 months treated conservatively for perianal abscess at a tertiary hospital in 2014-2018 were retrospectively reviewed.
- population
Data of 19 patients aged <24 months treated conservatively for perianal abscess
- intervention
evaluate the outcomes of conservative approach in selected cases of perianal abscesses in infants
- comparator
the most frequent approach is drainage with/without fistulotomy
- primaryOutcome
Three patients (15.7%) ultimately required surgical drainage
- result
surgical intervention was prevented in 13/17 patients (76.4%) available for follow up
- followUp
During follow up (mean, 22.4 months)
Pediatr Int · PMID 31469939 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Obst et al. 2019
Early-stage Management of Complex Wounds Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy With Instillation and a Dressing With Through Holes
Wound improved without surgery closure unknown.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
6 people2019
wound healing progressed with no complications in all cases, but wounds were not followed to closure or grafting
- Who was studied
- patients with complex wounds including pressure ulcers, necrotizing soft tissue infection, perianal abscess, and abdominal wound
- What they received
- negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time using a dressing with through holes, plus antibiotics and surgical debridement when appropriate
- Compared with
- none (case series, no comparison group)
- Main outcome
- progression of wound healing and formation of granulation tissue
- Quality
- This is a tiny, uncontrolled case series of only 6 patients with mixed wound types, including just one perianal abscess, so it cannot show whether this therapy avoids surgery for anorectal abscess specifically.
- Limitations
- Small sample size, no control group, mixed wound types with only one perianal abscess case, patients also received antibiotics and debridement, and outcomes were not followed to full closure.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
There were 6 patients (3 men, 3 women; average age, 58.5 years) treated.
- population
Wound types included 3 pressure ulcers, 1 necrotizing soft tissue infection, 1 perianal abscess, and 1 large abdominal wound.
- intervention
negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell time (NPWTi-d) using a novel reticulated open-cell foam dressing with through holes (ROCF-CC)
- comparator
Patients received antibiotics and surgical debridement when appropriate.
- primaryOutcome
In all cases, progression of wound healing was observed with no complications.
- result
This method produced viable granulation tissue and wound bed preparation; however, patients were not followed to closure or grafting.
Wounds · PMID 31184590 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Kanstrup et al. 2019
[Perianal abscess after anal intercourse should raise suspicion of rectal gonorrhoeae infection]
Surgery plus antibiotics healed abscessCase seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 peoplesix weeks
abscess was drained surgically and treated with antibiotics; six weeks later ultrasound showed scarring but no fistula
- Who was studied
- young man with anal pain and fever after anal sex, found to have rectal gonorrhoea
- What they received
- surgical incision of the abscess plus antibiotics for gonorrhoea
- Compared with
- none
- Main outcome
- healing of abscess and resolution of suspected fistula
- Quality
- this is a single patient case report, so it cannot show whether surgery can be avoided
- Limitations
- single case report; abscess was treated with surgery, not used to test avoiding surgery; no comparison group
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
This case report describes a younger man
- population
a younger man, who experienced increasing anal pain and later fever after anal intercourse. N. gonorrhoeae infection was verified, before a clinical examination revealed a perianal abscess
- intervention
six weeks after primary surgery and treatment with relevant antibiotics
- comparator
treatment with relevant antibiotics
- primaryOutcome
transanal ultrasonography showed perianal scarring and no signs of anocutaneous fistula
- result
six weeks after primary surgery and treatment with relevant antibiotics, transanal ultrasonography showed perianal scarring and no signs of anocutaneous fistula
Ugeskr Laeger · PMID 30799811 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Mak et al. 2018
Significant Medical and Surgical Morbidity in Perianal Crohn's Disease: Results from a Territory-Wide Study
Most still needed surgery eventually.RegistryLow qualityRelated question
283 people106 months
most patients still ended up needing surgery despite multiple courses of antibiotics, with surgery probability reaching about 78% by 8 years
- Who was studied
- adults with Crohn's disease who had perianal involvement (including fistulas and abscesses), from a Hong Kong IBD registry
- What they received
- antibiotics and biologic drugs used to manage perianal Crohn's disease
- Compared with
- surgical procedures (including abscess drainage, defunctioning surgery, proctectomy)
- Main outcome
- how often patients eventually needed biologics versus surgery over time
- Quality
- this is a retrospective registry study of a specific Crohn's disease population, not a controlled comparison of abscess treatments, so it gives only indirect, uncontrolled evidence.
- Limitations
- retrospective registry design, no control group, mixes fistula and abscess cases together, and focuses on Crohn's disease patients rather than typical anorectal abscess patients
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Consecutive patients with PCD were identified from the HKIBDR
- n
283 [28.8%] had perianal involvement
- intervention
70 [29.2%] required ≥5 courses of antibiotics
- intervention
Eighty-four patients [34.7%] received biologics
- comparator
98 [40.5%] had ≥2 surgical procedures
- comparator
Nine patients required defunctioning surgery and 4 required proctectomy
- primaryOutcome
Cumulative probabilities for use of biologics were 4.7%, 5.8%, and 8.6% at 12 months, 36 months, and 96 months, respectively, while the probabilities for surgery were 67.2%, 71.6%, and 77.7%, respectively.
- result
Patients with PCD had poor outcome, with young age of onset, multiple antibiotic use, and repeated surgery.
J Crohns Colitis · PMID 30165543 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Mandolfino et al. 2018
SECCA procedure for anal incontinence and antibiotic treatment: a case report of anal abscess
Longer antibiotics may prevent abscess.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 people2018
the authors suggest a longer antibiotic course may reduce the chance of abscess, based on this single case
- Who was studied
- a 66-year-old woman with gas and fecal incontinence who developed an anal abscess after a SECCA radiofrequency procedure
- What they received
- a full antibiotic course of at least 6 days after the SECCA procedure
- Compared with
- a short-term 24-hour antibiotic therapy
- Main outcome
- occurrence of anal abscess after the SECCA procedure
- Quality
- it is a single case report with no comparison group, so it cannot show whether antibiotics alone can treat an abscess
- Limitations
- single case report; no control group; suggestion is speculative, not tested
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
a rare case of an anal abscess related to a SECCA procedure in a 66-year-old woman affected by gas and FI for twenty years
- intervention
administering antibiotic therapy to patients and to run a full course of at least 6 days
- comparator
rather than a short-term (24 h) therapy
- primaryOutcome
to minimize the incidence of this complication
- result
We suggest that this finding could consolidate the importance of administering antibiotic therapy to patients and to run a full course of at least 6 days rather than a short-term (24 h) therapy
- n
a 66-year-old woman
BMC Surg · PMID 30086744 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Yamana 2018
Japanese Practice Guidelines for Anal Disorders II. Anal fistula
Surgery usually needed, rarely resolves alone.GuidelineVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2018
As spontaneous recovery is rare, except in the case of children, surgery is the principle approach to anal fistulas.
