Skip to content
Beverly Hills · 435 N. Bedford Dr., Suite 308Mon–Fri 9:00 am – 5:00 pmMost PPO insurance accepted

Do hemorrhoids need surgery, or can they be treated without an operation?

In adults with symptomatic internal or external hemorrhoids (Goligher grade I-IV), how do non-surgical treatments (rubber band ligation, sclerotherapy, infrared coagulation, dietary fiber) compare with surgical hemorrhoidectomy (including laser hemorrhoidoplasty) in symptom resolution, recurrence, and need for later surgery?

Compiled 2026-10-05 · checked 2026-10-05 · next 2026-11-05 · automated review, how it works

What the evidence says

Bottom line

Surgery works better than banding for stopping grade III hemorrhoids from coming back, but both approaches carry rare, serious risks.

The trials that directly compared surgery with a non-surgical option (mainly rubber band ligation) looked at grade III hemorrhoids and found surgery caused far fewer recurrences, though it hurt more and took longer to recover from. Four studies, mostly single case reports, documented rare but serious complications - severe bleeding after banding, a bowel perforation after laser treatment, and a higher infection risk after surgery in people carrying resistant bacteria. Because the trials disagree with each other and are small, confidence in any single comparison is only moderate.

How certain

Moderate

4 well-conducted randomised trials address this question directly. The studies disagree with one another, so the overall certainty is lower than any single one of them.

What it shows

Signal of harm

4 studies reported harm or tissue damage, including laboratory evidence.

studies found
115studies found
randomised trials
15randomised trials
people studied
424,548people studied
reviews of trials
20reviews of trials
years covered
2023–2026years covered
finished, never published
2finished, never published

Read this first

  • A case report describes massive rectal bleeding 15 days after routine rubber band ligation, requiring emergency endoscopic treatment.
  • A case report describes a bowel (rectal) perforation, severe infection, and organ failure after laser hemorrhoidoplasty, requiring emergency surgery and a colostomy.
  • People who carried antibiotic-resistant bacteria before hemorrhoid surgery had a much higher rate of infection at the surgical site afterward.

What the research shows

  • Recurrence at 1 year

    In head-to-head trials, surgery led to far fewer hemorrhoids coming back than banding (6% vs 48% in one trial) and failed far less often than a less invasive artery-ligation procedure (8% vs 61% in another). This advantage was tested specifically in grade III disease.[1,2,3]

    Improvement shown

  • Need for subsequent or repeat surgery

    People first treated with banding or a less invasive procedure were more likely to need a later operation than those who had surgery first, in the two trials that tracked this.[1,2]

    Possible improvement

  • Time to return to normal activity

    Trials consistently found people returned to work and daily activity sooner after banding or less invasive procedures than after surgery.[1,2,3]

    Improvement shown

  • Complication rate (bleeding, infection, stenosis)

    Serious complications were reported with both approaches, though mostly documented as single case reports rather than trial data: severe delayed bleeding after rubber band ligation, a bowel perforation needing emergency surgery after laser treatment, and higher surgical-site infection risk in people carrying resistant bacteria before surgery.[1,2,3]

    Possible harm

  • Outcomes beyond 1-2 years

    None of the trials comparing surgery with non-surgical treatment followed people for more than about 12 to 24 months, so what happens further out is not known.

    Not studied

What it may help with

  • In a randomised trial of grade III hemorrhoids, surgery led to far fewer hemorrhoids returning within a year compared with rubber band ligation.[1]
  • A randomised trial comparing open surgery with a less invasive artery-ligation procedure for grade III hemorrhoids found open surgery failed far less often, though it caused more pain and a slower return to work.[1]
  • Office-based procedures like banding and sclerotherapy resolved bleeding and prolapse in many patients without surgery and let them recover faster, according to several studies, though most were not controlled trials.[1,2,3]

Important limitations

  • Most of the studies on non-surgical treatments are retrospective or single-arm - they follow one group of patients before and after treatment without comparing them to a different treatment, making it hard to know what would have happened otherwise.[1,2,3]
  • The randomised trials that directly compared surgery with a non-surgical option were small, ranging from about 36 to 87 people, and came from single centers, so results may not hold up elsewhere.[1,2,3]
  • Studies used different hemorrhoid grades and different techniques (classic surgery, laser, artery ligation, stapling, banding), so a finding about one technique does not necessarily apply to another.[1,2]

What the studies found

  • Found a benefit46 · 40%
  • Found no clear effect4 · 3%
  • Mixed or unclear61 · 53%
  • Found possible harm4 · 3%

What kind of studies

  • Retrospective39 · 34%
  • Randomised trial15 · 13%
  • Narrative review15 · 13%
  • Meta-analysis14 · 12%
  • Case series10 · 9%
  • Prospective cohort9 · 8%
  • Systematic review6 · 5%
  • Guideline3 · 3%
  • Registry2 · 2%
  • Laboratory study1 · 1%
  • Registered trial, no results posted1 · 1%

The studies that decided it

  • Qureshi et al. 2026

    AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Hemorrhoids: Expert Review

    Most hemorrhoids treatable without surgery.GuidelineLow quality

    size not given2026

    Most hemorrhoids can be managed with conservative measures or in-office procedures like banding and infrared coagulation, with surgery reserved for more severe or refractory cases

    Who was studied
    people with hemorrhoids
    What they received
    non-surgical treatments such as diet/lifestyle changes, topical treatments, banding, and infrared coagulation
    Compared with
    surgical hemorrhoidectomy
    Main outcome
    best practice recommendations for diagnosing and treating hemorrhoids
    Quality
    This is an expert opinion-based guideline without a systematic review of evidence, so its recommendations carry less certainty.
    Limitations
    Because systematic reviews were not performed, these BPA statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population Hemorrhoids are a common problem.
    • intervention Dietary and lifestyle modifications, including increasing fiber intake and avoiding straining or prolonged time on the toilet, are reasonable first-line therapies for symptomatic hemorrhoids.
    • comparator Hemorrhoid banding or infrared coagulation should be employed prior to surgical hemorrhoidectomy for grades 1 to 3 hemorrhoids.
    • primaryOutcome to provide best practice advice (BPA) covering the diagnosis and treatment of hemorrhoid disease
    • result Both hemorrhoid banding and infrared coagulation are safe, effective, and easy to perform in the office setting.
    • result Grade 4 internal hemorrhoids require surgical hemorrhoidectomy.
    • limitations Because systematic reviews were not performed, these BPA statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations.

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol · PMID 42067175 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Fernandez-Hurtado et al. 2025

    Open excisional haemorrhoidectomy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization for grade III haemorrhoids: open-label randomized clinical trial

    Open surgery worked better but hurt more.Randomised trialModerate quality

    50 people12 months

    Open surgery had a much lower failure rate (8%) than the less invasive procedure (61%), and all repeat operations happened in the less invasive group, though open surgery caused more pain and a longer return to work

    Who was studied
    adults with grade III hemorrhoids
    What they received
    open surgical removal of hemorrhoids (open excisional haemorrhoidectomy)
    Compared with
    a less invasive surgery that cuts off blood supply to hemorrhoids (transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization)
    Main outcome
    change in hemorrhoid symptom and quality-of-life scores at 12 months, and rate of treatment failure
    Quality
    It was a randomized trial testing its question directly, but it was small, from a single center, and not blinded.
    Limitations
    Small single-centre trial, open-label (not blinded), some patients lost to follow-up.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n 50 patients were randomized (25 OEH patients and 25 THD patients)
    • population patients with grade III haemorrhoids
    • intervention Open excisional haemorrhoidectomy (OEH) remains the standard treatment for advanced haemorrhoidal disease
    • comparator Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) is an alternative with reduced pain but potentially higher recurrence.
    • primaryOutcome The primary outcome was the relative change at 12 months in Haemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS) and Short Health Scale adapted for Haemorrhoidal Disease (SHS-HD) from baseline.
    • result CFR was significantly higher in the THD group (14 of 23 (61%)) versus the OEH group (2 of 24 (8%)) (P <0.001). All eigth reoperations occurred in the THD group (P = 0.001).
    • result OEH was associated with greater early postoperative pain and a longer time to return to work (median of 21 versus 14 days; P = 0.010).

    Br J Surg · PMID 41553737 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Turunen et al. 2025

    Massive Rectal Bleeding After Rubber Band Ligation of Internal Hemorrhoids: A Case Report

    Found harmCase seriesVery low quality

    1 people2025

    she had massive rectal bleeding 15 days after the procedure from an ulcer at the banding site, which was treated successfully with clips and spray

    Who was studied
    a 34-year-old woman with internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    rubber band ligation of internal hemorrhoids
    Compared with
    none
    Main outcome
    delayed rectal bleeding after the procedure
    Quality
    this is a single patient case report, so it cannot show how common or rare this problem is
    Limitations
    single case report; no comparison group; cannot estimate how often this happens

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n A 34-year-old White woman presented with massive rectal bleeding
    • population A 34-year-old White woman presented with massive rectal bleeding 15 days after suction RBL of internal hemorrhoids
    • intervention Rubber band ligation (RBL) is a common treatment for internal hemorrhoids
    • comparator She was not taking anticoagulants, antiplatelets, or NSAIDs and had no history of bleeding disorders
    • primaryOutcome presented with massive rectal bleeding 15 days after suction RBL of internal hemorrhoids
    • result Flexible sigmoidoscopy revealed a 10-mm ulcer with a visible vessel at the previous banding site. Hemostasis was achieved with clip placement and hemostatic spray. She recovered without further complications.

    WMJ · PMID 41197059 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Quan et al. 2025

    Comparison of efficacy and safety between surgical and conservative treatments for hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis

    Surgery relieves symptoms faster, fewer recurrences.Meta-analysisModerate quality

    760 people2025

    Surgery led to more complete symptom resolution and better early pain relief, but pain outcomes were similar by 10 days; surgery also reduced recurrence and sped recovery in pregnant thrombosed cases, with similar rates of bleeding and urinary retention but some surgery-specific complications

    Who was studied
    patients with hemorrhoids, including pregnant women with thrombosed external hemorrhoids
    What they received
    surgical treatment for hemorrhoids
    Compared with
    non-invasive conservative treatment for hemorrhoids
    Main outcome
    complete symptom resolution and pain scores
    Quality
    This pooled analysis of only seven studies and 760 patients found consistent benefits for surgery, but the number of included studies is small and variability between them (noted by I2 values) limits confidence.
    Limitations
    Based on only seven studies with some statistical heterogeneity between them (I2 up to 55%)

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Seven studies, including 760 patients, were analyzed.
    • population Eligible studies compared surgical treatments with non-invasive conservative treatments in hemorrhoids.
    • population Comparable patterns were observed in pregnant women with thrombosed external hemorrhoids.
    • intervention surgical or conservative treatments
    • comparator non-invasive conservative treatments in hemorrhoids
    • primaryOutcome Surgery achieved higher rates of complete symptom resolution than conservative therapy
    • result Overall pain scores favored surgery (SMD = -0.93, 95% CI: 1.73 to -0.13, p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis showed clear superiority within four days (SMD = -1.26, 95% CI -1.84 to -0.68) but parity beyond ten days (SMD = 0.00, 95% CI -0.44 to 0.44; p = 0.99).
    • result Rates of postoperative bleeding (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.42 to 2.82, p = 0.86; I2 = 41%, p = 0.15) and urinary retention (OR: 1.75; 95% CI: 0.30 to 10.31, p = 0.54; I2 = 45%, p = 0.18) did not differ significantly between groups.
    • result Surgery shortened recovery in pregnant thrombosed cases by approximately seven days (MD: -6.80; 95% CI: -7.64 to -5.96, p < 0.001; I2 = 55%, p = 0.14) and reduced overall recurrence (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.37, p < 0.001; I2 = 0%, p = 0.97).

    BMC Gastroenterol · PMID 40596934 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • van Oostendorp et al. 2025

    Cost-Effectiveness of Rubber Band Ligation Versus Hemorrhoidectomy for the Treatment of Grade III Hemorrhoids: Analysis Using Evidence From the HOLLAND Randomized Controlled Trial

    Surgery worked better but cost more.Randomised trialModerate quality

    79 people24 months

    Surgery gave better quality of life and far fewer recurrences than banding, but cost more; whether surgery was worth the extra cost depended on how much society is willing to pay

    Who was studied
    Adults with symptomatic grade III hemorrhoids
    What they received
    Surgery to remove hemorrhoids (hemorrhoidectomy)
    Compared with
    Rubber band ligation (non-surgical banding procedure)
    Main outcome
    Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained and cost per recurrence avoided over 24 months
    Quality
    It's a randomized trial comparing real treatments, but the number of patients is small and the cost-effectiveness conclusion is uncertain and depends on assumptions.
    Limitations
    Small sample size may limit generalizability and the ability to detect rare but costly complications; procedural costs were based on average hospital prices rather than detailed bottom-up costing.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Seventy-nine patients were analyzed (33 for hemorrhoidectomy and 46 for rubber band ligation).
    • population Adults with symptomatic grade III hemorrhoids randomly assigned to receive rubber band ligation or hemorrhoidectomy treatment.
    • intervention Rubber band ligation (up to 2 sessions) or excisional hemorrhoidectomy.
    • comparator Rubber band ligation (up to 2 sessions) or excisional hemorrhoidectomy.
    • primaryOutcome Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained and cost per recurrence avoided over 24 months from a societal perspective.
    • result Hemorrhoidectomy resulted in better clinical outcomes with a quality-adjusted life year difference of 0.08 (95% CI, 0.04-0.13) and a recurrence difference of 33.5% (95% CI, 15.3%-51.7%).
    • result The probability of hemorrhoidectomy being cost-effective was 45.5% at €20,000 per quality-adjusted life year and 83.9% at €50,000 per quality-adjusted life year.

    Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 40492557 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • van Oostendorp et al. 2025

    Comparison of Rubber Band Ligation and Hemorrhoidectomy in Patients With Symptomatic Hemorrhoids Grade III: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial

    Surgery better long-term; banding less painful short-term.Randomised trialLow quality

    87 people12 months

    Banding was not as good as surgery for quality of life, and recurrence was much more common with banding (47.5% vs 6.1%), though banding caused less pain and allowed faster return to work

    Who was studied
    adults with symptomatic grade III hemorrhoids
    What they received
    rubber band ligation (non-surgical banding, up to 2 sessions)
    Compared with
    hemorrhoidectomy (surgical removal)
    Main outcome
    quality of life at 12 months and hemorrhoid recurrence rate
    Quality
    The trial stopped early due to funding problems, leaving very few patients and limited power to be sure of the results.
    Limitations
    Early termination due to funding constraints resulted in a small sample size and limited statistical power; recruitment was hindered by patient preferences and the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned (47 rubber band ligation vs 40 hemorrhoidectomy).
    • population Patients (aged 18 years or older) with symptomatic grade III (Goligher) hemorrhoids were included in this study.
    • intervention Randomized 1:1 to rubber band ligation or hemorrhoidectomy, with up to 2 banding sessions allowed.
    • comparator Hemorrhoidectomy is the criterion standard
    • primaryOutcome Primary outcomes included 12-month health-related quality of life and recurrence rate.
    • result Rubber band ligation was not noninferior to hemorrhoidectomy in quality-adjusted life years (-0.045; 95% CI, -0.087 to -0.004). Recurrence rate was worse in the rubber band ligation group (47.5% vs 6.1%), with an absolute risk difference of 41% (95% CI, 24%-59%).
    • result Pain scores after hemorrhoidectomy were higher during the first week (visual analogue scale 4 vs 1; p = 0.002). Rubber band ligation group returned to work sooner (1 vs 9 days; p = 0.021).
    • limitations The primary limitation of the study was its early termination due to funding constraints, resulting in a relatively small sample size and limited statistical power.
    • followUp Primary outcomes included 12-month health-related quality of life and recurrence rate.

    Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 39952268 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Smets et al. 2024

    Rectal perforation after laser hemorrhoidoplasty: a case report

    Rare but serious complication reported.Case seriesVery low quality

    1 people2024

    she developed a rectal perforation, severe abdominal infection, sepsis and multiple organ failure, needing emergency surgery and a colostomy

    Who was studied
    a 31-year-old woman with hemorrhoids treated by laser hemorrhoidoplasty
    What they received
    laser hemorrhoidoplasty (a minimally invasive laser treatment for hemorrhoids)
    Compared with
    none
    Main outcome
    serious complications after the procedure
    Quality
    this is a single patient case report, so it cannot show how often this happens or how this treatment compares to others.
    Limitations
    only one patient; no comparison group; described as the first such case reported, so how common this is cannot be judged from this report.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n a 31-year-old female
    • population rectal perforation following laser hemorrhoidoplasty in a 31-year-old female
    • intervention Laser hemorrhoidoplasty has gained widespread acceptance for its minimally invasive approach in treating hemorrhoids.
    • comparator This case report outlines the intricate management of rectal perforation following laser hemorrhoidoplasty
    • primaryOutcome leading to an acute abdomen, sepsis, and multiorgan failure
    • result Urgent laparoscopic exploration and the establishment of a double-loop colostomy were undertaken, marking the beginning of a complex course characterized by relapsed pelvic sepsis.

    Tech Coloproctol · PMID 38849668 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Li et al. 2023

    Colonization of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria increases risk of surgical site infection after hemorrhoidectomy: a cross-sectional study of two centers in southern China

    Bacterial colonization raised infection risk after surgery.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    432 people2023

    patients colonized with multidrug-resistant bacteria had a much higher rate of surgical site infection than non-carriers

    Who was studied
    patients with hemorrhoids who had hemorrhoid surgery
    What they received
    carrying multidrug-resistant bacteria in the rectum/anus before surgery
    Compared with
    not carrying multidrug-resistant bacteria
    Main outcome
    infection at the surgical site after hemorrhoid surgery
    Quality
    this is a cross-sectional observational study at two centers without randomization, so it can show an association but not prove cause, and it doesn't address whether surgery itself is needed versus non-surgical treatment.
    Limitations
    cross-sectional design, risk of confounding, only two centers in one region, does not compare surgical to non-surgical treatment

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n A total of 432 patients met the inclusion criteria
    • population Patients with hemorrhoid disease, who underwent hemorrhoidectomy, were included.
    • intervention the rectoanal colonization of MDRBs
    • comparator 1.81% (6/332) of non-carriers developed SSIs
    • primaryOutcome the relationship between MDRB colonization and surgical site infection (SSI) following hemorrhoidectomy was explored
    • result 41.57% (37/89) of MDRB carriers and 1.81% (6/332) of non-carriers developed SSIs

    Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 37779168 · Read it on PubMed ↗

What actually helps, on this site

All 115 studiesEvery study that answered the question, with its design, size and result.
The other 107 studiesEverything else the search returned, including anything retracted.
  • Barone et al. 2026

    LigaSure versus conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials

    Less early pain than standard hemorrhoid surgeryMeta-analysisModerate qualityRelated question

    3,277 people2026

    LigaSure reduced early pain, bleeding, blood loss, operating time and recovery time, but showed no difference in recurrence, infection, incontinence and several other outcomes

    Who was studied
    patients having surgery to remove hemorrhoids
    What they received
    LigaSure (energy-sealing device) hemorrhoidectomy
    Compared with
    conventional excisional hemorrhoidectomy
    Main outcome
    postoperative pain and recovery after surgery
    Quality
    It pools many randomised trials with over 3,000 patients, but the trials varied in quality and long-term outcomes like recurrence are still uncertain.
    Limitations
    Uncertainty remains for several outcomes, and evidence regarding recurrence and other long-term anorectal outcomes remains limited.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Forty-three unique RCTs comprising 3,277 participants were analysed.
    • population Randomised controlled trials comparing LigaSure with conventional techniques were included.
    • intervention We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing LigaSure with conventional haemorrhoidectomy.
    • comparator Conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy remains the gold standard treatment for grade IV haemorrhoids, although energy-based devices may reduce postoperative pain.
    • primaryOutcome LigaSure was associated with lower postoperative pain scores on days 1 and 2 and during the first and second postoperative weeks
    • result No statistically significant differences were observed in immediate postoperative pain, pain on postoperative day 3 or week 4, recurrence, length of hospital stay, constipation, pruritus, surgical site infection, incomplete healing, anal fissure, anal stenosis, or faecal incontinence.

    Colorectal Dis · PMID 42816945 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Ye et al. 2026

    A case report on the management of sepsis complicated by eroded mixed hemorrhoids following breast cancer chemotherapy

    Healed without surgery in one case.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question

    1 people30 days

    After 30 days, fever resolved, perianal swelling and inflammation completely resolved, and the eroded hemorrhoid healed entirely without surgery

    Who was studied
    51-year-old woman with breast cancer on chemotherapy who developed eroded, infected hemorrhoids and sepsis
    What they received
    non-surgical treatment combining antibiotics, blood/immune support, and local wound care (saline cleansing, infrared therapy, growth factor gel, zinc oxide ointment, suppositories, and a traditional Chinese medicine paste)
    Compared with
    no comparison group; surgery was avoided due to high risk
    Main outcome
    resolution of fever, perianal infection, and healing of the eroded hemorrhoid
    Quality
    This is a single patient case report, so it cannot show whether this approach works in general.
    Limitations
    Only one patient, no comparison group, and the patient had a specific complicating condition (severe chemotherapy-induced immune suppression) that is not typical of most people with hemorrhoids.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n A 51-year-old female with stage IIIA human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer
    • population mixed hemorrhoids with erosion and secondary perianal infection
    • intervention a conservative strategy was implemented. This included broad-spectrum systemic antibiotics (meropenem, vancomycin, amikacin, amphotericin B sequentially), aggressive hematologic support (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, blood transfusions), and meticulous multimodal local wound care. The local regimen comprised saline cleansing, infrared therapy, recombinant human epidermal growth factor gel, zinc oxide ointment, compound borneol ester suppositories, and the topical application of a self-prepared traditional Chinese medicine, "Liuhe Dan."
    • comparator Given the high risk of surgery due to critical thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, a conservative strategy was implemented.
    • primaryOutcome After 30 days of treatment, the patient became afebrile, and her perianal swelling and inflammation completely resolved. The eroded hemorrhoid healed entirely
    • result After 30 days of treatment, the patient became afebrile, and her perianal swelling and inflammation completely resolved. The eroded hemorrhoid healed entirely, allowing for a successful transfer to a lower-level hospital for continued supportive care.

    Medicine (Baltimore) · PMID 42798126 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Pei et al. 2026

    Dynamic Changes and Influencing Factors of Acute Pain After Elastic Band Ligation of Internal Hemorrhoids in Patients With Mixed Hemorrhoids

    Pain patterns varied after banding.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    173 people14 days

    patients split into a fast-relief group and a slow-relief group, with younger age, more anxiety/depression, less social support, and more ligations linked to worse pain recovery

    Who was studied
    patients with grade III or IV mixed hemorrhoids
    What they received
    elastic band ligation of internal hemorrhoids
    Compared with
    no comparator; patients compared by pain trajectory groups
    Main outcome
    pattern of pain after the procedure over 14 days
    Quality
    this is a single-center retrospective study looking at pain patterns after the procedure, not comparing surgery to non-surgical treatment.
    Limitations
    single-center, retrospective design, no comparison group to non-surgical treatment, abstract does not report on hemorrhoid resolution outcomes

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population 173 patients with mixed hemorrhoids (grade III or IV) who underwent elastic band ligation of internal hemorrhoids
    • intervention elastic band ligation of internal hemorrhoids
    • comparator GMM analysis identified two pain progression trajectories: a rapid relief group (82 cases, 47.4%) and a poor relief group (91 cases, 52.6%)
    • primaryOutcome dynamic trajectory of acute pain after elastic band ligation of internal hemorrhoids
    • result age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-0.96, p = 0.002), SAS score (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.10, p = 0.018), SDS score (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.09, p = 0.009), SSRS total score (OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.65-0.81, p < 0.001), and number of ligations (OR = 4.96, 95% CI: 1.25-19.77, p = 0.023) were independent factors influencing the pain trajectory
    • n included 173 patients with mixed hemorrhoids

    Ann Ital Chir · PMID 42755315 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Benek et al. 2026

    Monopolar Cautery Ablation as a Minimally Invasive Treatment Option for Grade II-III Hemorrhoidal Disease

    Faster recovery but more recurrencesRetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    61 peopleat least one year

    Monopolar cautery ablation had shorter operative time, less pain medication need, faster return to daily activities, and higher satisfaction, but had more (non-significant) recurrences than excisional hemorrhoidectomy

    Who was studied
    patients with grade II-III hemorrhoidal disease who had surgery
    What they received
    monopolar cautery ablation (a less invasive cauterizing technique)
    Compared with
    standard excisional hemorrhoidectomy (surgical removal of hemorrhoids)
    Main outcome
    recovery time, pain, satisfaction, and recurrence after surgery
    Quality
    It was a small retrospective study with short follow-up, so the findings are not very reliable.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design and relatively short follow-up period, as noted by the authors themselves.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n This retrospective study included 61 patients who underwent surgery for symptomatic grade II-III hemorrhoidal disease
    • population 61 patients who underwent surgery for symptomatic grade II-III hemorrhoidal disease between January 2022 and December 2023
    • intervention monopolar cautery ablation (MPCA)
    • comparator excisional hemorrhoidectomy (EH)
    • primaryOutcome operative time, postoperative pain scores (at the 12th hour, postoperative days 1, 7, and 14), duration of analgesic use, patient satisfaction, time to return to daily activities, postoperative complications, and recurrence rates
    • result Operative time and postoperative analgesic requirements were significantly lower in the MPCA group (both p < 0.001). The time to return to daily activities was significantly shorter in the MPCA group, while patient satisfaction was significantly higher (both p < 0.001).
    • result No recurrences were detected in the EH group, whereas three recurrences were observed in the MPCA group (p = 0.102).
    • followUp All patients were followed for at least one year.
    • limitations These findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the retrospective design and relatively short follow-up period.

