Do hemorrhoids need surgery, or can they be treated without an operation?
In adults with symptomatic internal or external hemorrhoids (Goligher grade I-IV), how do non-surgical treatments (rubber band ligation, sclerotherapy, infrared coagulation, dietary fiber) compare with surgical hemorrhoidectomy (including laser hemorrhoidoplasty) in symptom resolution, recurrence, and need for later surgery?
Compiled 2026-10-05 · checked 2026-10-05 · next 2026-11-05 · automated review, how it works
What the evidence says
Bottom line
Surgery works better than banding for stopping grade III hemorrhoids from coming back, but both approaches carry rare, serious risks.
The trials that directly compared surgery with a non-surgical option (mainly rubber band ligation) looked at grade III hemorrhoids and found surgery caused far fewer recurrences, though it hurt more and took longer to recover from. Four studies, mostly single case reports, documented rare but serious complications - severe bleeding after banding, a bowel perforation after laser treatment, and a higher infection risk after surgery in people carrying resistant bacteria. Because the trials disagree with each other and are small, confidence in any single comparison is only moderate.
How certain
Moderate
4 well-conducted randomised trials address this question directly. The studies disagree with one another, so the overall certainty is lower than any single one of them.
What it shows
Signal of harm
4 studies reported harm or tissue damage, including laboratory evidence.
- studies found
- 115studies found
- randomised trials
- 15randomised trials
- people studied
- 424,548people studied
- reviews of trials
- 20reviews of trials
- years covered
- 2023–2026years covered
- finished, never published
- 2finished, never published
Read this first
- A case report describes massive rectal bleeding 15 days after routine rubber band ligation, requiring emergency endoscopic treatment.
- A case report describes a bowel (rectal) perforation, severe infection, and organ failure after laser hemorrhoidoplasty, requiring emergency surgery and a colostomy.
- People who carried antibiotic-resistant bacteria before hemorrhoid surgery had a much higher rate of infection at the surgical site afterward.
What the research shows
Improvement shown
Possible improvement
Improvement shown
Complication rate (bleeding, infection, stenosis)
Serious complications were reported with both approaches, though mostly documented as single case reports rather than trial data: severe delayed bleeding after rubber band ligation, a bowel perforation needing emergency surgery after laser treatment, and higher surgical-site infection risk in people carrying resistant bacteria before surgery.[1,2,3]
Possible harm
Outcomes beyond 1-2 years
None of the trials comparing surgery with non-surgical treatment followed people for more than about 12 to 24 months, so what happens further out is not known.
Not studied
What it may help with
- In a randomised trial of grade III hemorrhoids, surgery led to far fewer hemorrhoids returning within a year compared with rubber band ligation.[1]
- A randomised trial comparing open surgery with a less invasive artery-ligation procedure for grade III hemorrhoids found open surgery failed far less often, though it caused more pain and a slower return to work.[1]
- Office-based procedures like banding and sclerotherapy resolved bleeding and prolapse in many patients without surgery and let them recover faster, according to several studies, though most were not controlled trials.[1,2,3]
Important limitations
- Most of the studies on non-surgical treatments are retrospective or single-arm - they follow one group of patients before and after treatment without comparing them to a different treatment, making it hard to know what would have happened otherwise.[1,2,3]
- The randomised trials that directly compared surgery with a non-surgical option were small, ranging from about 36 to 87 people, and came from single centers, so results may not hold up elsewhere.[1,2,3]
- Studies used different hemorrhoid grades and different techniques (classic surgery, laser, artery ligation, stapling, banding), so a finding about one technique does not necessarily apply to another.[1,2]
What the studies found
- Found a benefit46 · 40%
- Found no clear effect4 · 3%
- Mixed or unclear61 · 53%
- Found possible harm4 · 3%
What kind of studies
- Retrospective39 · 34%
- Randomised trial15 · 13%
- Narrative review15 · 13%
- Meta-analysis14 · 12%
- Case series10 · 9%
- Prospective cohort9 · 8%
- Systematic review6 · 5%
- Guideline3 · 3%
- Registry2 · 2%
- Laboratory study1 · 1%
- Registered trial, no results posted1 · 1%
The studies that decided it
Qureshi et al. 2026
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Hemorrhoids: Expert Review
Most hemorrhoids treatable without surgery.GuidelineLow quality
size not given2026
Most hemorrhoids can be managed with conservative measures or in-office procedures like banding and infrared coagulation, with surgery reserved for more severe or refractory cases
- Who was studied
- people with hemorrhoids
- What they received
- non-surgical treatments such as diet/lifestyle changes, topical treatments, banding, and infrared coagulation
- Compared with
- surgical hemorrhoidectomy
- Main outcome
- best practice recommendations for diagnosing and treating hemorrhoids
- Quality
- This is an expert opinion-based guideline without a systematic review of evidence, so its recommendations carry less certainty.
- Limitations
- Because systematic reviews were not performed, these BPA statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Hemorrhoids are a common problem.
- intervention
Dietary and lifestyle modifications, including increasing fiber intake and avoiding straining or prolonged time on the toilet, are reasonable first-line therapies for symptomatic hemorrhoids.
- comparator
Hemorrhoid banding or infrared coagulation should be employed prior to surgical hemorrhoidectomy for grades 1 to 3 hemorrhoids.
- primaryOutcome
to provide best practice advice (BPA) covering the diagnosis and treatment of hemorrhoid disease
- result
Both hemorrhoid banding and infrared coagulation are safe, effective, and easy to perform in the office setting.
- result
Grade 4 internal hemorrhoids require surgical hemorrhoidectomy.
- limitations
Because systematic reviews were not performed, these BPA statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol · PMID 42067175 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Fernandez-Hurtado et al. 2025
Open excisional haemorrhoidectomy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization for grade III haemorrhoids: open-label randomized clinical trial
Open surgery worked better but hurt more.Randomised trialModerate quality
50 people12 months
Open surgery had a much lower failure rate (8%) than the less invasive procedure (61%), and all repeat operations happened in the less invasive group, though open surgery caused more pain and a longer return to work
- Who was studied
- adults with grade III hemorrhoids
- What they received
- open surgical removal of hemorrhoids (open excisional haemorrhoidectomy)
- Compared with
- a less invasive surgery that cuts off blood supply to hemorrhoids (transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization)
- Main outcome
- change in hemorrhoid symptom and quality-of-life scores at 12 months, and rate of treatment failure
- Quality
- It was a randomized trial testing its question directly, but it was small, from a single center, and not blinded.
- Limitations
- Small single-centre trial, open-label (not blinded), some patients lost to follow-up.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
50 patients were randomized (25 OEH patients and 25 THD patients)
- population
patients with grade III haemorrhoids
- intervention
Open excisional haemorrhoidectomy (OEH) remains the standard treatment for advanced haemorrhoidal disease
- comparator
Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) is an alternative with reduced pain but potentially higher recurrence.
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcome was the relative change at 12 months in Haemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS) and Short Health Scale adapted for Haemorrhoidal Disease (SHS-HD) from baseline.
- result
CFR was significantly higher in the THD group (14 of 23 (61%)) versus the OEH group (2 of 24 (8%)) (P <0.001). All eigth reoperations occurred in the THD group (P = 0.001).
- result
OEH was associated with greater early postoperative pain and a longer time to return to work (median of 21 versus 14 days; P = 0.010).
Br J Surg · PMID 41553737 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Turunen et al. 2025
Massive Rectal Bleeding After Rubber Band Ligation of Internal Hemorrhoids: A Case Report
Found harmCase seriesVery low quality
1 people2025
she had massive rectal bleeding 15 days after the procedure from an ulcer at the banding site, which was treated successfully with clips and spray
- Who was studied
- a 34-year-old woman with internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- rubber band ligation of internal hemorrhoids
- Compared with
- none
- Main outcome
- delayed rectal bleeding after the procedure
- Quality
- this is a single patient case report, so it cannot show how common or rare this problem is
- Limitations
- single case report; no comparison group; cannot estimate how often this happens
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A 34-year-old White woman presented with massive rectal bleeding
- population
A 34-year-old White woman presented with massive rectal bleeding 15 days after suction RBL of internal hemorrhoids
- intervention
Rubber band ligation (RBL) is a common treatment for internal hemorrhoids
- comparator
She was not taking anticoagulants, antiplatelets, or NSAIDs and had no history of bleeding disorders
- primaryOutcome
presented with massive rectal bleeding 15 days after suction RBL of internal hemorrhoids
- result
Flexible sigmoidoscopy revealed a 10-mm ulcer with a visible vessel at the previous banding site. Hemostasis was achieved with clip placement and hemostatic spray. She recovered without further complications.
WMJ · PMID 41197059 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Quan et al. 2025
Comparison of efficacy and safety between surgical and conservative treatments for hemorrhoids: a meta-analysis
Surgery relieves symptoms faster, fewer recurrences.Meta-analysisModerate quality
760 people2025
Surgery led to more complete symptom resolution and better early pain relief, but pain outcomes were similar by 10 days; surgery also reduced recurrence and sped recovery in pregnant thrombosed cases, with similar rates of bleeding and urinary retention but some surgery-specific complications
- Who was studied
- patients with hemorrhoids, including pregnant women with thrombosed external hemorrhoids
- What they received
- surgical treatment for hemorrhoids
- Compared with
- non-invasive conservative treatment for hemorrhoids
- Main outcome
- complete symptom resolution and pain scores
- Quality
- This pooled analysis of only seven studies and 760 patients found consistent benefits for surgery, but the number of included studies is small and variability between them (noted by I2 values) limits confidence.
- Limitations
- Based on only seven studies with some statistical heterogeneity between them (I2 up to 55%)
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Seven studies, including 760 patients, were analyzed.
- population
Eligible studies compared surgical treatments with non-invasive conservative treatments in hemorrhoids.
- population
Comparable patterns were observed in pregnant women with thrombosed external hemorrhoids.
- intervention
surgical or conservative treatments
- comparator
non-invasive conservative treatments in hemorrhoids
- primaryOutcome
Surgery achieved higher rates of complete symptom resolution than conservative therapy
- result
Overall pain scores favored surgery (SMD = -0.93, 95% CI: 1.73 to -0.13, p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis showed clear superiority within four days (SMD = -1.26, 95% CI -1.84 to -0.68) but parity beyond ten days (SMD = 0.00, 95% CI -0.44 to 0.44; p = 0.99).
- result
Rates of postoperative bleeding (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.42 to 2.82, p = 0.86; I2 = 41%, p = 0.15) and urinary retention (OR: 1.75; 95% CI: 0.30 to 10.31, p = 0.54; I2 = 45%, p = 0.18) did not differ significantly between groups.
- result
Surgery shortened recovery in pregnant thrombosed cases by approximately seven days (MD: -6.80; 95% CI: -7.64 to -5.96, p < 0.001; I2 = 55%, p = 0.14) and reduced overall recurrence (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.37, p < 0.001; I2 = 0%, p = 0.97).
BMC Gastroenterol · PMID 40596934 · Read it on PubMed ↗
van Oostendorp et al. 2025
Cost-Effectiveness of Rubber Band Ligation Versus Hemorrhoidectomy for the Treatment of Grade III Hemorrhoids: Analysis Using Evidence From the HOLLAND Randomized Controlled Trial
Surgery worked better but cost more.Randomised trialModerate quality
79 people24 months
Surgery gave better quality of life and far fewer recurrences than banding, but cost more; whether surgery was worth the extra cost depended on how much society is willing to pay
- Who was studied
- Adults with symptomatic grade III hemorrhoids
- What they received
- Surgery to remove hemorrhoids (hemorrhoidectomy)
- Compared with
- Rubber band ligation (non-surgical banding procedure)
- Main outcome
- Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained and cost per recurrence avoided over 24 months
- Quality
- It's a randomized trial comparing real treatments, but the number of patients is small and the cost-effectiveness conclusion is uncertain and depends on assumptions.
- Limitations
- Small sample size may limit generalizability and the ability to detect rare but costly complications; procedural costs were based on average hospital prices rather than detailed bottom-up costing.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Seventy-nine patients were analyzed (33 for hemorrhoidectomy and 46 for rubber band ligation).
- population
Adults with symptomatic grade III hemorrhoids randomly assigned to receive rubber band ligation or hemorrhoidectomy treatment.
- intervention
Rubber band ligation (up to 2 sessions) or excisional hemorrhoidectomy.
- comparator
Rubber band ligation (up to 2 sessions) or excisional hemorrhoidectomy.
- primaryOutcome
Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained and cost per recurrence avoided over 24 months from a societal perspective.
- result
Hemorrhoidectomy resulted in better clinical outcomes with a quality-adjusted life year difference of 0.08 (95% CI, 0.04-0.13) and a recurrence difference of 33.5% (95% CI, 15.3%-51.7%).
- result
The probability of hemorrhoidectomy being cost-effective was 45.5% at €20,000 per quality-adjusted life year and 83.9% at €50,000 per quality-adjusted life year.
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 40492557 · Read it on PubMed ↗
van Oostendorp et al. 2025
Comparison of Rubber Band Ligation and Hemorrhoidectomy in Patients With Symptomatic Hemorrhoids Grade III: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial
Surgery better long-term; banding less painful short-term.Randomised trialLow quality
87 people12 months
Banding was not as good as surgery for quality of life, and recurrence was much more common with banding (47.5% vs 6.1%), though banding caused less pain and allowed faster return to work
- Who was studied
- adults with symptomatic grade III hemorrhoids
- What they received
- rubber band ligation (non-surgical banding, up to 2 sessions)
- Compared with
- hemorrhoidectomy (surgical removal)
- Main outcome
- quality of life at 12 months and hemorrhoid recurrence rate
- Quality
- The trial stopped early due to funding problems, leaving very few patients and limited power to be sure of the results.
- Limitations
- Early termination due to funding constraints resulted in a small sample size and limited statistical power; recruitment was hindered by patient preferences and the COVID-19 pandemic.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Eighty-seven patients were randomly assigned (47 rubber band ligation vs 40 hemorrhoidectomy).
- population
Patients (aged 18 years or older) with symptomatic grade III (Goligher) hemorrhoids were included in this study.
- intervention
Randomized 1:1 to rubber band ligation or hemorrhoidectomy, with up to 2 banding sessions allowed.
- comparator
Hemorrhoidectomy is the criterion standard
- primaryOutcome
Primary outcomes included 12-month health-related quality of life and recurrence rate.
- result
Rubber band ligation was not noninferior to hemorrhoidectomy in quality-adjusted life years (-0.045; 95% CI, -0.087 to -0.004). Recurrence rate was worse in the rubber band ligation group (47.5% vs 6.1%), with an absolute risk difference of 41% (95% CI, 24%-59%).
- result
Pain scores after hemorrhoidectomy were higher during the first week (visual analogue scale 4 vs 1; p = 0.002). Rubber band ligation group returned to work sooner (1 vs 9 days; p = 0.021).
- limitations
The primary limitation of the study was its early termination due to funding constraints, resulting in a relatively small sample size and limited statistical power.
- followUp
Primary outcomes included 12-month health-related quality of life and recurrence rate.
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 39952268 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Smets et al. 2024
Rectal perforation after laser hemorrhoidoplasty: a case report
Rare but serious complication reported.Case seriesVery low quality
1 people2024
she developed a rectal perforation, severe abdominal infection, sepsis and multiple organ failure, needing emergency surgery and a colostomy
- Who was studied
- a 31-year-old woman with hemorrhoids treated by laser hemorrhoidoplasty
- What they received
- laser hemorrhoidoplasty (a minimally invasive laser treatment for hemorrhoids)
- Compared with
- none
- Main outcome
- serious complications after the procedure
- Quality
- this is a single patient case report, so it cannot show how often this happens or how this treatment compares to others.
- Limitations
- only one patient; no comparison group; described as the first such case reported, so how common this is cannot be judged from this report.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
a 31-year-old female
- population
rectal perforation following laser hemorrhoidoplasty in a 31-year-old female
- intervention
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty has gained widespread acceptance for its minimally invasive approach in treating hemorrhoids.
- comparator
This case report outlines the intricate management of rectal perforation following laser hemorrhoidoplasty
- primaryOutcome
leading to an acute abdomen, sepsis, and multiorgan failure
- result
Urgent laparoscopic exploration and the establishment of a double-loop colostomy were undertaken, marking the beginning of a complex course characterized by relapsed pelvic sepsis.
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 38849668 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Li et al. 2023
Colonization of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria increases risk of surgical site infection after hemorrhoidectomy: a cross-sectional study of two centers in southern China
Bacterial colonization raised infection risk after surgery.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
432 people2023
patients colonized with multidrug-resistant bacteria had a much higher rate of surgical site infection than non-carriers
- Who was studied
- patients with hemorrhoids who had hemorrhoid surgery
- What they received
- carrying multidrug-resistant bacteria in the rectum/anus before surgery
- Compared with
- not carrying multidrug-resistant bacteria
- Main outcome
- infection at the surgical site after hemorrhoid surgery
- Quality
- this is a cross-sectional observational study at two centers without randomization, so it can show an association but not prove cause, and it doesn't address whether surgery itself is needed versus non-surgical treatment.
- Limitations
- cross-sectional design, risk of confounding, only two centers in one region, does not compare surgical to non-surgical treatment
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A total of 432 patients met the inclusion criteria
- population
Patients with hemorrhoid disease, who underwent hemorrhoidectomy, were included.