- Who was studied
- people with anorectal (anal) abscess or fistula
- What they received
- antibiotics or incision and drainage for anal abscess
- Compared with
- surgery for anal fistula
- Main outcome
- whether the condition resolves without surgical treatment
- Quality
- This is a general practice guideline summarizing common knowledge and expert recommendations, not a study with original patient data or statistics.
- Limitations
- The abstract is a general guideline summary without specific patient numbers, study design details, or outcome data; it mainly addresses anal fistula rather than abscess alone.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Anal abscess symptoms include sudden onset of anal pain, swelling, redness, and fever.
- intervention
Antibiotics should be administered in cases of perianal abscess with surrounding cellulitis, or concomitant systemic disease, or those not alleviated by incision and drainage.
- comparator
As spontaneous recovery is rare, except in the case of children, surgery is the principle approach to anal fistulas.
- primaryOutcome
As spontaneous recovery is rare, except in the case of children, surgery is the principle approach to anal fistulas.
- result
As spontaneous recovery is rare, except in the case of children, surgery is the principle approach to anal fistulas.
J Anus Rectum Colon · PMID 31559351 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Barry et al. 2018
Congenital Perirectal Dermoid Cyst: A Rare Cause of Complex, Recurrent Pediatric Fistula-in-ano
Rare case, surgery neededCase seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 people2018
the fistula was complex and recurrent, caused by a rare congenital cyst, and did not resolve with standard treatment
- Who was studied
- an 8-year-old boy with recurrent anal fistula
- What they received
- standard treatments for fistula-in-ano (not specified in detail)
- Compared with
- none
- Main outcome
- resolution of the fistula/abscess
- Quality
- this is a single patient case report, so it cannot show whether non-surgical treatment generally works
- Limitations
- single case report of an unusual underlying cause (congenital dermoid cyst), not representative of typical anorectal abscess
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
an 8-year-old boy with a complex, recurrent fistula-in-ano
- result
resulted from a rare congenital perirectal dermoid cyst
- primaryOutcome
complex, recurrent fistula-in-ano
- n
an 8-year-old boy
- intervention
often resolve with oral antibiotics; occasionally they require drainage or fistulotomy
- comparator
alternative diagnoses should be considered in cases of recurrent abscesses and fistulae that are refractory to standard treatments
Front Pediatr · PMID 29868530 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Lourtet Hascoet et al. 2018
Clinical diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of 221 consecutive anorectal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men
Most abscess patients avoided surgery.Prospective cohortVery low qualityRelated question
221 people2018
27 patients (13.9%) developed anal abscesses, and of these 14 (7.2% of the total) went on to have surgery for anal fistula
- Who was studied
- men who have sex with men with anorectal chlamydia or gonorrhoea infection (proctitis)
- What they received
- antibiotic treatment for the STI (azithromycin/ceftriaxone, excluding quinolones)
- Main outcome
- clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of the infections, including rates of anal abscess and surgery
- Quality
- This is a descriptive case series of STI patients without a control group comparing surgical versus non-surgical abscess care, so it cannot show whether abscess can be treated without surgery.
- Limitations
- Observational, no comparison group, focused on STI diagnosis/treatment rather than abscess management; abscess and surgery numbers are incidental findings.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
On 441 rectal samples collected, 221 (50.1%) were positive
- population
all MSM consulting for proctitis at proctology Institute-Saint-Joseph's Hospital, Paris, were included
- intervention
the association of recommended antibiotics excluding quinolones
- primaryOutcome
This study describes their clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects.
- result
Anal abscesses were found for 27 (13.9%) patients, and 14 (7.2%) of them underwent surgery for anal fistula.
Int J Infect Dis · PMID 29608959 · Read it on PubMed ↗
López et al. 2018
Comparative Study of Drainage and Antibiotics versus Drainage Only in the Management of Primary Subcutaneous Abscesses
Antibiotics added nothing after drainage.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question
165 people7 days
no significant difference in resolution between antibiotics and placebo
- Who was studied
- patients with skin abscesses needing drainage, including some perianal abscesses
- What they received
- antibiotics after incision and drainage
- Compared with
- placebo after incision and drainage
- Main outcome
- abscess resolved by day 7
- Quality
- This was a randomized trial, but it studied general skin abscesses (not specifically anorectal) and all patients still had surgical drainage, so it does not test surgery versus no-surgery.
- Limitations
- Both groups underwent surgical drainage; the study compares antibiotics vs placebo after drainage, not surgery vs no surgery, and perianal abscesses were only a subset of cases with uneven distribution between groups.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
One hundred sixty-five patients were included for analysis.
- population
Chest and peri-anal abscesses were statistically more frequent in group 2
- intervention
Patients were randomly assigned either to receive antibiotic agents (group 1) or placebo (group 2) after I&D.
- comparator
placebo (group 2) after I&D
- primaryOutcome
The primary end point was resolution rate of the abscess at the seventh day.
- result
Resolution rate was 96% in group 1 and 93% in group 2, with no statistical difference between both (p = 0.28).
Surg Infect (Larchmt) · PMID 29596040 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Zalieckas 2017
Treatment of perianal Crohn's disease
No clear answer given.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2017
abstract does not report a specific result; states treatment is less successful than in patients without Crohn's related perianal disease
- Who was studied
- patients with perianal Crohn's disease
- What they received
- multimodal approach to therapy including medical and surgical modalities
- Main outcome
- managing symptoms while maintaining continence
- Quality
- this is a general review article with no study data, numbers, or specific outcomes reported, so it carries little weight for this question.