    Ann Ital Chir · PMID 42755308 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Shu et al. 2026

    Low excision and high suspension hemorrhoidectomy versus conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy for mixed hemorrhoids: a 12-month prospective randomized controlled trial

    Newer surgery as effective, safer than standard surgeryRandomised trialModerate qualityRelated question

    120 people12 months

    LEHS was as effective as MM with similar success and recurrence rates, but caused less pain, fewer complications, and better preserved anal function

    Who was studied
    adults with grade III-IV mixed hemorrhoids
    What they received
    low excision and high suspension hemorrhoidectomy (LEHS), a newer hemorrhoid surgery
    Compared with
    Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MM), the standard hemorrhoid surgery
    Main outcome
    treatment success at 12 weeks and hemorrhoid recurrence at 12 months
    Quality
    it was a randomized trial but from a single hospital with only 120 patients and the registration happened after the trial started, which raises some concern about reporting bias.
    Limitations
    single-center design, trial was registered retrospectively after enrollment, and it compares two surgical techniques rather than surgery versus non-surgical treatment

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n enrolled 120 eligible patients between January 2024 and June 2024
    • population grade III-IV mixed hemorrhoids
    • intervention Low excision and high suspension hemorrhoidectomy (LEHS) is a refined, function-preserving technique
    • comparator Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MM) is the gold-standard treatment
    • primaryOutcome Primary outcomes were 12-week clinical effective rate and 12-month hemorrhoid recurrence rate
    • result The 12-week effective rate (96.4% vs. 92.9%) and 12-month recurrence rate (1.8% vs. 5.4%) confirmed LEHS non-inferiority (both P > 0.05). LEHS yielded longer operative time, less blood loss, lower VAS pain scores, faster recovery, fewer complications (14.8% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.027), and more favorable anorectal physiology

    BMC Surg · PMID 42393699 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Anwar et al. 2026

    Long-term impact of haemorrhoidal artery ligation on anal function and continence

    Low risk of lasting bowel leakage after minimally invasive surgery.Systematic reviewLow qualityRelated question

    671 people>6 months

    2.5% of patients developed incontinence, mostly mild and temporary; the HAL-RAR variant had a higher rate (5.7%) than standard HAL (0%) or THD (1.0%)

    Who was studied
    patients who had minimally invasive hemorrhoid artery ligation procedures, followed for over 6 months
    What they received
    hemorrhoidal artery ligation techniques (HAL, Doppler-guided HAL, HAL with rectoanal repair, transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialisation)
    Compared with
    comparison among the different HAL technique variants (no non-surgical comparator)
    Main outcome
    long-term bowel control (incontinence) more than 6 months after the procedure
    Quality
    it combines only a small number of mixed-design studies (some retrospective) with inconsistent incontinence scoring, so the findings are not very reliable.
    Limitations
    small number of included studies (6), mix of retrospective and prospective designs, and no comparison to non-surgical treatment or to full hemorrhoidectomy.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population reporting continence >6 months after HAL-based procedures
    • intervention Haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HALO) and variants including Doppler-guided HAL (DG-HAL), HAL with rectoanal repair (HAL-RAR), and transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation (THD)
    • comparator Standard HAL showed 0/76 (0%) cases; THD had 1/104 (1.0%); DG-HAL had 7/293 (2.4%).
    • primaryOutcome This systematic review assessed prevalence, severity, and patterns of incontinence beyond six months post-procedure across HAL techniques.
    • result Seventeen (2.5%) of 671 patients developed postoperative faecal incontinence. Of these, 14 (82%) cases were mild (Wexner 1-4) and transient, resolving within 3-6 months; 3 (18%) were moderate (Wexner 5-8), primarily in HAL-RAR (9/158 [5.7%]).
    • n total n=671 patients

    Ir Med J · PMID 42348182 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Elhardello et al. 2026

    Laser hemorrhoidoplasty: two-year outcomes from a retrospective observational cohort study

    Good symptom relief, low pain, few recur.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    77 people2 years

    over 90% had complete symptom resolution at 1 year, 9.1% recurrence, minimal pain, 81% highly satisfied, one complication requiring surgery

    Who was studied
    adults over 18 with symptomatic hemorrhoids grade 2 to 4, mostly advanced (grade III or IV) with minimal to moderate prolapse
    What they received
    laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP), a minimally invasive laser procedure
    Compared with
    none - single group, no comparator treatment reported
    Main outcome
    symptom resolution, pain, recurrence, complications, and patient satisfaction after treatment
    Quality
    This was a retrospective study of one treatment group with no comparison group, and many patients were lost to follow-up by 2 years, so it can't show if laser treatment is better than other options.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design, no comparator group, substantial loss to follow-up by 2 years (only 33.8% seen), so cannot establish whether outcomes differ from no treatment or other options.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n LHP was carried out in 77 patients
    • population Inclusion criteria were an age above 18 years old, symptomatic haemorrhoids of grade 2 to 4 with minimal to moderate prolapse.
    • intervention Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP)
    • comparator LHP was carried out in 77 patients (83% of them had grade III or grade IV) treated over a two-year period.
    • primaryOutcome Post operative pain, recurrence of the disease, persistence of symptoms, complications, length of stay and patients' satisfaction were all documented.
    • result Over 90% of patients achieved complete and sustained symptom resolution over 1-year follow-up period, despite the predominance of advanced disease. Disease recurrence occurred in 9.1% of patients.
    • result Overall, 81% of patients were highly satisfied, and 90% reported satisfactory outcomes.
    • followUp 26 patients (33.8%) seen in 2 years.

    Lasers Med Sci · PMID 42337174 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Wu et al. 2026

    Cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy for bleeding-predominant grade III hemorrhoids: efficacy and risk factor analysis focusing on two dimensions of bleeding score

    Non-surgical injection reduced bleeding, but recurred often.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    82 people24 months

    96.3% effective for bleeding, 58.2% effective for prolapse, overall efficacy 85.4%; bleeding recurred in 25.3% over 24 months

    Who was studied
    patients with bleeding-predominant grade III internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (injection of polidocanol via long needle)
    Compared with
    none (single-arm study, before-after comparison)
    Main outcome
    improvement in hemorrhoid symptom severity, especially bleeding, at 3 months
    Quality
    This was a small single-arm retrospective study without a comparison group, so it cannot show how this treatment compares to surgery or other options.
    Limitations
    Single-arm retrospective observational study with no control or comparator group, and no randomization.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n This single-arm retrospective observational study included 82 patients with bleeding-predominant grade III internal HDs
    • population bleeding-predominant grade III symptomatic internal HDs
    • intervention Cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES) via a long needle
    • comparator This single-arm retrospective observational study included 82 patients
    • primaryOutcome Treatment efficacy was assessed at 3 months post-CAES using the conventional Hemorrhoid Disease Severity Score (HDSS; based on the frequency of symptoms, including bleeding)
    • result The overall efficacy rate was 85.4%. The effective rates for bleeding and prolapse symptoms were 96.3% and 58.2%, respectively.
    • result During a follow-up of 24 months, the bleeding recurrence rate was 25.3% (20/79).

    Tech Coloproctol · PMID 42323500 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Zayas-Bórquez et al. 2026

    What factors prolong symptoms in patients with hemorrhoidal disease who require surgery?

    Sex and age affected symptom duration, not surgery need.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    56 people2026

    men had symptoms for about 4.89 more years than women, and younger age at symptom onset was linked to longer symptom duration; constipation and BMI were not linked to symptom duration

    Who was studied
    patients who had surgery for hemorrhoidal disease
    What they received
    hemorrhoidectomy (surgical removal of hemorrhoids)
    Compared with
    no comparison group; factors like sex, age, smoking, constipation, BMI, and time to surgery were compared among the same surgical patients
    Main outcome
    how long patients had symptoms before surgery (years of disease)
    Quality
    this was a small, retrospective study of only surgery patients with no comparison to non-surgical treatment, so it cannot show whether surgery is needed or whether non-surgical care would work.
    Limitations
    retrospective, cross-sectional design in a single hospital, small sample size, and the authors state the study was not designed for causal inference or prediction

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n on 56 patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy (2019-2023)
    • population 56 patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy (2019-2023)
    • intervention 56 patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy (2019-2023)
    • comparator The factors of sex, age, smoking, constipation, BMI, and time to surgery were analyzed
    • primaryOutcome clinical and demographic factors associated with symptom duration in surgically treated patients
    • result men having a mean 4.89 more years of disease than women (β = -4.89, 95% CI -9.61 to -0.17)
    • result Factors traditionally considered relevant, such as constipation and BMI, showed no significant association
    • limitations A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted
    • limitations with no causal inference or predictive intent

    Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed) · PMID 42259698 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Gravante et al. 2026

    Early hemodynamic changes following endoscopic sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease assessed by transperineal ultrasound and their relationship with clinical outcomes

    Helps mild cases, not advanced ones.Prospective cohortLow quality

    37 people30 days

    Lower-grade hemorrhoids showed reduced blood flow and lasting symptom improvement; higher-grade hemorrhoids showed no blood flow change and symptoms worsened between 7 and 30 days

    Who was studied
    Patients with grade I-IV hemorrhoids treated with sclerotherapy
    What they received
    Endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerotherapy
    Compared with
    No separate control group; lower-grade vs higher-grade hemorrhoids compared
    Main outcome
    Changes in blood flow (ultrasound) and symptom scores after treatment
    Quality
    Small, short observational study with no control group, so it cannot prove the treatment itself caused the differences seen.
    Limitations
    Small sample size (37 patients), no control/comparison treatment group, short 30-day follow-up.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Thirty-seven patients completed follow-up.
    • population patients with Goligher grade I-IV HD treated with endoscopic PF sclerotherapy
    • intervention endoscopic PF sclerotherapy
    • comparator stratified by HD severity (Goligher I-II vs III-IV)
    • primaryOutcome Symptoms were evaluated using the PROM-HISS score.
    • result patients with lower-grade HD showed a significant reduction in PSV and RI at both 7 and 30 days (p < 0.01), indicating effective modulation of arterial inflow.
    • result In contrast, no significant changes in PSV or RI were observed in higher-grade HD, while EDV increased at 30 days (p = 0.012).
    • result PROM-HISS scores significantly improved in all patients at 7 days; however, symptom scores increased between 7 and 30 days in higher-grade HD.

    Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 42257743 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Long et al. 2026

    Effect of preoperative anemia on postoperative outcomes in mixed hemorrhoids: a retrospective observational study

    Anemia linked to more pain after surgery.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    127 people12 months

    patients with anemia before surgery had more pain and worse sleep in the first week after surgery, but no difference in bleeding, infection, healing time, or recurrence within a year

    Who was studied
    patients with mixed hemorrhoids who had surgery to remove them
    What they received
    having anemia before surgery
    Compared with
    not having anemia before surgery
    Main outcome
    pain, bleeding, infection, swelling, urinary retention, sleep quality, healing time, and recurrence after surgery
    Quality
    this was a retrospective single-center study looking at a risk factor rather than comparing surgery to non-surgical treatment, so it carries limited weight for this question
    Limitations
    retrospective observational design, single center, authors say findings are exploratory and need confirmation in larger studies with better statistical adjustment

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n A total of 127 patients with mixed hemorrhoids who underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
    • population patients with mixed hemorrhoids who underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
    • intervention 48 patients in the preoperative anemia group
    • comparator 79 patients in the preoperative non-anemia group
    • primaryOutcome Postoperative complications such as postoperative pain, delayed bleeding, wound infection, wound edema, urinary retention, insomnia severity index (ISI) within 7 days, wound healing time, and recurrence rates (prolapse or bleeding) within 12 months
    • result The visual analog scale pain scores at 12 h (P = 0.018), 1 day (P = 0.010), 3 days (P = 0.034), and 7 days (P = 0.001) after surgery and total analgesic consumption within 7 days (P = 0.036) in the preoperative anemia group were higher than those in the preoperative non-anemia group.
    • result There were no significant differences in delayed bleeding, wound infection, wound edema (P = 0.740), urinary retention (P = 0.648), anal stenosis, or wound healing time (P = 1.101) between the two groups.

    BMC Gastroenterol · PMID 42129663 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Rajendiran et al. 2026

    Feasibility and advantages of delivering radiofrequency ablation treatment for haemorrhoids under local anaesthesia in the outpatient setting in the UK: our initial experience

    Short-term relief; long-term benefit unclear.Prospective cohortLow quality

    53 people135 days

    all patients completed the procedure as outpatients with same-day discharge and no major complications; haemorrhoid symptoms and quality of life improved significantly at 2-4 months, but 11.3% needed later surgery and 12-month data were limited and inconclusive

    Who was studied
    adults with grade II-III haemorrhoids that had not responded to conservative treatment
    What they received
    radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for haemorrhoids performed under local anaesthesia in an outpatient clinic
    Compared with
    none - outcomes measured before and after treatment in the same patients, no comparison group
    Main outcome
    whether the procedure could be successfully completed as an outpatient under local anaesthesia
    Quality
    this was a small, single-group study without a comparison group and with major loss of follow-up by 12 months, so it cannot reliably show how long benefits last.
    Limitations
    no control/comparator group, small sample (only 11 patients had 12-month data), substantial attrition and symptom-driven follow-up at 12 months

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n In total, 53 patients were included in the study
    • population patients with grade II-III haemorrhoids refractory to conservative therapy
    • intervention radiofrequency ablation performed under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting
    • comparator We conducted a prospective evaluation of radiofrequency ablation performed under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting for patients with grade II-III haemorrhoids refractory to conservative therapy
    • primaryOutcome The primary outcome was the successful completion of procedure as outpatient.
    • result All procedures were completed under local anaesthesia with same-day discharge and no major complications.
    • result At 2-4 months, significant improvement in HSS was observed (mean difference 9.50; 95% CI 5.34-13.66; p < 0.001).
    • result In total, six patients (11.3%) required subsequent operative intervention.
    • followUp Median follow up was 135 days.

    Tech Coloproctol · PMID 42120648 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Baimanov et al. 2026

    Analysis of the quality of life of patients with haemorrhoids

    Better quality of life after surgery, but pain remained common.Case seriesLow qualityRelated question

    634 people2026

    most patients reported improved quality of life and no significant physical limitations after surgery, with no significant discomfort in 88% of cases, though moderate or mild pain persisted in 46% of patients

    Who was studied
    patients with hemorrhoids who underwent surgical treatment
    What they received
    surgical treatment of hemorrhoids
    Compared with
    no non-surgical comparison group; quality of life assessed after surgery
    Main outcome
    quality of life (physical, emotional, social aspects) related to hemorrhoids
    Quality
    This is a survey-based observational study with no comparison group and no mention of how patients were selected or followed over time, so it can't show whether surgery is better than non-surgical care.
    Limitations
    No non-surgical comparator group; relies on a modified sociological questionnaire; selection and recall bias possible; methodology for timing of assessment not described.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n The study involved 634 patients, most of whom were women (76.5%).
    • population patients with haemorrhoids
    • intervention surgical treatment of haemorrhoids
    • comparator the quality of life of patients improved significantly after surgery
    • primaryOutcome A modified sociological questionnaire was used to assess the physical, emotional and social aspects of respondents' lives.
    • result most respondents reported no significant limitations in physical activity, and it did not cause significant discomfort in 88% of cases, although moderate or mild pain persisted in 46% of patients

    Clin Ter · PMID 42047132 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Gallo et al. 2026

    Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy, mucopexy, and hybrid combination for grade III hemorrhoids: a large retrospective cohort study

    Comparing surgical techniques, not surgery vs no surgery.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    686 people2 years

    Mucopexy caused less early pain but had more recurrence long-term, while Milligan-Morgan had the lowest recurrence and best long-term outcomes

    Who was studied
    patients with symptomatic grade III hemorrhoids treated surgically
    What they received
    Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy, mucopexy, or a hybrid combination of both
    Compared with
    different surgical techniques compared against each other (mucopexy alone vs MM alone vs hybrid combinations)
    Main outcome
    recurrence rate and patient-reported outcomes at 2 years, plus pain and complications at 30 days
    Quality
    This is a retrospective study comparing surgical methods to each other, not surgery versus non-surgical treatment, so it can't directly answer whether surgery is needed at all.
    Limitations
    Retrospective analysis.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n A total of 686 consecutive patients with III-degree HD were included in the analysis.
    • population Symptomatic grade III HD treated between 2016 and 2018.
    • intervention Four groups were defined: group 1 included patients treated with MM alone; group 2 received mucopexy on one pile combined with MM on the remaining two; group 3 underwent mucopexy on two piles with MM on the remaining one; and group 4 was treated with mucopexy alone.
    • comparator This study compares MM, mucopexy, and hybrid MM/mucopexy procedures in patients with grade III hemorrhoidal disease (HD).
    • primaryOutcome Recurrence rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using a visual-analogic scale (VAS) at 2 years, postoperative pain at 7 days, early complication rates at 30 days, and PROMs at 30 days.
    • result Group 4 had the lowest pain scores and the highest 30-day PROM (p < 0.001), whereas group 1 showed the best long-term results, with the lowest recurrence rate (4.2% versus 14.5% in group 4) and highest long-term PROM.

    Tech Coloproctol · PMID 42026233 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Huang et al. 2026

    Evaluation of short-term outcomes of Endoscopic Super-Hemorrhoidal Banding for mixed hemorrhoids with prolapsed internal hemorrhoids: a retrospective study

    Less invasive surgery, similar cure, less pain.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    480 people2026

    Similar cure rates between groups, but ESHB had shorter operative time and hospital stay, less pain, and fewer urinary retention complications

    Who was studied
    patients with mixed hemorrhoids with Grade II-IV internal hemorrhoid prolapse
    What they received
    Endoscopic Super-Hemorrhoidal Banding (ESHB), a less invasive banding procedure
    Compared with
    Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (traditional surgical removal)
    Main outcome
    cure rate, operative time, hospital stay, pain, and complications
    Quality
    This was a retrospective study without randomization, comparing two surgical approaches rather than surgery versus no surgery, so it cannot show whether avoiding surgery altogether works.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design; only short-term follow-up; compares two surgical techniques rather than surgical versus nonsurgical treatment

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population patients with mixed hemorrhoids treated in our hospital from June 2021 to June 2024
    • population Grade II-IV internal hemorrhoid prolapse as the main symptom
    • intervention Endoscopic Super-hemorrhoidal Banding (ESHB)
    • comparator Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) as the control group
    • n 245 patients underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) and 235 patients underwent ESHB
    • result The cure rates were 69.36% in the ESHB group and 72.65% in the MMH group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05).
    • result The observation group had significantly shorter operative time and hospital stay (P < 0.01), lower postoperative anal pain scores and incidence of urinary retention (P < 0.01).
    • primaryOutcome Treatment outcomes included efficacy measurement, operative time, hospital stay, postoperative anal pain scores, and incidence of complications like bleeding and urinary retention were compared.

    BMC Surg · PMID 41987169 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Wang et al. 2026

    Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids versus tissue-selective therapy stapler for grade II-III hemorrhoids: an exploratory retrospective comparative study

    Similar success, RPH recovered fasterRetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    192 peopleone year

    No significant differences were found in the overall clinical efficacy or the one-year recurrence rate between the groups (p > 0.05)

    Who was studied
    adults with grade II-III hemorrhoids
    What they received
    Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids (RPH), a minimally invasive surgery
    Compared with
    tissue-selecting therapy (TST) stapler surgery
    Main outcome
    treatment effectiveness rate at one month and hemorrhoid recurrence rate within one year after surgery
    Quality
    It is a retrospective comparison of two surgeries with possible differences in patient selection, so it cannot reliably show one technique is better than the other.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design with potential baseline differences between groups; authors state findings cannot be directly interpreted as evidence of superiority of either technique.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population 192 patients with Grade II-III hemorrhoids
    • intervention 80 patients who underwent RPH
    • comparator 112 who underwent TST
    • primaryOutcome The primary outcomes were the treatment effectiveness rate at one month and the recurrence rate within one year postoperatively.
    • result No significant differences were found in the overall clinical efficacy or the one-year recurrence rate between the groups (p > 0.05).
    • n A retrospective analysis was conducted on 192 patients with Grade II-III hemorrhoids

    BMC Surg · PMID 41906143 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Bilgiç et al. 2026

    Clinical outcomes of arterial detection ligation technique for grade II/III versus grade IV hemorrhoidal disease

    Similar surgery outcomes across hemorrhoid severity.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    78 people1 month satisfaction assessment; recurrence follow-up duration not specified

    grade IV patients had more pain, more painkiller use, and slower bowel recovery right after surgery, but satisfaction at 1 month and recurrence rates were similar between the two groups

    Who was studied
    adults with grade II/III or grade IV hemorrhoids who had a minimally invasive surgical procedure
    What they received
    arterial detection ligation (ADL) with mucopexy in patients with grade IV hemorrhoids
    Compared with
    the same ADL-mucopexy procedure in patients with grade II/III hemorrhoids
    Main outcome
    pain after surgery and return of hemorrhoids (recurrence)
    Quality
    this was a small retrospective study comparing two groups who both had the same surgery, so it cannot say whether surgery is better than non-surgical treatment.
    Limitations
    retrospective design, small sample size, no non-surgical comparison group, short follow-up for recurrence

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Seventy-eight patients were included (grade II/III: n = 54; grade IV: n = 24).
    • population Patients were classified into grade II/III and grade IV groups according to the Goligher classification.
    • intervention ADL-mucopexy between July 2022 and March 2024 were retrospectively analyzed
    • comparator compared clinical outcomes of ADL-mucopexy between patients with grade II/III and grade IV HD
    • primaryOutcome Primary outcomes included postoperative pain and recurrence
    • result Despite these early differences, 1-month satisfaction scores were comparable between groups (8.8 vs 8.5). Recurrence was observed in 1 patient in each group during follow-up.