- intervention
the rectoanal colonization of MDRBs
- comparator
1.81% (6/332) of non-carriers developed SSIs
- primaryOutcome
the relationship between MDRB colonization and surgical site infection (SSI) following hemorrhoidectomy was explored
- result
41.57% (37/89) of MDRB carriers and 1.81% (6/332) of non-carriers developed SSIs
Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 37779168 · Read it on PubMed ↗
What actually helps, on this site
Treatments Dr. Kamrava performs for this:
All 115 studiesEvery study that answered the question, with its design, size and result.
The other 107 studiesEverything else the search returned, including anything retracted.
Barone et al. 2026
LigaSure versus conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials
Less early pain than standard hemorrhoid surgeryMeta-analysisModerate qualityRelated question
3,277 people2026
LigaSure reduced early pain, bleeding, blood loss, operating time and recovery time, but showed no difference in recurrence, infection, incontinence and several other outcomes
- Who was studied
- patients having surgery to remove hemorrhoids
- What they received
- LigaSure (energy-sealing device) hemorrhoidectomy
- Compared with
- conventional excisional hemorrhoidectomy
- Main outcome
- postoperative pain and recovery after surgery
- Quality
- It pools many randomised trials with over 3,000 patients, but the trials varied in quality and long-term outcomes like recurrence are still uncertain.
- Limitations
- Uncertainty remains for several outcomes, and evidence regarding recurrence and other long-term anorectal outcomes remains limited.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Forty-three unique RCTs comprising 3,277 participants were analysed.
- population
Randomised controlled trials comparing LigaSure with conventional techniques were included.
- intervention
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing LigaSure with conventional haemorrhoidectomy.
- comparator
Conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy remains the gold standard treatment for grade IV haemorrhoids, although energy-based devices may reduce postoperative pain.
- primaryOutcome
LigaSure was associated with lower postoperative pain scores on days 1 and 2 and during the first and second postoperative weeks
- result
No statistically significant differences were observed in immediate postoperative pain, pain on postoperative day 3 or week 4, recurrence, length of hospital stay, constipation, pruritus, surgical site infection, incomplete healing, anal fissure, anal stenosis, or faecal incontinence.
Colorectal Dis · PMID 42816945 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Ye et al. 2026
A case report on the management of sepsis complicated by eroded mixed hemorrhoids following breast cancer chemotherapy
Healed without surgery in one case.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 people30 days
After 30 days, fever resolved, perianal swelling and inflammation completely resolved, and the eroded hemorrhoid healed entirely without surgery
- Who was studied
- 51-year-old woman with breast cancer on chemotherapy who developed eroded, infected hemorrhoids and sepsis
- What they received
- non-surgical treatment combining antibiotics, blood/immune support, and local wound care (saline cleansing, infrared therapy, growth factor gel, zinc oxide ointment, suppositories, and a traditional Chinese medicine paste)
- Compared with
- no comparison group; surgery was avoided due to high risk
- Main outcome
- resolution of fever, perianal infection, and healing of the eroded hemorrhoid
- Quality
- This is a single patient case report, so it cannot show whether this approach works in general.
- Limitations
- Only one patient, no comparison group, and the patient had a specific complicating condition (severe chemotherapy-induced immune suppression) that is not typical of most people with hemorrhoids.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A 51-year-old female with stage IIIA human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer
- population
mixed hemorrhoids with erosion and secondary perianal infection
- intervention
a conservative strategy was implemented. This included broad-spectrum systemic antibiotics (meropenem, vancomycin, amikacin, amphotericin B sequentially), aggressive hematologic support (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, blood transfusions), and meticulous multimodal local wound care. The local regimen comprised saline cleansing, infrared therapy, recombinant human epidermal growth factor gel, zinc oxide ointment, compound borneol ester suppositories, and the topical application of a self-prepared traditional Chinese medicine, "Liuhe Dan."
- comparator
Given the high risk of surgery due to critical thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, a conservative strategy was implemented.
- primaryOutcome
After 30 days of treatment, the patient became afebrile, and her perianal swelling and inflammation completely resolved. The eroded hemorrhoid healed entirely
- result
After 30 days of treatment, the patient became afebrile, and her perianal swelling and inflammation completely resolved. The eroded hemorrhoid healed entirely, allowing for a successful transfer to a lower-level hospital for continued supportive care.
Medicine (Baltimore) · PMID 42798126 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Pei et al. 2026
Dynamic Changes and Influencing Factors of Acute Pain After Elastic Band Ligation of Internal Hemorrhoids in Patients With Mixed Hemorrhoids
Pain patterns varied after banding.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
173 people14 days
patients split into a fast-relief group and a slow-relief group, with younger age, more anxiety/depression, less social support, and more ligations linked to worse pain recovery
- Who was studied
- patients with grade III or IV mixed hemorrhoids
- What they received
- elastic band ligation of internal hemorrhoids
- Compared with
- no comparator; patients compared by pain trajectory groups
- Main outcome
- pattern of pain after the procedure over 14 days
- Quality
- this is a single-center retrospective study looking at pain patterns after the procedure, not comparing surgery to non-surgical treatment.
- Limitations
- single-center, retrospective design, no comparison group to non-surgical treatment, abstract does not report on hemorrhoid resolution outcomes
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
173 patients with mixed hemorrhoids (grade III or IV) who underwent elastic band ligation of internal hemorrhoids
- intervention
elastic band ligation of internal hemorrhoids
- comparator
GMM analysis identified two pain progression trajectories: a rapid relief group (82 cases, 47.4%) and a poor relief group (91 cases, 52.6%)
- primaryOutcome
dynamic trajectory of acute pain after elastic band ligation of internal hemorrhoids
- result
age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-0.96, p = 0.002), SAS score (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.10, p = 0.018), SDS score (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.09, p = 0.009), SSRS total score (OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.65-0.81, p < 0.001), and number of ligations (OR = 4.96, 95% CI: 1.25-19.77, p = 0.023) were independent factors influencing the pain trajectory
- n
included 173 patients with mixed hemorrhoids
Ann Ital Chir · PMID 42755315 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Benek et al. 2026
Monopolar Cautery Ablation as a Minimally Invasive Treatment Option for Grade II-III Hemorrhoidal Disease
Faster recovery but more recurrencesRetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
61 peopleat least one year
Monopolar cautery ablation had shorter operative time, less pain medication need, faster return to daily activities, and higher satisfaction, but had more (non-significant) recurrences than excisional hemorrhoidectomy
- Who was studied
- patients with grade II-III hemorrhoidal disease who had surgery
- What they received
- monopolar cautery ablation (a less invasive cauterizing technique)
- Compared with
- standard excisional hemorrhoidectomy (surgical removal of hemorrhoids)
- Main outcome
- recovery time, pain, satisfaction, and recurrence after surgery
- Quality
- It was a small retrospective study with short follow-up, so the findings are not very reliable.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design and relatively short follow-up period, as noted by the authors themselves.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
This retrospective study included 61 patients who underwent surgery for symptomatic grade II-III hemorrhoidal disease
- population
61 patients who underwent surgery for symptomatic grade II-III hemorrhoidal disease between January 2022 and December 2023
- intervention
monopolar cautery ablation (MPCA)
- comparator
excisional hemorrhoidectomy (EH)
- primaryOutcome
operative time, postoperative pain scores (at the 12th hour, postoperative days 1, 7, and 14), duration of analgesic use, patient satisfaction, time to return to daily activities, postoperative complications, and recurrence rates
- result
Operative time and postoperative analgesic requirements were significantly lower in the MPCA group (both p < 0.001). The time to return to daily activities was significantly shorter in the MPCA group, while patient satisfaction was significantly higher (both p < 0.001).
- result
No recurrences were detected in the EH group, whereas three recurrences were observed in the MPCA group (p = 0.102).
- followUp
All patients were followed for at least one year.
- limitations
These findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the retrospective design and relatively short follow-up period.
Ann Ital Chir · PMID 42755308 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Shu et al. 2026
Low excision and high suspension hemorrhoidectomy versus conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy for mixed hemorrhoids: a 12-month prospective randomized controlled trial
Newer surgery as effective, safer than standard surgeryRandomised trialModerate qualityRelated question
120 people12 months
LEHS was as effective as MM with similar success and recurrence rates, but caused less pain, fewer complications, and better preserved anal function
- Who was studied
- adults with grade III-IV mixed hemorrhoids
- What they received
- low excision and high suspension hemorrhoidectomy (LEHS), a newer hemorrhoid surgery
- Compared with
- Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MM), the standard hemorrhoid surgery
- Main outcome
- treatment success at 12 weeks and hemorrhoid recurrence at 12 months
- Quality
- it was a randomized trial but from a single hospital with only 120 patients and the registration happened after the trial started, which raises some concern about reporting bias.
- Limitations
- single-center design, trial was registered retrospectively after enrollment, and it compares two surgical techniques rather than surgery versus non-surgical treatment
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
enrolled 120 eligible patients between January 2024 and June 2024
- population
grade III-IV mixed hemorrhoids
- intervention
Low excision and high suspension hemorrhoidectomy (LEHS) is a refined, function-preserving technique
- comparator
Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MM) is the gold-standard treatment
- primaryOutcome
Primary outcomes were 12-week clinical effective rate and 12-month hemorrhoid recurrence rate
- result
The 12-week effective rate (96.4% vs. 92.9%) and 12-month recurrence rate (1.8% vs. 5.4%) confirmed LEHS non-inferiority (both P > 0.05). LEHS yielded longer operative time, less blood loss, lower VAS pain scores, faster recovery, fewer complications (14.8% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.027), and more favorable anorectal physiology
BMC Surg · PMID 42393699 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Anwar et al. 2026
Long-term impact of haemorrhoidal artery ligation on anal function and continence
Low risk of lasting bowel leakage after minimally invasive surgery.Systematic reviewLow qualityRelated question
671 people>6 months
2.5% of patients developed incontinence, mostly mild and temporary; the HAL-RAR variant had a higher rate (5.7%) than standard HAL (0%) or THD (1.0%)
- Who was studied
- patients who had minimally invasive hemorrhoid artery ligation procedures, followed for over 6 months
- What they received
- hemorrhoidal artery ligation techniques (HAL, Doppler-guided HAL, HAL with rectoanal repair, transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialisation)
- Compared with
- comparison among the different HAL technique variants (no non-surgical comparator)
- Main outcome
- long-term bowel control (incontinence) more than 6 months after the procedure
- Quality
- it combines only a small number of mixed-design studies (some retrospective) with inconsistent incontinence scoring, so the findings are not very reliable.
- Limitations
- small number of included studies (6), mix of retrospective and prospective designs, and no comparison to non-surgical treatment or to full hemorrhoidectomy.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
reporting continence >6 months after HAL-based procedures
- intervention
Haemorrhoidal artery ligation (HALO) and variants including Doppler-guided HAL (DG-HAL), HAL with rectoanal repair (HAL-RAR), and transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation (THD)
- comparator
Standard HAL showed 0/76 (0%) cases; THD had 1/104 (1.0%); DG-HAL had 7/293 (2.4%).
- primaryOutcome
This systematic review assessed prevalence, severity, and patterns of incontinence beyond six months post-procedure across HAL techniques.
- result
Seventeen (2.5%) of 671 patients developed postoperative faecal incontinence. Of these, 14 (82%) cases were mild (Wexner 1-4) and transient, resolving within 3-6 months; 3 (18%) were moderate (Wexner 5-8), primarily in HAL-RAR (9/158 [5.7%]).
- n
total n=671 patients
Ir Med J · PMID 42348182 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Elhardello et al. 2026
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty: two-year outcomes from a retrospective observational cohort study
Good symptom relief, low pain, few recur.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
77 people2 years
over 90% had complete symptom resolution at 1 year, 9.1% recurrence, minimal pain, 81% highly satisfied, one complication requiring surgery
- Who was studied
- adults over 18 with symptomatic hemorrhoids grade 2 to 4, mostly advanced (grade III or IV) with minimal to moderate prolapse
- What they received
- laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP), a minimally invasive laser procedure
- Compared with
- none - single group, no comparator treatment reported
- Main outcome
- symptom resolution, pain, recurrence, complications, and patient satisfaction after treatment
- Quality
- This was a retrospective study of one treatment group with no comparison group, and many patients were lost to follow-up by 2 years, so it can't show if laser treatment is better than other options.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, no comparator group, substantial loss to follow-up by 2 years (only 33.8% seen), so cannot establish whether outcomes differ from no treatment or other options.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
LHP was carried out in 77 patients
- population
Inclusion criteria were an age above 18 years old, symptomatic haemorrhoids of grade 2 to 4 with minimal to moderate prolapse.
- intervention
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP)
- comparator
LHP was carried out in 77 patients (83% of them had grade III or grade IV) treated over a two-year period.
- primaryOutcome
Post operative pain, recurrence of the disease, persistence of symptoms, complications, length of stay and patients' satisfaction were all documented.
- result
Over 90% of patients achieved complete and sustained symptom resolution over 1-year follow-up period, despite the predominance of advanced disease. Disease recurrence occurred in 9.1% of patients.
- result
Overall, 81% of patients were highly satisfied, and 90% reported satisfactory outcomes.
- followUp
26 patients (33.8%) seen in 2 years.
Lasers Med Sci · PMID 42337174 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Wu et al. 2026
Cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy for bleeding-predominant grade III hemorrhoids: efficacy and risk factor analysis focusing on two dimensions of bleeding score
Non-surgical injection reduced bleeding, but recurred often.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
82 people24 months
96.3% effective for bleeding, 58.2% effective for prolapse, overall efficacy 85.4%; bleeding recurred in 25.3% over 24 months
- Who was studied
- patients with bleeding-predominant grade III internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (injection of polidocanol via long needle)
- Compared with
- none (single-arm study, before-after comparison)
- Main outcome
- improvement in hemorrhoid symptom severity, especially bleeding, at 3 months
- Quality
- This was a small single-arm retrospective study without a comparison group, so it cannot show how this treatment compares to surgery or other options.
- Limitations
- Single-arm retrospective observational study with no control or comparator group, and no randomization.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
This single-arm retrospective observational study included 82 patients with bleeding-predominant grade III internal HDs
- population
bleeding-predominant grade III symptomatic internal HDs
- intervention
Cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES) via a long needle
- comparator
This single-arm retrospective observational study included 82 patients
- primaryOutcome
Treatment efficacy was assessed at 3 months post-CAES using the conventional Hemorrhoid Disease Severity Score (HDSS; based on the frequency of symptoms, including bleeding)
- result
The overall efficacy rate was 85.4%. The effective rates for bleeding and prolapse symptoms were 96.3% and 58.2%, respectively.
- result
During a follow-up of 24 months, the bleeding recurrence rate was 25.3% (20/79).
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 42323500 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Zayas-Bórquez et al. 2026
What factors prolong symptoms in patients with hemorrhoidal disease who require surgery?
Sex and age affected symptom duration, not surgery need.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
56 people2026
men had symptoms for about 4.89 more years than women, and younger age at symptom onset was linked to longer symptom duration; constipation and BMI were not linked to symptom duration
- Who was studied
- patients who had surgery for hemorrhoidal disease
- What they received
- hemorrhoidectomy (surgical removal of hemorrhoids)
- Compared with
- no comparison group; factors like sex, age, smoking, constipation, BMI, and time to surgery were compared among the same surgical patients
- Main outcome
- how long patients had symptoms before surgery (years of disease)
- Quality
- this was a small, retrospective study of only surgery patients with no comparison to non-surgical treatment, so it cannot show whether surgery is needed or whether non-surgical care would work.
- Limitations
- retrospective, cross-sectional design in a single hospital, small sample size, and the authors state the study was not designed for causal inference or prediction
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
on 56 patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy (2019-2023)
- population
56 patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy (2019-2023)
- intervention
56 patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy (2019-2023)
- comparator
The factors of sex, age, smoking, constipation, BMI, and time to surgery were analyzed
- primaryOutcome
clinical and demographic factors associated with symptom duration in surgically treated patients
- result
men having a mean 4.89 more years of disease than women (β = -4.89, 95% CI -9.61 to -0.17)
- result
Factors traditionally considered relevant, such as constipation and BMI, showed no significant association
- limitations
A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted
- limitations
with no causal inference or predictive intent
Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed) · PMID 42259698 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Gravante et al. 2026
Early hemodynamic changes following endoscopic sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease assessed by transperineal ultrasound and their relationship with clinical outcomes
Helps mild cases, not advanced ones.Prospective cohortLow quality
37 people30 days
Lower-grade hemorrhoids showed reduced blood flow and lasting symptom improvement; higher-grade hemorrhoids showed no blood flow change and symptoms worsened between 7 and 30 days
- Who was studied
- Patients with grade I-IV hemorrhoids treated with sclerotherapy
- What they received
- Endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerotherapy
- Compared with
- No separate control group; lower-grade vs higher-grade hemorrhoids compared
- Main outcome
- Changes in blood flow (ultrasound) and symptom scores after treatment
- Quality
- Small, short observational study with no control group, so it cannot prove the treatment itself caused the differences seen.
- Limitations
- Small sample size (37 patients), no control/comparison treatment group, short 30-day follow-up.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Thirty-seven patients completed follow-up.
- population
patients with Goligher grade I-IV HD treated with endoscopic PF sclerotherapy
- intervention
endoscopic PF sclerotherapy
- comparator
stratified by HD severity (Goligher I-II vs III-IV)
- primaryOutcome
Symptoms were evaluated using the PROM-HISS score.