- Limitations
- no methodology, no data, no specific findings on abscess treatment without surgery are given
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Perianal Crohn's is a common manifestation of Crohn's disease.
- intervention
A multimodal approach to therapy including medical and surgical modalities is often necessary.
- primaryOutcome
The goal of treatment is to manage symptoms while maintaining continence.
- result
treatment is less successful than in those patients without Crohn's related perianal disease
Semin Pediatr Surg · PMID 29126509 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Dryden et al. 2017
Comparison of Stromal Vascular Fraction with or Without a Novel Bioscaffold to Fibrin Glue in a Porcine Model of Mechanically Induced Anorectal Fistula
Cell-scaffold therapy healed fistulas in pigsAnimal studyVery low qualityRelated question
17 people4 weeks
All fistulas treated with cells plus scaffold healed, compared with only some treated with cells alone and none treated with fibrin glue
- Who was studied
- Pigs with surgically created anorectal fistulas (a model of Crohn's-related fistula, not human abscess)
- What they received
- Stromal vascular fraction (fat-derived cells) injected alone or combined with a bioabsorbable scaffold
- Compared with
- Fibrin glue treatment of the fistula
- Main outcome
- Whether the fistula tract healed by week 2
- Quality
- This is a small animal experiment on surgically made fistulas, not a human study of abscess treatment, so it gives only indirect, low-certainty evidence.
- Limitations
- Small number of animals per group, a mechanically created fistula model in pigs rather than naturally occurring disease, and no human data; also studies fistula healing, not whether an abscess itself can be managed without surgery.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
ARFs were mechanically created and matured by setons.
- intervention
periaortic fat was harvested and processed for stromal vascular fraction (SVF). The cells were labeled with a membrane stain for later identification, then injected into the fistula or implanted through scaffold.
- comparator
Fistulas not treated with cells were injected with fibrin glue.
- primaryOutcome
Animals were monitored visually for healing at weeks 2 and 4, then euthanized to evaluate fistulas for histologic healing.
- result
All fistulas (6/6) treated with SVF + scaffolds healed by week 2, compared with only 4/6 with just SVF and 0/5 treated with fibrin glue.
- n
All fistulas (6/6) treated with SVF + scaffolds healed by week 2, compared with only 4/6 with just SVF and 0/5 treated with fibrin glue.
- followUp
Animals were monitored visually for healing at weeks 2 and 4
Inflamm Bowel Dis · PMID 28945635 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Rayen et al. 2017
The long-term outcome of anti-TNF alpha therapy in perianal Crohn's disease
Drug helped symptoms, rarely cured fistulas.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
75 people2017
73% of patients responded overall, but complete healing on MRI was rare, and those with prior abscess drainage were less likely to respond
- Who was studied
- adults with perianal Crohn's disease
- What they received
- anti-TNF alpha drug therapy
- Compared with
- patients with different fistula types and prior treatment history (no drug comparator)
- Main outcome
- response to anti-TNF therapy (clinical, MRI healing, need for surgery)
- Quality
- This was a retrospective single-center review without a control group, so it cannot reliably show whether treatment caused the outcomes.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, single center, no control group, and the abstract notes MRI often did not confirm clinical healing.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
The study included 75 adult patients with perianal Crohn's disease commenced on anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha therapy from January 2000 to December 2012.
- population
75 adult patients with perianal Crohn's disease
- intervention
anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha therapy
- comparator
Patients that had taken antibiotics and those that had previously required abscess drainage were less likely to respond to treatment
- primaryOutcome
Response to treatment was determined from records relating to clinical evaluation, magnetic resonance imaging follow-up and whether further surgical intervention was required.
- result
73% (55) of all patients and 38 of the 57 (67%) patients with perianal fistulas responded to anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha therapy.
- result
Five of the 57 (13%) patients with perianal fistulas demonstrated complete healing on clinical evaluation; however, magnetic resonance imaging confirmed complete healing in only two.
- result
Patients that had taken antibiotics and those that had previously required abscess drainage were less likely to respond to treatment [relative risk (RR) = 0.707 and 0.615, respectively; p = 0.03, p = 0.0001].
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 28066859 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Klag et al. 2015
Medical Therapy of Perianal Crohn's Disease
Drugs help but surgery still used.Narrative reviewLow qualityRelated question
size not given2015
medical drugs can help close fistulas but the review says they should be combined with surgery, not replace it
- Who was studied
- people with Crohn's disease who have fistulas or abscesses around the anus
- What they received
- antibiotics, immune-suppressing drugs, and anti-TNF biologic therapy
- Compared with
- not clearly compared against surgery alone
- Main outcome
- healing or closure of perianal fistulas/abscesses
- Quality
- this is a narrative literature review of selected articles, not a controlled study, so it can't reliably show whether surgery can be avoided.
- Limitations
- non-systematic selection of 36 articles, no original patient data, and focuses on Crohn's-related fistulas rather than typical anorectal abscess without surgery
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
perianal fistulas are a common feature of Crohn's disease (CD)
- intervention
Antibiotics, thiopurines, and calcineurin inhibitors are useful agents in the management of perianal CD.
- comparator
should be combined with surgical measures
- primaryOutcome
fistula healing seems to be possible in a substantial proportion of patients
- result
Antibiotics and several immunosuppressive drugs have improved the treatment of fistulizing CD and should be combined with surgical measures.
Viszeralmedizin · PMID 26557835 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Horsager et al. 2015
[Perianal abscesses in twins]
Outcome not reported in abstract.Case seriesVery low quality
2 people2015
- Who was studied
- 29-day-old twin baby boys with perianal abscesses
- What they received
- conservative (non-surgical) management
- Compared with
- incision and drainage (surgery)
- Main outcome
- resolution of perianal abscess
- Quality
- This is a report of just two infants, so it cannot reliably show whether non-surgical treatment works.
- Limitations
- Only two patients described; abstract does not report their treatment outcome, and aetiology and antibiotic effectiveness remain unproven.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
two 29-day-old monozygous twin boys with PA
- population
two 29-day-old monozygous twin boys with PA
- intervention
several studies suggest conservative management
- comparator
Traditionally, incision and drainage has been the treatment of choice
- primaryOutcome
In this case report we present two 29-day-old monozygous twin boys with PA.