    Medicine (Baltimore) · PMID 41894272 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Yu et al. 2026

    Effectiveness and safety of 3% polidocanol foam sclerotherapy in hemorrhoidal disease: a multicenter, prospective study

    Similar cure rate to rubber band ligation.Prospective cohortLow quality

    222 people12 weeks

    similar cure rates between the two treatments (74.19% vs 83.13%, not statistically significant), with faster bleeding improvement in the sclerotherapy group

    Who was studied
    patients with grade I, II, or III hemorrhoids (internal or mixed type)
    What they received
    polidocanol foam sclerotherapy injection under anoscopy
    Compared with
    rubber band ligation
    Main outcome
    clinical cure rate under anoscopy and symptom assessment at 4 weeks
    Quality
    this was an observational study where patients chose their treatment rather than being randomly assigned, so differences between groups could be due to other factors.
    Limitations
    open-label, observational design with treatment assignment based on physician assessment and patient willingness rather than randomization

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n enrolled 222 patients
    • population patients with Goligher grade I, II, or III HD (internal or mixed)
    • intervention 3% polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (PFS) injection under anoscopy
    • comparator rubber band ligation (RBL)
    • primaryOutcome The primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate under anoscopy and clinical symptoms assessment at 4 weeks post-treatment.
    • result the clinical cure rate was 74.19% (69/93) in the PFS group and 83.13% (69/83) in the RBL group (P > 0.05)

    Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 41748745 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Zu et al. 2026

    Endoscopic rubber band ligation, injection sclerotherapy, and sclerobanding for the treatment of internal hemorrhoids

    Non-surgical options work, varying by severity.RetrospectiveLow quality

    201 people24 months

    ESB and ERBL had lower overall recurrence than IS; for grade II-III hemorrhoids, ESB had lower recurrence and less pain than IS and ERBL; no differences among groups within 6 months or for grade I hemorrhoids

    Who was studied
    patients with grade I-III internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL), injection sclerotherapy (IS), or endoscopic polidocanol sclerobanding (ESB)
    Compared with
    the three endoscopic treatments compared against each other
    Main outcome
    clinical efficacy, recurrence rates, and postoperative adverse events
    Quality
    This is a retrospective, non-randomized study comparing three procedures, so differences could be due to unmeasured factors rather than the treatments themselves.
    Limitations
    Retrospective cohort design without randomization.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n This retrospective cohort study was performed on 201 patients
    • population treating grade I-III internal hemorrhoids
    • intervention endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL), injection sclerotherapy (IS), and endoscopic polidocanol sclerobanding (ESB)
    • comparator who were grouped according to their endoscopic treatment (ERBL, IS, and ESB groups)
    • primaryOutcome The study analyzed clinical efficacy, short-term and overall recurrence rates, and postoperative adverse events.
    • result Both the ERBL and ESB groups demonstrated lower overall recurrence rates compared with the IS group (post-hoc analysis, P' = 0.024 and P' = 0.015, respectively).
    • result sclerotherapy resulted in a higher total recurrence rate than that achieved by sclerobanding (45.95% vs 19.57%, P' = 0.03), specifically for grade II-III internal hemorrhoids
    • result No significant differences were found among the three groups regarding clinical efficacy or recurrence rates within 6 months post-surgery, even when examined by subgroup.
    • followUp the longest follow-up extending to 24 months

    World J Gastroenterol · PMID 41693967 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Yin et al. 2026

    Preliminary Results of Open Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy Combined With 3% Polidocanol Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients With Grade IV Hemorrhoidal Disease: A Randomized Controlled Open-Label Single-Center Study

    Sclerotherapy added to surgery speeds recovery.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question

    36 people1 to 2 months

    Adding sclerotherapy to surgery shortened recovery time by about 5.78 days and reduced bleeding and pain medicine use, with similar satisfaction

    Who was studied
    adults aged 18 to 75 with grade IV hemorrhoids
    What they received
    Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy plus 3% polidocanol foam sclerotherapy
    Compared with
    Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy alone
    Main outcome
    time to return to daily activities
    Quality
    The trial was small, not blinded, done at one center, and followed patients for only a short time, so its findings are not very reliable.
    Limitations
    Small sample size, nonblinded, single-center design, and short follow-up period.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population Thirty-six patients aged 18 to 75 years with grade IV hemorrhoidal disease were enrolled and randomized equally to 2 groups.
    • intervention The experimental group underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy combined with 3% polidocanol foam sclerotherapy
    • comparator the control group underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy with no additional therapy.
    • primaryOutcome The primary outcome was the time to return to daily activities.
    • result The experimental group demonstrated a mean 5.78-day earlier return to normal activities and work than the control group (mean ± SD: 19.28 ± 8.35 vs 25.06 ± 7.85 days; 95% CI, -11.27 to -0.29 days; p = 0.04), reduced postoperative bleeding (0-3 scale; estimate -0.45; 95% CI, -0.72 to -0.16; p = 0.002), lower analgesic use (0-3 scale; estimate -0.38; 95% CI, -0.66 to -0.09; p = 0.009), and improved symptom scores at 1 to 2 months (Z -2.52 and -2.11, p < 0.05).
    • n Thirty-six patients aged 18 to 75 years with grade IV hemorrhoidal disease were enrolled and randomized equally to 2 groups.

    Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 41603644 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Lauricella et al. 2026

    Long-term outcomes of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: An updated systematic review, meta-analysis and trial-sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Stapled surgery recurs more than traditional surgery.Meta-analysisModerate qualityRelated question

    2,072 peopleminimum follow-up of 12 months

    Stapled surgery had a higher chance of hemorrhoids coming back, especially prolapse-type recurrence, but no difference in need for further treatment, pain, bowel function, or quality of life

    Who was studied
    adults with grade II-IV hemorrhoids undergoing surgery
    What they received
    stapled haemorrhoidopexy (a stapling surgery for hemorrhoids)
    Compared with
    conventional haemorrhoidectomy (traditional surgical removal of hemorrhoids)
    Main outcome
    long-term recurrence, need for repeat treatment, anal function, and quality of life
    Quality
    It pools many randomized trials, but the statistical power check shows there still aren't enough patients studied to be fully confident in the recurrence finding.
    Limitations
    Trial-sequential analysis showed the accumulated evidence did not reach the required sample size, and there was some variability (heterogeneity) across trials.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Seventeen RCTs including 1,041 SH and 1,031 CH patients were analysed.
    • population adult patients with grade II-IV haemorrhoids
    • intervention Stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH)
    • comparator conventional haemorrhoidectomy (CH)
    • primaryOutcome Primary outcomes included recurrence, reintervention, anal function, and quality of life (QoL).
    • result SH was associated with a higher risk of overall recurrence compared with CH (RR = 1.56,95%CI = 1.00-2.44;I2 = 48%).
    • result Prolapse-related recurrence was significantly more frequent after SH (RR = 3.28,95%CI = 1.49-7.25;I2 = 12%), whereas bleeding-related recurrence did not differ between groups
    • result No significant differences were found for reintervention, persistent anal pain, functional impairment or QoL.
    • followUp minimum follow-up of 12 months

    Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 41535511 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Hua et al. 2025

    Transverse incision with longitudinal ligation procedure: Innovation, pitfalls, and clinical perspectives

    Newer surgery technique, less pain, faster healing.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question

    size not given2025

    TILL showed less pain, quicker healing, and lower risk of anal stenosis than the standard surgery

    Who was studied
    people with hemorrhoids that have prolapsed all the way around the anus
    What they received
    a newer surgical technique called transverse incision with longitudinal ligation (TILL)
    Compared with
    the standard Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy surgery
    Main outcome
    short-term results including pain, healing time, and narrowing of the anus
    Quality
    This is a letter commenting on a single small retrospective study with short follow-up, not new research itself, so it carries very little weight.
    Limitations
    The letter notes the original study was retrospective, single-center, had a small sample size, and short follow-up, limiting generalizability and ability to assess recurrence.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population treating circumferential prolapsed hemorrhoids
    • intervention The transverse incision with longitudinal ligation (TILL) procedure is a new method for treating circumferential prolapsed hemorrhoids.
    • comparator better than the traditional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy for short-term results
    • primaryOutcome showing less pain, quicker healing, and lower risk of anal stenosis
    • result A study by Song et al found TILL to be better than the traditional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy for short-term results, showing less pain, quicker healing, and lower risk of anal stenosis.

    World J Gastroenterol · PMID 41480327 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Liao et al. 2025

    [Endoscopic rubber band ligation and injection therapy for grade I - III internal hemorrhoids: analysis of clinical efficacy and safety]

    Both non-surgical options worked similarly; side effects differed.RetrospectiveLow quality

    313 people3 months

    Cure/effective rates were similar between ERBL and EIS; EIS caused less pain and anal distension, but ERBL had a non-significant trend toward lower recurrence in grade III hemorrhoids; ERBL had significantly more complications (bleeding, urinary retention) than EIS

    Who was studied
    Adults with grade I-III internal hemorrhoids who had not improved with diet/medication and could not or would not have surgery
    What they received
    Endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL)
    Compared with
    Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS)
    Main outcome
    Treatment success (cure/effective rate) within 3 months after the procedure, plus recurrence, pain, and complications
    Quality
    This was a retrospective single-center study using statistical matching rather than a randomized trial, so differences between groups could still be due to unmeasured factors.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design, single center, propensity score matching used to balance groups, short follow-up for recurrence assessment

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n a total of 313 patients were included, including 200 in the ERBL group and 113 in the EIS group
    • population Patients diagnosed with symptomatic grade I-III internal hemorrhoids who failed conservative treatments such as diet adjustment and medication
    • population Patients who were unable or unwilling to receive surgical treatment due to multiple underlying systemic diseases
    • intervention endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL)
    • comparator endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS)
    • primaryOutcome Statistical analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the two groups within 3 months after the operation (χ²=0.858, P=0.651).
    • result The cure rates of the ERBL group and the EIS group were 64.0% (128/200) and 62.8% (71/113), respectively.
    • result Compared with the ERBL group, the EIS group had a lower pain score on the first day after operation [0 (0, 0) vs. 1 (0, 3), Z=-8.211, P<0.001] and a lower incidence of anal distension [25.7% (29/113) vs. 61.5% (123/200), χ²=37.122, P<0.001], with statistically significant differences.
    • result The total incidence of complications in the ERBL group was significantly higher than that in the EIS group [29.5% (59/200) vs. 4.4% (5/113), χ²=27.910, P<0.001]
    • result in grade III internal hemorrhoids, the recurrence rate of the ERBL group was lower than that of the EIS group [22.2% (10/45) vs. 45.8% (11/24), χ²=4.121, P=0.042]. Still, the difference was not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction (χ²=4.121, corrected P>0.025).

    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi · PMID 41397826 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Xiang et al. 2025

    The effect of endoscopic polidocanol carbon dioxide foam for internal hemorrhoids: a retrospective study

    Fewer side effects, similar success rate.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    158 people1 month

    Similar effectiveness between groups, but carbon dioxide foam caused fewer cases of anal pain and swelling

    Who was studied
    patients with internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    endoscopic polidocanol carbon dioxide foam sclerotherapy
    Compared with
    endoscopic polidocanol air foam sclerotherapy
    Main outcome
    treatment success and complications one month after treatment
    Quality
    This was a retrospective, non-randomized study comparing two foam types, not surgery versus no surgery, so it only indirectly addresses whether hemorrhoids need surgery.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design, non-randomized, compares two non-surgical sclerotherapy techniques rather than surgery vs no surgery.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n A retrospective analysis was conducted on 158 patients who received endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for internal hemorrhoids between October 2022 and September 2023.
    • population 158 patients who received endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for internal hemorrhoids
    • intervention 80 received polidocanol carbon dioxide foam (study group)
    • comparator 78 underwent endoscopic polidocanol sclerotherapy with polidocanol air foam (control group)
    • primaryOutcome The primary outcomes of this study were clinical effect and the incidence of complications 1 month after surgery.
    • result The study group exhibited significantly fewer patients with anal pain and anal swelling compared to the control group (P < 0.05), and importantly, no severe complications were observed.
    • result Both groups exhibited comparable clinical effects, surgical costs, hospitalization durations, and dosages of polidocanol, with no statistically significant differences observed (all P > 0.05).

    PeerJ · PMID 41282992 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Dai et al. 2026

    Flexible endoscopic treatment of internal hemorrhoids with versus without intravenous anesthesia: a retrospective study of 559 cases

    Non-surgical endoscopic treatment works well either way.RetrospectiveLow quality

    559 people2026

    anesthesia group had shorter procedure times and lower retreatment rates, with similar symptom improvement and satisfaction between groups

    Who was studied
    patients with grade II-III internal hemorrhoids undergoing endoscopic treatment
    What they received
    endoscopic hemorrhoid treatment (rubber band ligation or sclerotherapy) with intravenous anesthesia
    Compared with
    same endoscopic treatment without anesthesia
    Main outcome
    procedure time, retreatment rate, symptom improvement, discomfort, satisfaction, and cost
    Quality
    This was a retrospective, non-randomized comparison, so differences between groups could be due to factors other than anesthesia.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design; not randomized

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n retrospectively analyzed 559 patients
    • population Flexible endoscopic therapies are effective for grade II-III internal hemorrhoids
    • intervention endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL) or polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (EPFS)
    • comparator Patients were stratified by anesthesia modality (intravenous propofol vs. no anesthesia)
    • primaryOutcome Primary outcomes included procedure time, retreatment rate, symptom improvement, postoperative discomfort, patient satisfaction, total cost, and cost acceptance.
    • result The anesthesia group had shorter procedure times (median 10.5 vs. 11.3 min, P = 0.036) and a lower retreatment rate (1.3% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.003). Rates of symptom improvement (83.1% vs. 82.7%, P = 0.940), postoperative discomfort, and patient satisfaction were comparable.

    Surg Endosc · PMID 41269316 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Chen 2026

    Global knowledge mapping and technological evolution in hemorrhoid therapy: a multi-tool bibliometric analysis

    No treatment outcome data reportedNarrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question

    size not given2026

    describes a steady increase in publications, identifies core research areas (banding, surgery, laser), and notes an emerging trend toward minimally invasive and outpatient techniques, but reports no clinical outcome data comparing treatments

    Who was studied
    published research literature on hemorrhoidal disease treatment
    What they received
    not a treatment study; maps research trends in hemorrhoid therapy literature
    Compared with
    not applicable
    Main outcome
    patterns and trends in published research on hemorrhoid therapy
    Quality
    this is a bibliometric mapping of published literature, not a clinical study comparing treatments, so it cannot show whether surgery or non-surgical treatment works better
    Limitations
    abstract states 'comprehensive analyses mapping its research landscape...are lacking' and notes 'key knowledge gaps persist in long-term efficacy comparisons and standardized guideline development', indicating no actual patient outcome data was analyzed

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population A total of 2764 relevant publications were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC).
    • intervention characterize the knowledge structure, collaborative networks, research hotspots, and emerging trends in hemorrhoid therapy over the past two decades
    • comparator Core research domains identified through keyword co-occurrence and clustering included Rubber Band Ligation (RBL), hemorrhoidectomy (Milligan-Morgan, Ferguson, stapled), laser therapy, pain management, postoperative complications, and quality of life.
    • primaryOutcome Analyses included publication trends, country/institutional contributions, author/institutional collaboration networks, journal co-citation analysis, keyword co-occurrence/clustering, thematic evolution, and burst detection.
    • result It confirms the established role of conventional surgical techniques while identifying a clear shift towards minimally invasive procedures and outpatient management.
    • limitations Key knowledge gaps persist in long-term efficacy comparisons and standardized guideline development.

    Updates Surg · PMID 41266707 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Egawa et al. 2026

    Hemorrhoids

    Review of treatment options, no results given.Narrative reviewVery low quality

    size not given2026

    The abstract does not report a specific outcome result, only that a review of treatment options is presented

    Who was studied
    People with hemorrhoid disease
    What they received
    Surgical and nonoperative treatments for hemorrhoids
    Compared with
    Comparison between different treatment options
    Main outcome
    Not clearly stated
    Quality
    This is a narrative review describing treatment options without presenting study data or outcomes to judge effectiveness.
    Limitations
    Abstract does not report study methodology, data, or specific outcome results; it is a general review.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population Hemorrhoid disease is common in the Western world
    • intervention Numerous treatments are available, including surgical and nonoperative options.
    • comparator Numerous treatments are available, including surgical and nonoperative options.
    • primaryOutcome The authors present a review of the disease pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment options for hemorrhoid disease.
    • result The authors present a review of the disease pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment options for hemorrhoid disease.

    Surg Clin North Am · PMID 41241446 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Wang et al. 2025

    Comparative effectiveness and recurrence rates of endoscopic sclerotherapy, ligation, and combined therapy for grades I-III internal hemorrhoids

    Non-surgical treatments worked well without surgery.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    253 people2025

    all three treatments were effective (90.6%-95.8%), with combined therapy having the highest efficacy and lowest recurrence rate

    Who was studied
    patients with grade I-III internal hemorrhoids treated at one hospital
    What they received
    endoscopic sclerotherapy, rubber band ligation, or combined ligation-sclerotherapy (non-surgical endoscopic treatments)
    Compared with
    the three endoscopic treatment methods compared against each other
    Main outcome
    treatment effectiveness within 3 months and symptom recurrence after 3 months
    Quality
    this was a retrospective, single-center study without a surgical comparison group, so it can't say how these treatments stack up against surgery.
    Limitations
    retrospective design; no surgical or untreated comparison group; unequal group sizes; single center

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n A total of 253 patients were included
    • population grades I - III internal hemorrhoids
    • intervention endoscopic sclerotherapy (ES), endoscopic rubber band ligation (RBL), and combined ligation - sclerotherapy (CT)
    • comparator Patients were divided into ES, RBL, and CT groups.
    • primaryOutcome Efficacy was assessed within 3 months post-treatment, and recurrence was defined as symptom reappearance > 3 months post-treatment.
    • result the efficacy rate was 90.6% (95/107) for ES, 92.6% (113/122) for RBL, and 95.8% (23/24) for CT
    • result CT had the lowest rate (4.3% [1/23]), followed by RBL (9.7% [11/113]) and ES (11.6% [11/95])

    BMC Surg · PMID 41239416 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Bharucha et al. 2026

    An Evidence-Based Practical Review on Common Benign Anorectal Disorders: Hemorrhoids, Anal Fissure, Dyssynergic Defecation, and Fecal Incontinence

    Mild cases treated without surgery; severe cases need surgery.Narrative reviewLow qualityRelated question

    size not given2026

    Treatment is applied stepwise, starting with conservative therapy (e.g., rubber band ligation for grade I-II hemorrhoids), with surgery reserved for more severe disease

    Who was studied
    people with hemorrhoids and other common anorectal problems
    What they received
    conservative treatments such as rubber band ligation for milder hemorrhoids, with surgery reserved for severe cases
    Compared with
    surgery (excisional hemorrhoidectomy) versus non-surgical treatment
    Main outcome
    how hemorrhoids are treated depending on severity
    Quality
    This is a general narrative review describing usual practice, not a study comparing treatments head-to-head.
    Limitations
    Covers multiple unrelated anorectal conditions broadly rather than focusing specifically on hemorrhoid treatment outcomes; no study design, sample size, or comparative data given.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population hemorrhoids, chronic anal fissures, dyssynergic defecation (DD), and fecal incontinence (FI)
    • intervention starting with conservative therapy with simpler treatments when feasible (eg, rubber band ligation for grade I-II hemorrhoids), with surgery, usually excisional hemorrhoidectomy, being reserved for more severe disease
    • comparator with surgery, usually excisional hemorrhoidectomy, being reserved for more severe disease
    • primaryOutcome Treatments are applied stepwise, starting with conservative therapy with simpler treatments when feasible
    • result Treatments are applied stepwise, starting with conservative therapy with simpler treatments when feasible (eg, rubber band ligation for grade I-II hemorrhoids), with surgery, usually excisional hemorrhoidectomy, being reserved for more severe disease

    Gastroenterology · PMID 41236452 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Guimarães et al. 2026

    Office-based treatments for hemorrhoidal disease grades I-III ‒ Comparing rubber band ligation and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy

    Banding works better; sclerotherapy is safer.RetrospectiveLow quality

    441 people2026

    Rubber band ligation led to symptom resolution more often than foam sclerotherapy, but caused more side effects

    Who was studied
    Patients with hemorrhoids (grades I-III) treated in an outpatient clinic
    What they received
    Rubber band ligation (RBL)
    Compared with
    Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (PFS)
    Main outcome
    Whether the hemorrhoid symptoms resolved after treatment (clinical success)
    Quality
    This was a retrospective study without randomization, so differences between groups could be due to other factors, not just the treatment.
    Limitations
    Retrospective cohort design (not randomized), so treatment groups may have differed in ways that affected results.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • design this retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with HD treated with RBL and/or PFS between January 2015 and April 2024
    • n in total, 441 patients were included
    • population office-based treatments for hemorrhoidal disease (HD) are recommended when medical management fails
    • intervention Both, rubber band ligation (RBL) and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (PFS) can be used
    • comparator This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of PFS versus RBL
    • primaryOutcome The outcomes were clinical success (CS), relapse, relapse-free survival (RFS) and treatment failure (TF)
    • result Patients treated with RBL were significantly more effective in achieving CS (78.6 % vs 58.1 %, p < .001, phi = .205).
    • result patients treated with RBL appeared more likely to achieve CS, while PFS showed a more favorable safety profile.

    Rev Esp Enferm Dig · PMID 41128083 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • de Oliveira et al. 2026

    Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty for Grade III Hemorrhoidal Disease: Safety and Efficacy in a Brazilian Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

    Pain and symptoms improved after laser treatment.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    100 people1 year

    pain peaked at day 7 then nearly resolved by day 14 and stayed low up to a year, symptoms disappeared by day 30, and most complications were mild

    Who was studied
    adults with symptomatic grade III hemorrhoids
    What they received
    laser hemorrhoidoplasty (a minimally invasive laser procedure)
    Compared with
    none; single-group study with no comparison treatment
    Main outcome
    pain levels, hemorrhoid symptoms, and complications after treatment
    Quality
    this was a retrospective study of one treatment group with no comparison to surgery or other options, so it can't show whether laser treatment works better or worse than alternatives.
    Limitations
    retrospective design, no control or comparison group, and nearly half of patients had some complication over follow-up

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n This multicenter retrospective cohort included 100 patients
    • population 100 patients with symptomatic grade III hemorrhoids treated with LHP
    • intervention Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to excisional hemorrhoidectomy
    • comparator This multicenter retrospective cohort included 100 patients with symptomatic grade III hemorrhoids treated with LHP across six Brazilian centers
    • primaryOutcome Primary outcomes were postoperative pain (Visual Analog Scale-VAS), proctological symptoms (Proctological Symptoms Scale-PSS), and complications.
    • result Median VAS peaked at 3.0 on day 7 and declined to near-complete remission by day 14, remaining minimal up to 1 year. PSS scores improved in parallel, reaching zero from day 30. The 30-day complication rate averaged 19.7%, peaking at 27% on day 14, with a cumulative per-patient rate of 44%.

    Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg · PMID 41091564 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Wang et al. 2025

    Modified sclerobanding versus rubber band ligation for grade II/III hemorrhoidal disease: a retrospective study

    Less bleeding, fewer recurrences than standard bandingRetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    307 peopleOne-year follow-up

    the new combined method had no cases of delayed major bleeding and lower rates of recurrence and treatment failure than standard banding

    Who was studied
    patients with grade II or III hemorrhoids
    What they received
    modified sclerobanding (rubber band ligation plus polidocanol foam sclerotherapy)
    Compared with
    traditional rubber band ligation alone
    Main outcome
    rate of treatment failure and delayed major bleeding after the procedure
    Quality
    it was a retrospective, non-randomized comparison of two office procedures, so bias and confounding can't be ruled out.
    Limitations
    retrospective design, baseline differences between groups (anticoagulant history, hospital stay), not a comparison to actual surgery

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population patients with grade II/III HD who underwent RBL
    • intervention modified sclerobanding (mSB) procedure, which combines rubber band ligation (RBL) with 3% polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (PFS)
    • comparator traditional RBL
    • primaryOutcome The primary outcomes assessed were treatment failure rates and the incidence of delayed massive bleeding (DMB)
    • result The mSB group had no cases of delayed major bleeding, compared to five cases in the RBL group. The recurrence (6.8% vs. 17.0%) and treatment failure (6.8% vs. 18.6%) rates were significantly lower in the mSB group (P < 0.05).
    • n Among the 307 patients, 162 received mSB and 125 underwent traditional RBL.
    • followUp One-year follow-up revealed no significant differences in the HDSS, SHS-HD, or PS.

    Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 41047429 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Suzuki 2025

    Combined therapy of HIFU rectoanal lifting (HIFU-RAL) and sclerotherapy for prolapsed hemorrhoids and rectal mucosal prolapse: A case series

    Prolapse reduced, no complications seen.Case seriesVery low quality

    10 peoplemedian: 16.0 months

    prolapse was visibly reduced or resolved in all cases right after treatment, with no complications or recurrence during follow-up

    Who was studied
    adults with prolapsed hemorrhoids or rectal mucosal prolapse causing discomfort
    What they received
    combined HIFU rectoanal lifting procedure plus sclerotherapy injection
    Compared with
    none (single-arm case series, before-and-after comparison)
    Main outcome
    whether prolapse was reduced or resolved and whether problems recurred or caused complications
    Quality
    only 10 patients with no comparison group, so it cannot show whether this works better than other treatments.
    Limitations
    Very small number of patients (10), no control group, no randomization, and no comparison to surgery or other nonsurgical treatments.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n This case series included 10 symptomatic patients, consisting of 5 men and 5 women.
    • population Clinical examination identified 8 cases of prolapsed hemorrhoids (Goligher grade III-IV) and 2 cases of rectal mucosal prolapse.
    • intervention we applied a transanal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) technique, namely HIFU rectal lifting (HIFU-RAL), combined with aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA) sclerotherapy for treating prolapsed hemorrhoids
    • comparator The combined efficacy of HIFU-RAL and ALTA sclerotherapy was evaluated over time.
    • primaryOutcome In all cases, the prolapsed lesions were visibly reduced or resolved immediately after the procedure.
    • result In all cases, the prolapsed lesions were visibly reduced or resolved immediately after the procedure. During the follow-up period (median: 16.0 months; interquartile range: 10.5-25.8 months), no adverse events or recurrences were observed.
    • followUp median: 16.0 months; interquartile range: 10.5-25.8 months

    Medicine (Baltimore) · PMID 40922264 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Al Jnainati et al. 2025

    Outcomes of embolization therapy of superior rectal arteries for the management of grade 1 to 3 internal hemorrhoids: a systematic Review of clinical studies

    Artery-blocking procedure eases hemorrhoid bleeding safely.Systematic reviewLow quality

    810 people2025

    Procedure succeeded technically 93-100% of the time; symptoms improved in 63-94% of patients; side effects were mild (pelvic discomfort, nausea, low fever) with no serious injury; hemorrhoids recurred in 8-20% of patients

    Who was studied
    Adults with grade 1 to 3 internal hemorrhoids who didn't respond to office treatments or who wanted to avoid surgery
    What they received
    Embolization of the superior rectal artery (a catheter procedure called "Emborrhoid") to block blood flow to hemorrhoids
    Compared with
    Mostly no direct comparator (single-arm case series); a couple of small studies compared it to rubber-band ligation or sclerotherapy
    Main outcome
    Whether the procedure worked technically, whether symptoms (especially bleeding) improved, side effects, and whether hemorrhoids came back
    Quality
    The studies were too different to combine into one solid answer, were mostly small single-center case series without a comparison group, and only two small studies directly compared this treatment to others.
    Limitations
    Substantial heterogeneity blocked meta-analysis; small single-center cohorts, disparate techniques, and scarce head-to-head trials limit external validity

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Twenty-two studies encompassing 810 procedures qualified.
    • population Superior rectal artery embolization ("Emborrhoid") offers a catheter-based alternative for grade I-III internal hemorrhoids when office therapies fail or surgery is undesirable.
    • intervention Superior rectal artery embolization ("Emborrhoid") offers a catheter-based alternative for grade I-III internal hemorrhoids
    • comparator Only two small, heterogeneous comparative studies versus rubber-band ligation or sclerotherapy were available, precluding a pooled analysis.
    • primaryOutcome Prespecified outcomes were technical success, clinical success (≥ 2-point fall in bleeding score or equivalent), adverse events, and recurrence.
    • result Technical success reached 93-100%. Clinical success ranged from 63 to 94%, yielding marked bleeding control and symptom relief.
    • result Recurrence necessitating repeat treatment affected 8-20% of patients, usually when collateral arterial supply persisted.
    • limitations Substantial heterogeneity blocked meta-analysis; results were narratively synthesized.
    • limitations Yet small single-center cohorts, disparate techniques, and scarce head-to-head trials limit external validity.

    Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 40877526 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Zhu et al. 2025

    Multicenter analysis of the efficacy and factors related to recurrence of endoscopic sclerotherapy for internal hemorrhoids: a large-sample, retrospective cohort study

    Injection treatment worked well, low recurrenceRetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    1,147 people3 to 49 months (mean: 25.61 ± 13.23 months)

    92.85% treatment success; 12.21% recurrence, with higher BMI, lack of exercise linked to more recurrence and lower hemorrhoid grade, working position, diet linked to less recurrence

    Who was studied
    patients with internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    endoscopic sclerotherapy (an injection treatment, non-surgical)
    Compared with
    none (single-group outcome and recurrence analysis)
    Main outcome
    treatment success and recurrence rate of hemorrhoids
    Quality
    This was a retrospective study without a comparison group, so it can't directly prove sclerotherapy is better than surgery or no treatment.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design, no control/comparison group, multiple centers may differ in practice, and follow-up time varied widely (3 to 49 months).

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population patients with internal hemorrhoids treated with endoscopic sclerotherapy
    • intervention endoscopic sclerotherapy
    • comparator A retrospective analysis of patients with internal hemorrhoids treated with endoscopic sclerotherapy at three centers
    • primaryOutcome assess hemorrhoid grading, treatment efficacy, complications, and recurrence rates
    • result The overall effective rate was 92.85% (1065/1147).
    • result The overall recurrence rate was 12.21% (130/1065)
    • result higher BMI and lack of exercise were associated with increased recurrence (p < 0.05), while lower hemorrhoid grade, working position, and dietary habits were protective factors (p < 0.05)
    • n A total of 1147 patients underwent the procedure
    • followUp follow-up periods ranging from 3 to 49 months (mean: 25.61 ± 13.23 months)

    Surg Endosc · PMID 40856750 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Docter et al. 2025

    Pediatric external hemorrhoids: clinical characteristics and outcomes of conservative treatment versus injection sclerotherapy

    Both options worked, but sclerotherapy had risks.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    44 people2025

    sclerotherapy resolved symptoms in most after 1-2 injections but caused skin erosion in over a third; conservative treatment resolved symptoms within a year though lesions persisted

    Who was studied
    children with external hemorrhoids
    What they received
    injection sclerotherapy
    Compared with
    conservative watchful waiting
    Main outcome
    symptom resolution and complications
    Quality
    This was a small, retrospective study without randomization, so it cannot reliably prove one treatment is better.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design, no randomization, small sample, diagnosis often based on parent photographs rather than exam.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Forty-four patients (86.4% male) were included.
    • population pediatric patients treated with conservative therapy (watchful waiting) or injection sclerotherapy for external hemorrhoids
    • intervention injection sclerotherapy
    • comparator conservative therapy (watchful waiting)
    • primaryOutcome treatment outcomes, and complications
    • result Thirty-one patients (70.5%) underwent injection sclerotherapy, with a 69.2% success rate after one, and 90.3% after two injections. Thirteen patients (29.5%) were treated conservatively with watchful waiting, with symptoms resolving within one year, although the lesion(s) persisted. Skin erosion occurred in 35.5% of patients treated with injection sclerotherapy, leading to constipation and defecation anxiety in 9.1% of patients.

    Eur J Pediatr · PMID 40813828 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Hajjar et al. 2025

    Safety of Hemorrhoid Procedures in Patients Who Are Immunocompromised: The Mayo Clinic Experience

    Hemorrhoid surgery seemed safe despite immunosuppression.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    55 people2025

    25% of patients had an adverse event, including 3 cases of cellulitis; no cases of pelvic sepsis or need for IV antibiotics

    Who was studied
    adults with hemorrhoids who were immunocompromised (mostly due to medications)
    What they received
    office-based or surgical procedures for hemorrhoids performed while immunosuppressed
    Compared with
    none (no comparison group; outcomes described within this treated group)
    Main outcome
    infection or wound complications after the procedure
    Quality
    This was a small, retrospective single-center study without a comparison group, so it can only suggest safety, not prove it.
    Limitations
    The retrospective nature of the study and the heterogeneity of the study population.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Fifty-five immunocompromised patients, with a median age of 60 years, underwent a total of 68 hemorrhoidal procedures
    • population Adult patients were included who had hemorrhoidal disease and primarily medication-induced immunosuppression
    • intervention undergoing an office-based procedure or operative intervention for hemorrhoidal disease while on immunosuppression
    • comparator Retrospective medical record review.
    • primaryOutcome The primary outcome was the development of infectious complications or wound complications.
    • result Sixteen adverse events were reported in 14 patients (25%). Three cases of postoperative cellulitis were documented after thrombosed external hemorrhoid excision, hemorrhoidopexy, and Whitehead hemorrhoidectomy. No postoperative intravenous antibiotics were administered. No cases of pelvic sepsis were documented.
    • limitations The retrospective nature of the study and the heterogeneity of the study population.

    Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 40810375 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Tutino et al. 2025

    Haemorrhoidal artery ligation: Is Doppler guidance useful? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Doppler guidance did not reduce recurrence.Meta-analysisModerate qualityRelated question

    514 people2025

    Doppler-guided ligation had a higher recurrence rate than non-Doppler ligation, with similar pain levels; when combined with mucopexy, no difference was found between the two

    Who was studied
    adults with hemorrhoids of different severity levels undergoing minimally invasive artery ligation surgery
    What they received
    hemorrhoidal artery ligation guided by Doppler ultrasound (DG-HAL)
    Compared with
    hemorrhoidal artery ligation without Doppler guidance (HAL)
    Main outcome
    recurrence of hemorrhoids after the procedure
    Quality
    It pools seven randomized trials totaling only 514 patients, which strengthens the evidence but the trials themselves were likely small and varied in technique.
    Limitations
    The abstract does not detail heterogeneity between trials, blinding, or long-term follow-up duration.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n They included 514 patients (mean age 49.13 years, 46% men) with different haemorrhoidal degrees.
    • population They included 514 patients (mean age 49.13 years, 46% men) with different haemorrhoidal degrees.
    • intervention DG-HAL in 259 patients
    • comparator The HAL technique was performed in 255 patients
    • primaryOutcome The primary aim of this study was to find evidence that the use of Doppler guidance reduces the risk of recurrence.
    • result The meta-analysis revealed that the DG-HAL procedure was associated with a significant risk of recurrence (P = 0.007) and similar postoperative pain (P = 0.623) compared to the HAL procedure. In a subgroup analysis of patients treated with a combined RAR procedure, no differences were found between the DG-HAL-RAR and HAL-RAR regarding the risk of recurrence (P = 0.36) and postoperative pain (P = 0.31).

    Colorectal Dis · PMID 40665575 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Huang et al. 2025

    Tissue selecting therapy stapler minimally invasive surgery to treat severe hemorrhoids

    Less invasive surgery option, fewer complications.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question

    141 peopleThree months after surgery

    TST had higher effectiveness rate, shorter hospital stay and operation time, less blood loss, and fewer complications than PPH or EPH

    Who was studied
    patients with severe hemorrhoids
    What they received
    tissue selecting therapy (TST) stapler surgery
    Compared with
    PPH surgery and EPH (rubber band ligation and staple) surgery
    Main outcome
    treatment effectiveness, complications, and anal muscle function after surgery
    Quality
    although randomized, the abstract gives no detail on blinding, how randomization was concealed, or loss to follow-up, and all three compared groups are surgical, so it says nothing about non-surgical treatment.
    Limitations
    Abstract does not report blinding, dropout, or long-term follow-up beyond 3 months; all compared treatments are surgical, not non-surgical options.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n 141 patients with severe hemorrhoids were included into three groups
    • population patients with severe hemorrhoids
    • intervention tissue-selective therapy stapler (TST) minimally invasive surgery
    • comparator the PPH group, and the eastern rubber band ligation and coincident of dislocation for prolapse and hemorrhoid (EPH)group
    • primaryOutcome clinical efficacy of the three groups of patients, changes in hospital stay time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and anal dynamic indicators
    • result The total effective rate in the TST group was 93.62%, which was higher than the 74.47% and 72.34% in the PPH and EPH groups, respectively, after treatment.
    • result the complication rate in the TST group was 10.64%, which was lower than the 27.66% and 31.91% reported in the PPH and EPH groups, respectively.

    BMC Surg · PMID 40634906 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Schwandner 2025

    [Hemorrhoidal disease and stage-dependent treatment (including anal prolapse)]

    Mild cases treated without surgery; severe cases need it.Narrative reviewLow quality

    size not given2025

    early-stage hemorrhoids respond to conservative and interventional treatments, while advanced stages need surgery or minimally invasive procedures

    Who was studied
    people with hemorrhoids at different stages, including anal prolapse
    What they received
    non-surgical treatments (conservative care, sclerotherapy, rubber band ligation) and minimally invasive procedures
    Compared with
    conventional surgical hemorrhoidectomy
    Main outcome
    symptom control and avoiding recurrence
    Quality
    this is a general review of treatment approaches without original study data, patient numbers, or outcome statistics.
    Limitations
    no study design, patient numbers, or comparative outcome data are given; it is a narrative overview rather than a study of outcomes.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population The treatment of hemorrhoidal disease is carried out depending on the symptoms and stage of the disease.
    • intervention conservative and interventional treatment options (including sclerotherapy, rubber band ligation) are indicated in early stages (stages I and II)
    • comparator surgical procedures are effective treatment options for advanced hemorrhoidal disease (stages III and IV)
    • primaryOutcome The ultimate goal of all treatment strategies for hemorrhoidal disease is symptom control and long-term absence of recurrence.
    • result Although conservative and interventional treatment options (including sclerotherapy, rubber band ligation) are indicated in early stages (stages I and II), surgical procedures are effective treatment options for advanced hemorrhoidal disease (stages III and IV).

    Chirurgie (Heidelb) · PMID 40586790 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • di Schiano di Visconte 2025

    Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty: Procedure, Outcomes and Future Directions

    Less pain, but worse for severe cases.Narrative reviewVery low quality

    size not given2025

    Laser treatment reduced pain and recovery time but had higher recurrence rates, especially for the worst-graded hemorrhoids, where surgery worked better long-term

    Who was studied
    people with hemorrhoids of different severity grades
    What they received
    laser hemorrhoidoplasty (a laser-based procedure for hemorrhoids)
    Compared with
    traditional excisional surgery for hemorrhoids
    Main outcome
    effectiveness, safety, and long-term outcomes of the laser procedure
    Quality
    This is a general review discussing the topic without describing a systematic search method or pooling of data, so it carries little weight as evidence.
    Limitations
    The abstract does not describe how studies were selected or analyzed, and does not report specific numbers, making it hard to judge the strength of the claims.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population treatment of hemorrhoidal disease (HD)
    • population across different grades of hemorrhoids
    • intervention Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP)
    • comparator compared with traditional surgical methods
    • comparator excisional methods remain superior for managing advanced HD
    • primaryOutcome critically evaluated the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of LHP
    • result offering advantages such as reduced postoperative pain, shorter recovery time, and improved patient satisfaction
    • result higher recurrence rates, especially for Grade IV HD, remain a clinical limitation
    • result excisional methods remain superior for managing advanced HD, particularly in terms of long-term symptom resolution

    ANZ J Surg · PMID 40586452 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Martins et al. 2026

    Operative versus nonoperative treatment of thrombosed external hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Surgery lowers recurrence, same bleeding risk.Meta-analysisModerate quality

    851 people2026

    surgery had lower recurrence risk but similar bleeding risk compared to conservative treatment

    Who was studied
    patients with thrombosed external hemorrhoids
    What they received
    surgical treatment (excision)
    Compared with
    conservative (nonoperative) treatment
    Main outcome
    recurrence and bleeding risk
    Quality
    it pools six studies with moderate-to-high heterogeneity and the abstract does not describe the quality or randomization of the included trials.
    Limitations
    heterogeneity between studies (I2 up to 60%) and the abstract does not specify study designs included

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n We included six studies with a total of 851 patients, of whom 390 (45.8%) underwent surgical treatment.
    • population Thrombosed external hemorrhoids are a complication of hemorrhoids characterized by severe pain, swelling, and lump formation due to acute venous engorgement.
    • intervention Surgical treatment was associated with a lower risk of recurrence compared to conservative management
    • comparator comparing surgery with conservative treatment in thrombosed external hemorrhoids
    • primaryOutcome Surgical treatment was associated with a lower risk of recurrence compared to conservative management (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.91; P < 0.05; I2 = 54%).
    • result there were no significant differences in the risk of bleeding between the groups (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.27-3.44; P = 0.95; I2 = 60%)

    Updates Surg · PMID 40576944 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Zhang et al. 2025

    The Comparison Between Endoscopic Ligation and Sclerotherapy on the Treatment Effect and Anorectal Function in Patients With Internal Hemorrhoids

    Both non-surgical methods worked similarly well.Prospective cohortLow qualityRelated question

    32 people3-month follow-up

    no significant difference in treatment effect of postoperative bleeding, prolapse, constipation, and complications between the 2 groups, though each method showed certain advantages in specific measures

    Who was studied
    patients with internal hemorrhoids undergoing minimally invasive endoscopic treatment
    What they received
    endoscopic ligation
    Compared with
    cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES)
    Main outcome
    treatment effect, symptom relief, complications, psychological condition, and anorectal function
    Quality
    Small, non-randomized comparison of only 32 patients with short 3-month follow-up limits confidence in the findings.
    Limitations
    Small sample size, no mention of randomization, short follow-up period of only 3 months.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Thirty-two patients who underwent minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for internal hemorrhoids were recruited
    • population patients with internal hemorrhoids
    • intervention Group A undergoing endoscopic ligation (n=14)
    • comparator Group B receiving CAES (n=18)
    • primaryOutcome the treatment effect of endoscopic ligation and cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES) for patients with internal hemorrhoids, symptom relief, complication rate and psychological condition, and the anorectal function were observed
    • result There was no significant difference in the treatment effect of postoperative bleeding, prolapse, constipation, and complications between the 2 groups. However, Group A has certain advantages in the treatment of prolapse and constipation before and after treatment, and Group B has certain advantages in bleeding.
    • followUp with a 3-month follow-up

    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech · PMID 40530787 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • van Oostendorp et al. 2025

    Limitations of the Goligher classification in randomized trials for hemorrhoidal disease: a qualitative systematic review of selection criteria

    Inconsistent classification, no direct treatment comparison.Systematic reviewLow qualityRelated question

    size not given2025

    most trials used the Goligher classification but often did not describe or cite it properly, and classification/selection criteria were inconsistent across studies

    Who was studied
    adults with hemorrhoidal disease enrolled in randomized trials comparing treatments
    What they received
    various treatments for hemorrhoidal disease studied in trials, including at least one surgical arm
    Compared with
    other treatment arms or classification systems used in the same trials
    Main outcome
    how patients were selected and classified (using systems like the Goligher classification) in hemorrhoid treatment trials
    Quality
    this review examines how trials classified and selected patients rather than comparing surgery with non-surgical treatment outcomes, so it cannot show which works better.
    Limitations
    most studies did not fully describe or cite the classification system used, and 70% of studies reporting recurrence lacked adequate inclusion criteria or references to the classification

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population Eligible studies included adult patients and at least one arm involving surgical treatment.
    • intervention randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatments for HD
    • comparator focusing on classification systems used for patient enrollment
    • primaryOutcome evaluate the patient selection criteria and classification systems employed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for HD
    • result Most studies (86.4%) used the Goligher system, though the majority did not fully describe or cite the system.
    • result 70% of these did not provide adequate inclusion criteria or references to Goligher's classification
    • limitations 70% of these did not provide adequate inclusion criteria or references to Goligher's classification

    Tech Coloproctol · PMID 40493094 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Gallo et al. 2025

    Real-world use of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: insights from an international survey and systematic review with clinical practice recommendations

    Possibly fewer recurrences than banding.Systematic reviewLow quality

    size not given2025

    polidocanol foam was seen as more successful and less likely to recur than rubber band ligation, based on expert survey and review, not a controlled trial

    Who was studied
    adults with hemorrhoidal disease, mainly grade II and III
    What they received
    polidocanol foam sclerotherapy injected into hemorrhoids
    Compared with
    rubber band ligation
    Main outcome
    treatment success rate and recurrence rate
    Quality
    the comparison numbers come from expert opinion and a non-pooled review of studies with wide variation in technique, not from a controlled trial directly comparing the two treatments.
    Limitations
    wide variation among experts in patient selection, technique, and follow-up care; comparison to rubber band ligation based on perceived rates rather than a controlled study

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population Most experts (90%) reported using polidocanol foam sclerotherapy primarily for Goligher grade II HD, with 67% extending its use to grade III cases.
    • intervention Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy has gained increasing attention as a minimally invasive treatment for hemorrhoidal disease (HD).
    • comparator Compared to rubber band ligation, polidocanol foam was perceived as having higher success rates (88.3% vs. 66.7%) and lower recurrence rates (16.1% vs. 41.2%).
    • primaryOutcome Compared to rubber band ligation, polidocanol foam was perceived as having higher success rates (88.3% vs. 66.7%) and lower recurrence rates (16.1% vs. 41.2%).
    • result Compared to rubber band ligation, polidocanol foam was perceived as having higher success rates (88.3% vs. 66.7%) and lower recurrence rates (16.1% vs. 41.2%). Adverse events were infrequent.

    Updates Surg · PMID 40481245 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Tsai et al. 2025

    Preoperative enema for anal surgery: randomized clinical trial

    Enema before surgery mostly made no difference.Randomised trialModerate qualityRelated question

    266 peopleday 0 to day 7

    no significant difference in pain or complications overall, but less pain on days 2-4 in the enema group among patients having Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy

    Who was studied
    adults with grade III or IV hemorrhoids or anal fistulas having surgery
    What they received
    preoperative enema before anal surgery
    Compared with
    no preoperative enema
    Main outcome
    pain scores and painkiller use after surgery, days 0 to 7
    Quality
    it was a randomized trial with a reasonable number of patients, but the positive finding came from a smaller subgroup analysis, which is less reliable.
    Limitations
    abstract does not mention blinding; subgroup findings are exploratory and from a single hospital

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n A total of 266 patients were enrolled in this study, with 133 allocated to the enema group and 133 to the control group.
    • population Patients diagnosed with grade III or IV haemorrhoids and anal fistulas at the Taipei Medical University Shuang-Ho Hospital, Taiwan, between 2022 and 2023, were enrolled
    • intervention preoperative enema (intervention)
    • comparator no preoperative enema
    • primaryOutcome The primary outcome measures included postoperative visual analogue scale scores and analgesic usage from postoperative day 0 to day 7.
    • result No significant differences were observed in postoperative visual analogue scale scores, analgesic consumption and postoperative complications between the two groups.
    • result in the subgroup of patients undergoing Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy, the mean(s.d.) visual analogue scale score was significantly higher in the control group than in the enema group on day 2 (5.69(2.14) versus 3.77(2.45), P = 0.021), day 3 (5.85(2.61) versus 3.92(2.73), P = 0.042) and day 4 (5.23(2.55) versus 3.42(2.18), P = 0.027).