- result
patients with lower-grade HD showed a significant reduction in PSV and RI at both 7 and 30 days (p < 0.01), indicating effective modulation of arterial inflow.
- result
In contrast, no significant changes in PSV or RI were observed in higher-grade HD, while EDV increased at 30 days (p = 0.012).
- result
PROM-HISS scores significantly improved in all patients at 7 days; however, symptom scores increased between 7 and 30 days in higher-grade HD.
Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 42257743 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Long et al. 2026
Effect of preoperative anemia on postoperative outcomes in mixed hemorrhoids: a retrospective observational study
Anemia linked to more pain after surgery.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
127 people12 months
patients with anemia before surgery had more pain and worse sleep in the first week after surgery, but no difference in bleeding, infection, healing time, or recurrence within a year
- Who was studied
- patients with mixed hemorrhoids who had surgery to remove them
- What they received
- having anemia before surgery
- Compared with
- not having anemia before surgery
- Main outcome
- pain, bleeding, infection, swelling, urinary retention, sleep quality, healing time, and recurrence after surgery
- Quality
- this was a retrospective single-center study looking at a risk factor rather than comparing surgery to non-surgical treatment, so it carries limited weight for this question
- Limitations
- retrospective observational design, single center, authors say findings are exploratory and need confirmation in larger studies with better statistical adjustment
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A total of 127 patients with mixed hemorrhoids who underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
- population
patients with mixed hemorrhoids who underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
- intervention
48 patients in the preoperative anemia group
- comparator
79 patients in the preoperative non-anemia group
- primaryOutcome
Postoperative complications such as postoperative pain, delayed bleeding, wound infection, wound edema, urinary retention, insomnia severity index (ISI) within 7 days, wound healing time, and recurrence rates (prolapse or bleeding) within 12 months
- result
The visual analog scale pain scores at 12 h (P = 0.018), 1 day (P = 0.010), 3 days (P = 0.034), and 7 days (P = 0.001) after surgery and total analgesic consumption within 7 days (P = 0.036) in the preoperative anemia group were higher than those in the preoperative non-anemia group.
- result
There were no significant differences in delayed bleeding, wound infection, wound edema (P = 0.740), urinary retention (P = 0.648), anal stenosis, or wound healing time (P = 1.101) between the two groups.
BMC Gastroenterol · PMID 42129663 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Rajendiran et al. 2026
Feasibility and advantages of delivering radiofrequency ablation treatment for haemorrhoids under local anaesthesia in the outpatient setting in the UK: our initial experience
Short-term relief; long-term benefit unclear.Prospective cohortLow quality
53 people135 days
all patients completed the procedure as outpatients with same-day discharge and no major complications; haemorrhoid symptoms and quality of life improved significantly at 2-4 months, but 11.3% needed later surgery and 12-month data were limited and inconclusive
- Who was studied
- adults with grade II-III haemorrhoids that had not responded to conservative treatment
- What they received
- radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for haemorrhoids performed under local anaesthesia in an outpatient clinic
- Compared with
- none - outcomes measured before and after treatment in the same patients, no comparison group
- Main outcome
- whether the procedure could be successfully completed as an outpatient under local anaesthesia
- Quality
- this was a small, single-group study without a comparison group and with major loss of follow-up by 12 months, so it cannot reliably show how long benefits last.
- Limitations
- no control/comparator group, small sample (only 11 patients had 12-month data), substantial attrition and symptom-driven follow-up at 12 months
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
In total, 53 patients were included in the study
- population
patients with grade II-III haemorrhoids refractory to conservative therapy
- intervention
radiofrequency ablation performed under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting
- comparator
We conducted a prospective evaluation of radiofrequency ablation performed under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting for patients with grade II-III haemorrhoids refractory to conservative therapy
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcome was the successful completion of procedure as outpatient.
- result
All procedures were completed under local anaesthesia with same-day discharge and no major complications.
- result
At 2-4 months, significant improvement in HSS was observed (mean difference 9.50; 95% CI 5.34-13.66; p < 0.001).
- result
In total, six patients (11.3%) required subsequent operative intervention.
- followUp
Median follow up was 135 days.
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 42120648 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Baimanov et al. 2026
Analysis of the quality of life of patients with haemorrhoids
Better quality of life after surgery, but pain remained common.Case seriesLow qualityRelated question
634 people2026
most patients reported improved quality of life and no significant physical limitations after surgery, with no significant discomfort in 88% of cases, though moderate or mild pain persisted in 46% of patients
- Who was studied
- patients with hemorrhoids who underwent surgical treatment
- What they received
- surgical treatment of hemorrhoids
- Compared with
- no non-surgical comparison group; quality of life assessed after surgery
- Main outcome
- quality of life (physical, emotional, social aspects) related to hemorrhoids
- Quality
- This is a survey-based observational study with no comparison group and no mention of how patients were selected or followed over time, so it can't show whether surgery is better than non-surgical care.
- Limitations
- No non-surgical comparator group; relies on a modified sociological questionnaire; selection and recall bias possible; methodology for timing of assessment not described.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
The study involved 634 patients, most of whom were women (76.5%).
- population
patients with haemorrhoids
- intervention
surgical treatment of haemorrhoids
- comparator
the quality of life of patients improved significantly after surgery
- primaryOutcome
A modified sociological questionnaire was used to assess the physical, emotional and social aspects of respondents' lives.
- result
most respondents reported no significant limitations in physical activity, and it did not cause significant discomfort in 88% of cases, although moderate or mild pain persisted in 46% of patients
Clin Ter · PMID 42047132 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Gallo et al. 2026
Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy, mucopexy, and hybrid combination for grade III hemorrhoids: a large retrospective cohort study
Comparing surgical techniques, not surgery vs no surgery.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
686 people2 years
Mucopexy caused less early pain but had more recurrence long-term, while Milligan-Morgan had the lowest recurrence and best long-term outcomes
- Who was studied
- patients with symptomatic grade III hemorrhoids treated surgically
- What they received
- Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy, mucopexy, or a hybrid combination of both
- Compared with
- different surgical techniques compared against each other (mucopexy alone vs MM alone vs hybrid combinations)
- Main outcome
- recurrence rate and patient-reported outcomes at 2 years, plus pain and complications at 30 days
- Quality
- This is a retrospective study comparing surgical methods to each other, not surgery versus non-surgical treatment, so it can't directly answer whether surgery is needed at all.
- Limitations
- Retrospective analysis.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A total of 686 consecutive patients with III-degree HD were included in the analysis.
- population
Symptomatic grade III HD treated between 2016 and 2018.
- intervention
Four groups were defined: group 1 included patients treated with MM alone; group 2 received mucopexy on one pile combined with MM on the remaining two; group 3 underwent mucopexy on two piles with MM on the remaining one; and group 4 was treated with mucopexy alone.
- comparator
This study compares MM, mucopexy, and hybrid MM/mucopexy procedures in patients with grade III hemorrhoidal disease (HD).
- primaryOutcome
Recurrence rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using a visual-analogic scale (VAS) at 2 years, postoperative pain at 7 days, early complication rates at 30 days, and PROMs at 30 days.
- result
Group 4 had the lowest pain scores and the highest 30-day PROM (p < 0.001), whereas group 1 showed the best long-term results, with the lowest recurrence rate (4.2% versus 14.5% in group 4) and highest long-term PROM.
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 42026233 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Huang et al. 2026
Evaluation of short-term outcomes of Endoscopic Super-Hemorrhoidal Banding for mixed hemorrhoids with prolapsed internal hemorrhoids: a retrospective study
Less invasive surgery, similar cure, less pain.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
480 people2026
Similar cure rates between groups, but ESHB had shorter operative time and hospital stay, less pain, and fewer urinary retention complications
- Who was studied
- patients with mixed hemorrhoids with Grade II-IV internal hemorrhoid prolapse
- What they received
- Endoscopic Super-Hemorrhoidal Banding (ESHB), a less invasive banding procedure
- Compared with
- Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (traditional surgical removal)
- Main outcome
- cure rate, operative time, hospital stay, pain, and complications
- Quality
- This was a retrospective study without randomization, comparing two surgical approaches rather than surgery versus no surgery, so it cannot show whether avoiding surgery altogether works.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design; only short-term follow-up; compares two surgical techniques rather than surgical versus nonsurgical treatment
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
patients with mixed hemorrhoids treated in our hospital from June 2021 to June 2024
- population
Grade II-IV internal hemorrhoid prolapse as the main symptom
- intervention
Endoscopic Super-hemorrhoidal Banding (ESHB)
- comparator
Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) as the control group
- n
245 patients underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) and 235 patients underwent ESHB
- result
The cure rates were 69.36% in the ESHB group and 72.65% in the MMH group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05).
- result
The observation group had significantly shorter operative time and hospital stay (P < 0.01), lower postoperative anal pain scores and incidence of urinary retention (P < 0.01).
- primaryOutcome
Treatment outcomes included efficacy measurement, operative time, hospital stay, postoperative anal pain scores, and incidence of complications like bleeding and urinary retention were compared.
BMC Surg · PMID 41987169 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Wang et al. 2026
Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids versus tissue-selective therapy stapler for grade II-III hemorrhoids: an exploratory retrospective comparative study
Similar success, RPH recovered fasterRetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
192 peopleone year
No significant differences were found in the overall clinical efficacy or the one-year recurrence rate between the groups (p > 0.05)
- Who was studied
- adults with grade II-III hemorrhoids
- What they received
- Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids (RPH), a minimally invasive surgery
- Compared with
- tissue-selecting therapy (TST) stapler surgery
- Main outcome
- treatment effectiveness rate at one month and hemorrhoid recurrence rate within one year after surgery
- Quality
- It is a retrospective comparison of two surgeries with possible differences in patient selection, so it cannot reliably show one technique is better than the other.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design with potential baseline differences between groups; authors state findings cannot be directly interpreted as evidence of superiority of either technique.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
192 patients with Grade II-III hemorrhoids
- intervention
80 patients who underwent RPH
- comparator
112 who underwent TST
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcomes were the treatment effectiveness rate at one month and the recurrence rate within one year postoperatively.
- result
No significant differences were found in the overall clinical efficacy or the one-year recurrence rate between the groups (p > 0.05).
- n
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 192 patients with Grade II-III hemorrhoids
BMC Surg · PMID 41906143 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Bilgiç et al. 2026
Clinical outcomes of arterial detection ligation technique for grade II/III versus grade IV hemorrhoidal disease
Similar surgery outcomes across hemorrhoid severity.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
78 people1 month satisfaction assessment; recurrence follow-up duration not specified
grade IV patients had more pain, more painkiller use, and slower bowel recovery right after surgery, but satisfaction at 1 month and recurrence rates were similar between the two groups
- Who was studied
- adults with grade II/III or grade IV hemorrhoids who had a minimally invasive surgical procedure
- What they received
- arterial detection ligation (ADL) with mucopexy in patients with grade IV hemorrhoids
- Compared with
- the same ADL-mucopexy procedure in patients with grade II/III hemorrhoids
- Main outcome
- pain after surgery and return of hemorrhoids (recurrence)
- Quality
- this was a small retrospective study comparing two groups who both had the same surgery, so it cannot say whether surgery is better than non-surgical treatment.
- Limitations
- retrospective design, small sample size, no non-surgical comparison group, short follow-up for recurrence
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Seventy-eight patients were included (grade II/III: n = 54; grade IV: n = 24).
- population
Patients were classified into grade II/III and grade IV groups according to the Goligher classification.
- intervention
ADL-mucopexy between July 2022 and March 2024 were retrospectively analyzed
- comparator
compared clinical outcomes of ADL-mucopexy between patients with grade II/III and grade IV HD
- primaryOutcome
Primary outcomes included postoperative pain and recurrence
- result
Despite these early differences, 1-month satisfaction scores were comparable between groups (8.8 vs 8.5). Recurrence was observed in 1 patient in each group during follow-up.
Medicine (Baltimore) · PMID 41894272 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Yu et al. 2026
Effectiveness and safety of 3% polidocanol foam sclerotherapy in hemorrhoidal disease: a multicenter, prospective study
Similar cure rate to rubber band ligation.Prospective cohortLow quality
222 people12 weeks
similar cure rates between the two treatments (74.19% vs 83.13%, not statistically significant), with faster bleeding improvement in the sclerotherapy group
- Who was studied
- patients with grade I, II, or III hemorrhoids (internal or mixed type)
- What they received
- polidocanol foam sclerotherapy injection under anoscopy
- Compared with
- rubber band ligation
- Main outcome
- clinical cure rate under anoscopy and symptom assessment at 4 weeks
- Quality
- this was an observational study where patients chose their treatment rather than being randomly assigned, so differences between groups could be due to other factors.
- Limitations
- open-label, observational design with treatment assignment based on physician assessment and patient willingness rather than randomization
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
enrolled 222 patients
- population
patients with Goligher grade I, II, or III HD (internal or mixed)
- intervention
3% polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (PFS) injection under anoscopy
- comparator
rubber band ligation (RBL)
- primaryOutcome
The primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate under anoscopy and clinical symptoms assessment at 4 weeks post-treatment.
- result
the clinical cure rate was 74.19% (69/93) in the PFS group and 83.13% (69/83) in the RBL group (P > 0.05)
Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 41748745 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Zu et al. 2026
Endoscopic rubber band ligation, injection sclerotherapy, and sclerobanding for the treatment of internal hemorrhoids
Non-surgical options work, varying by severity.RetrospectiveLow quality
201 people24 months
ESB and ERBL had lower overall recurrence than IS; for grade II-III hemorrhoids, ESB had lower recurrence and less pain than IS and ERBL; no differences among groups within 6 months or for grade I hemorrhoids
- Who was studied
- patients with grade I-III internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL), injection sclerotherapy (IS), or endoscopic polidocanol sclerobanding (ESB)
- Compared with
- the three endoscopic treatments compared against each other
- Main outcome
- clinical efficacy, recurrence rates, and postoperative adverse events
- Quality
- This is a retrospective, non-randomized study comparing three procedures, so differences could be due to unmeasured factors rather than the treatments themselves.
- Limitations
- Retrospective cohort design without randomization.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
This retrospective cohort study was performed on 201 patients
- population
treating grade I-III internal hemorrhoids
- intervention
endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL), injection sclerotherapy (IS), and endoscopic polidocanol sclerobanding (ESB)
- comparator
who were grouped according to their endoscopic treatment (ERBL, IS, and ESB groups)
- primaryOutcome
The study analyzed clinical efficacy, short-term and overall recurrence rates, and postoperative adverse events.
- result
Both the ERBL and ESB groups demonstrated lower overall recurrence rates compared with the IS group (post-hoc analysis, P' = 0.024 and P' = 0.015, respectively).
- result
sclerotherapy resulted in a higher total recurrence rate than that achieved by sclerobanding (45.95% vs 19.57%, P' = 0.03), specifically for grade II-III internal hemorrhoids
- result
No significant differences were found among the three groups regarding clinical efficacy or recurrence rates within 6 months post-surgery, even when examined by subgroup.
- followUp
the longest follow-up extending to 24 months
World J Gastroenterol · PMID 41693967 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Yin et al. 2026
Preliminary Results of Open Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy Combined With 3% Polidocanol Foam Sclerotherapy in Patients With Grade IV Hemorrhoidal Disease: A Randomized Controlled Open-Label Single-Center Study
Sclerotherapy added to surgery speeds recovery.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question
36 people1 to 2 months
Adding sclerotherapy to surgery shortened recovery time by about 5.78 days and reduced bleeding and pain medicine use, with similar satisfaction
- Who was studied
- adults aged 18 to 75 with grade IV hemorrhoids
- What they received
- Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy plus 3% polidocanol foam sclerotherapy
- Compared with
- Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy alone
- Main outcome
- time to return to daily activities
- Quality
- The trial was small, not blinded, done at one center, and followed patients for only a short time, so its findings are not very reliable.
- Limitations
- Small sample size, nonblinded, single-center design, and short follow-up period.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Thirty-six patients aged 18 to 75 years with grade IV hemorrhoidal disease were enrolled and randomized equally to 2 groups.
- intervention
The experimental group underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy combined with 3% polidocanol foam sclerotherapy
- comparator
the control group underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy with no additional therapy.
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcome was the time to return to daily activities.
- result
The experimental group demonstrated a mean 5.78-day earlier return to normal activities and work than the control group (mean ± SD: 19.28 ± 8.35 vs 25.06 ± 7.85 days; 95% CI, -11.27 to -0.29 days; p = 0.04), reduced postoperative bleeding (0-3 scale; estimate -0.45; 95% CI, -0.72 to -0.16; p = 0.002), lower analgesic use (0-3 scale; estimate -0.38; 95% CI, -0.66 to -0.09; p = 0.009), and improved symptom scores at 1 to 2 months (Z -2.52 and -2.11, p < 0.05).
- n
Thirty-six patients aged 18 to 75 years with grade IV hemorrhoidal disease were enrolled and randomized equally to 2 groups.