Ugeskr Laeger · PMID 26240046 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Futami et al. 2015
[Surgical treatment for perianal Crohn's disease]
No clear answer on abscess aloneNarrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2015
medications alone are hard to maintain long-term remission with; surgery is often needed but carries recurrence and incontinence risk, so the goal has shifted to reducing drainage rather than complete closure
- Who was studied
- people with perianal Crohn's disease (fistula, abscess, ulcers, etc.)
- What they received
- medications (antibiotics, immunosuppressants, anti-TNF) and surgical options such as fistulotomy, seton drainage, diverting stoma
- Compared with
- different surgical techniques and medical therapy compared to each other
- Main outcome
- maintaining remission and anal function / symptom control
- Quality
- This is a narrative overview summarizing general treatment experience, not a controlled study, so it cannot reliably show whether abscess can be treated without surgery.
- Limitations
- Narrative review with no original data, no defined study population or outcome measures, and focused on fistula management rather than abscess specifically.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Perianal lesions are a frequent complication of Crohn's disease (CD) and include fistula, abscess, anal ulcer, skin tag, anal stricture, and carcinoma.
- intervention
The condition is treated with medications such as antibiotics, immunosuppressants, or anti-tumor necrosis factor agents.
- intervention
Surgical therapy is selected according to the type of fistula and can include conventional fistulotomy, seton drainage, diverting stoma, and anorectal amputation.
- result
However, it is difficult to maintain long-term remission.
- result
After fistulotomy, recurrence is frequent and there is an increased risk of incontinence.
- result
Currently, the goal of therapy for these patients has shifted from complete fistula closure to reducing drainage from the fistula to improve their quality of life.
- comparator
Seton drainage is the preferred treatment to improve symptoms and preserve anal function.
- primaryOutcome
Ongoing careful management is important to control anal symptoms and maintain long-term anal function in the treatment of patients with CD
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi · PMID 26050507 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Jeong et al. 2015
Perianal Abscess and Proctitis by Klebsiella pneumoniae
Antibiotics failed; needed surgery.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 people2015
Antibiotics alone did not resolve the infection; lesions worsened and surgery with drainage was required, after which he improved
- Who was studied
- 61-year-old man with diabetes and history of alcohol abuse, with abdominal and anal pain
- What they received
- antibiotics alone (ciprofloxacin and metronidazole) initially, then surgery after worsening
- Main outcome
- resolution of perianal/perirectal abscess and proctitis
- Quality
- This is a single case report, so it cannot reliably show whether non-surgical treatment works in general.
- Limitations
- Single patient case report with an unusual, invasive bacterial cause (ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae) in a patient with diabetes and alcoholism, limiting generalizability.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A 61-year-old man with diabetes mellitus and a history of alcohol abuse presented with abdominal and anal pain for two weeks.
- population
A 61-year-old man with diabetes mellitus and a history of alcohol abuse presented with abdominal and anal pain for two weeks.
- intervention
The patient was treated with ciprofloxacin and metronidazole.
- intervention
The patient underwent laparoscopic sigmoid colostomy and perirectal abscess incision and drainage.
- primaryOutcome
showed a perianal and perirectal abscess
- result
The lesions were aggravated and seemed webbed in appearance because of damage to the rectal mucosa.
- result
He improved after surgery and was discharged.
Intest Res · PMID 25691848 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Ribière et al. 2014
[Management of intestinal complications in inflammatory bowel diseases]
Drainage plus antibiotics, surgery if needed.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2014
abscesses are drained and treated with antibiotics, but surgery is usually required if obstructive signs persist after the abscess resolves
- Who was studied
- patients with Crohn's disease who develop abdominal, pelvic or perianal abscesses
- What they received
- abscess drainage combined with antibiotics, and for perianal abscess drainage with non-tight setons plus antibiotics and anti-TNF therapy
- Compared with
- surgery (resection)
- Main outcome
- need for surgery after abscess management
- Quality
- this is a narrative expert review summarizing management recommendations without original study data, a defined outcome measure, or sample size.
- Limitations
- No study design, methodology, or outcome data are reported; this is a general narrative review of IBD complication management rather than a study of anorectal abscess treatment in the general population.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
For Crohn's disease (CD), it is mainly strictures, fistulas and abdominal or pelvic abscess in luminal forms and perianal lesions (ulcers, fissures, fistula/abscess) in the perineal forms.
- intervention
Abdomino-pelvic abscess should be drained if the size is greater than 4-5 cm and treated with antibiotics.
- intervention
Anoperineal abscess must be drained by non-tight setons.
- intervention
Medical treatment also involves antibiotics and antiTNF, usually in combotherapy.
- comparator
If obstructive signs are present after the resolution of the abscess, surgery is usually required.
- result
Abdomino-pelvic abscess should be drained if the size is greater than 4-5 cm and treated with antibiotics. If obstructive signs are present after the resolution of the abscess, surgery is usually required.
- primaryOutcome
If obstructive signs are present after the resolution of the abscess, surgery is usually required.
Rev Prat · PMID 25638864 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Ghosh et al. 2014
Role of immunosuppressives in special situations: perianal disease and postoperative period
Abscess drainage still needed first.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2014
abscess drainage and seton placement were described as necessary before starting immunosuppressant or anti-TNF therapy
- Who was studied
- patients with perianal Crohn's disease, including complex fistulising disease
- What they received
- immunosuppressants (azathioprine, anti-TNF, tacrolimus, thalidomide) with or without surgical drainage/seton
- Compared with
- no treatment or conventional management
- Main outcome
- need for perianal surgery and disease recurrence
- Quality
- this is a narrative review of Crohn's disease drug therapy, not a study testing whether abscesses can be managed without surgery, and it explicitly says drainage is needed first.
- Limitations
- abstract focuses on perianal Crohn's disease management with drugs, not on whether abscess drainage can be avoided; no original study design or patient numbers given for this specific question.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Complex perianal disease is associated with poor outcome and requires early effective therapy.
- intervention
antibiotics, immunosuppressants and anti-TNF therapy are required
- comparator
azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine was associated with a significantly reduced risk of clinical recurrence
- primaryOutcome
a higher cumulative proportion of patients in the azathioprine group were free of perianal surgery
- result
Drainage of any abscess at examination under anaesthesia and seton insertion are important before introduction of immunosuppressants and anti-TNF therapy.