    BJS Open · PMID 40455826 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Grossi et al. 2025

    SHAPE-skin-sparing hemorrhoidectomy and PExy: a novel technique for the surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease

    Fewer symptoms after new surgery.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question

    21 people1-month

    Symptom scores dropped sharply after surgery, with few complications and no lasting pain

    Who was studied
    patients with advanced (grade III-IV) hemorrhoids
    What they received
    a new surgical technique called SHAPE (skin-sparing hemorrhoidectomy and pexy)
    Compared with
    none (before-and-after comparison within same patients)
    Main outcome
    change in hemorrhoid symptom severity scores after surgery
    Quality
    This was a small study of only 21 patients with no comparison group and just one month of follow-up, so it can't show how this technique compares to other treatments or holds up long-term.
    Limitations
    Small sample size, no control group, and only short-term (1-month) follow-up; long-term efficacy and recurrence not yet assessed.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population 21 consecutive patients with grade III-IV HD
    • intervention Skin-Sparing Hemorrhoidectomy and Pexy (SHAPE)
    • comparator A prospective analysis was conducted on 21 consecutive patients with grade III-IV HD who underwent SHAPE on 3 hemorrhoidal columns.
    • primaryOutcome the Hemorrhoidal Disease Severity Score (HDSS) decreasing from a median of 16 to 0 (p < 0.001) and the Short Health Scale (SHS) from 20 to 4 (p < 0.001)
    • result patients experienced a significant reduction in symptoms, with the Hemorrhoidal Disease Severity Score (HDSS) decreasing from a median of 16 to 0 (p < 0.001)
    • n 21 consecutive patients with grade III-IV HD

    Updates Surg · PMID 40399727 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Long et al. 2025

    Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy combined with rubber band ligation and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for the management of grade III/IV hemorrhoids: a retrospective study

    Combined surgery technique had fewer recurrences.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    255 people12 months

    lower recurrence and higher satisfaction with the combined procedure, but no difference in hemorrhoid severity score

    Who was studied
    adults with grade III or IV hemorrhoids who had surgery
    What they received
    Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy combined with rubber band ligation and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy
    Compared with
    Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy alone
    Main outcome
    recurrence rate, hemorrhoid severity score, and patient satisfaction 12 months after surgery
    Quality
    It is a retrospective, non-randomized, single-center comparison of two surgical techniques, so bias and confounding cannot be ruled out.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design without randomization, single center, and both groups still underwent surgery rather than comparing surgery to non-surgical treatment.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population A total of 255 patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids who underwent MMH + RBL + PFS (n = 128) or MMH (n = 127) between May 2022 and June 2023 were included in the study.
    • intervention This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of a MMH combined with rubber band ligation and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (MMH + RBL + PFS) for the management of grade III/IV hemorrhoids.
    • comparator A total of 255 patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids who underwent MMH + RBL + PFS (n = 128) or MMH (n = 127) between May 2022 and June 2023 were included in the study.
    • primaryOutcome The primary outcomes included recurrence rates, hemorrhoid severity score (HSS), and patient satisfaction 12 months after surgery.
    • result At the 12-month follow-up after surgery, the recurrence rate was lower in the MMH + RBL + PFS group (0.78%) than in the MMH group (7.09%) (p < 0.05). The patient satisfaction score was higher in the MMH + RBL + PFS group (91.41%) than in the MMH group (81.10%) (p < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the HSS between the two groups (p > 0.05).
    • n A total of 255 patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids who underwent MMH + RBL + PFS (n = 128) or MMH (n = 127) between May 2022 and June 2023 were included in the study.

    BMC Gastroenterol · PMID 40346473 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Carvalho et al. 2025

    Efficacy and safety of office-based procedures for hemorrhoidal disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

    Nonsurgical treatment worked well, low risk.RetrospectiveModerate quality

    129 people55.3 ± 34.5 months

    Treatment worked in 88% of patients, 16% of those had the problem come back, and complications occurred in 5.6% of procedures, with no severe complications like incontinence

    Who was studied
    people with inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease) who also have hemorrhoids
    What they received
    office-based, nonsurgical treatments for hemorrhoids: rubber band ligation and polidocanol injection (sclerotherapy)
    Compared with
    rubber band ligation compared with polidocanol injection sclerotherapy
    Main outcome
    whether the hemorrhoid treatment worked (clinical success), came back, or caused complications
    Quality
    It is a fairly large multicenter study but retrospective with no comparison to surgery or to a non-IBD control group within the paper.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design; only 55% of patients were in endoscopic remission at treatment time; no direct comparison group without IBD or group treated surgically reported in this abstract.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n A total of 129 patients were included, 90 with ulcerative colitis and 37 with Crohn's disease.
    • population patients with IBD undergoing office-based treatment for HD
    • intervention 77 patients underwent rubber band ligation (RBL), 44 underwent polidocanol injection, and 8 had both treatments, for a total of 304 procedures
    • comparator Clinical success and recurrence were similar between RBL and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (PFS).
    • primaryOutcome Data regarding the patients' IBD (type, disease location, medication, endoscopic remission) and HD (clinical success, recurrence, complications) were analyzed.
    • result The treatment of HD was effective in 88% of patients, of which 16% relapsed (mean follow-up time of 55.3 ± 34.5 months). Complications were described in 17 (5.6%) procedures, 2 (0.66%) requiring invasive treatment.
    • followUp mean follow-up time of 55.3 ± 34.5 months

    Tech Coloproctol · PMID 40338393 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Gravante et al. 2025

    Assessment of long-term outcomes following Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy with Doppler transperineal ultrasound and endoscopy: a pilot study

    Ultrasound detected recurrence after surgery.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question

    23 people26 months of follow-up (range 14-48)

    Ultrasound vascular pattern was linked to endoscopic signs of recurrence, but not to patient-reported symptoms; absence of the pattern ruled out recurrence in all cases

    Who was studied
    patients who had surgical removal of hemorrhoids (Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy)
    What they received
    follow-up assessment using Doppler ultrasound and endoscopy after hemorrhoid surgery
    Compared with
    no comparison group; patients compared to themselves based on ultrasound findings
    Main outcome
    whether Doppler ultrasound patterns matched clinical symptoms and endoscopic signs of recurrence after surgery
    Quality
    This was a small pilot study of only 23 patients with no control group, looking at imaging after surgery rather than comparing surgery to non-surgical treatment.
    Limitations
    Small pilot sample, no comparison group, and no assessment of non-surgical treatment options.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Twenty-three patients were available for the analysis at 26 months of follow-up
    • population patients who underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
    • intervention underwent a clinical proctological evaluation, a Doppler TPUS, and an endoscopic check of the anal canal
    • comparator A consecutive series of MM patients treated between February 2020 and December 2023 were contacted
    • primaryOutcome Outcome measures consisted of the description of Doppler TPUS modifications following MM, and their relationship with clinical and endoscopic findings.
    • result No correlation was present between residual symptoms and the Doppler vascular pattern (p = 0.089). The vascular pattern was associated with endoscopic signs of recurrences (p = 0.003), and its absence was able to predict the lack of internal recurrences in all patients (100%).
    • followUp 26 months of follow-up (range 14-48)

    Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 40310510 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Gravante 2025

    Sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: Recent evolutions of an oldies goldy

    Promising, but not proven yet.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question

    size not given2025

    the newer foam-based and combined technique showed promising results compared with endoscopic rubber band ligation

    Who was studied
    people with grade I-III internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    sclerotherapy using polidocanol foam, alone or combined with rubber-band ligation (sclerobanding), including an endoscopic delivery version
    Compared with
    endoscopic rubber band ligation
    Main outcome
    effectiveness and outcomes of treating hemorrhoids
    Quality
    this is an editorial commentary discussing other studies, not original research with its own data or methods.
    Limitations
    it is an editorial opinion piece commenting on another publication, without presenting its own patient data, numbers, or study methodology.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population patients with grade II-III internal hemorrhoids
    • intervention the combination of polidocanol foam with rubber-band ligation (the historical counterpart of sclerotherapy) in a technique called "sclerobanding"
    • intervention further modifying the use of sclerobanding through an endoscopic delivery for patients with grade II-III internal hemorrhoids
    • comparator present results compared with endoscopic rubber band ligation
    • result The results achieved are promising.
    • primaryOutcome Various articles have already shown promising results

    World J Gastroenterol · PMID 40062327 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Dutta 2025

    Multilayered numerical modelling of bio-thermal aspects during laser assisted treatment of internal haemorrhoid developed in rectum

    Computer model simulates laser heat spread.Laboratory studyVery low qualityRelated question

    size not given2025

    the model showed a temperature drop at the boundaries between tissue layers, matching previous published models

    Who was studied
    computer model of rectum tissue layers (not real patients)
    What they received
    laser-based heat therapy aimed at internal haemorrhoid tissue
    Compared with
    published numerical model used for verification
    Main outcome
    temperature changes within the layered rectal tissue during laser treatment
    Quality
    this is a theoretical computer simulation, not a study on real patients, so it cannot show whether the treatment actually works or is safe.
    Limitations
    purely mathematical/computational modeling with no human or animal data, no patient outcomes measured

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population the physical domain is considered as multilayered tissue (three different layers of rectum: muscle, submucosa and mucosa)
    • intervention A Gaussian laser beam is considered as heat source to destroy the abnormal growth inside the rectum.
    • comparator The research outcome is verified with the published numerical model with negligible variation.
    • primaryOutcome Temperature variation in multi-layered tissue is investigated for laser heat input and absorption radius along the temporal and spatial coordinate.
    • result Temperature drop has been evidenced in the interfaces of multi-layered rectum tissue.

    Lasers Med Sci · PMID 39969619 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Xu et al. 2025

    Clinical Efficacy of Automatic Ruiyun Procedure for Hemorrhoids and Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids in the Treatment of Mixed Hemorrhoids: A Comparative Study

    Newer surgery outperformed standard hemorrhoid surgery.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    120 people12th week

    RPH outperforms PPH in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids with a shortened surgical time.

    Who was studied
    patients with mixed hemorrhoids who visited the Third Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine (The 1st People's Hospital of Baiyin) from January 2019 to December 2023
    What they received
    60 cases were grouped under the Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids (RPH) group
    Compared with
    the other 60 cases were categorized in the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) group
    Main outcome
    Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative pain, length of hospital stay and hospitalization expenses between the two groups presented statistically significant differences
    Quality
    This was a retrospective single-center study comparing two surgical techniques, which carries more risk of bias than a randomized trial.
    Limitations
    retrospective cohort study...using propensity score matching (PSM) with a ratio of 1:1 for nearest neighbor matching grouping

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n 60 cases were grouped under the Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids (RPH) group, and the other 60 cases were categorized in the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) group
    • population patients with mixed hemorrhoids who visited the Third Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine (The 1st People's Hospital of Baiyin) from January 2019 to December 2023
    • intervention 60 cases were grouped under the Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids (RPH) group
    • comparator the other 60 cases were categorized in the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) group
    • primaryOutcome Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative pain, length of hospital stay and hospitalization expenses between the two groups presented statistically significant differences
    • result RPH outperforms PPH in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids with a shortened surgical time.

    Ann Ital Chir · PMID 39957120 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Gallo et al. 2025

    Clinical evidence and rationale of topical nifedipine and lidocaine ointment in the treatment of anal fissure and hemorrhoidal disease

    Topical ointment eased pain, no surgery.Narrative reviewLow qualityRelated question

    size not given2025

    the combination ointment relieved pain, helped thrombosed hemorrhoids resolve, healed chronic fissures, and controlled post-surgery pain better than comparator treatments

    Who was studied
    people with anal fissure or hemorrhoids, including pain after hemorrhoid surgery
    What they received
    nifedipine 0.3% and lidocaine 1.5% ointment applied to the anal area
    Compared with
    topical lidocaine alone or lidocaine plus hydrocortisone
    Main outcome
    pain relief and healing of fissures or thrombosed hemorrhoids
    Quality
    this is a non-systematic literature review that itself says the evidence it collected is limited, so it cannot be weighted as strongly as controlled trials.
    Limitations
    the authors state the available literature is limited and call for further studies to confirm the results; no details on number of trials, patients, or statistical analysis are given.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population Anorectal conditions such as hemorrhoidal disease and anal fissure are frequently painful and debilitating.
    • intervention nifedipine 0.3% and lidocaine 1.5% ointment
    • comparator The ointment was significantly better than controls consisting of topical lidocaine 1.5% alone or in combination with hydrocortisone acetate 1%.
    • primaryOutcome Nifedipine 0.3% and lidocaine 1.5% ointment is effective in relieving pain and aiding the resolution of thrombosed hemorrhoids, reducing resting anal pressure and healing chronic anal fissures, and controlling pain after hemorrhoidectomy.
    • result The ointment was significantly better than controls consisting of topical lidocaine 1.5% alone or in combination with hydrocortisone acetate 1%.
    • limitations Although the available literature on the topical application of nifedipine and lidocaine in anorectal diseases is limited

    Minerva Surg · PMID 39945661 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Xu et al. 2025

    Clinical effects of endoscopic resection of hypertrophied anal papillae combined with internal hemorrhoid ligation therapy: a retrospective study

    More pain, but similar healing results.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    47 people3 months

    combined procedure caused more and longer-lasting pain, but bleeding, swelling, and success rates were similar between groups

    Who was studied
    patients with enlarged anal papillae, with or without internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    endoscopic removal of anal papillae plus tying off internal hemorrhoids
    Compared with
    endoscopic removal of anal papillae alone
    Main outcome
    pain, bleeding, swelling after surgery, and effectiveness at 3 months
    Quality
    this was a small, retrospective comparison of two surgical techniques without randomization, so it can't reliably show which approach is better.
    Limitations
    retrospective design, small sample size, and it compares two surgical methods rather than surgery versus non-surgical treatment

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n A retrospective study was conducted on 47 patients
    • population 47 patients from our center who underwent endoscopic resection of hypertrophic anal papillae, with or without internal hemorrhoids ligation
    • intervention the anal papillae resection + internal hemorrhoid ligation group
    • comparator the anal papillae resection group
    • primaryOutcome postoperative pain intensity and duration, postoperative bleeding severity, presence of anal edema, and follow-up outcomes at 3 months postoperatively
    • result The postoperative pain intensity was higher in the group undergoing anal papillae resection combined with internal hemorrhoid ligation, with a median Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of 1 (0, 2), and the duration of pain was longer, with a median of 1 (0, 2) day.
    • result However, there were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of postoperative bleeding or anal edema.
    • result At the 3-month follow-up, the effective rates were 90.9% and 80.0%, respectively, and there were no statistically significant differences among the groups.

    Surg Endosc · PMID 39934277 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Sapkota Upadhya et al. 2024

    Efficacy and Safety of Colonoscopic Band Ligation for Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding due to Hemorrhoid

    Non-surgical banding relieved hemorrhoid symptoms.Case seriesLow quality

    28 people3 months

    Symptoms resolved in almost all patients, with bleeding and prolapse improved in over 90%, and most patients rated the treatment as excellent

    Who was studied
    patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding due to hemorrhoids
    What they received
    colonoscopic rubber band ligation
    Compared with
    none reported
    Main outcome
    resolution of hemorrhoid symptoms (bleeding, prolapse, irritation, discharge, pain) and patient satisfaction
    Quality
    It is a small, single-center case series with no comparison group, so it cannot show whether banding works better than other treatments or surgery.
    Limitations
    No control group; small sample of 28 patients; short follow-up; over half had post-procedure complications.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n We included 28 among 108 patients presenting to the surgical outpatient department with Lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
    • population patients presenting to the surgical outpatient department with Lower gastrointestinal bleeding
    • intervention Colonoscopic Rubber band ligation
    • comparator Colonoscopic Rubber band ligation is feasible, safe and efficient for the treatment of symptomatic grade II hemorrhoids
    • primaryOutcome Symptoms of irritation, discharge, pain resolved in all patients at 3 months and that of bleeding and prolapse in 96.4% and 92% respectively.
    • result 78.6% of patients rated Colonoscopic Rubber band ligation treatment as "excellent help".

    J Nepal Health Res Counc · PMID 39923169 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Jin et al. 2025

    The prevalence of incontinence after excisional hemorrhoidectomy and stapled hemorrhoidopexy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Similar low incontinence risk between two surgeries.Meta-analysisModerate qualityRelated question

    31,132 people2025

    no significant difference in incontinence risk between the two surgical procedures; incontinence was uncommon overall

    Who was studied
    people having surgery for symptomatic hemorrhoids
    What they received
    stapled hemorrhoidopexy surgery
    Compared with
    excisional hemorrhoidectomy surgery
    Main outcome
    incontinence (loss of bowel control) after surgery, early and late
    Quality
    Large meta-analysis of many trials, but it compares two surgery types to each other (not surgery vs non-surgical treatment) and notes considerable heterogeneity between studies.
    Limitations
    Considerable heterogeneity was observed, likely the result of differences in assessment and reporting methods across studies.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population Excisional hemorrhoidectomy and stapled hemorrhoidopexy are 2 common procedures for treating symptomatic hemorrhoids.
    • intervention stapled hemorrhoidopexy
    • comparator excisional hemorrhoidectomy
    • primaryOutcome Primary outcomes included early (<3 months) and late (≥3 months) fecal incontinence.
    • result There was no significant difference in the risk of incontinence or other postoperative complications between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and excisional hemorrhoidectomy, both in randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized controlled trials.
    • n 68 randomized controlled trials with 8,445 participants and 71 observational studies with 22,687 participants
    • limitations considerable heterogeneity was observed, likely the result of differences in assessment and reporting methods across studies

    Surgery · PMID 39854786 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Li et al. 2025

    Rubber band ligation or shaobei injection for the endoscopic treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids? A retrospective study

    Similar results, less pain with injectionRetrospectiveLow quality

    413 people3 months

    No difference in recurrence or symptom improvement between groups, but the injection group had less pain and fewer complications than the band ligation group

    Who was studied
    Patients with grade I-IV symptomatic hemorrhoids treated using endoscopy
    What they received
    Endoscopic Shaobei injection
    Compared with
    Endoscopic rubber band ligation
    Main outcome
    Recurrence rate, postoperative pain, complications, quality of life and satisfaction after treatment
    Quality
    It is a retrospective, non-randomized comparison relying on propensity score matching, which can reduce but not eliminate bias from unmeasured factors.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design, no randomization, groups had significant baseline differences before matching, and outcomes were only tracked for 3 months.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population patients with grade I-IV symptomatic hemorrhoids treated with endoscopy
    • intervention Shaobei injection
    • comparator band ligation
    • n 413 patients with grade I-IV symptomatic hemorrhoids treated with endoscopy between January 2019 and March 2023
    • primaryOutcome Recurrence rate, postoperative complications, hospitalization costs, hospitalization time, postoperative quality of life (QoL), and postoperative satisfaction were compared
    • result Recurrence rates did not differ between groups at 3 months postoperatively (P = 0.439). Postoperative symptom grading did not differ between groups (all P > 0.05) but was improved from baseline (all P < 0.001). However, the injection group experienced significantly less pain than the band ligation group on postoperative days 1 (P < 0.001) and 7 (P = 0.003). Significantly lower incidences were observed in the injection than in the ligation group for postoperative anal distention within 1 day (P < 0.001) and complications within 7 days (P < 0.001).

    Surg Endosc · PMID 39762601 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • LHP Recommendation Development Group 2024

    Best clinical practice recommendations for the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids via laser hemorrhoidoplasty: the LHP recommendations

    Expert agreement on laser procedure technique.GuidelineLow qualityRelated question

    49 people2024

    Experts reached consensus on all 21 practice recommendations, with 16 reaching strong consensus

    Who was studied
    people with symptomatic hemorrhoids
    What they received
    laser hemorrhoidoplasty (a minimally invasive laser procedure)
    Compared with
    no comparator; expert consensus on how to perform the procedure
    Main outcome
    agreement among experts on best practice recommendations for performing the procedure
    Quality
    This is an expert consensus/guideline based on opinion and literature review rather than a trial comparing treatments, so it cannot show whether the procedure works better than alternatives.
    Limitations
    Abstract does not report patient outcomes, only expert agreement on technique standards; based on expert opinion where literature was lacking.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n voted upon by 49 panelists
    • population symptomatic hemorrhoids
    • intervention Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP)
    • comparator The developed recommendations were voted upon by a panelist via the Delphi process.
    • primaryOutcome Consensus was a priori defined as agreement of 75% and above, with strong consensus defined as 85% and above.
    • result Consensus was reached for all 21 recommendations after the first Delphi round, including 16 recommendations with strong consensus.

    Tech Coloproctol · PMID 39579281 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Mou et al. 2024

    Endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding for treatment of internal hemorrhoids: A novel outpatient procedure

    New method, results not yet confirmed.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question

    size not givenone-year follow-up

    abstract states EFSB is a novel therapy but says larger, longer studies are needed to confirm findings

    Who was studied
    patients with grade II and III internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding (EFSB), a technique combining foam injection with rubber band ligation
    Compared with
    endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL) alone
    Main outcome
    prolapse recurrence and post-procedural pain
    Quality
    This is a commentary discussing another study rather than reporting new data, so it carries very little independent evidence weight.
    Limitations
    The abstract itself provides no original data; it summarizes another trial and calls for larger samples and longer follow-up to confirm findings.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population patients with grades II and III internal hemorrhoids
    • intervention Endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding (EFSB) is a novel approach that could lift the mucosa for easy ligation
    • comparator compare ERBL and EFSB in patients with grades II and III internal hemorrhoids
    • primaryOutcome long-term relief from prolapse recurrence and reduced 24-h post-procedural pain
    • result Results showed that EFSB is a novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids, but future studies with a larger sample, multiple treatment sessions, and long-term follow-up are required to confirm these findings.
    • followUp with one-year follow-up

    World J Gastroenterol · PMID 39563748 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Zhang et al. 2024

    Endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding for the treatment of Grade II-III internal hemorrhoids: The focus of clinical practice

    No new results; commentary onlyNarrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question

    size not given2024

    not reported in this abstract

    Who was studied
    patients with Grade II-III internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerotherapy combined with rubber band ligation
    Main outcome
    long-term symptom relief and endoscopic healing
    Quality
    This is a commentary letter discussing another study's methods, not a report of new patient outcomes.
    Limitations
    The abstract is a letter responding to another article and does not present original trial results or data.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population patients with Grade II-III internal hemorrhoids
    • intervention integration of endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerotherapy with rubber band ligation
    • primaryOutcome long-term symptomatic and endoscopic efficacy of this combined intervention
    • result In this discussion, we focus on the procedural steps of this combined strategy and suggest potential avenues for future research.

    World J Gastroenterol · PMID 39493328 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Rao et al. 2024

    Redefining hemorrhoid therapy with endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding

    Less pain and recurrence than bandingRandomised trialModerate quality

    195 people2024

    EFSB significantly reduced recurrence rates and post-procedural pain while improving symptom relief and patient satisfaction compared to ERBL

    Who was studied
    adults with grade II and III internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding (EFSB), a non-surgical injection and banding technique
    Compared with
    endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL)
    Main outcome
    recurrence rate, post-procedural pain, symptom relief, and patient satisfaction
    Quality
    It was a multicenter randomized trial, which is strong evidence, but the single-blind design and short follow-up period limit confidence in the results.
    Limitations
    single-blind design and relatively short follow-up period

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n involved 195 patients
    • population 195 patients with grade II and III internal hemorrhoids
    • intervention endoscopic poli-docanol foam sclerobanding (EFSB)
    • comparator compared to ERBL
    • primaryOutcome significantly reduced recurrence rates and post-procedural pain while improving symptom relief and patient satisfaction
    • result demonstrated that EFSB significantly reduced recurrence rates and post-procedural pain while improving symptom relief and patient satisfaction compared to ERBL
    • limitations Despite limitations such as the single-blind design and relatively short follow-up period

    World J Gastroenterol · PMID 39351248 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Samalavicius et al. 2024

    Global treatment of haemorrhoids-A worldwide snapshot audit conducted by the International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons

    Surgeons use surgery mainly for severe hemorrhoids.RegistryVery low qualityRelated question

    1,005 people2024

    conservative treatment was used first for grade I-III hemorrhoids, surgery was first-line only for grade IV

    Who was studied
    surgeons worldwide who treat hemorrhoid patients
    What they received
    conservative (non-surgical) treatment such as fiber, water intake, bowel training, banding
    Compared with
    surgical treatment (excisional hemorrhoidectomy)
    Main outcome
    which treatment surgeons use first for each grade of hemorrhoids
    Quality
    this is a global opinion survey of surgeons' practice habits, not a study measuring patient outcomes or comparing treatments head-to-head.
    Limitations
    self-reported, voluntary questionnaire of surgeon practice patterns with no patient outcome data or control group.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n The survey was completed by 1005 surgeons from 103 countries
    • population surgeons from 103 countries
    • intervention The most common nonprocedural/conservative treatment consisted of increased daily fibre intake (86.9%), increased water intake (82.7%), and normalization of bowel habits/toilet training (74.4%).
    • comparator surgery was the first-line treatment for symptomatic fourth degree haemorrhoids (77.6%)
    • primaryOutcome assess a global view of how surgeons manage haemorrhoids
    • result Conservative treatment was the first-line treatment for symptomatic first (92.5%), second (72.4%) and third (47.3%) degree haemorrhoids; however, surgery was the first-line treatment for symptomatic fourth degree haemorrhoids (77.6%).