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 41603644 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Lauricella et al. 2026
Long-term outcomes of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: An updated systematic review, meta-analysis and trial-sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
Stapled surgery recurs more than traditional surgery.Meta-analysisModerate qualityRelated question
2,072 peopleminimum follow-up of 12 months
Stapled surgery had a higher chance of hemorrhoids coming back, especially prolapse-type recurrence, but no difference in need for further treatment, pain, bowel function, or quality of life
- Who was studied
- adults with grade II-IV hemorrhoids undergoing surgery
- What they received
- stapled haemorrhoidopexy (a stapling surgery for hemorrhoids)
- Compared with
- conventional haemorrhoidectomy (traditional surgical removal of hemorrhoids)
- Main outcome
- long-term recurrence, need for repeat treatment, anal function, and quality of life
- Quality
- It pools many randomized trials, but the statistical power check shows there still aren't enough patients studied to be fully confident in the recurrence finding.
- Limitations
- Trial-sequential analysis showed the accumulated evidence did not reach the required sample size, and there was some variability (heterogeneity) across trials.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Seventeen RCTs including 1,041 SH and 1,031 CH patients were analysed.
- population
adult patients with grade II-IV haemorrhoids
- intervention
Stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH)
- comparator
conventional haemorrhoidectomy (CH)
- primaryOutcome
Primary outcomes included recurrence, reintervention, anal function, and quality of life (QoL).
- result
SH was associated with a higher risk of overall recurrence compared with CH (RR = 1.56,95%CI = 1.00-2.44;I2 = 48%).
- result
Prolapse-related recurrence was significantly more frequent after SH (RR = 3.28,95%CI = 1.49-7.25;I2 = 12%), whereas bleeding-related recurrence did not differ between groups
- result
No significant differences were found for reintervention, persistent anal pain, functional impairment or QoL.
- followUp
minimum follow-up of 12 months
Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 41535511 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Hua et al. 2025
Transverse incision with longitudinal ligation procedure: Innovation, pitfalls, and clinical perspectives
Newer surgery technique, less pain, faster healing.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2025
TILL showed less pain, quicker healing, and lower risk of anal stenosis than the standard surgery
- Who was studied
- people with hemorrhoids that have prolapsed all the way around the anus
- What they received
- a newer surgical technique called transverse incision with longitudinal ligation (TILL)
- Compared with
- the standard Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy surgery
- Main outcome
- short-term results including pain, healing time, and narrowing of the anus
- Quality
- This is a letter commenting on a single small retrospective study with short follow-up, not new research itself, so it carries very little weight.
- Limitations
- The letter notes the original study was retrospective, single-center, had a small sample size, and short follow-up, limiting generalizability and ability to assess recurrence.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
treating circumferential prolapsed hemorrhoids
- intervention
The transverse incision with longitudinal ligation (TILL) procedure is a new method for treating circumferential prolapsed hemorrhoids.
- comparator
better than the traditional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy for short-term results
- primaryOutcome
showing less pain, quicker healing, and lower risk of anal stenosis
- result
A study by Song et al found TILL to be better than the traditional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy for short-term results, showing less pain, quicker healing, and lower risk of anal stenosis.
World J Gastroenterol · PMID 41480327 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Liao et al. 2025
[Endoscopic rubber band ligation and injection therapy for grade I - III internal hemorrhoids: analysis of clinical efficacy and safety]
Both non-surgical options worked similarly; side effects differed.RetrospectiveLow quality
313 people3 months
Cure/effective rates were similar between ERBL and EIS; EIS caused less pain and anal distension, but ERBL had a non-significant trend toward lower recurrence in grade III hemorrhoids; ERBL had significantly more complications (bleeding, urinary retention) than EIS
- Who was studied
- Adults with grade I-III internal hemorrhoids who had not improved with diet/medication and could not or would not have surgery
- What they received
- Endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL)
- Compared with
- Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS)
- Main outcome
- Treatment success (cure/effective rate) within 3 months after the procedure, plus recurrence, pain, and complications
- Quality
- This was a retrospective single-center study using statistical matching rather than a randomized trial, so differences between groups could still be due to unmeasured factors.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, single center, propensity score matching used to balance groups, short follow-up for recurrence assessment
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
a total of 313 patients were included, including 200 in the ERBL group and 113 in the EIS group
- population
Patients diagnosed with symptomatic grade I-III internal hemorrhoids who failed conservative treatments such as diet adjustment and medication
- population
Patients who were unable or unwilling to receive surgical treatment due to multiple underlying systemic diseases
- intervention
endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL)
- comparator
endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS)
- primaryOutcome
Statistical analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the two groups within 3 months after the operation (χ²=0.858, P=0.651).
- result
The cure rates of the ERBL group and the EIS group were 64.0% (128/200) and 62.8% (71/113), respectively.
- result
Compared with the ERBL group, the EIS group had a lower pain score on the first day after operation [0 (0, 0) vs. 1 (0, 3), Z=-8.211, P<0.001] and a lower incidence of anal distension [25.7% (29/113) vs. 61.5% (123/200), χ²=37.122, P<0.001], with statistically significant differences.
- result
The total incidence of complications in the ERBL group was significantly higher than that in the EIS group [29.5% (59/200) vs. 4.4% (5/113), χ²=27.910, P<0.001]
- result
in grade III internal hemorrhoids, the recurrence rate of the ERBL group was lower than that of the EIS group [22.2% (10/45) vs. 45.8% (11/24), χ²=4.121, P=0.042]. Still, the difference was not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction (χ²=4.121, corrected P>0.025).
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi · PMID 41397826 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Xiang et al. 2025
The effect of endoscopic polidocanol carbon dioxide foam for internal hemorrhoids: a retrospective study
Fewer side effects, similar success rate.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
158 people1 month
Similar effectiveness between groups, but carbon dioxide foam caused fewer cases of anal pain and swelling
- Who was studied
- patients with internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- endoscopic polidocanol carbon dioxide foam sclerotherapy
- Compared with
- endoscopic polidocanol air foam sclerotherapy
- Main outcome
- treatment success and complications one month after treatment
- Quality
- This was a retrospective, non-randomized study comparing two foam types, not surgery versus no surgery, so it only indirectly addresses whether hemorrhoids need surgery.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, non-randomized, compares two non-surgical sclerotherapy techniques rather than surgery vs no surgery.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 158 patients who received endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for internal hemorrhoids between October 2022 and September 2023.
- population
158 patients who received endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for internal hemorrhoids
- intervention
80 received polidocanol carbon dioxide foam (study group)
- comparator
78 underwent endoscopic polidocanol sclerotherapy with polidocanol air foam (control group)
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcomes of this study were clinical effect and the incidence of complications 1 month after surgery.
- result
The study group exhibited significantly fewer patients with anal pain and anal swelling compared to the control group (P < 0.05), and importantly, no severe complications were observed.
- result
Both groups exhibited comparable clinical effects, surgical costs, hospitalization durations, and dosages of polidocanol, with no statistically significant differences observed (all P > 0.05).
PeerJ · PMID 41282992 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Dai et al. 2026
Flexible endoscopic treatment of internal hemorrhoids with versus without intravenous anesthesia: a retrospective study of 559 cases
Non-surgical endoscopic treatment works well either way.RetrospectiveLow quality
559 people2026
anesthesia group had shorter procedure times and lower retreatment rates, with similar symptom improvement and satisfaction between groups
- Who was studied
- patients with grade II-III internal hemorrhoids undergoing endoscopic treatment
- What they received
- endoscopic hemorrhoid treatment (rubber band ligation or sclerotherapy) with intravenous anesthesia
- Compared with
- same endoscopic treatment without anesthesia
- Main outcome
- procedure time, retreatment rate, symptom improvement, discomfort, satisfaction, and cost
- Quality
- This was a retrospective, non-randomized comparison, so differences between groups could be due to factors other than anesthesia.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design; not randomized
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
retrospectively analyzed 559 patients
- population
Flexible endoscopic therapies are effective for grade II-III internal hemorrhoids
- intervention
endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL) or polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (EPFS)
- comparator
Patients were stratified by anesthesia modality (intravenous propofol vs. no anesthesia)
- primaryOutcome
Primary outcomes included procedure time, retreatment rate, symptom improvement, postoperative discomfort, patient satisfaction, total cost, and cost acceptance.
- result
The anesthesia group had shorter procedure times (median 10.5 vs. 11.3 min, P = 0.036) and a lower retreatment rate (1.3% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.003). Rates of symptom improvement (83.1% vs. 82.7%, P = 0.940), postoperative discomfort, and patient satisfaction were comparable.
Surg Endosc · PMID 41269316 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Chen 2026
Global knowledge mapping and technological evolution in hemorrhoid therapy: a multi-tool bibliometric analysis
No treatment outcome data reportedNarrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2026
describes a steady increase in publications, identifies core research areas (banding, surgery, laser), and notes an emerging trend toward minimally invasive and outpatient techniques, but reports no clinical outcome data comparing treatments
- Who was studied
- published research literature on hemorrhoidal disease treatment
- What they received
- not a treatment study; maps research trends in hemorrhoid therapy literature
- Compared with
- not applicable
- Main outcome
- patterns and trends in published research on hemorrhoid therapy
- Quality
- this is a bibliometric mapping of published literature, not a clinical study comparing treatments, so it cannot show whether surgery or non-surgical treatment works better
- Limitations
- abstract states 'comprehensive analyses mapping its research landscape...are lacking' and notes 'key knowledge gaps persist in long-term efficacy comparisons and standardized guideline development', indicating no actual patient outcome data was analyzed
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
A total of 2764 relevant publications were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC).
- intervention
characterize the knowledge structure, collaborative networks, research hotspots, and emerging trends in hemorrhoid therapy over the past two decades
- comparator
Core research domains identified through keyword co-occurrence and clustering included Rubber Band Ligation (RBL), hemorrhoidectomy (Milligan-Morgan, Ferguson, stapled), laser therapy, pain management, postoperative complications, and quality of life.
- primaryOutcome
Analyses included publication trends, country/institutional contributions, author/institutional collaboration networks, journal co-citation analysis, keyword co-occurrence/clustering, thematic evolution, and burst detection.
- result
It confirms the established role of conventional surgical techniques while identifying a clear shift towards minimally invasive procedures and outpatient management.
- limitations
Key knowledge gaps persist in long-term efficacy comparisons and standardized guideline development.
Updates Surg · PMID 41266707 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Egawa et al. 2026
Hemorrhoids
Review of treatment options, no results given.Narrative reviewVery low quality
size not given2026
The abstract does not report a specific outcome result, only that a review of treatment options is presented
- Who was studied
- People with hemorrhoid disease
- What they received
- Surgical and nonoperative treatments for hemorrhoids
- Compared with
- Comparison between different treatment options
- Main outcome
- Not clearly stated
- Quality
- This is a narrative review describing treatment options without presenting study data or outcomes to judge effectiveness.
- Limitations
- Abstract does not report study methodology, data, or specific outcome results; it is a general review.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Hemorrhoid disease is common in the Western world
- intervention
Numerous treatments are available, including surgical and nonoperative options.
- comparator
Numerous treatments are available, including surgical and nonoperative options.
- primaryOutcome
The authors present a review of the disease pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment options for hemorrhoid disease.
- result
The authors present a review of the disease pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment options for hemorrhoid disease.
Surg Clin North Am · PMID 41241446 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Wang et al. 2025
Comparative effectiveness and recurrence rates of endoscopic sclerotherapy, ligation, and combined therapy for grades I-III internal hemorrhoids
Non-surgical treatments worked well without surgery.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
253 people2025
all three treatments were effective (90.6%-95.8%), with combined therapy having the highest efficacy and lowest recurrence rate
- Who was studied
- patients with grade I-III internal hemorrhoids treated at one hospital
- What they received
- endoscopic sclerotherapy, rubber band ligation, or combined ligation-sclerotherapy (non-surgical endoscopic treatments)
- Compared with
- the three endoscopic treatment methods compared against each other
- Main outcome
- treatment effectiveness within 3 months and symptom recurrence after 3 months
- Quality
- this was a retrospective, single-center study without a surgical comparison group, so it can't say how these treatments stack up against surgery.
- Limitations
- retrospective design; no surgical or untreated comparison group; unequal group sizes; single center
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A total of 253 patients were included
- population
grades I - III internal hemorrhoids
- intervention
endoscopic sclerotherapy (ES), endoscopic rubber band ligation (RBL), and combined ligation - sclerotherapy (CT)
- comparator
Patients were divided into ES, RBL, and CT groups.
- primaryOutcome
Efficacy was assessed within 3 months post-treatment, and recurrence was defined as symptom reappearance > 3 months post-treatment.
- result
the efficacy rate was 90.6% (95/107) for ES, 92.6% (113/122) for RBL, and 95.8% (23/24) for CT
- result
CT had the lowest rate (4.3% [1/23]), followed by RBL (9.7% [11/113]) and ES (11.6% [11/95])
BMC Surg · PMID 41239416 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Bharucha et al. 2026
An Evidence-Based Practical Review on Common Benign Anorectal Disorders: Hemorrhoids, Anal Fissure, Dyssynergic Defecation, and Fecal Incontinence
Mild cases treated without surgery; severe cases need surgery.Narrative reviewLow qualityRelated question
size not given2026
Treatment is applied stepwise, starting with conservative therapy (e.g., rubber band ligation for grade I-II hemorrhoids), with surgery reserved for more severe disease
- Who was studied
- people with hemorrhoids and other common anorectal problems
- What they received
- conservative treatments such as rubber band ligation for milder hemorrhoids, with surgery reserved for severe cases
- Compared with
- surgery (excisional hemorrhoidectomy) versus non-surgical treatment
- Main outcome
- how hemorrhoids are treated depending on severity
- Quality
- This is a general narrative review describing usual practice, not a study comparing treatments head-to-head.
- Limitations
- Covers multiple unrelated anorectal conditions broadly rather than focusing specifically on hemorrhoid treatment outcomes; no study design, sample size, or comparative data given.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
hemorrhoids, chronic anal fissures, dyssynergic defecation (DD), and fecal incontinence (FI)
- intervention
starting with conservative therapy with simpler treatments when feasible (eg, rubber band ligation for grade I-II hemorrhoids), with surgery, usually excisional hemorrhoidectomy, being reserved for more severe disease
- comparator
with surgery, usually excisional hemorrhoidectomy, being reserved for more severe disease
- primaryOutcome
Treatments are applied stepwise, starting with conservative therapy with simpler treatments when feasible
- result
Treatments are applied stepwise, starting with conservative therapy with simpler treatments when feasible (eg, rubber band ligation for grade I-II hemorrhoids), with surgery, usually excisional hemorrhoidectomy, being reserved for more severe disease
Gastroenterology · PMID 41236452 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Guimarães et al. 2026
Office-based treatments for hemorrhoidal disease grades I-III ‒ Comparing rubber band ligation and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy
Banding works better; sclerotherapy is safer.RetrospectiveLow quality
441 people2026
Rubber band ligation led to symptom resolution more often than foam sclerotherapy, but caused more side effects
- Who was studied
- Patients with hemorrhoids (grades I-III) treated in an outpatient clinic
- What they received
- Rubber band ligation (RBL)
- Compared with
- Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (PFS)
- Main outcome
- Whether the hemorrhoid symptoms resolved after treatment (clinical success)
- Quality
- This was a retrospective study without randomization, so differences between groups could be due to other factors, not just the treatment.
- Limitations
- Retrospective cohort design (not randomized), so treatment groups may have differed in ways that affected results.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- design
this retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with HD treated with RBL and/or PFS between January 2015 and April 2024
- n
in total, 441 patients were included
- population
office-based treatments for hemorrhoidal disease (HD) are recommended when medical management fails
- intervention
Both, rubber band ligation (RBL) and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (PFS) can be used
- comparator
This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of PFS versus RBL
- primaryOutcome
The outcomes were clinical success (CS), relapse, relapse-free survival (RFS) and treatment failure (TF)
- result
Patients treated with RBL were significantly more effective in achieving CS (78.6 % vs 58.1 %, p < .001, phi = .205).
- result
patients treated with RBL appeared more likely to achieve CS, while PFS showed a more favorable safety profile.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig · PMID 41128083 · Read it on PubMed ↗
de Oliveira et al. 2026
Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty for Grade III Hemorrhoidal Disease: Safety and Efficacy in a Brazilian Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
Pain and symptoms improved after laser treatment.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
100 people1 year
pain peaked at day 7 then nearly resolved by day 14 and stayed low up to a year, symptoms disappeared by day 30, and most complications were mild
- Who was studied
- adults with symptomatic grade III hemorrhoids
- What they received
- laser hemorrhoidoplasty (a minimally invasive laser procedure)
- Compared with
- none; single-group study with no comparison treatment
- Main outcome
- pain levels, hemorrhoid symptoms, and complications after treatment
- Quality
- this was a retrospective study of one treatment group with no comparison to surgery or other options, so it can't show whether laser treatment works better or worse than alternatives.
- Limitations
- retrospective design, no control or comparison group, and nearly half of patients had some complication over follow-up
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
This multicenter retrospective cohort included 100 patients
- population
100 patients with symptomatic grade III hemorrhoids treated with LHP
- intervention
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to excisional hemorrhoidectomy
- comparator
This multicenter retrospective cohort included 100 patients with symptomatic grade III hemorrhoids treated with LHP across six Brazilian centers
- primaryOutcome
Primary outcomes were postoperative pain (Visual Analog Scale-VAS), proctological symptoms (Proctological Symptoms Scale-PSS), and complications.