Dig Dis · PMID 25531359 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Chavada et al. 2014
Uncommon manifestations of Listeria monocytogenes infection
Abscess treated with surgery and antibiotics together.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
3 people2014
All three patients, including the one with perianal abscess, were treated with antibiotics and surgery with favourable outcomes
- Who was studied
- Patients with unusual Listeria monocytogenes infections, including one with a perianal abscess
- What they received
- Antibiotics plus surgery
- Compared with
- None
- Main outcome
- Clinical outcome after treatment
- Quality
- This is a tiny case series of only three unrelated patients with different infections, not a controlled study of abscess treatment, so it cannot show whether surgery can be avoided.
- Limitations
- Only three cases reported, mixed infection types and sites, no comparison group, surgery was combined with antibiotics in all cases so their individual contributions cannot be separated.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Three unrelated cases of unique focal infections caused by Listeria monocytogenes are presented.
- population
3) A 60 year old Asian man with perianal abscess.
- intervention
They were managed with antibiotics and surgery with favourable outcomes.
- comparator
They were managed with antibiotics and surgery with favourable outcomes.
- primaryOutcome
They were managed with antibiotics and surgery with favourable outcomes.
- result
They were managed with antibiotics and surgery with favourable outcomes.
BMC Infect Dis · PMID 25466213 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Shoji et al. 2014
Currarino syndrome in an adult presenting with a presacral abscess: a case report
Drainage worked short-term; surgery followed later.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 peoplefour years and six months after surgery
symptoms disappeared after drainage and antibiotics, but excision surgery was still performed three months later
- Who was studied
- 32-year-old man with Currarino syndrome and a presacral abscess
- What they received
- abscess drainage through a perianal approach combined with antibiotics
- Compared with
- no non-surgical comparator; later radical excision surgery
- Main outcome
- resolution of infection symptoms and abscess
- Quality
- this is a single patient case report, so it cannot show whether this approach works in general
- Limitations
- single case report of a rare congenital condition (Currarino syndrome) rather than a typical anorectal abscess, with no comparison group
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
A 32-year-old Japanese man presented with fever, arthralgia and buttock pain.
- intervention
The abscess was drained by a perianal approach with our patient treated with antibiotics.
- comparator
After three months, an excision was performed through a posterior sagittal approach.
- primaryOutcome
His symptoms soon disappeared.
- result
Abscess drainage followed by radical surgery resulted in a successful outcome.
- n
A 32-year-old Japanese man presented with fever, arthralgia and buttock pain.
J Med Case Rep · PMID 24571710 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Tonkić et al. 2013
[Treatment of fistulizing Crohn's disease]
Abscess drainage recommended, not avoided.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2013
the abstract states that if a perianal abscess is present it should be drained urgently, and complex perianal disease needs combined drug and surgical treatment
- Who was studied
- people with Crohn's disease who have fistulas (abnormal tunnels) connecting the bowel to other organs or skin, including perianal fistulas and abscesses
- What they received
- antibiotics, immunosuppressants, anti-TNF drugs, seton placement, and surgical drainage for perianal disease
- Compared with
- different treatment approaches compared to each other depending on fistula type and severity
- Main outcome
- whether fistulas and abscesses heal or resolve with different treatment approaches
- Quality
- this is an expert narrative review summarizing treatment recommendations, not a study with original data comparing surgical versus non-surgical abscess treatment
- Limitations
- the abstract is a general review of Crohn's fistula treatment, not a study specifically testing whether abscesses can be treated without surgery, and no controlled trials are described for this question
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
The treatment of fistulating Crohn's disease should include a combined medical and surgical approach
- intervention
Antibiotics (metronidazole and ciprofloxacine) are useful for treating complex perianal disease
- intervention
azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine is the first line medical therapy for complex perianal disease, which is always given in combination with surgical therapy (seton, fistulotomy/fistulectomy)
- intervention
Anti TNF-alpha agents (infliximab and adalimumab) should be used as a second choice medical treatment
- comparator
In refractory and extensive complex perianal disease a diverting stoma or proctectomy should be performed
- result
The presence of a perianal abscess should be ascertained and if present should be drained urgently
- result
In case of a complex perianal disease, seton placement should also be recommended
- primaryOutcome
There are no controlled-randomized trials to assess the effect of medical treatment for non-perianal fistulating Crohn's disease
Acta Med Croatica · PMID 24471302 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Mattila et al. 2013
Extraintestinal Clostridium difficile infections
Does not address abscess treatment choice.RetrospectiveVery low qualityRelated question
31 people1-year
mortality and disease severity were linked to patients' underlying illnesses, not to any treatment comparison
- Who was studied
- patients with extraintestinal Clostridium difficile infections, including some with perianal abscesses
- What they received
- none - this study did not test a treatment, it characterized infections
- Main outcome
- clinical features and risk factors of extraintestinal C. difficile infections
- Quality
- this is a small retrospective chart review with no treatment comparison, so it cannot show whether surgery or non-surgical treatment works better for abscesses
- Limitations
- retrospective record review, very small subgroup with perianal abscess, no comparison of treatments, mostly focused on bacteriology and mortality rather than abscess management
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Extraintestinal CDI was found in 31 patients
- population
4 had perianal abscesses
- intervention
Our objective was to characterize clinical features and risk factors of these infections.
- primaryOutcome
to characterize clinical features and risk factors of these infections
- result
The 1-year mortality rate was 36% and it correlated with the severity of underlying diseases.
- followUp
The 1-year mortality rate was 36%
Clin Infect Dis · PMID 23771984 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Garrick et al. 2013
A multidisciplinary team model of caring for patients with perianal Crohn's disease incorporating a literature review, topical therapy and personal practice
Combined therapy, not surgery alone, works best.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2013
a combination of medical and surgical treatment, including topical wound care, is suggested to give the best outcomes
- Who was studied
- patients with perianal Crohn's disease
- What they received
- antibiotic therapy, immunosuppression, immunomodulation and topical wound management (honey and silver dressings)
- Compared with
- surgery alone versus combined medical and surgical treatment
- Main outcome
- overall management and disease outcomes in perianal Crohn's disease, not a single defined outcome
- Quality
- this is a narrative literature review and personal practice summary, not a controlled study testing abscess treatment without surgery.