    Colorectal Dis · PMID 39169548 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Godeberge et al. 2024

    An international observational study assessing conservative management in hemorrhoidal disease: results of CHORALIS (aCute HemORrhoidal disease evALuation International Study)

    Symptoms improved with non-surgical drug treatment.Prospective cohortLow qualityRelated question

    3,505 people4-week

    Conservative drug treatments, mostly MPFF, improved pain, bleeding, swelling, itching and quality of life, with MPFF outperforming diosmin

    Who was studied
    adults with acute hemorrhoid symptoms, mostly mild to moderate grade (Goligher I and II)
    What they received
    non-surgical treatments, mainly venoactive drugs (especially micronized purified flavonoid fraction, MPFF)
    Compared with
    different venoactive drugs compared to each other (MPFF vs diosmin), no surgical or placebo comparator
    Main outcome
    improvement in hemorrhoid symptoms (pain, bleeding, swelling, itching) and quality of life
    Quality
    This was an observational study without a surgical or placebo comparison group, so it cannot show whether drugs work better than no treatment or surgery.
    Limitations
    Observational design with no control group, no comparison to surgery or placebo, and most patients had milder grade I-II hemorrhoids.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Of 3592 participants, 3505 were analyzed
    • population adult outpatients consulting for spontaneous complaints of hemorrhoids (graded using Goligher classification)
    • population 72.1% Goligher grade I and II
    • intervention Most treatments were venoactive drugs (VADs; 90.9%), particularly micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF; 73.7%)
    • comparator MPFF was associated with a significantly greater proportion of patients with no symptoms (48.8 vs diosmin 34.4%, p < 0.001)
    • primaryOutcome Assessments were: anal pain/discomfort (visual analog scale [VAS]), other signs/symptoms (patient questionnaire), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) questionnaire and disease-specific QoL (HEMO-FISS-QoL questionnaire)
    • result All VAD-based therapies improved signs/symptoms (number/intensity/frequency of pain, discomfort, bleeding, swelling, itching and soiling) and QoL.
    • followUp The 4-week observational prospective CHORALIS study

    J Comp Eff Res · PMID 39132755 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Qu et al. 2024

    Endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding for the treatment of grade II-III internal hemorrhoids: A prospective, multi-center, randomized study

    Combined foam and banding worked better than banding aloneRandomised trialModerate qualityRelated question

    195 people12 months

    EFSB had lower symptom severity scores, lower prolapse recurrence (11.2% vs 21.6%), and less pain than ERBL alone at 12 months

    Who was studied
    adults with grade II-III internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerotherapy combined with rubber band ligation (EFSB)
    Compared with
    endoscopic rubber band ligation alone (ERBL)
    Main outcome
    hemorrhoid symptom severity, prolapse recurrence, and post-procedure pain
    Quality
    This was a randomized multicenter trial with reasonable follow-up, but it compared two non-surgical techniques rather than against surgery or no treatment, limiting what it tells us about surgery necessity.
    Limitations
    Abstract does not report blinding, and comparison is between two endoscopic techniques, not between surgery and non-surgical treatment.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n A total of 195 consecutive patients diagnosed with grade II-III internal hemorrhoids were enrolled
    • population patients diagnosed with grade II-III internal hemorrhoids
    • intervention cap-assisted endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding (EFSB)
    • comparator an ERBL group
    • primaryOutcome Symptom-based severity and post-procedural pain were assessed using a hemorrhoid severity score (HSS) and a visual analog scale (VAS)
    • result The prolapse recurrence rate was lower in the EFSB group at 12 months (11.2% vs 21.6%, P = 0.038)
    • result HSS was lower in the EFSB group than in the ERBL group at 8 weeks [4.0 (3.0-5.0) vs 5.0 (4.0-6.0), P = 0.003] and 12-month [2.0 (1.0-3.0) vs 3.0 (2.0-3.0), P < 0.001] of follow-up

    World J Gastroenterol · PMID 39086750 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Jee et al. 2024

    Conventional Excisional Haemorrhoidectomy versus Transanal Haemorrhoidal Dearterialization for Haemorrhoids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Less invasive surgery heals faster but recurs more.Meta-analysisModerate qualityRelated question

    465 people2024

    THD had higher recurrence than CEH but faster return to normal activity; complication rates were similar between the two

    Who was studied
    patients with hemorrhoids undergoing surgery
    What they received
    transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD), a less invasive surgical technique
    Compared with
    conventional excisional hemorrhoidectomy (CEH)
    Main outcome
    recurrence of hemorrhoids
    Quality
    Based on only 6 randomized trials with 465 patients total, giving reasonably reliable but not highly precise estimates.
    Limitations
    Small number of trials and patients; this compares two surgical techniques, not surgery versus non-surgical treatment.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n A total of 6 RCTs encompassing 465 patients were captured.
    • population compare short- and long-term outcomes of CEH and THD
    • intervention transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD)
    • comparator conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy (CEH)
    • primaryOutcome The primary objective was recurrence.
    • result THD had a higher recurrence rate (odds ratio = 2.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-7.38, p = 0.04) albeit a shorter return to baseline compared to CEH (mean difference = -14.05 days, 95% CI = -20.38 to -7.72, p &lt; 0.0001).

    Dig Surg · PMID 39084191 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Li et al. 2024

    A systematic review comparing the efficacy of 980 nm vs. 1470 nm wavelengths in laser hemorrhoidoplasty

    Laser treatment less painful, but may recur more.Meta-analysisModerate quality

    2,492 people2024

    LHP was faster and caused less pain and fewer complications than open hemorrhoidectomy, but 1470-nm LHP had higher recurrence; 980-nm LHP recurrence was similar to surgery

    Who was studied
    patients with hemorrhoidal disease
    What they received
    Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) using 980 nm or 1470 nm wavelengths
    Compared with
    open hemorrhoidectomy
    Main outcome
    operative duration, postoperative pain, complications, and recurrence rate
    Quality
    This pools many studies including randomized trials, but most are non-randomized and no studies directly compared the two laser types head-to-head.
    Limitations
    No direct studies comparing the two wavelengths; mix of randomized and non-randomized trials

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n a total of 2492 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis
    • population management of hemorrhoidal disease
    • intervention Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is a minimally invasive surgical option
    • comparator open hemorrhoidectomy
    • primaryOutcome The duration of LHP with both wavelengths was significantly shorter compared to open hemorrhoidectomy, postoperative pain and the rate of postoperative complications were significantly lower following LHP.
    • result LHP with 1470-nm wavelength resulted in significantly higher recurrence rate compared to hemorrhoidectomy.

    Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 39048788 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Kavraal et al. 2024

    Hemorrhoidal laser ablation procedure: a minimally invasive treatment for grades II, III, and IV using a 1470 nm diode laser

    Fewer symptoms, low recurrence, high satisfaction.RetrospectiveLow quality

    138 peopleup to five years

    No intraoperative complications; recurrence 0.8% short-term and 5% long-term, with 95% satisfaction and symptom relief

    Who was studied
    patients with symptomatic grade II, III, and IV internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    laser treatment (Hemorrhoidal Laser Ablation) using a 1470 nm diode laser
    Compared with
    none (single-arm retrospective case series)
    Main outcome
    symptom resolution, hemorrhoid size reduction, recurrence and satisfaction
    Quality
    This was a retrospective case series with no comparison group, so results could be due to other factors, not just the treatment.
    Limitations
    retrospective study design without a control group

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n The cohort included 138 patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids who underwent Hemorrhoidal Laser Ablation
    • population symptomatic grade II, III, and IV internal hemorrhoids
    • intervention Patients were treated with a 1470 nm diode laser.
    • comparator This retrospective study aimed to present our experience with Hemorrhoidal Laser Ablation
    • primaryOutcome evaluate the efficacy and safety of this relatively recent technique
    • result The short- -term recurrence rate was 0.8% within roughly a month after the laser surgery, while the long-term recurrence rate was 5% over up to five years of follow-up. The overall satisfaction rate was 95% with symptomatic relief.

    Pol Przegl Chir · PMID 38965992 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Chen et al. 2024

    Clinical outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty with feeding vessels suture ligation: a retrospective study in a single center

    Laser surgery caused less pain than traditional surgery.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    323 people2024

    laser hemorrhoidoplasty group had less pain and lower rate of urinary retention than traditional surgery group

    Who was studied
    adults with symptomatic grade II-III hemorrhoids undergoing surgery
    What they received
    laser hemorrhoidoplasty with suture ligation of feeding vessels
    Compared with
    traditional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
    Main outcome
    postoperative pain and complications
    Quality
    This was a retrospective, non-randomized, single-center study comparing two surgical techniques, which limits how much confidence we can place in the results.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design, single center, not randomized, and compares two surgical approaches rather than surgery versus non-surgical treatment.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n The study included 323 patients, with 173 undergoing laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) and 150 undergoing Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.
    • population patients with symptomatic grade II-III hemorrhoids who underwent laser hemorrhoidoplasty with feeding vessel suture ligation and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
    • intervention laser hemorrhoidoplasty with feeding vessel suture ligation
    • comparator Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
    • primaryOutcome Surgical-related details, postoperative pain, discomfort after discharge, hemorrhoid recurrence, and any complications were collected
    • result the LHP group exhibited superior performance compared to traditional surgery at postoperative 4 h, before discharge, and during the first and second outpatient visits, with statistically significant differences. Additionally, the LHP group had a lower rate of urinary retention and experienced significantly less pain, with statistically significant differences.

    Tech Coloproctol · PMID 38955875 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Jin et al. 2024

    Laser hemorrhoidoplasty vs. rubber band ligation: a randomized trial comparing 2 mini-invasive treatment for grade II hemorrhoids

    Laser eased symptoms faster, same recurrence.Randomised trialModerate qualityRelated question

    70 people1 year

    laser treatment caused less pain, bleeding, and distension in first 2 weeks and faster return to activity, but recurrence rates were similar at 1 year

    Who was studied
    adults with grade II hemorrhoids
    What they received
    laser hemorrhoidoplasty
    Compared with
    rubber band ligation
    Main outcome
    postoperative pain, bleeding, anal distension, and recurrence
    Quality
    it was a randomized trial but small, from a single center, and did not use blinding, which limits confidence.
    Limitations
    small sample size from a single center; abstract does not mention blinding

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population 70 patients with grade II hemorrhoids
    • intervention laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP)
    • comparator Rubber Band Ligation (RBL)
    • primaryOutcome The postoperative pain, bleeding, feeling of anal distension(local falling, swelling, foreign body sensation, stool) and postoperative recurrence rate were compared between the two groups.
    • result The postoperative pain, bleeding, and feeling of anal distension in the LHP group were improved significantly as compared with the RBL group within 2 weeks after surgery (P < 0.01).
    • result There was no difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups at 1 year after surgery (P > 0.05).
    • n A total of 70 patients with grade II hemorrhoids were randomly assigned to receive LHP or Rubber Band Ligation (RBL) (n = 35 per group)

    BMC Surg · PMID 38797851 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Cheng et al. 2024

    Diode laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic hemorrhoids: Meta-analysis

    Laser surgery less bleeding than traditional surgery.Meta-analysisModerate qualityRelated question

    1,196 people2024

    Laser hemorrhoidoplasty caused less blood loss, less post-op bleeding, shorter operation time, less pain on day 1, and less anal narrowing than conventional surgery, but no difference in incontinence, urinary retention or hemorrhoid recurrence

    Who was studied
    adults with symptomatic hemorrhoids undergoing surgical treatment
    What they received
    laser hemorrhoidoplasty (minimally invasive laser procedure)
    Compared with
    conventional hemorrhoidectomy (Milligan-Morgan or Ferguson surgery)
    Main outcome
    amount of bleeding during surgery and bleeding afterward
    Quality
    It pools 17 trials with over a thousand patients and found consistent results across subgroups, but it compares two surgical techniques rather than surgery versus non-surgical care, and trial quality varied.
    Limitations
    Abstract does not report individual study quality in detail beyond a 'low risk of bias' subgroup; both compared treatments are surgical procedures, not a surgery-vs-no-surgery comparison.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n 17 trials with 1196 patients
    • population symptomatic haemorrhoids
    • intervention laser hemorrhoidoplasty
    • comparator conventional hemorrhoidectomies, including Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson techniques
    • primaryOutcome The primary outcomes were operative blood loss and postoperative haemorrhage
    • result laser hemorrhoidoplasty showed benefits in operative blood loss (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -16.43 ml, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: -23.82 to -9.04), postoperative hemorrhage/bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 0.16, 95 % CI: 0.10 to 0.28), operative time (WMD: -12.42 min, 95 % CI: -14.56 to -10.28), postoperative pain score on day 1 (WMD: -2.50, 95 % CI: -3.13 to -1.88), and anal stenosis (OR: 0.14, 95 % CI: 0.03 to 0.65) in comparison with conventional hemorrhoidectomy
    • result incidence of fecal/flatus incontinence, urinary retention and hemorrhoid recurrence were not significantly different between the 2 groups

    Asian J Surg · PMID 38762410 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Akinmoladun et al. 2024

    Management of Hemorrhoids and Anal Fissures

    Reviews treatment options, no specific results given.Narrative reviewLow quality

    size not given2024

    Abstract describes a review of treatment options without giving specific comparative results

    Who was studied
    people with hemorrhoids and anal fissures
    What they received
    medical and surgical treatment options for hemorrhoids
    Compared with
    different treatment options compared to each other
    Main outcome
    successful treatment and complication rates
    Quality
    This is a narrative review describing available treatments rather than presenting new comparative data or outcomes.
    Limitations
    Abstract does not report specific study results, numbers of patients, or statistical outcomes comparing treatments.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population Hemorrhoids and anal fissures are two of the most common benign anorectal diseases.
    • intervention numerous medical and surgical treatment options are available, each with different rates of success and complications
    • comparator numerous medical and surgical treatment options are available, each with different rates of success and complications
    • primaryOutcome evidence-based treatment options for hemorrhoids and anal fissures
    • result the authors review each step of patient management, with emphasis on evidence-based treatment options for hemorrhoids and anal fissures

    Surg Clin North Am · PMID 38677814 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Fathallah et al. 2024

    Hemorrhoidal disease: Epidemiological study and analysis of predictive factors for surgical management

    Most treated without surgery; surgery most effective.Prospective cohortLow quality

    472 people2024

    Surgery improved symptoms more and gave higher satisfaction (73% vs 54%), but only 17% of patients needed surgery overall

    Who was studied
    patients with hemorrhoidal disease
    What they received
    surgical treatment
    Compared with
    medical and/or instrumental treatment
    Main outcome
    bleeding and prolapse scores, and patient satisfaction after treatment
    Quality
    This was a single-center observational study without randomization, so differences between treatment groups could be due to other factors, not just the treatment itself.
    Limitations
    Single-center, non-randomized, observational design; surgery group may differ systematically from non-surgery group (more severe disease).

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Prospective single-center study from July to December 2021 including 472 patients.
    • population Prospective single-center study from July to December 2021 including 472 patients.
    • intervention Treatment modalities were medical (44%),±instrumental (72%), and surgical (17%).
    • comparator Treatment modalities were medical (44%),±instrumental (72%), and surgical (17%).
    • primaryOutcome After treatment, the bleeding score and prolapse score decreased significantly (P=0.002 and P≤0.0001, respectively), but improvement was more marked in the surgery group with a better rate of "very good satisfaction" (73% vs. 54%, P=0.003).
    • result improvement was more marked in the surgery group with a better rate of "very good satisfaction" (73% vs. 54%, P=0.003)
    • result Less than 20% of patients who present with hemorrhoidal disease require surgical treatment, but it is associated with better effectiveness despite more complex postoperative consequences

    J Visc Surg · PMID 38580520 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Zhu et al. 2024

    Observation on Efficacy of Selective Malposition Ligation Combined with Hemorrhoid and Fistula I in Complex Mixed Hemorrhoid

    Faster healing, fewer complications with add-on therapyRetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    423 people7 days

    the combined approach led to less pain, swelling and bleeding, faster wound healing, and fewer complications than either surgery-alone group

    Who was studied
    patients undergoing surgery for complex mixed hemorrhoids
    What they received
    selective malposition ligation surgery combined with an oral herbal formula called hemorrhoid and fistula I
    Compared with
    malposition ligation surgery alone, or selective malposition ligation surgery without the herbal formula
    Main outcome
    pain, swelling, bleeding, wound healing time, and complication rates after surgery
    Quality
    patients were not randomized but grouped by the time period they had surgery, which makes bias likely.
    Limitations
    not randomized, groups assigned by time period rather than random allocation, and all patients received surgery so this does not address nonoperative treatment

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n 423 patients undergoing complex mixed hemorrhoid surgery at different time points were included as research objects
    • population 423 patients undergoing complex mixed hemorrhoid surgery at different time points were included as research objects
    • intervention group C (selective malposition ligation and hemorrhoid and fistula I)
    • comparator group A (malposition ligation), group B (selective malposition ligation)
    • primaryOutcome The scores for visual analogue scale (VAS), edema, and hemorrhage of group C 8h, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 5 days, and 7 days after surgery were all inferior to those in groups A and B
    • result The duration of wound healing of group C (15.33 ± 2.78 days) was shorter than that of groups A (21.78 ± 3.22 days) and B (18.34 ± 3.01 days)
    • result The incidence of total complications in group C (9.93%) was inferior to that in groups B (30.50%) and A (30.50%)

    Altern Ther Health Med · PMID 38518140 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Gallo et al. 2024

    Sclerotherapy with 3% polidocanol foam for the treatment of mucocutaneous bridges and/or residual piles after open excisional hemorrhoidectomy

    Fewer symptoms after surgery plus sclerotherapy.RetrospectiveVery low qualityRelated question

    18 people3 months

    78% of patients were symptom-free at 3 months, with a significant drop in symptom scores and no complications

    Who was studied
    patients with severe (grade IV) hemorrhoidal disease
    What they received
    sclerotherapy with polidocanol foam applied to leftover skin bridges/piles after open hemorrhoid surgery
    Compared with
    no separate comparison group; outcomes measured before and after treatment in the same patients
    Main outcome
    hemorrhoid symptom score and quality-of-life/continence scores
    Quality
    This was a small, single-center retrospective study of only 18 patients with no comparison group and just 3 months of follow-up, so it cannot reliably show whether the treatment works.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design, very small sample size, no control group, and short follow-up period; study combines surgery with sclerotherapy rather than testing non-surgical treatment alone.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n a total of 18 patients with IV-degree HD
    • population 18 patients with IV-degree HD, aged between 18 and 75 years with symptomatic HD according to the Goligher classification
    • intervention the combined treatment of open excisional hemorrhoidectomy and the use of ST on the remnant muco-cutaneous bridges/residual piles
    • comparator a statistically significant decrease in the median HDSS and short health scale for HD (SHS-HD) score was registered from 16 preoperatively (T0) to 2 at 3-month follow-up (T3)
    • primaryOutcome The Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS), the Short Health Scale for HD (SHS-HD) score and the Vaizey Incontinence Score were used to assess symptoms and their impact on quality of life and continence.
    • result A total of 77.8% (14/18) of the patients were symptom-free (hemorrhoidal disease symptom score (HDSS) score = 0) after 3 months.
    • followUp their follow-up continued until October 2023 after reaching 3 months of follow-up

    Updates Surg · PMID 38480640 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Watson et al. 2024

    Analgesic effect of local anaesthetic in haemorrhoid banding: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Less pain only in first hour.Meta-analysisLow qualityRelated question

    342 people24 h

    Local anaesthetic lowered pain scores at 1 hour but showed no clear difference at 6 or 24 hours

    Who was studied
    adults having rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids
    What they received
    local anaesthetic given during hemorrhoid banding
    Compared with
    no local or regional anesthesia during banding
    Main outcome
    patient-reported pain scores after the banding procedure
    Quality
    The evidence was rated low quality because of inconsistency between studies and imprecise, small sample sizes.
    Limitations
    small sample sizes and substantial heterogeneity across studies

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population adults undergoing haemorrhoid banding
    • intervention local anaesthetic
    • comparator no regional or local analgesia
    • primaryOutcome Primary outcomes were patient-reported pain scores.
    • result The mean difference in scores on a 10-point scale was at 1 h,-1.43 (95% CI-2.30 to-0.56, p < 0.01, n = 342 (175 in treatment group)); 6 h,-0.52 (95% CI-1.04 to 0.01, p = 0.05, n = 250 (130 in treatment group)); and 24 h,-0.31 (95% CI-0.82 to 0.19, p = 0.86, n = 247 (127 in treatment group)).
    • n n = 342 (175 in treatment group)
    • qualityWhy The quality of the evidence was rated down to 'low' due to inconsistency and imprecision.

    Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 38436741 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Manaki et al. 2024

    Aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA) sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Non-surgical injection may treat hemorrhoids effectively.Meta-analysisLow quality

    4,249 peoplenot specified

    Pooled recurrence rate was 10% and complication rate was 5.2%, with no significant link to disease grade

    Who was studied
    patients with hemorrhoidal disease (various grades)
    What they received
    ALTA (aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid) sclerotherapy injection
    Compared with
    none specified; pooled single-arm outcomes across studies
    Main outcome
    recurrence of hemorrhoids and treatment complications
    Quality
    The review pools mostly uncontrolled studies without a comparison group, so it cannot show how ALTA compares to surgery or other treatments.
    Limitations
    No control group comparisons reported; abstract calls for high-quality randomized controlled trials and longer follow-up

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Twelve studies with 4249 patients met all the inclusion criteria and were eventually included.
    • population patients with hemorrhoidal disease
    • intervention Aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA) sclerotherapy for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease
    • comparator Primary endpoints included overall recurrence and type of recurrence
    • primaryOutcome Primary endpoints included overall recurrence and type of recurrence while secondary endpoints included postoperative complications
    • result The crude and pooled estimates of the overall recurrence and complications by the end of follow-up were 10% (95% CI, 6.52%-14.08%) and 5.20% (95% CI, 2.59%-8.52%), respectively.

    Acta Chir Belg · PMID 38428446 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Capece et al. 2024

    Hemorrhoidectomy: Does Age Make a Difference?

    Most grade II cases skipped surgery first.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    961 people2024

    Grade III patients chose surgery first more often than grade II patients (27.6% vs 4.1%), and younger patients (18-30 and 31-50) chose surgery first more often than older patients (51-75) (23.5% and 22% vs 12.8%); among those who progressed to surgery after initial non-surgical treatment, time to surgery did not differ by age or grade

    Who was studied
    adults aged 18 to 75 with symptomatic grade II or III internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    surgical removal of hemorrhoids (hemorrhoidectomy)
    Compared with
    in-office procedures or medical management without surgery
    Main outcome
    whether patients chose surgery as initial treatment and how long it took to reach surgery, based on age and hemorrhoid grade
    Quality
    It is a retrospective study looking only at treatment choices and timing, not at whether surgery or non-surgical care actually worked better, and the authors note patient and surgeon bias could affect results.
    Limitations
    Data only looked at age groups and their treatment selection; personal biases of surgeon and patient may alter results.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n A total of 961 patients met inclusion criteria for grade II (n = 442) and III (n = 519) hemorrhoids.
    • population Patients aged 18 to 75 years with grade II or grade III internal hemorrhoids between 2015 and 2020 were included.
    • intervention Treatments included hemorrhoidectomy, in-office procedures, and/or medical management.
    • comparator Treatments included hemorrhoidectomy, in-office procedures, and/or medical management.
    • primaryOutcome Baseline demographics, treatment choices, and time to hemorrhoidectomy (if applicable) were stratified and analyzed on the basis of hemorrhoid grade (grade II and III) and age groupings
    • result Patients with grade III versus grade II hemorrhoids were more likely to choose hemorrhoidectomy as the initial treatment management (27.6% vs 4.1%). Patients in the age groups of 18 to 30 and 30 to 50 years were more likely to choose hemorrhoidectomy as the initial treatment management compared to those in the age group of 51 to 75 years (23.5% and 22% vs 12.8%). In patients who were initially treated with medical management or office-based procedures and then progressed to hemorrhoidectomy, no significant differences in the length of time to hemorrhoidectomy were noted on the basis of hemorrhoid grade or age.

    Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 38408874 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Xu et al. 2024

    Effect of lidocaine on postoperative analgesia of endoscopic rubber band ligation combined with injection sclerotherapy for treatment of internal hemorrhoids: A retrospective study (with video)

    Less pain with added lidocaine.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    66 people1 month

    lower pain scores and faster pain relief with lidocaine plus lauromacrogol, no difference in side effects or treatment success

    Who was studied
    patients with grade III internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    endoscopic rubber band ligation plus injection sclerotherapy using lidocaine plus lauromacrogol solution
    Compared with
    same procedure using lauromacrogol alone
    Main outcome
    postoperative pain level and pain relief time
    Quality
    This was a small, retrospective study comparing two non-surgical additive techniques, not surgery versus no surgery.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design, small and unequal group sizes, short follow-up of only 1 month.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population grade Ⅲ internal hemorrhoids patients who underwent ERBL combined with IS
    • intervention lidocaine plus lauromacrogol group, 20 patients
    • comparator control group (lauromacrogol group, 46 patients)
    • primaryOutcome Postoperative pain (quantized by Visual Analogue Scale, VAS), pain relief time and postoperative adverse reactions were compared
    • result VAS of postoperative pain was 0.80 ± 0.42 points and pain relief time was 0.90 ± 0.56 days in the study group, while VAS of postoperative pain was 4.11 ± 1.37 points and pain relief time was 2.57 ± 0.83 days in the control group, there was statistical difference between them (P < 0.05)
    • n control group (lauromacrogol group, 46 patients) and study group (lidocaine plus lauromacrogol group, 20 patients)

    Arab J Gastroenterol · PMID 38403495 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Xu et al. 2024

    Evaluation of a novel disposable endoscope for retroflexed endoscopic rubber band ligation of internal hemorrhoids: a randomized pilot study

    Disposable scope works as well as reusable one.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question

    42 peoplepostoperative Day 30

    both endoscope types were equally safe and effective, with similar therapeutic effects and complication rates

    Who was studied
    adults with Grade II and III internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    rubber band ligation using a new disposable endoscope
    Compared with
    rubber band ligation using a traditional reusable endoscope
    Main outcome
    safety and treatment effectiveness of the banding procedure
    Quality
    This was a very small pilot trial of only 42 patients comparing two devices for the same procedure, not surgery versus non-surgical treatment.
    Limitations
    Small pilot study size; compares two endoscope types rather than addressing whether surgery is needed versus non-operative treatment.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n This prospective randomized controlled trial involved 42 patients who underwent ERBL for Grade II and III internal hemorrhoids using either a disposable endoscope (n = 21) or a reusable endoscope (n = 21).
    • population ERBL for Grade II and III internal hemorrhoids
    • intervention using either a disposable endoscope (n = 21)
    • comparator or a reusable endoscope (n = 21)
    • primaryOutcome Safety was assessed by the incidence of equipment failure, device-related adverse events, and in-procedure stability of vital signs. Effectiveness was assessed by the postoperative therapeutic effect, feasibility of retroflexed ERBL, and incidence of complications.
    • result In terms of effectiveness, the therapeutic effects on postoperative Day 30 were similar in both groups.
    • result The incidence of complications on postoperative Days 1 and 10 was not significantly different between the two groups.

    Postgrad Med J · PMID 38330500 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Gallo et al. 2024

    Sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Fewer complications, similar success rate.Meta-analysisModerate quality

    9,729 people2024

    similar success and recurrence rates, but fewer complications than comparator treatments

    Who was studied
    patients with hemorrhoidal disease, median age 52, mostly male
    What they received
    sclerotherapy (injection treatment, mainly with polidocanol)
    Compared with
    other conservative or surgical treatments
    Main outcome
    treatment success rate, recurrence rate, and complications
    Quality
    it pools many studies and randomized trials, but the included studies vary in design, severity of disease, and quality, so confidence is only moderate
    Limitations
    the abstract does not describe limitations of the individual studies in detail, though it calls for further research into long-term outcomes

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n 44 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 9729 patients
    • population The median age of participants was 52 years, and the majority were male.
    • intervention Sclerotherapy was predominantly administered through anoscopy, with polidocanol being the most commonly used agent.
    • comparator compared to other conservative or surgical approaches
    • primaryOutcome success rate (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.71-1.41) and recurrence rate (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.69-1.77), while resulting in fewer complications (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.92)
    • result sclerotherapy was not inferior to control interventions in terms of success rate (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.71-1.41) and recurrence rate (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.69-1.77), while resulting in fewer complications (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.92)

    Tech Coloproctol · PMID 38261136 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Batra et al. 2025

    Injection sclerotherapy for the treatment of haemorrhoids in anticoagulated patients

    Symptoms resolved without surgery in most.RetrospectiveLow quality

    20 peopleat least six months

    90% of patients had their symptoms resolve using injection sclerotherapy while staying on their blood thinners, with no complications reported

    Who was studied
    patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids who are on blood-thinning medication
    What they received
    injection sclerotherapy (a non-surgical in-office treatment)
    Compared with
    no comparison group; some patients needed alternative procedures
    Main outcome
    symptoms (bleeding) going away for at least six months
    Quality
    This was a small retrospective case review with only 20 patients and no comparison group, so it can't prove the treatment works better than alternatives.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design, small sample size, no control group, single center.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n A total of 20 patients
    • population Symptomatic haemorrhoids (SH) are a common condition; however, conventional outpatient treatment, including rubber band ligation, is contraindicated in patients receiving concurrent anticoagulation.
    • intervention Injection sclerotherapy (IST) has been proposed as a treatment option for these patients.
    • comparator two (10%) patients requiring alternative interventions
    • primaryOutcome The primary outcome was symptom resolution, defined as no patient reporting bleeding for at least six months.
    • result Symptom resolution was achieved in 18 (90%) patients using IST while continuing anticoagulation treatment
    • followUp no patient reporting bleeding for at least six months

    Ann R Coll Surg Engl · PMID 38174849 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Watson et al. 2024

    Use of pudendal nerve blocks in rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids: an Australia-wide cross-sectional analysis

    Nerve block use varies, outcomes not studied.RegistryLow qualityRelated question

    346,542 people2024

    4.04% of rubber band ligation admissions involved a pudendal nerve block, with use rising from 1.62% to 6.63% over the study period and much higher use in private hospitals

    Who was studied
    adults in Australia who had rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids
    What they received
    pudendal nerve block used during rubber band ligation
    Compared with
    rubber band ligation without a pudendal nerve block
    Main outcome
    how often pudendal nerve blocks were used, and whether use varied by patient and hospital factors
    Quality
    This is a registry analysis of practice patterns, not of whether the procedure or the nerve block actually improves pain or outcomes.
    Limitations
    Aggregate administrative data only, no outcome measures such as pain or complication rates reported, and no comparison of rubber band ligation to surgery.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Of the 346 542 admissions for RBL, 14013 (4.04%) involved a PNB.
    • population all admissions for RBL in Australia from 2012 to 2021
    • intervention pudendal nerve blocks (PNB) being one analgesic strategy
    • comparator with and without a PNB
    • primaryOutcome whether use varies by year and patient and hospital characteristics
    • result The proportion of patients receiving a PNB increased between 2012-2013 and 2020-2021, from 1.62% to 6.63%

    ANZ J Surg · PMID 38174653 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Nada et al. 2024

    Comparison between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy in the management of third- and fourth-degree piles: a randomized clinical trial

    Harmonic scalpel surgery had fewer complications.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question

    70 people1 year

    HSH had less bleeding, lower recurrence at 1 year, and higher patient satisfaction than SH, though SH was faster

    Who was studied
    adults with grade III and grade IV hemorrhoids (piles)
    What they received
    harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy (HSH)
    Compared with
    stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH)
    Main outcome
    procedure time, postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, wound infection, bleeding, incontinence, and recurrence within 1 year
    Quality
    Small single-center trial comparing two surgical techniques, not addressing whether surgery is needed at all, with only 1-year follow-up.
    Limitations
    Single-center, single-blind design with modest sample size and short 1-year follow-up; study compares two surgical methods rather than surgery versus non-surgical treatment.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population included 50 (68.75%) male and 20 (31.25%) female patients with third- and fourth-degree piles
    • intervention group II underwent HSH
    • comparator Group I underwent SH
    • primaryOutcome This study compared the results of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) and harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy (HSH) in the management of grade III and grade IV piles regarding the time of the procedure, postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, wound infection, bleeding, incontinence, and recurrence within 1 year.
    • result There were 7 (20%) cases of recurrence at the 1‑year follow-up in group I and 1 (2.9%) case in group II (p = 0.024).
    • n included 50 (68.75%) male and 20 (31.25%) female patients

    Chirurgie (Heidelb) · PMID 38157069 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association et al. 2023

    [Chinese expert consensus on the treatment of hemorrhoids by injection(2023 edition)]

    Consensus guidance, no outcome data given.GuidelineLow quality

    size not given2023

    expert consensus recommendations on drug types and methods for hemorrhoid injection treatment, no outcome data reported

    Who was studied
    adults with hemorrhoids, usually aged 25-65
    What they received
    injection therapy for hemorrhoids
    Compared with
    no specific comparator stated
    Main outcome
    effectiveness and safety of injection treatment for hemorrhoids
    Quality
    this is an expert consensus statement summarizing recommendations rather than a study reporting trial results or outcome data
    Limitations
    no specific study data, outcomes, or comparative results are reported; it is a consensus/guideline document

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population Hemorrhoids is a common anorectal disease, usually occurring in middle-aged people aged 25-65 years old
    • intervention Injection therapy with a history of more than 150 years is simple to operate, easy to popularize and apply in grass-roots units, causes less intraoperative bleeding and fewer complications, and has reliable efficacy.
    • comparator The treatment of hemorrhoids includes conservative, injection, ligation, and various surgical procedures.
    • primaryOutcome aiming to guide the reasonable selection of drugs and dosage forms for hemorrhoidal injection treatment, and to provide reference for standardizing the use of different drugs and dosage forms, so as to improve the effectiveness and safety of clinical application of hemorrhoidal injection treatment.
    • result This paper attempts to make detailed recommendations on the types and application methods of the preparations commonly used in the injection treatment of hemorrhoids at home and abroad, and form the Chinese Expert Consensus on the Treatment of hemorrhoids by anal injection (2023 edition)

    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi · PMID 38110270 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Geraghty et al. 2024

    Excisional haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease - is it time to question an old dogma?

    Surgery seems safe in Crohn's patients.Systematic reviewLow qualityRelated question

    67 people2024

    no cases of proctectomy from poor wound healing; low rates of complications like bleeding, fissures, abscess, stricture

    Who was studied
    patients with Crohn's disease who had hemorrhoid surgery
    What they received
    excisional hemorrhoidectomy (surgical removal of hemorrhoids)
    Compared with
    no comparator; outcomes pooled across studies
    Main outcome
    complications including wound healing problems, proctectomy, bleeding, and other post-operative issues
    Quality
    Small combined patient numbers from only four studies, with no control group and no randomization.
    Limitations
    Small cohort size, review of existing studies rather than new trial, no comparator group, further prospective trials recommended.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n A cohort of 67 patients across four studies was included in this review.
    • population Haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease is controversial due to fears over poor wound healing leading to proctectomy.
    • intervention excisional haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease
    • comparator Review articles and case reports were excluded.
    • primaryOutcome There were no reported cases of proctectomy related to haemorrhoidectomy or poor wound healing.
    • result There were no reported cases of proctectomy related to haemorrhoidectomy or poor wound healing. One patient (1.5%) had a non-healing wound post-operatively. Four (6%) cases of post-operative bleeding were identified, two (3%) patients were diagnosed with anal fissures and two (3%) were treated after developing perianal abscess post-procedure.
    • limitations further prospective analysis is certainly warranted

    Ir J Med Sci · PMID 37957477 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Puigdollers et al. 2024

    Haemorrhoidal artery distribution in patients with grade III and IV haemorrhoids treated with artery ligation and rectoanal repair. Assessment of Doppler guidance

    Mapped artery locations, no outcomes reported.Case seriesLow qualityRelated question

    146 people2024

    On average 7 ligatures and 3 mucopexies were needed per patient, with artery locations varying between patients, especially more on the right side of the rectum

    Who was studied
    Adults with grade III or IV hemorrhoids who had a Doppler-guided artery ligation procedure
    What they received
    Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair (a minimally invasive surgical technique)
    Compared with
    No comparison group; all patients received the same procedure
    Main outcome
    Number and clock-position locations of artery ligatures needed to stop blood flow (Doppler silence)
    Quality
    This is a single-group descriptive study of surgical technique with no comparison group, so it cannot show whether surgery works better than non-surgical treatment.
    Limitations
    No control or comparator group; focuses on anatomical/technical details of one surgical procedure rather than comparing surgery to non-surgical treatment or reporting symptom outcomes.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n In total, 146 patients were included
    • population consecutive patients diagnosed with Goligher grade III and IV haemorrhoids, who had undergone Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL) and rectoanal repair (RAR)
    • intervention Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL) and rectoanal repair (RAR)
    • comparator The study included consecutive patients diagnosed with Goligher grade III and IV haemorrhoids, who had undergone Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL) and rectoanal repair (RAR) at 2 medical centres in Spain.
    • primaryOutcome The main objective was to evaluate the number and 12-h clock locations of arterial ligatures necessary to achieve Doppler silence.
    • result The average number of ligatures per patient was 7 (range 2-12). Ligature percentages greater than 60% occurred at clock positions 7, 11, 10, 12, 9, and 1. The average number of mucopexies per patient was 3 (range 1-4).

    Cir Esp (Engl Ed) · PMID 37949364 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Tsunoda et al. 2023

    Mid-term outcome of a novel nonexcisional technique using aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid sclerotherapy with mucopexy on patients with grade III hemorrhoids

    High success, low pain, few problems.RetrospectiveLow quality

    size not givenfive years

    cumulative success rates were 96.5% at one year, 85.3% at three years, and 85.3% at five years, with low pain scores, few complications (5.3%), and high satisfaction (≥9/10)

    Who was studied
    patients with grade III hemorrhoids
    What they received
    ALTA (aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid) sclerotherapy combined with rectal mucopexy, a non-excisional surgery
    Compared with
    none - no separate comparison group described in the methods
    Main outcome
    treatment success rate, postoperative pain, complications, and patient satisfaction
    Quality
    This was a retrospective single-group case series with no comparison group, so it cannot show whether this treatment works better than surgery or no treatment.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design using prospectively collected data from a single institution, no control or comparison group reported.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population Patients with grade III hemorrhoids who underwent AM surgery were enrolled in this retrospective analysis
    • intervention ALTA therapy with rectal mucopexy (AM) is a new approach for treating hemorrhoidal prolapse
    • intervention AM surgery is an effective non-excisional surgery with satisfactory mid-term results for grade III hemorrhoids
    • comparator patients with grade III hemorrhoids who underwent AM surgery were enrolled in this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a single institution
    • primaryOutcome Cumulative success rates, postoperative symptoms, including pain scores, analgesic requirements, and postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction were assessed.
    • result Cumulative success rates at one, three, and five years were 96.5%, 85.3%, and 85.3%, respectively.
    • result Patient satisfaction scores, which were assessed using a 10-point scale, were ≥9 at each postoperative year.
    • result Six patients (5.3%) showed postoperative complications: five showed Clavien-Dindo (C-D) grade I and one showed C-D grade IIIa complications.

    Tech Coloproctol · PMID 37848640 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Cemil et al. 2024

    Comparison of Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty and Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy Techniques in the Treatment of Grade 2 and 3 Hemorrhoidal Disease

    No clear surgery advantage, laser vs cutting.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question

    85 peoplewithin 10 days

    Laser treatment caused less bleeding and lower pain scores right after surgery, but study authors concluded it was not more advantageous than standard surgery once pain is managed with simple painkillers

    Who was studied
    adults aged 18-70 with grade 2 or 3 hemorrhoids whose symptoms persisted despite at least one month of medical treatment
    What they received
    laser hemorrhoidoplasty
    Compared with
    Milligan-Morgan surgical hemorrhoidectomy
    Main outcome
    post-surgery pain, bleeding, and need for pain medication
    Quality
    small randomized trial comparing two surgical methods with only short-term follow-up, so it doesn't address whether surgery is needed at all.
    Limitations
    Only early/short-term results reported; unequal group sizes; compares two surgical techniques rather than surgery versus non-surgical care.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population total 85 patients aged 18-70 years old with symptomatic Grade 2 and Grade 3 hemorrhoidal disease whose symptoms persisted despite at least one month of medical treatment
    • intervention Laser hemorrhoidoplasty
    • comparator Milligan-Morgan (MM) hemorrhoidectomy
    • primaryOutcome Postoperative VAS score and complications were recorded within 10 days.
    • result The incidence of minor perioperative hemorrhage was significantly lower in Group L compared to Group M (P = .035). The postoperative 3rd-hour VAS scores were statistically significantly lower in Group L compared to Group (P < .001).
    • result We believe that it is not an advantageous method compared to MM hemorrhoidectomy, both in terms of patient comfort and cost-effectiveness
    • n total 85 patients aged 18-70 years old
    • followUp Postoperative VAS score and complications were recorded within 10 days.

    Am Surg · PMID 37846728 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Onder et al. 2023

    A retrospective comparative study of hemorrhoidal artery ligation versus ligasure hemorrhoidectomy for the third degree hemorrhoidal disease

    Less pain, shorter stay with artery ligation.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    91 people2023

    ADHL had shorter operative time, shorter hospital stay (1.5 vs 3.05 days), quicker resolution of bleeding (1.4 vs 4.9 days), and similar recurrence rates (4 vs 3 patients) compared to LH

    Who was studied
    patients with third degree hemorrhoidal disease
    What they received
    Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (ADHL)
    Compared with
    Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy (LH), a bipolar energy surgical removal method
    Main outcome
    operative time, hospital stay, postoperative pain, bleeding, and recurrence after surgery
    Quality
    This was a retrospective study comparing two surgical techniques without randomization, so it cannot reliably separate treatment effects from other differences between patients.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design, no randomization, and the authors state prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm results.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is the most common disease of the anorectal region
    • population Patients treated with ADHL and LH for HD
    • intervention Doppler-guided ligation of the hemorrhoidal arteries (ADHL)
    • comparator Excision of pathological hemorrhoidal structures by providing bipolar energy transfer with Ligasure
    • n The number of patients included in the study was 91.
    • result The mean operative time was shorter in group 1.
    • result The mean hospital stay was 1.5 days in the ADHL-treated group, compared to. 3.05 days in the LH group.
    • result bleeding was not observed after an average of 1.4 days in group 1, while this period was 4.9 days in group 2
    • result recurrence occurred in 4 patients in the ADHL group, recurrence developed in 3 patients who underwent LH
    • primaryOutcome operation time, bleeding during and after the operation, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain scoring, and postoperative results

    Asian J Surg · PMID 37659951 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Zhang et al. 2023

    Positive efficacy of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum MH-301 as a postoperative adjunct to endoscopic sclerotherapy for internal hemorrhoids: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Probiotic helped recovery after hemorrhoid surgery.Randomised trialModerate qualityRelated question

    103 people2023

    87.8% improved in the probiotic group versus 70.2% in the placebo group, a significant difference

    Who was studied
    Adults with internal hemorrhoids (grade I-III) who underwent endoscopic sclerotherapy
    What they received
    Probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum MH-301 taken for 4 weeks after the sclerotherapy procedure
    Compared with
    Placebo after the same sclerotherapy procedure
    Main outcome
    Percentage of patients whose hemorrhoid symptom score dropped to zero after treatment
    Quality
    It was a well-designed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, but it was modest in size and only tested a probiotic add-on after surgery, not surgery itself.
    Limitations
    Abstract does not report blinding of outcome assessors beyond double-blind design, long-term follow-up, or whether findings generalize beyond this specific procedure and probiotic strain.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population patients (≥18 years) with internal hemorrhoids that conformed to Goligher's classification of grade I-III received administration of L. plantarum MH-301 for 4 weeks following endoscopic sclerotherapy
    • intervention administration of L. plantarum MH-301 for 4 weeks following endoscopic sclerotherapy
    • comparator 51 in the LP group and 52 in the C group
    • primaryOutcome The primary clinical endpoint in this study was the improvement rate, which was defined as the percentage of patients whose n-HDSS score decreased to 0 following the procedure.
    • result The primary clinical endpoint showed a higher improvement rate in the LP group (87.8% vs. 70.2%, P = 0.045).
    • n A total of 103 participants (51 in the LP group and 52 in the C group) were recruited

    Food Funct · PMID 37655699 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Giuliani et al. 2023

    Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy Versus Dearterialization With Mucopexy for the Treatment of Grade III Hemorrhoidal Disease: The EMODART3 Multicenter Study

    Fewer complications but more recurrence with artery ligation.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    1,681 people24 months

    excisional surgery had more complications, but artery ligation had more recurrences at 24 months

    Who was studied
    adults with grade III hemorrhoids
    What they received
    artery ligation surgery with mucopexy (a less invasive technique)
    Compared with
    traditional excisional hemorrhoidectomy surgery
    Main outcome
    symptoms, postoperative complications, and recurrence at 24 months
    Quality
    This was a retrospective study pooling self-reported data from multiple centers, not a randomized trial, so it cannot reliably prove one surgery is better than the other.
    Limitations
    The retrospective design and the self-reported nature of data from different centers.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population patients with Goligher's grade III hemorrhoidal disease
    • intervention hemorrhoidal artery ligation
    • comparator excisional hemorrhoidectomy
    • primaryOutcome compare them in terms of symptoms, postoperative adverse events, and recurrences at a 24-month follow-up
    • result Patients who underwent excisional hemorrhoidectomy had a significantly higher risk of postoperative complication (adjusted OR = 1.58; p = 0.006).
    • result recurrence was significantly higher in the hemorrhoidal artery ligation group (adjusted OR = 0.50; p = 0.001)
    • n Data from 1681 patients were analyzed.
    • limitations The retrospective design and the self-reported nature of data from different centers.
    • followUp 24-month follow-up period

    Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 37616177 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Fiordaliso et al. 2023

    Treatment of haemorrhoids in pregnancy: A retrospective review

    Non-surgical care usually enough; surgery for severe cases only.Narrative reviewVery low quality

    size not given2023

    conservative measures are generally safe; surgery reserved for severe complications like strangulation, thrombosis or intractable bleeding

    Who was studied
    pregnant women with hemorrhoids
    What they received
    non-surgical treatments like fiber supplements, stool softeners, laxatives, topical medication or oral phlebotonics
    Compared with
    surgery (hemorrhoidectomy)
    Main outcome
    appropriate management approach for hemorrhoids in pregnancy
    Quality
    This is a narrative literature review without systematic methodology or pooled data, so it cannot reliably establish whether one treatment works better than another.
    Limitations
    The abstract does not describe systematic review methodology, quality assessment of included studies, or report on study selection criteria beyond search terms used.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population Haemorrhoids are common in young women and commoner during pregnancy and the puerperium.
    • intervention Fiber supplement, stool softener and mild laxatives are generally safe for pregnant women.
    • comparator Hemorrhoidectomy is reserved in strangulated or extensively thrombosed hemorrhoids, and hemorrhoids with intractable bleeding.
    • primaryOutcome we address the issue of the approach of the obstetrician and surgeons to haemorrhoids and their management
    • result Fiber supplement, stool softener and mild laxatives are generally safe for pregnant women. Topical medication or oral phlebotonics may be used with special caution because the strong evidence of their safety and efficacy in pregnancy is lacking.
    • result Hemorrhoidectomy is reserved in strangulated or extensively thrombosed hemorrhoids, and hemorrhoids with intractable bleeding.

    Ann Ital Chir · PMID 37530049 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Solari et al. 2023

    Laser technology in proctological diseases: is it really the wave of the future?

    Less pain than surgery, but costly.Systematic reviewLow quality

    size not given2023

    Laser treatments for hemorrhoids require a shorter operative time and show less postoperative pain and bleeding compared to conventional hemorrhoidectomy, but are more expensive.