- result
Median VAS peaked at 3.0 on day 7 and declined to near-complete remission by day 14, remaining minimal up to 1 year. PSS scores improved in parallel, reaching zero from day 30. The 30-day complication rate averaged 19.7%, peaking at 27% on day 14, with a cumulative per-patient rate of 44%.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg · PMID 41091564 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Wang et al. 2025
Modified sclerobanding versus rubber band ligation for grade II/III hemorrhoidal disease: a retrospective study
Less bleeding, fewer recurrences than standard bandingRetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
307 peopleOne-year follow-up
the new combined method had no cases of delayed major bleeding and lower rates of recurrence and treatment failure than standard banding
- Who was studied
- patients with grade II or III hemorrhoids
- What they received
- modified sclerobanding (rubber band ligation plus polidocanol foam sclerotherapy)
- Compared with
- traditional rubber band ligation alone
- Main outcome
- rate of treatment failure and delayed major bleeding after the procedure
- Quality
- it was a retrospective, non-randomized comparison of two office procedures, so bias and confounding can't be ruled out.
- Limitations
- retrospective design, baseline differences between groups (anticoagulant history, hospital stay), not a comparison to actual surgery
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
patients with grade II/III HD who underwent RBL
- intervention
modified sclerobanding (mSB) procedure, which combines rubber band ligation (RBL) with 3% polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (PFS)
- comparator
traditional RBL
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcomes assessed were treatment failure rates and the incidence of delayed massive bleeding (DMB)
- result
The mSB group had no cases of delayed major bleeding, compared to five cases in the RBL group. The recurrence (6.8% vs. 17.0%) and treatment failure (6.8% vs. 18.6%) rates were significantly lower in the mSB group (P < 0.05).
- n
Among the 307 patients, 162 received mSB and 125 underwent traditional RBL.
- followUp
One-year follow-up revealed no significant differences in the HDSS, SHS-HD, or PS.
Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 41047429 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Suzuki 2025
Combined therapy of HIFU rectoanal lifting (HIFU-RAL) and sclerotherapy for prolapsed hemorrhoids and rectal mucosal prolapse: A case series
Prolapse reduced, no complications seen.Case seriesVery low quality
10 peoplemedian: 16.0 months
prolapse was visibly reduced or resolved in all cases right after treatment, with no complications or recurrence during follow-up
- Who was studied
- adults with prolapsed hemorrhoids or rectal mucosal prolapse causing discomfort
- What they received
- combined HIFU rectoanal lifting procedure plus sclerotherapy injection
- Compared with
- none (single-arm case series, before-and-after comparison)
- Main outcome
- whether prolapse was reduced or resolved and whether problems recurred or caused complications
- Quality
- only 10 patients with no comparison group, so it cannot show whether this works better than other treatments.
- Limitations
- Very small number of patients (10), no control group, no randomization, and no comparison to surgery or other nonsurgical treatments.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
This case series included 10 symptomatic patients, consisting of 5 men and 5 women.
- population
Clinical examination identified 8 cases of prolapsed hemorrhoids (Goligher grade III-IV) and 2 cases of rectal mucosal prolapse.
- intervention
we applied a transanal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) technique, namely HIFU rectal lifting (HIFU-RAL), combined with aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA) sclerotherapy for treating prolapsed hemorrhoids
- comparator
The combined efficacy of HIFU-RAL and ALTA sclerotherapy was evaluated over time.
- primaryOutcome
In all cases, the prolapsed lesions were visibly reduced or resolved immediately after the procedure.
- result
In all cases, the prolapsed lesions were visibly reduced or resolved immediately after the procedure. During the follow-up period (median: 16.0 months; interquartile range: 10.5-25.8 months), no adverse events or recurrences were observed.
- followUp
median: 16.0 months; interquartile range: 10.5-25.8 months
Medicine (Baltimore) · PMID 40922264 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Al Jnainati et al. 2025
Outcomes of embolization therapy of superior rectal arteries for the management of grade 1 to 3 internal hemorrhoids: a systematic Review of clinical studies
Artery-blocking procedure eases hemorrhoid bleeding safely.Systematic reviewLow quality
810 people2025
Procedure succeeded technically 93-100% of the time; symptoms improved in 63-94% of patients; side effects were mild (pelvic discomfort, nausea, low fever) with no serious injury; hemorrhoids recurred in 8-20% of patients
- Who was studied
- Adults with grade 1 to 3 internal hemorrhoids who didn't respond to office treatments or who wanted to avoid surgery
- What they received
- Embolization of the superior rectal artery (a catheter procedure called "Emborrhoid") to block blood flow to hemorrhoids
- Compared with
- Mostly no direct comparator (single-arm case series); a couple of small studies compared it to rubber-band ligation or sclerotherapy
- Main outcome
- Whether the procedure worked technically, whether symptoms (especially bleeding) improved, side effects, and whether hemorrhoids came back
- Quality
- The studies were too different to combine into one solid answer, were mostly small single-center case series without a comparison group, and only two small studies directly compared this treatment to others.
- Limitations
- Substantial heterogeneity blocked meta-analysis; small single-center cohorts, disparate techniques, and scarce head-to-head trials limit external validity
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Twenty-two studies encompassing 810 procedures qualified.
- population
Superior rectal artery embolization ("Emborrhoid") offers a catheter-based alternative for grade I-III internal hemorrhoids when office therapies fail or surgery is undesirable.
- intervention
Superior rectal artery embolization ("Emborrhoid") offers a catheter-based alternative for grade I-III internal hemorrhoids
- comparator
Only two small, heterogeneous comparative studies versus rubber-band ligation or sclerotherapy were available, precluding a pooled analysis.
- primaryOutcome
Prespecified outcomes were technical success, clinical success (≥ 2-point fall in bleeding score or equivalent), adverse events, and recurrence.
- result
Technical success reached 93-100%. Clinical success ranged from 63 to 94%, yielding marked bleeding control and symptom relief.
- result
Recurrence necessitating repeat treatment affected 8-20% of patients, usually when collateral arterial supply persisted.
- limitations
Substantial heterogeneity blocked meta-analysis; results were narratively synthesized.
- limitations
Yet small single-center cohorts, disparate techniques, and scarce head-to-head trials limit external validity.
Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 40877526 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Zhu et al. 2025
Multicenter analysis of the efficacy and factors related to recurrence of endoscopic sclerotherapy for internal hemorrhoids: a large-sample, retrospective cohort study
Injection treatment worked well, low recurrenceRetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
1,147 people3 to 49 months (mean: 25.61 ± 13.23 months)
92.85% treatment success; 12.21% recurrence, with higher BMI, lack of exercise linked to more recurrence and lower hemorrhoid grade, working position, diet linked to less recurrence
- Who was studied
- patients with internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- endoscopic sclerotherapy (an injection treatment, non-surgical)
- Compared with
- none (single-group outcome and recurrence analysis)
- Main outcome
- treatment success and recurrence rate of hemorrhoids
- Quality
- This was a retrospective study without a comparison group, so it can't directly prove sclerotherapy is better than surgery or no treatment.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, no control/comparison group, multiple centers may differ in practice, and follow-up time varied widely (3 to 49 months).
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
patients with internal hemorrhoids treated with endoscopic sclerotherapy
- intervention
endoscopic sclerotherapy
- comparator
A retrospective analysis of patients with internal hemorrhoids treated with endoscopic sclerotherapy at three centers
- primaryOutcome
assess hemorrhoid grading, treatment efficacy, complications, and recurrence rates
- result
The overall effective rate was 92.85% (1065/1147).
- result
The overall recurrence rate was 12.21% (130/1065)
- result
higher BMI and lack of exercise were associated with increased recurrence (p < 0.05), while lower hemorrhoid grade, working position, and dietary habits were protective factors (p < 0.05)
- n
A total of 1147 patients underwent the procedure
- followUp
follow-up periods ranging from 3 to 49 months (mean: 25.61 ± 13.23 months)
Surg Endosc · PMID 40856750 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Docter et al. 2025
Pediatric external hemorrhoids: clinical characteristics and outcomes of conservative treatment versus injection sclerotherapy
Both options worked, but sclerotherapy had risks.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
44 people2025
sclerotherapy resolved symptoms in most after 1-2 injections but caused skin erosion in over a third; conservative treatment resolved symptoms within a year though lesions persisted
- Who was studied
- children with external hemorrhoids
- What they received
- injection sclerotherapy
- Compared with
- conservative watchful waiting
- Main outcome
- symptom resolution and complications
- Quality
- This was a small, retrospective study without randomization, so it cannot reliably prove one treatment is better.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, no randomization, small sample, diagnosis often based on parent photographs rather than exam.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Forty-four patients (86.4% male) were included.
- population
pediatric patients treated with conservative therapy (watchful waiting) or injection sclerotherapy for external hemorrhoids
- intervention
injection sclerotherapy
- comparator
conservative therapy (watchful waiting)
- primaryOutcome
treatment outcomes, and complications
- result
Thirty-one patients (70.5%) underwent injection sclerotherapy, with a 69.2% success rate after one, and 90.3% after two injections. Thirteen patients (29.5%) were treated conservatively with watchful waiting, with symptoms resolving within one year, although the lesion(s) persisted. Skin erosion occurred in 35.5% of patients treated with injection sclerotherapy, leading to constipation and defecation anxiety in 9.1% of patients.
Eur J Pediatr · PMID 40813828 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Hajjar et al. 2025
Safety of Hemorrhoid Procedures in Patients Who Are Immunocompromised: The Mayo Clinic Experience
Hemorrhoid surgery seemed safe despite immunosuppression.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
55 people2025
25% of patients had an adverse event, including 3 cases of cellulitis; no cases of pelvic sepsis or need for IV antibiotics
- Who was studied
- adults with hemorrhoids who were immunocompromised (mostly due to medications)
- What they received
- office-based or surgical procedures for hemorrhoids performed while immunosuppressed
- Compared with
- none (no comparison group; outcomes described within this treated group)
- Main outcome
- infection or wound complications after the procedure
- Quality
- This was a small, retrospective single-center study without a comparison group, so it can only suggest safety, not prove it.
- Limitations
- The retrospective nature of the study and the heterogeneity of the study population.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Fifty-five immunocompromised patients, with a median age of 60 years, underwent a total of 68 hemorrhoidal procedures
- population
Adult patients were included who had hemorrhoidal disease and primarily medication-induced immunosuppression
- intervention
undergoing an office-based procedure or operative intervention for hemorrhoidal disease while on immunosuppression
- comparator
Retrospective medical record review.
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcome was the development of infectious complications or wound complications.
- result
Sixteen adverse events were reported in 14 patients (25%). Three cases of postoperative cellulitis were documented after thrombosed external hemorrhoid excision, hemorrhoidopexy, and Whitehead hemorrhoidectomy. No postoperative intravenous antibiotics were administered. No cases of pelvic sepsis were documented.
- limitations
The retrospective nature of the study and the heterogeneity of the study population.
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 40810375 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Tutino et al. 2025
Haemorrhoidal artery ligation: Is Doppler guidance useful? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Doppler guidance did not reduce recurrence.Meta-analysisModerate qualityRelated question
514 people2025
Doppler-guided ligation had a higher recurrence rate than non-Doppler ligation, with similar pain levels; when combined with mucopexy, no difference was found between the two
- Who was studied
- adults with hemorrhoids of different severity levels undergoing minimally invasive artery ligation surgery
- What they received
- hemorrhoidal artery ligation guided by Doppler ultrasound (DG-HAL)
- Compared with
- hemorrhoidal artery ligation without Doppler guidance (HAL)
- Main outcome
- recurrence of hemorrhoids after the procedure
- Quality
- It pools seven randomized trials totaling only 514 patients, which strengthens the evidence but the trials themselves were likely small and varied in technique.
- Limitations
- The abstract does not detail heterogeneity between trials, blinding, or long-term follow-up duration.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
They included 514 patients (mean age 49.13 years, 46% men) with different haemorrhoidal degrees.
- population
They included 514 patients (mean age 49.13 years, 46% men) with different haemorrhoidal degrees.
- intervention
DG-HAL in 259 patients
- comparator
The HAL technique was performed in 255 patients
- primaryOutcome
The primary aim of this study was to find evidence that the use of Doppler guidance reduces the risk of recurrence.
- result
The meta-analysis revealed that the DG-HAL procedure was associated with a significant risk of recurrence (P = 0.007) and similar postoperative pain (P = 0.623) compared to the HAL procedure. In a subgroup analysis of patients treated with a combined RAR procedure, no differences were found between the DG-HAL-RAR and HAL-RAR regarding the risk of recurrence (P = 0.36) and postoperative pain (P = 0.31).
Colorectal Dis · PMID 40665575 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Huang et al. 2025
Tissue selecting therapy stapler minimally invasive surgery to treat severe hemorrhoids
Less invasive surgery option, fewer complications.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question
141 peopleThree months after surgery
TST had higher effectiveness rate, shorter hospital stay and operation time, less blood loss, and fewer complications than PPH or EPH
- Who was studied
- patients with severe hemorrhoids
- What they received
- tissue selecting therapy (TST) stapler surgery
- Compared with
- PPH surgery and EPH (rubber band ligation and staple) surgery
- Main outcome
- treatment effectiveness, complications, and anal muscle function after surgery
- Quality
- although randomized, the abstract gives no detail on blinding, how randomization was concealed, or loss to follow-up, and all three compared groups are surgical, so it says nothing about non-surgical treatment.
- Limitations
- Abstract does not report blinding, dropout, or long-term follow-up beyond 3 months; all compared treatments are surgical, not non-surgical options.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
141 patients with severe hemorrhoids were included into three groups
- population
patients with severe hemorrhoids
- intervention
tissue-selective therapy stapler (TST) minimally invasive surgery
- comparator
the PPH group, and the eastern rubber band ligation and coincident of dislocation for prolapse and hemorrhoid (EPH)group
- primaryOutcome
clinical efficacy of the three groups of patients, changes in hospital stay time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and anal dynamic indicators
- result
The total effective rate in the TST group was 93.62%, which was higher than the 74.47% and 72.34% in the PPH and EPH groups, respectively, after treatment.
- result
the complication rate in the TST group was 10.64%, which was lower than the 27.66% and 31.91% reported in the PPH and EPH groups, respectively.
BMC Surg · PMID 40634906 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Schwandner 2025
[Hemorrhoidal disease and stage-dependent treatment (including anal prolapse)]
Mild cases treated without surgery; severe cases need it.Narrative reviewLow quality
size not given2025
early-stage hemorrhoids respond to conservative and interventional treatments, while advanced stages need surgery or minimally invasive procedures
- Who was studied
- people with hemorrhoids at different stages, including anal prolapse
- What they received
- non-surgical treatments (conservative care, sclerotherapy, rubber band ligation) and minimally invasive procedures
- Compared with
- conventional surgical hemorrhoidectomy
- Main outcome
- symptom control and avoiding recurrence
- Quality
- this is a general review of treatment approaches without original study data, patient numbers, or outcome statistics.
- Limitations
- no study design, patient numbers, or comparative outcome data are given; it is a narrative overview rather than a study of outcomes.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
The treatment of hemorrhoidal disease is carried out depending on the symptoms and stage of the disease.
- intervention
conservative and interventional treatment options (including sclerotherapy, rubber band ligation) are indicated in early stages (stages I and II)
- comparator
surgical procedures are effective treatment options for advanced hemorrhoidal disease (stages III and IV)
- primaryOutcome
The ultimate goal of all treatment strategies for hemorrhoidal disease is symptom control and long-term absence of recurrence.
- result
Although conservative and interventional treatment options (including sclerotherapy, rubber band ligation) are indicated in early stages (stages I and II), surgical procedures are effective treatment options for advanced hemorrhoidal disease (stages III and IV).
Chirurgie (Heidelb) · PMID 40586790 · Read it on PubMed ↗
di Schiano di Visconte 2025
Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty: Procedure, Outcomes and Future Directions
Less pain, but worse for severe cases.Narrative reviewVery low quality
size not given2025
Laser treatment reduced pain and recovery time but had higher recurrence rates, especially for the worst-graded hemorrhoids, where surgery worked better long-term
- Who was studied
- people with hemorrhoids of different severity grades
- What they received
- laser hemorrhoidoplasty (a laser-based procedure for hemorrhoids)
- Compared with
- traditional excisional surgery for hemorrhoids
- Main outcome
- effectiveness, safety, and long-term outcomes of the laser procedure
- Quality
- This is a general review discussing the topic without describing a systematic search method or pooling of data, so it carries little weight as evidence.
- Limitations
- The abstract does not describe how studies were selected or analyzed, and does not report specific numbers, making it hard to judge the strength of the claims.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
treatment of hemorrhoidal disease (HD)
- population
across different grades of hemorrhoids
- intervention
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP)
- comparator
compared with traditional surgical methods
- comparator
excisional methods remain superior for managing advanced HD
- primaryOutcome
critically evaluated the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of LHP
- result
offering advantages such as reduced postoperative pain, shorter recovery time, and improved patient satisfaction
- result
higher recurrence rates, especially for Grade IV HD, remain a clinical limitation
- result
excisional methods remain superior for managing advanced HD, particularly in terms of long-term symptom resolution
ANZ J Surg · PMID 40586452 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Martins et al. 2026
Operative versus nonoperative treatment of thrombosed external hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Surgery lowers recurrence, same bleeding risk.Meta-analysisModerate quality
851 people2026
surgery had lower recurrence risk but similar bleeding risk compared to conservative treatment
- Who was studied
- patients with thrombosed external hemorrhoids
- What they received
- surgical treatment (excision)
- Compared with
- conservative (nonoperative) treatment
- Main outcome
- recurrence and bleeding risk
- Quality
- it pools six studies with moderate-to-high heterogeneity and the abstract does not describe the quality or randomization of the included trials.