- Limitations
- abstract does not describe a specific study design, patient numbers, or controlled comparison; it is an expert review and recommendation piece.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Perianal CD involves areas of chronic abscess formation, ulceration, skin tags or fistula formation.
- intervention
Current practice focuses predominantly on the use of antibiotic therapy, immunosuppression, immunomodulation and surgery.
- comparator
The majority of evidence suggests that a combination of medical and surgical management produces the best disease outcomes.
- primaryOutcome
This review covers the management of perianal CD and provides recommendations for practice for the multidisciplinary team (MDT)
- result
A combination of treatment modalities that includes topical wound management is likely to produce the best patient outcomes.
Frontline Gastroenterol · PMID 28839719 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Hogan et al. 2013
Beware the ischiorectal abscess
Improved without surgery, but risky.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 people2013
the abscess eventually drained spontaneously through the skin and the patient's sepsis improved, but conservative management of this condition is linked to up to 30% mortality
- Who was studied
- 65-year-old man with an ischiorectal (anorectal) abscess that had formed a connection to the spinal canal
- What they received
- non-surgical management with antibiotics after the patient refused definitive surgery
- Compared with
- standard surgical treatment of the abscess
- Main outcome
- resolution of infection and clinical improvement
- Quality
- this is a single unusual case report with no comparison group, so it can't show whether avoiding surgery is generally safe or effective.
- Limitations
- single case, highly atypical abscess connected to a spinal defect, patient refused surgery by choice rather than by medical trial, no control group
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A previously healthy sixty-five year old man presented emergently with rectal pain, weight loss and recurrent severe tension headaches.
- population
A previously healthy sixty-five year old man presented emergently with rectal pain, weight loss and recurrent severe tension headaches.
- intervention
He was treated with broad spectrum antibiotics and a neurosurgical opinion was sought.
- intervention
The patient in this case was adamant that he did not consent to definitive surgical intervention.
- comparator
In fit healthy patients surgery is the mainstay of treatment as myelomengingoceles do not regress spontaneously.
- result
He remained clinically unwell (septic and coagulopathic) until the abscess fistulated through the perianal skin, draining pus mixed with clear fluid (likely CSF) at which point he improved systemically.
- result
Conservative management is associated with up to 30% mortality (largely due to bacterial meningitis).
- primaryOutcome
He remained clinically unwell (septic and coagulopathic) until the abscess fistulated through the perianal skin, draining pus mixed with clear fluid (likely CSF) at which point he improved systemically.
Int J Surg Case Rep · PMID 23396392 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Hvas et al. 2011
Diagnosis and treatment of fistulising Crohn's disease
Abscesses should be drained, per review.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2011
the review states that any abscess should be drained, and that fistula treatments vary from antibiotics and medication to surgery depending on complexity
- Who was studied
- people with Crohn's disease who develop fistulas (abnormal connections between the bowel and other organs or skin)
- What they received
- various treatments for Crohn's-related fistulas and abscesses, including drainage, antibiotics, immune-suppressing drugs, and surgery
- Compared with
- different treatment approaches compared to each other within the review
- Main outcome
- closure of fistulas and absence of abscesses
- Quality
- this is a general review article about Crohn's disease fistulas, not a study designed to test whether abscesses can be treated without surgery, and it does not report original data or a specific comparison for abscess treatment alone.
- Limitations
- This abstract is about fistula treatment in Crohn's disease patients specifically, not about anorectal abscess treatment in general; it is a narrative review without original patient data on abscess management alone.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Fistulas are discovered in up to 25% of all Crohn's disease patients during long-term follow-up examinations.
- intervention
Any abscess should be drained, and the disease extent throughout the entire gastrointestinal tract should be evaluated.
- result
Any abscess should be drained, and the disease extent throughout the entire gastrointestinal tract should be evaluated.
- primaryOutcome
Treatment goals for perianal fistulas include reduced fistula secretion or none, evaluated by clinical examination; the absence of abscesses; and patient satisfaction.
- comparator
Fistulotomy is considered for simple perianal fistulas. In complex perianal fistulas, antibiotics and azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine, which are often combined with a loose seton, constitute the first-line medical therapy.
Dan Med Bull · PMID 21975159 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Kawahara et al. 2011
Management of perianal abscess with hainosankyuto in neonates and young infants
Herbal medicine cured most infants.Case seriesVery low quality
15 peoplemedian 28 days (range, 14-117 days)
14 of 15 infants were cured without recurrence, most within 28-60 days
- Who was studied
- male infants under 3 months old with perianal abscess
- What they received
- oral traditional Japanese herbal medicine (hainosankyuto, TJ-122)
- Compared with
- none (no surgery or antibiotics used)
- Main outcome
- cure of perianal abscess without recurrence
- Quality
- this is a small, uncontrolled case series without a comparison group, so it cannot reliably prove the treatment works better than surgery or no treatment.
- Limitations
- no control group, small sample size, all male infants, no comparison to surgical treatment or placebo
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Fifteen male infants with PA under the age of 3 months were reviewed.
- intervention
TJ-122 was administered at a dose of 0.20 g/kg/day (n= 13) or 0.25 g/kg/day (n= 2) orally in two or three divided doses before meals.
- comparator
Antibiotics were not used in any of the patients.
- primaryOutcome
Of the 15 patients, 14 were cured and had no recurrence
- result
Of the 15 patients, 14 were cured and had no recurrence, with a median TJ-122 administration of 28 days (range, 14-117 days). Eight patients were cured within 28 days (53%) and 12 were cured within 60 days (80%).
- n
Fifteen male infants with PA under the age of 3 months were reviewed.
Pediatr Int · PMID 21575105 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Gligorijević et al. 2010
The role of pelvic MRI in assesment of combined surgical and infliximab treatment for perianal Crohn's disease
Found a benefitProspective cohortLow qualityRelated question
24 people8 weeks
PDAI score dropped significantly after infliximab, with 46% complete response and MRI showing remission in most re-scanned patients
- Who was studied
- patients with perianal Crohn's disease
- What they received
- combined surgical treatment (seton placement) plus infliximab infusions, with MRI assessment
- Compared with
- before versus after infliximab treatment (no separate control group)
- Main outcome
- fistula activity score (PDAI) and MRI-assessed remission of fistula/abscess
- Quality
- Small uncontrolled group with no comparison arm, so it's hard to know how much benefit came from surgery versus the drug.