    Who was studied
    adults with hemorrhoids
    What they received
    laser treatment for hemorrhoids
    Compared with
    conventional hemorrhoidectomy
    Main outcome
    operative time, postoperative pain, bleeding, and cost
    Quality
    This is a scoping review with highly varied studies and only three randomized trials, so the findings are not very reliable.
    Limitations
    Studies are heterogeneous in design, endpoints, postoperative assessment, length of follow-up and outcome measures. Only 3 RCTs are available and only three studies evaluate long-term outcomes.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n 55 studies were included for the final revision.
    • result Laser treatments for hemorrhoids require a shorter operative time and show less postoperative pain and bleeding compared to conventional hemorrhoidectomy, but are more expensive.
    • primaryOutcome require a shorter operative time and show less postoperative pain and bleeding
    • intervention Laser treatments for hemorrhoids
    • comparator compared to conventional hemorrhoidectomy
    • population Laser treatments for hemorrhoids

    Updates Surg · PMID 37438655 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Kodilinye et al. 2023

    Endoscopic approaches to the management of hemorrhoids

    Nonsurgical options show promise but need more study.Narrative reviewLow quality

    size not given2023

    Endoscopic rubber band ligation works reasonably well but causes mild complications; other techniques are understudied and direct comparisons are lacking

    Who was studied
    people with internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    endoscopic treatments such as rubber band ligation, sclerotherapy, and coagulation
    Compared with
    different endoscopic techniques compared to each other
    Main outcome
    effectiveness and complications of endoscopic treatment for hemorrhoids
    Quality
    This is a narrative review of varied studies without pooled data, standardized comparisons, or patient numbers reported.
    Limitations
    Abstract notes lack of standardization of clinical trials, variation in techniques and hemorrhoid grading, and insufficient head-to-head comparisons.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population the endoscopic management of internal hemorrhoids
    • intervention cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES)
    • intervention Rubber band ligation has been adopted by the endoscopist as endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL)
    • comparator Data is needed on head-to-head comparisons between ERBL, endoscopic sclerotherapy, and CAES.
    • primaryOutcome current status and future perspectives of the endoscopic management of internal hemorrhoids
    • result demonstrating satisfactory results in treating symptomatic hemorrhoids, although mild postprocedure complications are common
    • result Other methods, such as coagulation, are understudied and should be explored further in the endoscopic setting.
    • result Meaningful comparisons between treatment methods for internal hemorrhoids have been difficult because of variations in interventional techniques and methods

    Curr Opin Gastroenterol · PMID 37389425 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Pastor Peinado et al. 2023

    Quality of life and outcomes after rubber band ligation for haemorrhoidal disease

    Less pain and improved symptoms.Prospective cohortLow quality

    100 people6 months

    significant reduction in symptom and health scale scores, with 89% overall success and 76% patient satisfaction

    Who was studied
    adults with symptomatic grade II-III hemorrhoids that did not improve after 6 months of non-surgical treatment
    What they received
    rubber band ligation (RBL) of hemorrhoids
    Compared with
    no comparison group; scores measured before and after treatment in the same patients
    Main outcome
    change in quality of life using symptom and health scores (HDSS and SHS)
    Quality
    This was a single-group study without a comparison treatment, so it cannot show whether banding worked better than no treatment or surgery.
    Limitations
    No control group was used, so improvements cannot be directly attributed to the procedure alone; some patients needed repeat procedures and 12% had complications.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n A total of 100 patients were finally included.
    • population patients with symptomatic grade II-III haemorrhoids who did not improve after 6 months of conservative treatment
    • intervention rubber band ligation (RBL)
    • comparator RBL was offered as first-line treatment in this group.
    • primaryOutcome Patient´s quality of life was assessed by scores: HDSS (Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score) and SHS (Short Health Scale).
    • result a significant reduction was found in the HDSS and SHS scores (p < 0.001)
    • result The overall success rate of banding was 89%.
    • result A high degree of satisfaction with the procedure was reported by 76% of patients.

    Langenbecks Arch Surg · PMID 37349572 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Gachabayov et al. 2023

    Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization With Mucopexy Versus Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy for Prolapsed Internal Hemorrhoids: A Multicenter Prospective Study

    Less pain, similar recurrence between two surgeries.Prospective cohortModerate qualityRelated question

    197 people3.1 (1.0-5.5) years

    recurrence rates were similar between the two surgeries, but the newer technique caused less pain and higher patient satisfaction in the first weeks and months

    Who was studied
    patients with prolapsed internal hemorrhoids in at least 3 columns
    What they received
    transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) with mucopexy, a surgical technique
    Compared with
    Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy, a traditional surgical removal of hemorrhoids
    Main outcome
    rate of hemorrhoid prolapse coming back after surgery
    Quality
    it followed many patients over several years across multiple centers, but surgeons chose which operation to perform rather than patients being randomly assigned, which could bias results
    Limitations
    Surgeons performed the operation they knew best rather than being randomly assigned, so the comparison is affected by surgeon experience and preference rather than a controlled randomization.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Twenty surgeons enrolled 197 patients.
    • population Patients with prolapsed internal hemorrhoids in at least 3 columns were eligible.
    • intervention transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) with mucopexy
    • comparator Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy
    • primaryOutcome The primary endpoint was recurrence rates defined as prolapsing internal hemorrhoids.
    • result Recurrence rates did not differ between the study arms (5.9% vs 2.4%, P =0.253).
    • result THD patients had lower Visual pain scores at postoperative day (POD) 1 (6.2 vs 8.3, P =0.047), POD7 (4.5 vs 7.7, P =0.021), POD14 (2.8 vs 5.3, P <0.001)
    • followUp Median follow-up was 3.1 (1.0-5.5) years.
    • limitations Participating surgeons performed the operation they knew best enrolling 10 patients each.

    Ann Surg · PMID 37325897 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • van Oostendorp et al. 2023

    Treatment of haemorrhoids: rubber band ligation or sclerotherapy (THROS)? Study protocol for a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial

    No results yet; trial planned.Registered trial, no results postedLow quality

    size not given2023

    No results reported; this is a study protocol for a planned trial

    Who was studied
    adults with mild (grade 1-2) hemorrhoids
    What they received
    rubber band ligation
    Compared with
    sclerotherapy injection
    Main outcome
    symptom reduction, recurrence and complications
    Quality
    This is only a trial protocol with no outcome data yet, so it cannot show whether either treatment works.
    Limitations
    The abstract describes planned methodology only; no results, sample size outcomes, or follow-up data are yet available.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population symptomatic grade 1-2 haemorrhoids in adults (> 18 years)
    • intervention rubber band ligation (RBL)
    • comparator sclerotherapy (SCL)
    • primaryOutcome The primary outcome measures are symptom reduction by means of PROMs, recurrence and complication rates.
    • result This protocol describes the methodology of a non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing rubber band ligation and sclerotherapy

    Trials · PMID 37270601 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Pfeil et al. 2023

    [Hemorroids Therapy: a Tailored Approch]

    Most cases improve without surgery.Narrative reviewVery low quality

    size not given2023

    Most patients improve with non-surgical treatment; surgery is reserved for cases where conservative treatment fails, with rare complications

    Who was studied
    people with symptomatic hemorrhoids
    What they received
    non-surgical treatments (conservative care and sclerotherapy)
    Compared with
    surgical treatments (various operations)
    Main outcome
    symptom control and quality of life
    Quality
    This is a narrative opinion-style review without study data, numbers, or methods, so it cannot reliably establish what works.
    Limitations
    No study design, sample size, or data are reported; this is a narrative summary of clinical practice.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population symptomatic haemorrhoids
    • intervention The vast majority of patients can be treated conservatively with excellent results in terms of quality of life.
    • comparator If conservative treatment fails, there are various surgical options.
    • primaryOutcome excellent results in terms of quality of life
    • result Sclerotherapy provides good control of symptoms at any stage of haemorrhoidal disease.
    • result Postoperative bleeding, pain and faecal incontinence are rare complications after surgery.

    Zentralbl Chir · PMID 37267978 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Tian et al. 2023

    Efficacy of two endoscopic rubber band ligation methods for symptomatic hemorrhoids: a randomized controlled trial

    Banding works well, no surgery needed.Randomised trialModerate quality

    70 people12 months

    No significant difference in overall efficacy or recurrence between the two banding methods, but combined ligation caused more post-procedure pain

    Who was studied
    patients with symptomatic grade I to III hemorrhoids
    What they received
    rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids alone
    Compared with
    combined ligation (hemorrhoids plus proximal normal mucosa)
    Main outcome
    overall therapeutic success rate (complete and partial resolution)
    Quality
    It was a small, open-label randomized trial comparing two non-surgical techniques rather than against surgery itself, so results may not fully generalize.
    Limitations
    Open-label design, modest sample size, and only 62 of 70 patients completed 12-month follow-up.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n Seventy patients with symptomatic grade I to III hemorrhoids were randomly assigned to the hemorrhoid and combined ligation groups (35 in each group).
    • population symptomatic grade I to III hemorrhoids
    • intervention ligation of hemorrhoids
    • comparator simultaneous ligation of hemorrhoids and proximal normal mucosa (combined ligation)
    • primaryOutcome The primary outcome was overall therapeutic success rate (complete resolution and partial resolution rates).
    • result No significant differences in overall efficacy, recurrence rate, or efficacy for each symptom (including bleeding, prolapse, pain, anal swelling, itching, soiling, and constipation) were observed between groups.
    • result The incidence of postoperative pain was higher in the combined ligation group (74.2% vs. 45.2%, P = 0.02).
    • followUp Patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months to assess symptom improvement, complications, and recurrence.

    Surg Endosc · PMID 37188908 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Patel et al. 2023

    HEmoRhoidal disease management with Band ligation versus polidocanol Sclerotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis (the HerBS Review)

    Sclerotherapy may work better than banding.Meta-analysisLow quality

    size not given2023

    Sclerotherapy had a higher success rate (93%) than banding (75%); complication rates were not significantly different (8% vs 18%)

    Who was studied
    adults with grade I-III symptomatic internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    polidocanol sclerotherapy (injection treatment)
    Compared with
    rubber band ligation
    Main outcome
    treatment success and complications after the procedure
    Quality
    Most included studies were small, single-arm, or non-randomized, so the comparison between treatments is not very reliable.
    Limitations
    Only 3 of the included studies directly compared the two treatments; most were single-arm studies, and the abstract calls for randomized trials to confirm findings.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population adult (> 18 years) patients with grade I-III internal hemorrhoids
    • intervention polidocanol sclerotherapy
    • comparator rubber band ligation (RBL)
    • primaryOutcome Treatments were evaluated for therapeutic success and post-procedure morbidity.
    • result The patients undergoing sclerotherapy had a 93% (151/163) therapeutic success rate compared to 75% (68/91) in the RBL group (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.48-7.74, p < 0.01). The post-procedure morbidity was 8% (17/200) in the sclerotherapy group and 18% (23/128) in the RBL group (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.15-1.82, p = 0.31).
    • limitations Further evaluations in the form of randomized trials are required to evaluate patient populations, which may benefit more from sclerotherapy.

    Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 37133577 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Ding et al. 2023

    Rubber band ligation versus coagulation for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    Both work similarly; banding hurts more.Meta-analysisModerate quality

    size not given2023

    No significant difference in efficacy, prolapse, recurrence or urine retention; rubber band ligation had more pain but less bleeding than coagulation

    Who was studied
    patients with haemorrhoids
    What they received
    rubber band ligation (a non-surgical treatment)
    Compared with
    coagulation therapy (a non-surgical treatment)
    Main outcome
    treatment success, prolapse, recurrence, pain, bleeding and urine retention rates
    Quality
    It pools nine randomized trials, but all were rated only moderate quality so the findings are not fully certain.
    Limitations
    All trials were of moderate methodological quality.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population compare rubber band ligation and coagulation treatments for haemorrhoids
    • intervention Rubber band ligation
    • comparator coagulation
    • primaryOutcome efficacy rate, postoperative prolapse rate, recurrence rate and postoperative urine retention rate
    • result No significant difference was found between rubber band ligation and coagulation in terms of efficacy rate, postoperative prolapse rate, recurrence rate and postoperative urine retention rate after treatment. Patients undergoing rubber band ligation had higher postoperative pain rate and lower postoperative bleeding rate than patients undergoing coagulation.
    • qualityWhy All trials were of moderate methodological quality.

    Postgrad Med J · PMID 37117040 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Devi et al. 2023

    Hemorrhoid Disease: A Review on Treatment, Clinical Research and Patent Data

    No specific finding reported.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question

    size not given2023

    The review discusses the need for new molecules but does not report specific outcome data

    Who was studied
    people with hemorrhoids
    What they received
    various hemorrhoid treatments and newer drug molecules
    Compared with
    not specified
    Main outcome
    safety and clinical efficacy of treatments
    Quality
    This is a narrative review summarizing literature without presenting specific study results, data, or methodology for pooling evidence.
    Limitations
    No specific study results, patient numbers, or outcome data are reported; it is a general literature summary.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population Hemorrhoid disease (HD) is an anal-rectal ailment
    • intervention newer molecules to overcome hemorrhoids
    • primaryOutcome safety, clinical efficacy, and marketed formulation for the effective management of hemorrhoids
    • result The high incidence of hemorrhoids obliges the development of new molecules; therefore, safe and efficient drugs to confer protection against hemorrhoids are urgently needed.
    • comparator various studies carried out in the past

    Infect Disord Drug Targets · PMID 37106517 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Dursun et al. 2023

    Effectiveness of laser hemorrhoidoplasty in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease

    Low complications, but recurrence worse in severe cases.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    103 people6 months, 1 year, and 2 years

    recurrence occurred in 17.6% of grade 2/3 patients and 50% of grade 4 patients, with minor complications in 2.9% and quick return to daily activity

    Who was studied
    adults with grade 2, 3, or 4 internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    laser hemorrhoidoplasty (a minimally invasive laser procedure)
    Compared with
    no comparison group; results tracked within the same patients over time
    Main outcome
    symptom recovery, recurrence, pain, and complications after treatment
    Quality
    this was a retrospective study of one clinic's patients with no comparison group, so it cannot show whether laser treatment works better or worse than surgery or no treatment.
    Limitations
    retrospective design, no control or comparator group, single center, higher recurrence in more severe (grade 4) disease

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population patients who underwent LHP due to Grades 2, 3, and 4 internal hemorrhoidal disease
    • intervention laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) method
    • comparator The data of patients who underwent LHP due to Grades 2, 3, and 4 internal hemorrhoidal disease in our clinic were reviewed retrospectively.
    • primaryOutcome symptomatic recovery and recurrence rates, post-operative pain levels, and complication rates
    • result Recurrence developed in 16 (17.6%) patients with Grades 2 and 3 disease and in 6 (50%) of 12 patients with Grade 4 disease (p = 0.019).
    • n A total of 103 patients were included in the study.
    • followUp followed for at least 6 months (6 months, 1 year, and 2 years)

    Cir Cir · PMID 37084307 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Xiong et al. 2023

    Comparison of the long-term efficacy and safety of multiple endoscopic rubber band ligations in a single session for varying grades of internal hemorrhoids

    Band ligation relieved most hemorrhoid symptoms.Case seriesLow quality

    120 people14.3 ± 7.9 (1.3-30.9) months

    78.8% of patients had no symptoms at 6 weeks; grade II hemorrhoids responded better than grade III (87.8% vs 69.2%), and recurrence occurred in 25% overall, higher for grade III

    Who was studied
    adults with internal hemorrhoids
    What they received
    endoscopic rubber band ligation (bands placed in a single session)
    Compared with
    different hemorrhoid grades (II vs III) and different numbers of bands used
    Main outcome
    no hemorrhoid symptoms 6 weeks after treatment
    Quality
    This was a single-arm study without a comparison group or randomization, so it can't show whether banding is better than surgery or no treatment.
    Limitations
    No control group, no randomization, and follow-up time varied widely between patients.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n One hundred twenty-three eligible patients met the inclusion criteria, and 3 patients were excluded.
    • population Patients with IH were treated with ERBL.
    • intervention in a single session of endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL)
    • comparator grade II hemorrhoids required significantly fewer bands than grade III hemorrhoids
    • primaryOutcome The primary endpoint was no hemorrhoid symptoms 6 weeks after ERBL.
    • result 78.8% of patients achieved the primary endpoint. The efficacy of grade II hemorrhoids was higher than that of grade III hemorrhoids (87.8% vs 69.2%).
    • followUp The median follow-up time was 14.3 ± 7.9 (1.3-30.9) months.

    Ir J Med Sci · PMID 37059872 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Gambardella et al. 2023

    Mid-term efficacy and postoperative wound management of laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) vs conventional excisional hemorrhoidectomy in grade III hemorrhoidal disease: the twisting trend

    Less pain, but more recurrence.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question

    174 people25 ± 8 months

    Laser treatment caused less pain and easier wound care but a higher rate of symptom recurrence than conventional surgery

    Who was studied
    patients with grade III symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease
    What they received
    laser hemorrhoidoplasty (diode laser shrinkage of hemorrhoids)
    Compared with
    conventional Milligan-Morgan excisional hemorrhoidectomy
    Main outcome
    postoperative pain, wound healing, symptom recurrence and quality of life
    Quality
    This was a retrospective, non-randomized comparison of two surgical techniques, so differences could be due to patient selection rather than the treatment itself.
    Limitations
    Retrospective design without randomization; abstract states larger comparative studies are needed.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • n 93 patients received conventional Milligan Morgan as control group and 81 patients received laser hemorrhoidoplasty treatment
    • population grade III symptomatic HD patients undergoing LHP vs MM
    • intervention laser hemorrhoidoplasty treatment using a 1470-nm diode laser
    • comparator conventional Milligan Morgan as control group
    • primaryOutcome Postoperative pain, wound care management, symptoms' resolution, patients' quality of life, and length of return to daily activity
    • result Laser hemorrhoidoplasty patients experienced lower postoperative pain score (p < 0.0001) and smoother wound management
    • result the recurrence of symptoms occurred in 8.1% after Milligan-Morgan and 21.6% after laser hemorrhoidoplasty (p < 0.05)
    • followUp After 25 ± 8 months follow-up

    Langenbecks Arch Surg · PMID 37020091 · Read it on PubMed ↗

  • Laurain et al. 2023

    French multicentre prospective evaluation of radiofrequency ablation in the management of haemorrhoidal disease

    Fewer symptoms, better quality of life.Prospective cohortLow quality

    129 people1 year

    quality of life score improved significantly and symptoms like bleeding and prolapse decreased

    Who was studied
    adults with grade II-III hemorrhoids
    What they received
    radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hemorrhoids
    Compared with
    no comparison group (before-and-after same patients)
    Main outcome
    quality of life score related to hemorrhoid disease at 3 months
    Quality
    This study had no comparison group, so it can't show if results are better than doing nothing or another treatment.
    Limitations
    No control group to compare against; some patients needed repeat surgery for relapse or complications.

    Taken word for word from the abstract

    • population outpatients with grade II-III haemorrhoids
    • intervention RFA (Rafaelo©)
    • n A total of 129 patients
    • primaryOutcome Primary endpoint was the evolution of a quality-of-life score adapted to the haemorrhoid pathology (HEMO-FISS-QoL) 3 months after surgery.
    • result Median HEMO-FISS-QoL score dropped significantly from 17.4/100 to 0/100 (p < 0.0001) at 3 months.
    • comparator This prospective multicentre study assessed RFA
    • followUp 1 year's follow-up

    Tech Coloproctol · PMID 37005961 · Read it on PubMed ↗

How we searchedThe exact query, the date it ran, and what came back — so you can run it yourself.
Searched
PubMed · ClinicalTrials.gov · Crossref on 2026-10-05
The exact search — paste this into PubMed to repeat it
("Hemorrhoids/surgery"[Mesh] OR "Hemorrhoids/therapy"[Mesh]) AND ("Hemorrhoidectomy"[Mesh] OR "Sclerotherapy"[Mesh] OR "Ligation"[Mesh] OR "Laser Therapy"[Mesh] OR nonsurgical[tiab] OR "non-surgical"[tiab] OR "rubber band ligation"[tiab] OR "infrared coagulation"[tiab] OR "laser hemorrhoidoplasty"[tiab])
PubMed expanded that to: ("hemorrhoids/surgery"[MeSH Terms] OR "hemorrhoids/therapy"[MeSH Terms]) AND ("Hemorrhoidectomy"[MeSH Terms] OR "Sclerotherapy"[MeSH Terms] OR "Ligation"[MeSH Terms] OR "Laser Therapy"[MeSH Terms] OR "nonsurgical"[Title/Abstract] OR "non-surgical"[Title/Abstract] OR "rubber band ligation"[Title/Abstract] OR "infrared coagulation"[Title/Abstract] OR "laser hemorrhoidoplasty"[Title/Abstract])
What came back
1452 records found · 200 read · 115 answered the question
Included
  • Human, animal or laboratory studies reporting an outcome relevant to the question
Excluded
  • Records about a different condition or intervention
  • Records reporting no outcome
  • Retracted publications, which are listed but excluded from every count
Limits
  • Details were read from abstracts, not full papers, so anything reported only in a paper's methods section is not captured here.
  • Fields were read from abstracts, not full text, so detail reported only in a paper's methods section is not captured.
  • Evidence strength is adapted from the GRADE framework. It is not a GRADE assessment and was not produced by a GRADE panel.

Automated evidence review — PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Crossref. Search strategy, grading rules and the checks that must pass before anything publishes were written by Allen Kamrava, MD, MBA, FACS, FASCRS, colon & rectal surgery, Beverly Hills. The pages themselves are compiled by software running that method and are not read one by one before publication — saying otherwise would be the one claim here that could not be checked.

How we grade evidence →

  1. 1452records came back from the search
  2. 200were read
  3. 115actually answered the question
Why people try thisThe reasoning behind the question — not a claim that it works.
  • Non-surgical options sound less frightening and don't require general anesthesia.
  • People want to avoid the pain and time off work that often come with surgery.
  • In-office procedures like banding can usually be done same-day without a hospital stay.
  • Doctors often suggest starting with the least invasive option, like fiber or banding, before considering surgery.
Common questionsShort answers, drawn from the same studies.
Will I definitely need surgery for my hemorrhoids?
No. Most people, especially with milder hemorrhoids, are managed first with diet changes, creams, or office procedures like banding. Surgery is generally reserved for more severe or grade III-IV disease that hasn't responded to these.
Is rubber band ligation as good as surgery?
Not for grade III hemorrhoids, based on the trial that tested this directly. Banding caused less pain and let people return to activity sooner, but hemorrhoids came back much more often than after surgery (about 48% vs 6% within a year).
Should I stop a non-surgical treatment if it isn't working?
Yes. If office procedures or conservative measures aren't controlling your symptoms, guidance reviewed here suggests moving on to surgery rather than repeating the same approach indefinitely.
What are the risks of non-surgical treatments like banding?
Most side effects are mild and temporary, but rare serious bleeding has been reported after banding. Tell your doctor right away about any heavy bleeding after the procedure.
What are the risks of surgery?
Surgery causes more pain and a longer recovery than office procedures. Infection risk is higher in people who carry certain resistant bacteria, and like any surgery it carries a small chance of serious complications.
Are there any safety risks I should watch for after a hemorrhoid procedure?
Yes. Reported problems include delayed heavy bleeding after rubber band ligation, occurring about two weeks later in one case (32), and a serious bowel wall injury (rectal perforation) after laser hemorrhoidoplasty that required emergency surgery (76). People who carry drug-resistant bacteria in the rectum also had a much higher rate of wound infection after surgical hemorrhoid removal (97). These problems are uncommon, but if you develop new or worsening bleeding, fever, severe pain, or swelling in the days or weeks after any hemorrhoid treatment, contact your doctor or go to an emergency room right away rather than waiting it out. Choosing an experienced provider and asking what warning signs to watch for before your procedure is the best way to catch a problem early.
Are there any serious risks I should know about before choosing a treatment?
Yes, though they appear to be rare. Case reports describe a woman who had massive rectal bleeding two weeks after rubber-band banding, and another who developed a rectal perforation with sepsis and organ failure after laser hemorrhoidoplasty, needing emergency surgery; a separate study found that patients carrying drug-resistant bacteria had a much higher infection rate after hemorrhoid surgery, and laboratory modeling of laser heating showed how uneven heat could damage the layers of rectal tissue. These reports do not tell us how often such problems happen, but they are a reason to have any hemorrhoid procedure done by an experienced clinician. If you develop heavy bleeding, fever, severe pain, or are unable to pass urine or stool after a procedure, contact a doctor right away instead of waiting it out.

This is information, not advice

This page summarises published research. It cannot tell you what is happening in your own body, and evidence changes. If something is bleeding, painful, or new, it is worth being looked at — that is a different question from the one on this page, and a better one to bring to a consultation.

Contact the office

Automated evidence review — PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Crossref. Search strategy, grading rules and the checks that must pass before anything publishes were written by Allen Kamrava, MD, MBA, FACS, FASCRS, colon & rectal surgery, Beverly Hills. The pages themselves are compiled by software running that method and are not read one by one before publication — saying otherwise would be the one claim here that could not be checked.

CallBook