- Limitations
- heterogeneity between studies (I2 up to 60%) and the abstract does not specify study designs included
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
We included six studies with a total of 851 patients, of whom 390 (45.8%) underwent surgical treatment.
- population
Thrombosed external hemorrhoids are a complication of hemorrhoids characterized by severe pain, swelling, and lump formation due to acute venous engorgement.
- intervention
Surgical treatment was associated with a lower risk of recurrence compared to conservative management
- comparator
comparing surgery with conservative treatment in thrombosed external hemorrhoids
- primaryOutcome
Surgical treatment was associated with a lower risk of recurrence compared to conservative management (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.91; P < 0.05; I2 = 54%).
- result
there were no significant differences in the risk of bleeding between the groups (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.27-3.44; P = 0.95; I2 = 60%)
Updates Surg · PMID 40576944 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Zhang et al. 2025
The Comparison Between Endoscopic Ligation and Sclerotherapy on the Treatment Effect and Anorectal Function in Patients With Internal Hemorrhoids
Both non-surgical methods worked similarly well.Prospective cohortLow qualityRelated question
32 people3-month follow-up
no significant difference in treatment effect of postoperative bleeding, prolapse, constipation, and complications between the 2 groups, though each method showed certain advantages in specific measures
- Who was studied
- patients with internal hemorrhoids undergoing minimally invasive endoscopic treatment
- What they received
- endoscopic ligation
- Compared with
- cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES)
- Main outcome
- treatment effect, symptom relief, complications, psychological condition, and anorectal function
- Quality
- Small, non-randomized comparison of only 32 patients with short 3-month follow-up limits confidence in the findings.
- Limitations
- Small sample size, no mention of randomization, short follow-up period of only 3 months.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Thirty-two patients who underwent minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for internal hemorrhoids were recruited
- population
patients with internal hemorrhoids
- intervention
Group A undergoing endoscopic ligation (n=14)
- comparator
Group B receiving CAES (n=18)
- primaryOutcome
the treatment effect of endoscopic ligation and cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES) for patients with internal hemorrhoids, symptom relief, complication rate and psychological condition, and the anorectal function were observed
- result
There was no significant difference in the treatment effect of postoperative bleeding, prolapse, constipation, and complications between the 2 groups. However, Group A has certain advantages in the treatment of prolapse and constipation before and after treatment, and Group B has certain advantages in bleeding.
- followUp
with a 3-month follow-up
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech · PMID 40530787 · Read it on PubMed ↗
van Oostendorp et al. 2025
Limitations of the Goligher classification in randomized trials for hemorrhoidal disease: a qualitative systematic review of selection criteria
Inconsistent classification, no direct treatment comparison.Systematic reviewLow qualityRelated question
size not given2025
most trials used the Goligher classification but often did not describe or cite it properly, and classification/selection criteria were inconsistent across studies
- Who was studied
- adults with hemorrhoidal disease enrolled in randomized trials comparing treatments
- What they received
- various treatments for hemorrhoidal disease studied in trials, including at least one surgical arm
- Compared with
- other treatment arms or classification systems used in the same trials
- Main outcome
- how patients were selected and classified (using systems like the Goligher classification) in hemorrhoid treatment trials
- Quality
- this review examines how trials classified and selected patients rather than comparing surgery with non-surgical treatment outcomes, so it cannot show which works better.
- Limitations
- most studies did not fully describe or cite the classification system used, and 70% of studies reporting recurrence lacked adequate inclusion criteria or references to the classification
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Eligible studies included adult patients and at least one arm involving surgical treatment.
- intervention
randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatments for HD
- comparator
focusing on classification systems used for patient enrollment
- primaryOutcome
evaluate the patient selection criteria and classification systems employed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for HD
- result
Most studies (86.4%) used the Goligher system, though the majority did not fully describe or cite the system.
- result
70% of these did not provide adequate inclusion criteria or references to Goligher's classification
- limitations
70% of these did not provide adequate inclusion criteria or references to Goligher's classification
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 40493094 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Gallo et al. 2025
Real-world use of polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: insights from an international survey and systematic review with clinical practice recommendations
Possibly fewer recurrences than banding.Systematic reviewLow quality
size not given2025
polidocanol foam was seen as more successful and less likely to recur than rubber band ligation, based on expert survey and review, not a controlled trial
- Who was studied
- adults with hemorrhoidal disease, mainly grade II and III
- What they received
- polidocanol foam sclerotherapy injected into hemorrhoids
- Compared with
- rubber band ligation
- Main outcome
- treatment success rate and recurrence rate
- Quality
- the comparison numbers come from expert opinion and a non-pooled review of studies with wide variation in technique, not from a controlled trial directly comparing the two treatments.
- Limitations
- wide variation among experts in patient selection, technique, and follow-up care; comparison to rubber band ligation based on perceived rates rather than a controlled study
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Most experts (90%) reported using polidocanol foam sclerotherapy primarily for Goligher grade II HD, with 67% extending its use to grade III cases.
- intervention
Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy has gained increasing attention as a minimally invasive treatment for hemorrhoidal disease (HD).
- comparator
Compared to rubber band ligation, polidocanol foam was perceived as having higher success rates (88.3% vs. 66.7%) and lower recurrence rates (16.1% vs. 41.2%).
- primaryOutcome
Compared to rubber band ligation, polidocanol foam was perceived as having higher success rates (88.3% vs. 66.7%) and lower recurrence rates (16.1% vs. 41.2%).
- result
Compared to rubber band ligation, polidocanol foam was perceived as having higher success rates (88.3% vs. 66.7%) and lower recurrence rates (16.1% vs. 41.2%). Adverse events were infrequent.
Updates Surg · PMID 40481245 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Tsai et al. 2025
Preoperative enema for anal surgery: randomized clinical trial
Enema before surgery mostly made no difference.Randomised trialModerate qualityRelated question
266 peopleday 0 to day 7
no significant difference in pain or complications overall, but less pain on days 2-4 in the enema group among patients having Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
- Who was studied
- adults with grade III or IV hemorrhoids or anal fistulas having surgery
- What they received
- preoperative enema before anal surgery
- Compared with
- no preoperative enema
- Main outcome
- pain scores and painkiller use after surgery, days 0 to 7
- Quality
- it was a randomized trial with a reasonable number of patients, but the positive finding came from a smaller subgroup analysis, which is less reliable.
- Limitations
- abstract does not mention blinding; subgroup findings are exploratory and from a single hospital
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A total of 266 patients were enrolled in this study, with 133 allocated to the enema group and 133 to the control group.
- population
Patients diagnosed with grade III or IV haemorrhoids and anal fistulas at the Taipei Medical University Shuang-Ho Hospital, Taiwan, between 2022 and 2023, were enrolled
- intervention
preoperative enema (intervention)
- comparator
no preoperative enema
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcome measures included postoperative visual analogue scale scores and analgesic usage from postoperative day 0 to day 7.
- result
No significant differences were observed in postoperative visual analogue scale scores, analgesic consumption and postoperative complications between the two groups.
- result
in the subgroup of patients undergoing Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy, the mean(s.d.) visual analogue scale score was significantly higher in the control group than in the enema group on day 2 (5.69(2.14) versus 3.77(2.45), P = 0.021), day 3 (5.85(2.61) versus 3.92(2.73), P = 0.042) and day 4 (5.23(2.55) versus 3.42(2.18), P = 0.027).
BJS Open · PMID 40455826 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Grossi et al. 2025
SHAPE-skin-sparing hemorrhoidectomy and PExy: a novel technique for the surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease
Fewer symptoms after new surgery.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
21 people1-month
Symptom scores dropped sharply after surgery, with few complications and no lasting pain
- Who was studied
- patients with advanced (grade III-IV) hemorrhoids
- What they received
- a new surgical technique called SHAPE (skin-sparing hemorrhoidectomy and pexy)
- Compared with
- none (before-and-after comparison within same patients)
- Main outcome
- change in hemorrhoid symptom severity scores after surgery
- Quality
- This was a small study of only 21 patients with no comparison group and just one month of follow-up, so it can't show how this technique compares to other treatments or holds up long-term.
- Limitations
- Small sample size, no control group, and only short-term (1-month) follow-up; long-term efficacy and recurrence not yet assessed.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
21 consecutive patients with grade III-IV HD
- intervention
Skin-Sparing Hemorrhoidectomy and Pexy (SHAPE)
- comparator
A prospective analysis was conducted on 21 consecutive patients with grade III-IV HD who underwent SHAPE on 3 hemorrhoidal columns.
- primaryOutcome
the Hemorrhoidal Disease Severity Score (HDSS) decreasing from a median of 16 to 0 (p < 0.001) and the Short Health Scale (SHS) from 20 to 4 (p < 0.001)
- result
patients experienced a significant reduction in symptoms, with the Hemorrhoidal Disease Severity Score (HDSS) decreasing from a median of 16 to 0 (p < 0.001)
- n
21 consecutive patients with grade III-IV HD
Updates Surg · PMID 40399727 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Long et al. 2025
Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy combined with rubber band ligation and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for the management of grade III/IV hemorrhoids: a retrospective study
Combined surgery technique had fewer recurrences.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
255 people12 months
lower recurrence and higher satisfaction with the combined procedure, but no difference in hemorrhoid severity score
- Who was studied
- adults with grade III or IV hemorrhoids who had surgery
- What they received
- Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy combined with rubber band ligation and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy
- Compared with
- Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy alone
- Main outcome
- recurrence rate, hemorrhoid severity score, and patient satisfaction 12 months after surgery
- Quality
- It is a retrospective, non-randomized, single-center comparison of two surgical techniques, so bias and confounding cannot be ruled out.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design without randomization, single center, and both groups still underwent surgery rather than comparing surgery to non-surgical treatment.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
A total of 255 patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids who underwent MMH + RBL + PFS (n = 128) or MMH (n = 127) between May 2022 and June 2023 were included in the study.
- intervention
This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of a MMH combined with rubber band ligation and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (MMH + RBL + PFS) for the management of grade III/IV hemorrhoids.
- comparator
A total of 255 patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids who underwent MMH + RBL + PFS (n = 128) or MMH (n = 127) between May 2022 and June 2023 were included in the study.
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcomes included recurrence rates, hemorrhoid severity score (HSS), and patient satisfaction 12 months after surgery.
- result
At the 12-month follow-up after surgery, the recurrence rate was lower in the MMH + RBL + PFS group (0.78%) than in the MMH group (7.09%) (p < 0.05). The patient satisfaction score was higher in the MMH + RBL + PFS group (91.41%) than in the MMH group (81.10%) (p < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in the HSS between the two groups (p > 0.05).
- n
A total of 255 patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids who underwent MMH + RBL + PFS (n = 128) or MMH (n = 127) between May 2022 and June 2023 were included in the study.
BMC Gastroenterol · PMID 40346473 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Carvalho et al. 2025
Efficacy and safety of office-based procedures for hemorrhoidal disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Nonsurgical treatment worked well, low risk.RetrospectiveModerate quality
129 people55.3 ± 34.5 months
Treatment worked in 88% of patients, 16% of those had the problem come back, and complications occurred in 5.6% of procedures, with no severe complications like incontinence
- Who was studied
- people with inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease) who also have hemorrhoids
- What they received
- office-based, nonsurgical treatments for hemorrhoids: rubber band ligation and polidocanol injection (sclerotherapy)
- Compared with
- rubber band ligation compared with polidocanol injection sclerotherapy
- Main outcome
- whether the hemorrhoid treatment worked (clinical success), came back, or caused complications
- Quality
- It is a fairly large multicenter study but retrospective with no comparison to surgery or to a non-IBD control group within the paper.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design; only 55% of patients were in endoscopic remission at treatment time; no direct comparison group without IBD or group treated surgically reported in this abstract.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A total of 129 patients were included, 90 with ulcerative colitis and 37 with Crohn's disease.
- population
patients with IBD undergoing office-based treatment for HD
- intervention
77 patients underwent rubber band ligation (RBL), 44 underwent polidocanol injection, and 8 had both treatments, for a total of 304 procedures
- comparator
Clinical success and recurrence were similar between RBL and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy (PFS).
- primaryOutcome
Data regarding the patients' IBD (type, disease location, medication, endoscopic remission) and HD (clinical success, recurrence, complications) were analyzed.
- result
The treatment of HD was effective in 88% of patients, of which 16% relapsed (mean follow-up time of 55.3 ± 34.5 months). Complications were described in 17 (5.6%) procedures, 2 (0.66%) requiring invasive treatment.
- followUp
mean follow-up time of 55.3 ± 34.5 months
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 40338393 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Gravante et al. 2025
Assessment of long-term outcomes following Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy with Doppler transperineal ultrasound and endoscopy: a pilot study
Ultrasound detected recurrence after surgery.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
23 people26 months of follow-up (range 14-48)
Ultrasound vascular pattern was linked to endoscopic signs of recurrence, but not to patient-reported symptoms; absence of the pattern ruled out recurrence in all cases
- Who was studied
- patients who had surgical removal of hemorrhoids (Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy)
- What they received
- follow-up assessment using Doppler ultrasound and endoscopy after hemorrhoid surgery
- Compared with
- no comparison group; patients compared to themselves based on ultrasound findings
- Main outcome
- whether Doppler ultrasound patterns matched clinical symptoms and endoscopic signs of recurrence after surgery
- Quality
- This was a small pilot study of only 23 patients with no control group, looking at imaging after surgery rather than comparing surgery to non-surgical treatment.
- Limitations
- Small pilot sample, no comparison group, and no assessment of non-surgical treatment options.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Twenty-three patients were available for the analysis at 26 months of follow-up
- population
patients who underwent Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
- intervention
underwent a clinical proctological evaluation, a Doppler TPUS, and an endoscopic check of the anal canal
- comparator
A consecutive series of MM patients treated between February 2020 and December 2023 were contacted
- primaryOutcome
Outcome measures consisted of the description of Doppler TPUS modifications following MM, and their relationship with clinical and endoscopic findings.
- result
No correlation was present between residual symptoms and the Doppler vascular pattern (p = 0.089). The vascular pattern was associated with endoscopic signs of recurrences (p = 0.003), and its absence was able to predict the lack of internal recurrences in all patients (100%).
- followUp
26 months of follow-up (range 14-48)
Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 40310510 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Gravante 2025
Sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: Recent evolutions of an oldies goldy
Promising, but not proven yet.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2025
the newer foam-based and combined technique showed promising results compared with endoscopic rubber band ligation
- Who was studied
- people with grade I-III internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- sclerotherapy using polidocanol foam, alone or combined with rubber-band ligation (sclerobanding), including an endoscopic delivery version
- Compared with
- endoscopic rubber band ligation
- Main outcome
- effectiveness and outcomes of treating hemorrhoids
- Quality
- this is an editorial commentary discussing other studies, not original research with its own data or methods.
- Limitations
- it is an editorial opinion piece commenting on another publication, without presenting its own patient data, numbers, or study methodology.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
patients with grade II-III internal hemorrhoids
- intervention
the combination of polidocanol foam with rubber-band ligation (the historical counterpart of sclerotherapy) in a technique called "sclerobanding"
- intervention
further modifying the use of sclerobanding through an endoscopic delivery for patients with grade II-III internal hemorrhoids
- comparator
present results compared with endoscopic rubber band ligation
- result
The results achieved are promising.
- primaryOutcome
Various articles have already shown promising results
World J Gastroenterol · PMID 40062327 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Dutta 2025
Multilayered numerical modelling of bio-thermal aspects during laser assisted treatment of internal haemorrhoid developed in rectum
Computer model simulates laser heat spread.Laboratory studyVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2025
the model showed a temperature drop at the boundaries between tissue layers, matching previous published models
- Who was studied
- computer model of rectum tissue layers (not real patients)
- What they received
- laser-based heat therapy aimed at internal haemorrhoid tissue
- Compared with
- published numerical model used for verification
- Main outcome
- temperature changes within the layered rectal tissue during laser treatment
- Quality
- this is a theoretical computer simulation, not a study on real patients, so it cannot show whether the treatment actually works or is safe.
- Limitations
- purely mathematical/computational modeling with no human or animal data, no patient outcomes measured
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
the physical domain is considered as multilayered tissue (three different layers of rectum: muscle, submucosa and mucosa)
- intervention
A Gaussian laser beam is considered as heat source to destroy the abnormal growth inside the rectum.
- comparator
The research outcome is verified with the published numerical model with negligible variation.
- primaryOutcome
Temperature variation in multi-layered tissue is investigated for laser heat input and absorption radius along the temporal and spatial coordinate.
- result
Temperature drop has been evidenced in the interfaces of multi-layered rectum tissue.
Lasers Med Sci · PMID 39969619 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Xu et al. 2025
Clinical Efficacy of Automatic Ruiyun Procedure for Hemorrhoids and Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids in the Treatment of Mixed Hemorrhoids: A Comparative Study
Newer surgery outperformed standard hemorrhoid surgery.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
120 people12th week
RPH outperforms PPH in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids with a shortened surgical time.
- Who was studied
- patients with mixed hemorrhoids who visited the Third Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine (The 1st People's Hospital of Baiyin) from January 2019 to December 2023
- What they received
- 60 cases were grouped under the Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids (RPH) group
- Compared with
- the other 60 cases were categorized in the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) group
- Main outcome
- Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative pain, length of hospital stay and hospitalization expenses between the two groups presented statistically significant differences
- Quality
- This was a retrospective single-center study comparing two surgical techniques, which carries more risk of bias than a randomized trial.