- Limitations
- No control group, small sample size, and treatment combined surgery (seton) with infliximab rather than testing non-surgical treatment alone.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
24 patients with signs of PACD were prospectively evaluated
- population
24 patients with signs of PACD were prospectively evaluated
- intervention
started on Infliximab 5 mg/kg (IFX) at 0, 2 and 6 weeks induction protocol
- intervention
Surgical examination under anesthesia (EUA) was performed and non-cutting seton placed where appropriate
- comparator
Pelvic MRI was performed in each patient before Infliximab treatment, and in half of the patients after IFX
- primaryOutcome
Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI) was calculated to evaluate perianal fistulae activity
- result
Median PDAI before and 8 weeks after IFX treatment was 8.3 +/- 2.08 and 3.5 +/- 1.03, respectively (p = 0.00064)
- result
complete response (no drainage) in 11/24 (46%) patients
Acta Chir Iugosl · PMID 21066991 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Ulug et al. 2010
The evaluation of bacteriology in perianal abscesses of 81 adult patients
Identified common bacteria, not treatment effectiveness.Case seriesLow qualityRelated question
81 people2010
aerobic bacteria (not anaerobic) were the most common organisms found
- Who was studied
- adult patients with perianal abscesses
- What they received
- not applicable (microbiological analysis of abscess specimens)
- Compared with
- not applicable, no treatment comparison made
- Main outcome
- types of bacteria causing the abscesses
- Quality
- This is a small, non-comparative case series that only looked at bacteria types and did not test or compare surgical versus non-surgical treatment.
- Limitations
- No comparison of treatment approaches (surgery vs no surgery) was made; study only describes bacteriology, all patients presumably underwent drainage as standard care.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
81 consecutive adult patients with perianal abscesses
- population
81 consecutive adult patients with perianal abscesses, who presented at a university hospital in Diyarbakir
- primaryOutcome
it is important to identify the causative organisms; therefore, we accessed the microbiological analysis of these patients
- result
this study demonstrated that aerobic organisms are the predominant isolates in these infections
- intervention
Treatment of perianal abscesses requires prompt surgical drainage and antimicrobial therapy
- comparator
there is no evidence that uncomplicated perianal abscesses can be safely treated only with drainage
Braz J Infect Dis · PMID 20835504 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Lewis et al. 2010
Anorectal Crohn's disease
Review says abscesses need draining, not avoidance.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2010
abstract states abscesses should be drained surgically alongside medical therapy; does not report outcomes of avoiding surgery
- Who was studied
- people with Crohn's disease affecting the anus or rectum
- What they received
- combined medical and surgical treatment (draining abscess, setons, antibiotics, immunosuppressive drugs like infliximab)
- Main outcome
- successful treatment of perianal fistula/abscess disease
- Quality
- this is a general review of treatment approach, not a study with measured outcomes comparing surgery versus no surgery for abscess.
- Limitations
- abstract is a narrative review describing general treatment strategy, not an original study with data on abscess drainage versus non-surgical treatment.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Crohn's disease manifests with perianal or rectal symptoms in approximately one-third of patients
- intervention
Any abscess should be drained and setons placed if there is active rectal inflammation or complex fistulae. Antibiotics and immunosuppressive therapy (especially with infliximab) should also be initiated.
- result
Any abscess should be drained and setons placed if there is active rectal inflammation or complex fistulae.
- primaryOutcome
combined medical and surgical intervention when treating perianal fistulae has been shown to offer the best chance for success
Surg Clin North Am · PMID 20109634 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Brown et al. 2009
Perirectal abscess infections related to MRSA: a prevalent and underrecognized pathogen
MRSA common, antibiotics often inadequate.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
124 people2009
MRSA was found in 19% of cases, and when it was present, antibiotics only adequately covered it 33% of the time
- Who was studied
- adults with a perirectal (anorectal) abscess
- What they received
- antibiotics given together with incision and drainage
- Compared with
- incision and drainage without matched antibiotic coverage / cases where antibiotics were not adequate for the organism
- Main outcome
- how common MRSA was in the abscess cultures and whether prescribed antibiotics actually covered the bacteria found
- Quality
- it is a retrospective chart review over 8 years with no comparison of surgical versus non-surgical outcomes, so it can't show whether abscesses can be treated without surgery.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, cultures were only taken in 52% of patients, no randomization, and no direct comparison of surgery versus no surgery as treatment.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
In all, 124 patients were treated for perirectal abscess during the 8-year period.
- design
We conducted a retrospective study of all adult patients who presented with a perirectal abscess.
- population
all adult patients who presented with a perirectal abscess
- intervention
35% of patients were given antibiotics coupled with incision and drainage
- comparator
The antibiotics offered adequate coverage when compared with the sensitivities of the organisms 73% of the time.
- primaryOutcome
The prevalence of MRSA in our patient population was 19%, and when this organism was cultured, the patient only received adequate coverage 33% of the time.
- result
The prevalence of MRSA in our patient population was 19%, and when this organism was cultured, the patient only received adequate coverage 33% of the time.
J Surg Educ · PMID 20005498 · Read it on PubMed ↗
de Parades et al. 2008
[Cryptoglandular anal fistulas]
Surgery needed; antibiotics alone not enough.Narrative reviewLow quality
size not given2008
Antibiotics are not useful for initial treatment; the abscess needs urgent surgical incision, and surgical fistulotomy is very effective but can risk incontinence, leading to interest in sphincter-sparing alternatives
- Who was studied
- people with cryptoglandular anal fistulas (a type of perianal infection)
- What they received
- incision of the abscess under local anaesthesia, followed by surgical fistulotomy
- Compared with
- antibiotic therapy alone, or sphincter-preserving techniques (rectal flap, fibrin glue)
- Main outcome
- getting rid of the infection and preventing recurrence
- Quality
- This is a narrative review describing general management principles without original patient data or comparative results.
- Limitations
- No original data, no patient numbers, no study design described, and no quantified outcomes are reported.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Cryptoglandular anal fistulae are the most frequently occurring form of perianal sepsis.