- Limitations
- retrospective cohort study...using propensity score matching (PSM) with a ratio of 1:1 for nearest neighbor matching grouping
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
60 cases were grouped under the Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids (RPH) group, and the other 60 cases were categorized in the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) group
- population
patients with mixed hemorrhoids who visited the Third Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine (The 1st People's Hospital of Baiyin) from January 2019 to December 2023
- intervention
60 cases were grouped under the Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids (RPH) group
- comparator
the other 60 cases were categorized in the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) group
- primaryOutcome
Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of postoperative pain, length of hospital stay and hospitalization expenses between the two groups presented statistically significant differences
- result
RPH outperforms PPH in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids with a shortened surgical time.
Ann Ital Chir · PMID 39957120 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Gallo et al. 2025
Clinical evidence and rationale of topical nifedipine and lidocaine ointment in the treatment of anal fissure and hemorrhoidal disease
Topical ointment eased pain, no surgery.Narrative reviewLow qualityRelated question
size not given2025
the combination ointment relieved pain, helped thrombosed hemorrhoids resolve, healed chronic fissures, and controlled post-surgery pain better than comparator treatments
- Who was studied
- people with anal fissure or hemorrhoids, including pain after hemorrhoid surgery
- What they received
- nifedipine 0.3% and lidocaine 1.5% ointment applied to the anal area
- Compared with
- topical lidocaine alone or lidocaine plus hydrocortisone
- Main outcome
- pain relief and healing of fissures or thrombosed hemorrhoids
- Quality
- this is a non-systematic literature review that itself says the evidence it collected is limited, so it cannot be weighted as strongly as controlled trials.
- Limitations
- the authors state the available literature is limited and call for further studies to confirm the results; no details on number of trials, patients, or statistical analysis are given.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Anorectal conditions such as hemorrhoidal disease and anal fissure are frequently painful and debilitating.
- intervention
nifedipine 0.3% and lidocaine 1.5% ointment
- comparator
The ointment was significantly better than controls consisting of topical lidocaine 1.5% alone or in combination with hydrocortisone acetate 1%.
- primaryOutcome
Nifedipine 0.3% and lidocaine 1.5% ointment is effective in relieving pain and aiding the resolution of thrombosed hemorrhoids, reducing resting anal pressure and healing chronic anal fissures, and controlling pain after hemorrhoidectomy.
- result
The ointment was significantly better than controls consisting of topical lidocaine 1.5% alone or in combination with hydrocortisone acetate 1%.
- limitations
Although the available literature on the topical application of nifedipine and lidocaine in anorectal diseases is limited
Minerva Surg · PMID 39945661 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Xu et al. 2025
Clinical effects of endoscopic resection of hypertrophied anal papillae combined with internal hemorrhoid ligation therapy: a retrospective study
More pain, but similar healing results.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
47 people3 months
combined procedure caused more and longer-lasting pain, but bleeding, swelling, and success rates were similar between groups
- Who was studied
- patients with enlarged anal papillae, with or without internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- endoscopic removal of anal papillae plus tying off internal hemorrhoids
- Compared with
- endoscopic removal of anal papillae alone
- Main outcome
- pain, bleeding, swelling after surgery, and effectiveness at 3 months
- Quality
- this was a small, retrospective comparison of two surgical techniques without randomization, so it can't reliably show which approach is better.
- Limitations
- retrospective design, small sample size, and it compares two surgical methods rather than surgery versus non-surgical treatment
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A retrospective study was conducted on 47 patients
- population
47 patients from our center who underwent endoscopic resection of hypertrophic anal papillae, with or without internal hemorrhoids ligation
- intervention
the anal papillae resection + internal hemorrhoid ligation group
- comparator
the anal papillae resection group
- primaryOutcome
postoperative pain intensity and duration, postoperative bleeding severity, presence of anal edema, and follow-up outcomes at 3 months postoperatively
- result
The postoperative pain intensity was higher in the group undergoing anal papillae resection combined with internal hemorrhoid ligation, with a median Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of 1 (0, 2), and the duration of pain was longer, with a median of 1 (0, 2) day.
- result
However, there were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of postoperative bleeding or anal edema.
- result
At the 3-month follow-up, the effective rates were 90.9% and 80.0%, respectively, and there were no statistically significant differences among the groups.
Surg Endosc · PMID 39934277 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Sapkota Upadhya et al. 2024
Efficacy and Safety of Colonoscopic Band Ligation for Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding due to Hemorrhoid
Non-surgical banding relieved hemorrhoid symptoms.Case seriesLow quality
28 people3 months
Symptoms resolved in almost all patients, with bleeding and prolapse improved in over 90%, and most patients rated the treatment as excellent
- Who was studied
- patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding due to hemorrhoids
- What they received
- colonoscopic rubber band ligation
- Compared with
- none reported
- Main outcome
- resolution of hemorrhoid symptoms (bleeding, prolapse, irritation, discharge, pain) and patient satisfaction
- Quality
- It is a small, single-center case series with no comparison group, so it cannot show whether banding works better than other treatments or surgery.
- Limitations
- No control group; small sample of 28 patients; short follow-up; over half had post-procedure complications.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
We included 28 among 108 patients presenting to the surgical outpatient department with Lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
- population
patients presenting to the surgical outpatient department with Lower gastrointestinal bleeding
- intervention
Colonoscopic Rubber band ligation
- comparator
Colonoscopic Rubber band ligation is feasible, safe and efficient for the treatment of symptomatic grade II hemorrhoids
- primaryOutcome
Symptoms of irritation, discharge, pain resolved in all patients at 3 months and that of bleeding and prolapse in 96.4% and 92% respectively.
- result
78.6% of patients rated Colonoscopic Rubber band ligation treatment as "excellent help".
J Nepal Health Res Counc · PMID 39923169 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Jin et al. 2025
The prevalence of incontinence after excisional hemorrhoidectomy and stapled hemorrhoidopexy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Similar low incontinence risk between two surgeries.Meta-analysisModerate qualityRelated question
31,132 people2025
no significant difference in incontinence risk between the two surgical procedures; incontinence was uncommon overall
- Who was studied
- people having surgery for symptomatic hemorrhoids
- What they received
- stapled hemorrhoidopexy surgery
- Compared with
- excisional hemorrhoidectomy surgery
- Main outcome
- incontinence (loss of bowel control) after surgery, early and late
- Quality
- Large meta-analysis of many trials, but it compares two surgery types to each other (not surgery vs non-surgical treatment) and notes considerable heterogeneity between studies.
- Limitations
- Considerable heterogeneity was observed, likely the result of differences in assessment and reporting methods across studies.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Excisional hemorrhoidectomy and stapled hemorrhoidopexy are 2 common procedures for treating symptomatic hemorrhoids.
- intervention
stapled hemorrhoidopexy
- comparator
excisional hemorrhoidectomy
- primaryOutcome
Primary outcomes included early (<3 months) and late (≥3 months) fecal incontinence.
- result
There was no significant difference in the risk of incontinence or other postoperative complications between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and excisional hemorrhoidectomy, both in randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized controlled trials.
- n
68 randomized controlled trials with 8,445 participants and 71 observational studies with 22,687 participants
- limitations
considerable heterogeneity was observed, likely the result of differences in assessment and reporting methods across studies
Surgery · PMID 39854786 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Li et al. 2025
Rubber band ligation or shaobei injection for the endoscopic treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids? A retrospective study
Similar results, less pain with injectionRetrospectiveLow quality
413 people3 months
No difference in recurrence or symptom improvement between groups, but the injection group had less pain and fewer complications than the band ligation group
- Who was studied
- Patients with grade I-IV symptomatic hemorrhoids treated using endoscopy
- What they received
- Endoscopic Shaobei injection
- Compared with
- Endoscopic rubber band ligation
- Main outcome
- Recurrence rate, postoperative pain, complications, quality of life and satisfaction after treatment
- Quality
- It is a retrospective, non-randomized comparison relying on propensity score matching, which can reduce but not eliminate bias from unmeasured factors.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, no randomization, groups had significant baseline differences before matching, and outcomes were only tracked for 3 months.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
patients with grade I-IV symptomatic hemorrhoids treated with endoscopy
- intervention
Shaobei injection
- comparator
band ligation
- n
413 patients with grade I-IV symptomatic hemorrhoids treated with endoscopy between January 2019 and March 2023
- primaryOutcome
Recurrence rate, postoperative complications, hospitalization costs, hospitalization time, postoperative quality of life (QoL), and postoperative satisfaction were compared
- result
Recurrence rates did not differ between groups at 3 months postoperatively (P = 0.439). Postoperative symptom grading did not differ between groups (all P > 0.05) but was improved from baseline (all P < 0.001). However, the injection group experienced significantly less pain than the band ligation group on postoperative days 1 (P < 0.001) and 7 (P = 0.003). Significantly lower incidences were observed in the injection than in the ligation group for postoperative anal distention within 1 day (P < 0.001) and complications within 7 days (P < 0.001).
Surg Endosc · PMID 39762601 · Read it on PubMed ↗
LHP Recommendation Development Group 2024
Best clinical practice recommendations for the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids via laser hemorrhoidoplasty: the LHP recommendations
Expert agreement on laser procedure technique.GuidelineLow qualityRelated question
49 people2024
Experts reached consensus on all 21 practice recommendations, with 16 reaching strong consensus
- Who was studied
- people with symptomatic hemorrhoids
- What they received
- laser hemorrhoidoplasty (a minimally invasive laser procedure)
- Compared with
- no comparator; expert consensus on how to perform the procedure
- Main outcome
- agreement among experts on best practice recommendations for performing the procedure
- Quality
- This is an expert consensus/guideline based on opinion and literature review rather than a trial comparing treatments, so it cannot show whether the procedure works better than alternatives.
- Limitations
- Abstract does not report patient outcomes, only expert agreement on technique standards; based on expert opinion where literature was lacking.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
voted upon by 49 panelists
- population
symptomatic hemorrhoids
- intervention
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP)
- comparator
The developed recommendations were voted upon by a panelist via the Delphi process.
- primaryOutcome
Consensus was a priori defined as agreement of 75% and above, with strong consensus defined as 85% and above.
- result
Consensus was reached for all 21 recommendations after the first Delphi round, including 16 recommendations with strong consensus.
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 39579281 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Mou et al. 2024
Endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding for treatment of internal hemorrhoids: A novel outpatient procedure
New method, results not yet confirmed.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not givenone-year follow-up
abstract states EFSB is a novel therapy but says larger, longer studies are needed to confirm findings
- Who was studied
- patients with grade II and III internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding (EFSB), a technique combining foam injection with rubber band ligation
- Compared with
- endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL) alone
- Main outcome
- prolapse recurrence and post-procedural pain
- Quality
- This is a commentary discussing another study rather than reporting new data, so it carries very little independent evidence weight.
- Limitations
- The abstract itself provides no original data; it summarizes another trial and calls for larger samples and longer follow-up to confirm findings.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
patients with grades II and III internal hemorrhoids
- intervention
Endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding (EFSB) is a novel approach that could lift the mucosa for easy ligation
- comparator
compare ERBL and EFSB in patients with grades II and III internal hemorrhoids
- primaryOutcome
long-term relief from prolapse recurrence and reduced 24-h post-procedural pain
- result
Results showed that EFSB is a novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids, but future studies with a larger sample, multiple treatment sessions, and long-term follow-up are required to confirm these findings.
- followUp
with one-year follow-up
World J Gastroenterol · PMID 39563748 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Zhang et al. 2024
Endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding for the treatment of Grade II-III internal hemorrhoids: The focus of clinical practice
No new results; commentary onlyNarrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2024
not reported in this abstract
- Who was studied
- patients with Grade II-III internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerotherapy combined with rubber band ligation
- Main outcome
- long-term symptom relief and endoscopic healing
- Quality
- This is a commentary letter discussing another study's methods, not a report of new patient outcomes.
- Limitations
- The abstract is a letter responding to another article and does not present original trial results or data.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
patients with Grade II-III internal hemorrhoids
- intervention
integration of endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerotherapy with rubber band ligation
- primaryOutcome
long-term symptomatic and endoscopic efficacy of this combined intervention
- result
In this discussion, we focus on the procedural steps of this combined strategy and suggest potential avenues for future research.
World J Gastroenterol · PMID 39493328 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Rao et al. 2024
Redefining hemorrhoid therapy with endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding
Less pain and recurrence than bandingRandomised trialModerate quality
195 people2024
EFSB significantly reduced recurrence rates and post-procedural pain while improving symptom relief and patient satisfaction compared to ERBL
- Who was studied
- adults with grade II and III internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding (EFSB), a non-surgical injection and banding technique
- Compared with
- endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL)
- Main outcome
- recurrence rate, post-procedural pain, symptom relief, and patient satisfaction
- Quality
- It was a multicenter randomized trial, which is strong evidence, but the single-blind design and short follow-up period limit confidence in the results.
- Limitations
- single-blind design and relatively short follow-up period
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
involved 195 patients
- population
195 patients with grade II and III internal hemorrhoids
- intervention
endoscopic poli-docanol foam sclerobanding (EFSB)
- comparator
compared to ERBL
- primaryOutcome
significantly reduced recurrence rates and post-procedural pain while improving symptom relief and patient satisfaction
- result
demonstrated that EFSB significantly reduced recurrence rates and post-procedural pain while improving symptom relief and patient satisfaction compared to ERBL
- limitations
Despite limitations such as the single-blind design and relatively short follow-up period
World J Gastroenterol · PMID 39351248 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Samalavicius et al. 2024
Global treatment of haemorrhoids-A worldwide snapshot audit conducted by the International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons
Surgeons use surgery mainly for severe hemorrhoids.RegistryVery low qualityRelated question
1,005 people2024
conservative treatment was used first for grade I-III hemorrhoids, surgery was first-line only for grade IV
- Who was studied
- surgeons worldwide who treat hemorrhoid patients
- What they received
- conservative (non-surgical) treatment such as fiber, water intake, bowel training, banding
- Compared with
- surgical treatment (excisional hemorrhoidectomy)
- Main outcome
- which treatment surgeons use first for each grade of hemorrhoids
- Quality
- this is a global opinion survey of surgeons' practice habits, not a study measuring patient outcomes or comparing treatments head-to-head.
- Limitations
- self-reported, voluntary questionnaire of surgeon practice patterns with no patient outcome data or control group.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
The survey was completed by 1005 surgeons from 103 countries
- population
surgeons from 103 countries
- intervention
The most common nonprocedural/conservative treatment consisted of increased daily fibre intake (86.9%), increased water intake (82.7%), and normalization of bowel habits/toilet training (74.4%).
- comparator
surgery was the first-line treatment for symptomatic fourth degree haemorrhoids (77.6%)
- primaryOutcome
assess a global view of how surgeons manage haemorrhoids
- result
Conservative treatment was the first-line treatment for symptomatic first (92.5%), second (72.4%) and third (47.3%) degree haemorrhoids; however, surgery was the first-line treatment for symptomatic fourth degree haemorrhoids (77.6%).
Colorectal Dis · PMID 39169548 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Godeberge et al. 2024
An international observational study assessing conservative management in hemorrhoidal disease: results of CHORALIS (aCute HemORrhoidal disease evALuation International Study)
Symptoms improved with non-surgical drug treatment.Prospective cohortLow qualityRelated question
3,505 people4-week
Conservative drug treatments, mostly MPFF, improved pain, bleeding, swelling, itching and quality of life, with MPFF outperforming diosmin
- Who was studied
- adults with acute hemorrhoid symptoms, mostly mild to moderate grade (Goligher I and II)
- What they received
- non-surgical treatments, mainly venoactive drugs (especially micronized purified flavonoid fraction, MPFF)
- Compared with
- different venoactive drugs compared to each other (MPFF vs diosmin), no surgical or placebo comparator
- Main outcome
- improvement in hemorrhoid symptoms (pain, bleeding, swelling, itching) and quality of life
- Quality
- This was an observational study without a surgical or placebo comparison group, so it cannot show whether drugs work better than no treatment or surgery.
- Limitations
- Observational design with no control group, no comparison to surgery or placebo, and most patients had milder grade I-II hemorrhoids.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Of 3592 participants, 3505 were analyzed
- population
adult outpatients consulting for spontaneous complaints of hemorrhoids (graded using Goligher classification)
- population
72.1% Goligher grade I and II
- intervention
Most treatments were venoactive drugs (VADs; 90.9%), particularly micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF; 73.7%)
- comparator
MPFF was associated with a significantly greater proportion of patients with no symptoms (48.8 vs diosmin 34.4%, p < 0.001)
- primaryOutcome
Assessments were: anal pain/discomfort (visual analog scale [VAS]), other signs/symptoms (patient questionnaire), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) questionnaire and disease-specific QoL (HEMO-FISS-QoL questionnaire)
- result
All VAD-based therapies improved signs/symptoms (number/intensity/frequency of pain, discomfort, bleeding, swelling, itching and soiling) and QoL.