- intervention
consists of its incision under local anaesthesia
- intervention
surgical fistulotomy
- comparator
Antibiotic therapy is not of use in initial management except in special cases.
- comparator
sphincter preserving techniques using the advancement of a covering flap of rectal mucosa and the injection of fibrin glue
- primaryOutcome
aims to dry up the purulent discharge and avoid recurrence of the abscess
- result
Antibiotic therapy is not of use in initial management except in special cases. Treatment of an abscess, if present, is required urgently and when possible, consists of its incision under local anaesthesia.
- result
These techniques are very effective in terms of eradication of the problem but there is sometimes a risk of anal incontinence.
Rev Prat · PMID 19143149 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Magdeburg et al. 2008
Perianal abscess caused by Actinomyces: report of a case
Surgery plus antibiotics healed infectionCase seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 people2008
The infection healed after surgery and antibiotics
- Who was studied
- A patient with a painless perianal mass
- What they received
- Surgical excision plus antibiotics
- Compared with
- None
- Main outcome
- Healing of the perianal infection
- Quality
- This is a single patient case report, so it cannot show whether avoiding surgery would work.
- Limitations
- Single case report of a rare bacterial cause of abscess; surgery was still performed, so it does not address nonsurgical treatment.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
The patient had a short history of painless perineal induration without fever or leucocytosis with normal routine blood tests.
- intervention
Appropriate surgery and antibiotic treatment healed the perianal infection.
- comparator
The treatment comprises excision of the abscess and. if appropriate, fistulectomy.
- primaryOutcome
Appropriate surgery and antibiotic treatment healed the perianal infection.
- result
Appropriate surgery and antibiotic treatment healed the perianal infection.
- n
report a case of perianal actinomycosis
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 19018464 · Read it on PubMed ↗
How we searchedThe exact query, the date it ran, and what came back — so you can run it yourself.
- Searched
- PubMed · ClinicalTrials.gov · Crossref on 2026-10-05
- The exact search — paste this into PubMed to repeat it
("Anal Canal"[Mesh] OR anorectal[tiab] OR perianal[tiab] OR perirectal[tiab]) AND ("Abscess"[Mesh] OR abscess[tiab]) AND ("Drainage"[Mesh] OR "incision and drainage"[tiab] OR surgical[tiab] OR surgery[tiab]) AND ("Anti-Bacterial Agents"[Mesh] OR antibiotic*[tiab] OR antimicrobial*[tiab])- PubMed expanded that to:
("Anal Canal"[MeSH Terms] OR "anorectal"[Title/Abstract] OR "perianal"[Title/Abstract] OR "perirectal"[Title/Abstract]) AND ("Abscess"[MeSH Terms] OR "Abscess"[Title/Abstract]) AND ("Drainage"[MeSH Terms] OR "incision and drainage"[Title/Abstract] OR "surgical"[Title/Abstract] OR "surgery"[Title/Abstract]) AND ("Anti-Bacterial Agents"[MeSH Terms] OR "antibiotic*"[Title/Abstract] OR "antimicrobial*"[Title/Abstract]) - What came back
- 283 records found · 197 read · 72 answered the question
- Included
- Human, animal or laboratory studies reporting an outcome relevant to the question
- Excluded
- Records about a different condition or intervention
- Records reporting no outcome
- Retracted publications, which are listed but excluded from every count
- Limits
- Details were read from abstracts, not full papers, so anything reported only in a paper's methods section is not captured here.
- Fields were read from abstracts, not full text, so detail reported only in a paper's methods section is not captured.
- Evidence strength is adapted from the GRADE framework. It is not a GRADE assessment and was not produced by a GRADE panel.
Automated evidence review — PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Crossref. Search strategy, grading rules and the checks that must pass before anything publishes were written by Allen Kamrava, MD, MBA, FACS, FASCRS, colon & rectal surgery, Beverly Hills. The pages themselves are compiled by software running that method and are not read one by one before publication — saying otherwise would be the one claim here that could not be checked.
- 283records came back from the search
- 197were read
- 72actually answered the question
Why people try thisThe reasoning behind the question — not a claim that it works.
- Fear of a cutting procedure and local anaesthesia in a sensitive area.
- Hoping a course of pills will be simpler than scheduling a procedure.
- Embarrassment about discussing or showing the area to a surgeon.
- Wanting to avoid time off work or the discomfort of a wound healing open.
Common questionsShort answers, drawn from the same studies.
- Can antibiotics alone cure my anal abscess?
- In the one trial that tested this in adults, antibiotics alone (with a needle draw-off) worked for some people, but the abscess came back much more often than when it was properly drained. Most abscesses still need to be opened and drained.
- Should I ask my doctor for antibiotics instead of a drainage procedure?
- You can ask, but based on the one adult trial, drainage works more reliably. Antibiotics are sometimes added alongside drainage, especially if you have a fever, diabetes, or a weakened immune system — that's a different situation from antibiotics replacing drainage entirely.
- What happens if I leave the abscess untreated and just take antibiotics?
- Case reports describe adults whose infection spread and worsened on antibiotics alone, eventually needing urgent surgery. An abscess is a pocket of pus; antibiotics often can't reach it well enough on their own.
- Should I stop the antibiotics I've already been prescribed?
- Don't stop any prescribed antibiotic on your own. The point here is that antibiotics alone shouldn't replace drainage — talk to whoever prescribed them about whether you also need the abscess drained.
- Is needle aspiration a good middle ground between pills and full surgery?
- One trial tested needle aspiration plus antibiotics against standard incision and drainage, and aspiration led to more recurrences (41% versus 15%). It may still be an option in some cases, but standard drainage worked better in this trial.
This is information, not advice
This page summarises published research. It cannot tell you what is happening in your own body, and evidence changes. If something is bleeding, painful, or new, it is worth being looked at — that is a different question from the one on this page, and a better one to bring to a consultation.
Contact the officeAutomated evidence review — PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Crossref. Search strategy, grading rules and the checks that must pass before anything publishes were written by Allen Kamrava, MD, MBA, FACS, FASCRS, colon & rectal surgery, Beverly Hills. The pages themselves are compiled by software running that method and are not read one by one before publication — saying otherwise would be the one claim here that could not be checked.