- followUp
The 4-week observational prospective CHORALIS study
J Comp Eff Res · PMID 39132755 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Qu et al. 2024
Endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding for the treatment of grade II-III internal hemorrhoids: A prospective, multi-center, randomized study
Combined foam and banding worked better than banding aloneRandomised trialModerate qualityRelated question
195 people12 months
EFSB had lower symptom severity scores, lower prolapse recurrence (11.2% vs 21.6%), and less pain than ERBL alone at 12 months
- Who was studied
- adults with grade II-III internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerotherapy combined with rubber band ligation (EFSB)
- Compared with
- endoscopic rubber band ligation alone (ERBL)
- Main outcome
- hemorrhoid symptom severity, prolapse recurrence, and post-procedure pain
- Quality
- This was a randomized multicenter trial with reasonable follow-up, but it compared two non-surgical techniques rather than against surgery or no treatment, limiting what it tells us about surgery necessity.
- Limitations
- Abstract does not report blinding, and comparison is between two endoscopic techniques, not between surgery and non-surgical treatment.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A total of 195 consecutive patients diagnosed with grade II-III internal hemorrhoids were enrolled
- population
patients diagnosed with grade II-III internal hemorrhoids
- intervention
cap-assisted endoscopic polidocanol foam sclerobanding (EFSB)
- comparator
an ERBL group
- primaryOutcome
Symptom-based severity and post-procedural pain were assessed using a hemorrhoid severity score (HSS) and a visual analog scale (VAS)
- result
The prolapse recurrence rate was lower in the EFSB group at 12 months (11.2% vs 21.6%, P = 0.038)
- result
HSS was lower in the EFSB group than in the ERBL group at 8 weeks [4.0 (3.0-5.0) vs 5.0 (4.0-6.0), P = 0.003] and 12-month [2.0 (1.0-3.0) vs 3.0 (2.0-3.0), P < 0.001] of follow-up
World J Gastroenterol · PMID 39086750 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Jee et al. 2024
Conventional Excisional Haemorrhoidectomy versus Transanal Haemorrhoidal Dearterialization for Haemorrhoids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Less invasive surgery heals faster but recurs more.Meta-analysisModerate qualityRelated question
465 people2024
THD had higher recurrence than CEH but faster return to normal activity; complication rates were similar between the two
- Who was studied
- patients with hemorrhoids undergoing surgery
- What they received
- transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD), a less invasive surgical technique
- Compared with
- conventional excisional hemorrhoidectomy (CEH)
- Main outcome
- recurrence of hemorrhoids
- Quality
- Based on only 6 randomized trials with 465 patients total, giving reasonably reliable but not highly precise estimates.
- Limitations
- Small number of trials and patients; this compares two surgical techniques, not surgery versus non-surgical treatment.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A total of 6 RCTs encompassing 465 patients were captured.
- population
compare short- and long-term outcomes of CEH and THD
- intervention
transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD)
- comparator
conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy (CEH)
- primaryOutcome
The primary objective was recurrence.
- result
THD had a higher recurrence rate (odds ratio = 2.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-7.38, p = 0.04) albeit a shorter return to baseline compared to CEH (mean difference = -14.05 days, 95% CI = -20.38 to -7.72, p < 0.0001).
Dig Surg · PMID 39084191 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Li et al. 2024
A systematic review comparing the efficacy of 980 nm vs. 1470 nm wavelengths in laser hemorrhoidoplasty
Laser treatment less painful, but may recur more.Meta-analysisModerate quality
2,492 people2024
LHP was faster and caused less pain and fewer complications than open hemorrhoidectomy, but 1470-nm LHP had higher recurrence; 980-nm LHP recurrence was similar to surgery
- Who was studied
- patients with hemorrhoidal disease
- What they received
- Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) using 980 nm or 1470 nm wavelengths
- Compared with
- open hemorrhoidectomy
- Main outcome
- operative duration, postoperative pain, complications, and recurrence rate
- Quality
- This pools many studies including randomized trials, but most are non-randomized and no studies directly compared the two laser types head-to-head.
- Limitations
- No direct studies comparing the two wavelengths; mix of randomized and non-randomized trials
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
a total of 2492 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis
- population
management of hemorrhoidal disease
- intervention
Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) is a minimally invasive surgical option
- comparator
open hemorrhoidectomy
- primaryOutcome
The duration of LHP with both wavelengths was significantly shorter compared to open hemorrhoidectomy, postoperative pain and the rate of postoperative complications were significantly lower following LHP.
- result
LHP with 1470-nm wavelength resulted in significantly higher recurrence rate compared to hemorrhoidectomy.
Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 39048788 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Kavraal et al. 2024
Hemorrhoidal laser ablation procedure: a minimally invasive treatment for grades II, III, and IV using a 1470 nm diode laser
Fewer symptoms, low recurrence, high satisfaction.RetrospectiveLow quality
138 peopleup to five years
No intraoperative complications; recurrence 0.8% short-term and 5% long-term, with 95% satisfaction and symptom relief
- Who was studied
- patients with symptomatic grade II, III, and IV internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- laser treatment (Hemorrhoidal Laser Ablation) using a 1470 nm diode laser
- Compared with
- none (single-arm retrospective case series)
- Main outcome
- symptom resolution, hemorrhoid size reduction, recurrence and satisfaction
- Quality
- This was a retrospective case series with no comparison group, so results could be due to other factors, not just the treatment.
- Limitations
- retrospective study design without a control group
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
The cohort included 138 patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids who underwent Hemorrhoidal Laser Ablation
- population
symptomatic grade II, III, and IV internal hemorrhoids
- intervention
Patients were treated with a 1470 nm diode laser.
- comparator
This retrospective study aimed to present our experience with Hemorrhoidal Laser Ablation
- primaryOutcome
evaluate the efficacy and safety of this relatively recent technique
- result
The short- -term recurrence rate was 0.8% within roughly a month after the laser surgery, while the long-term recurrence rate was 5% over up to five years of follow-up. The overall satisfaction rate was 95% with symptomatic relief.
Pol Przegl Chir · PMID 38965992 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Chen et al. 2024
Clinical outcomes of laser hemorrhoidoplasty with feeding vessels suture ligation: a retrospective study in a single center
Laser surgery caused less pain than traditional surgery.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
323 people2024
laser hemorrhoidoplasty group had less pain and lower rate of urinary retention than traditional surgery group
- Who was studied
- adults with symptomatic grade II-III hemorrhoids undergoing surgery
- What they received
- laser hemorrhoidoplasty with suture ligation of feeding vessels
- Compared with
- traditional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
- Main outcome
- postoperative pain and complications
- Quality
- This was a retrospective, non-randomized, single-center study comparing two surgical techniques, which limits how much confidence we can place in the results.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, single center, not randomized, and compares two surgical approaches rather than surgery versus non-surgical treatment.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
The study included 323 patients, with 173 undergoing laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) and 150 undergoing Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.
- population
patients with symptomatic grade II-III hemorrhoids who underwent laser hemorrhoidoplasty with feeding vessel suture ligation and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
- intervention
laser hemorrhoidoplasty with feeding vessel suture ligation
- comparator
Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
- primaryOutcome
Surgical-related details, postoperative pain, discomfort after discharge, hemorrhoid recurrence, and any complications were collected
- result
the LHP group exhibited superior performance compared to traditional surgery at postoperative 4 h, before discharge, and during the first and second outpatient visits, with statistically significant differences. Additionally, the LHP group had a lower rate of urinary retention and experienced significantly less pain, with statistically significant differences.
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 38955875 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Jin et al. 2024
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty vs. rubber band ligation: a randomized trial comparing 2 mini-invasive treatment for grade II hemorrhoids
Laser eased symptoms faster, same recurrence.Randomised trialModerate qualityRelated question
70 people1 year
laser treatment caused less pain, bleeding, and distension in first 2 weeks and faster return to activity, but recurrence rates were similar at 1 year
- Who was studied
- adults with grade II hemorrhoids
- What they received
- laser hemorrhoidoplasty
- Compared with
- rubber band ligation
- Main outcome
- postoperative pain, bleeding, anal distension, and recurrence
- Quality
- it was a randomized trial but small, from a single center, and did not use blinding, which limits confidence.
- Limitations
- small sample size from a single center; abstract does not mention blinding
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
70 patients with grade II hemorrhoids
- intervention
laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP)
- comparator
Rubber Band Ligation (RBL)
- primaryOutcome
The postoperative pain, bleeding, feeling of anal distension(local falling, swelling, foreign body sensation, stool) and postoperative recurrence rate were compared between the two groups.
- result
The postoperative pain, bleeding, and feeling of anal distension in the LHP group were improved significantly as compared with the RBL group within 2 weeks after surgery (P < 0.01).
- result
There was no difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups at 1 year after surgery (P > 0.05).
- n
A total of 70 patients with grade II hemorrhoids were randomly assigned to receive LHP or Rubber Band Ligation (RBL) (n = 35 per group)
BMC Surg · PMID 38797851 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Cheng et al. 2024
Diode laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic hemorrhoids: Meta-analysis
Laser surgery less bleeding than traditional surgery.Meta-analysisModerate qualityRelated question
1,196 people2024
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty caused less blood loss, less post-op bleeding, shorter operation time, less pain on day 1, and less anal narrowing than conventional surgery, but no difference in incontinence, urinary retention or hemorrhoid recurrence
- Who was studied
- adults with symptomatic hemorrhoids undergoing surgical treatment
- What they received
- laser hemorrhoidoplasty (minimally invasive laser procedure)
- Compared with
- conventional hemorrhoidectomy (Milligan-Morgan or Ferguson surgery)
- Main outcome
- amount of bleeding during surgery and bleeding afterward
- Quality
- It pools 17 trials with over a thousand patients and found consistent results across subgroups, but it compares two surgical techniques rather than surgery versus non-surgical care, and trial quality varied.
- Limitations
- Abstract does not report individual study quality in detail beyond a 'low risk of bias' subgroup; both compared treatments are surgical procedures, not a surgery-vs-no-surgery comparison.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
17 trials with 1196 patients
- population
symptomatic haemorrhoids
- intervention
laser hemorrhoidoplasty
- comparator
conventional hemorrhoidectomies, including Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson techniques
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcomes were operative blood loss and postoperative haemorrhage
- result
laser hemorrhoidoplasty showed benefits in operative blood loss (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -16.43 ml, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: -23.82 to -9.04), postoperative hemorrhage/bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 0.16, 95 % CI: 0.10 to 0.28), operative time (WMD: -12.42 min, 95 % CI: -14.56 to -10.28), postoperative pain score on day 1 (WMD: -2.50, 95 % CI: -3.13 to -1.88), and anal stenosis (OR: 0.14, 95 % CI: 0.03 to 0.65) in comparison with conventional hemorrhoidectomy
- result
incidence of fecal/flatus incontinence, urinary retention and hemorrhoid recurrence were not significantly different between the 2 groups
Asian J Surg · PMID 38762410 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Akinmoladun et al. 2024
Management of Hemorrhoids and Anal Fissures
Reviews treatment options, no specific results given.Narrative reviewLow quality
size not given2024
Abstract describes a review of treatment options without giving specific comparative results
- Who was studied
- people with hemorrhoids and anal fissures
- What they received
- medical and surgical treatment options for hemorrhoids
- Compared with
- different treatment options compared to each other
- Main outcome
- successful treatment and complication rates
- Quality
- This is a narrative review describing available treatments rather than presenting new comparative data or outcomes.
- Limitations
- Abstract does not report specific study results, numbers of patients, or statistical outcomes comparing treatments.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Hemorrhoids and anal fissures are two of the most common benign anorectal diseases.
- intervention
numerous medical and surgical treatment options are available, each with different rates of success and complications
- comparator
numerous medical and surgical treatment options are available, each with different rates of success and complications
- primaryOutcome
evidence-based treatment options for hemorrhoids and anal fissures
- result
the authors review each step of patient management, with emphasis on evidence-based treatment options for hemorrhoids and anal fissures
Surg Clin North Am · PMID 38677814 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Fathallah et al. 2024
Hemorrhoidal disease: Epidemiological study and analysis of predictive factors for surgical management
Most treated without surgery; surgery most effective.Prospective cohortLow quality
472 people2024
Surgery improved symptoms more and gave higher satisfaction (73% vs 54%), but only 17% of patients needed surgery overall
- Who was studied
- patients with hemorrhoidal disease
- What they received
- surgical treatment
- Compared with
- medical and/or instrumental treatment
- Main outcome
- bleeding and prolapse scores, and patient satisfaction after treatment
- Quality
- This was a single-center observational study without randomization, so differences between treatment groups could be due to other factors, not just the treatment itself.
- Limitations
- Single-center, non-randomized, observational design; surgery group may differ systematically from non-surgery group (more severe disease).
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Prospective single-center study from July to December 2021 including 472 patients.
- population
Prospective single-center study from July to December 2021 including 472 patients.
- intervention
Treatment modalities were medical (44%),±instrumental (72%), and surgical (17%).
- comparator
Treatment modalities were medical (44%),±instrumental (72%), and surgical (17%).
- primaryOutcome
After treatment, the bleeding score and prolapse score decreased significantly (P=0.002 and P≤0.0001, respectively), but improvement was more marked in the surgery group with a better rate of "very good satisfaction" (73% vs. 54%, P=0.003).
- result
improvement was more marked in the surgery group with a better rate of "very good satisfaction" (73% vs. 54%, P=0.003)
- result
Less than 20% of patients who present with hemorrhoidal disease require surgical treatment, but it is associated with better effectiveness despite more complex postoperative consequences
J Visc Surg · PMID 38580520 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Zhu et al. 2024
Observation on Efficacy of Selective Malposition Ligation Combined with Hemorrhoid and Fistula I in Complex Mixed Hemorrhoid
Faster healing, fewer complications with add-on therapyRetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
423 people7 days
the combined approach led to less pain, swelling and bleeding, faster wound healing, and fewer complications than either surgery-alone group
- Who was studied
- patients undergoing surgery for complex mixed hemorrhoids
- What they received
- selective malposition ligation surgery combined with an oral herbal formula called hemorrhoid and fistula I
- Compared with
- malposition ligation surgery alone, or selective malposition ligation surgery without the herbal formula
- Main outcome
- pain, swelling, bleeding, wound healing time, and complication rates after surgery
- Quality
- patients were not randomized but grouped by the time period they had surgery, which makes bias likely.
- Limitations
- not randomized, groups assigned by time period rather than random allocation, and all patients received surgery so this does not address nonoperative treatment
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
423 patients undergoing complex mixed hemorrhoid surgery at different time points were included as research objects
- population
423 patients undergoing complex mixed hemorrhoid surgery at different time points were included as research objects
- intervention
group C (selective malposition ligation and hemorrhoid and fistula I)
- comparator
group A (malposition ligation), group B (selective malposition ligation)
- primaryOutcome
The scores for visual analogue scale (VAS), edema, and hemorrhage of group C 8h, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 5 days, and 7 days after surgery were all inferior to those in groups A and B
- result
The duration of wound healing of group C (15.33 ± 2.78 days) was shorter than that of groups A (21.78 ± 3.22 days) and B (18.34 ± 3.01 days)
- result
The incidence of total complications in group C (9.93%) was inferior to that in groups B (30.50%) and A (30.50%)
Altern Ther Health Med · PMID 38518140 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Gallo et al. 2024
Sclerotherapy with 3% polidocanol foam for the treatment of mucocutaneous bridges and/or residual piles after open excisional hemorrhoidectomy
Fewer symptoms after surgery plus sclerotherapy.RetrospectiveVery low qualityRelated question
18 people3 months
78% of patients were symptom-free at 3 months, with a significant drop in symptom scores and no complications
- Who was studied
- patients with severe (grade IV) hemorrhoidal disease
- What they received
- sclerotherapy with polidocanol foam applied to leftover skin bridges/piles after open hemorrhoid surgery
- Compared with
- no separate comparison group; outcomes measured before and after treatment in the same patients
- Main outcome
- hemorrhoid symptom score and quality-of-life/continence scores
- Quality
- This was a small, single-center retrospective study of only 18 patients with no comparison group and just 3 months of follow-up, so it cannot reliably show whether the treatment works.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, very small sample size, no control group, and short follow-up period; study combines surgery with sclerotherapy rather than testing non-surgical treatment alone.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
a total of 18 patients with IV-degree HD
- population
18 patients with IV-degree HD, aged between 18 and 75 years with symptomatic HD according to the Goligher classification
- intervention
the combined treatment of open excisional hemorrhoidectomy and the use of ST on the remnant muco-cutaneous bridges/residual piles
- comparator
a statistically significant decrease in the median HDSS and short health scale for HD (SHS-HD) score was registered from 16 preoperatively (T0) to 2 at 3-month follow-up (T3)
- primaryOutcome
The Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS), the Short Health Scale for HD (SHS-HD) score and the Vaizey Incontinence Score were used to assess symptoms and their impact on quality of life and continence.
- result
A total of 77.8% (14/18) of the patients were symptom-free (hemorrhoidal disease symptom score (HDSS) score = 0) after 3 months.
- followUp
their follow-up continued until October 2023 after reaching 3 months of follow-up
Updates Surg · PMID 38480640 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Watson et al. 2024
Analgesic effect of local anaesthetic in haemorrhoid banding: systematic review and meta-analysis
Less pain only in first hour.Meta-analysisLow qualityRelated question
342 people24 h
Local anaesthetic lowered pain scores at 1 hour but showed no clear difference at 6 or 24 hours
- Who was studied
- adults having rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids
- What they received
- local anaesthetic given during hemorrhoid banding
- Compared with
- no local or regional anesthesia during banding
- Main outcome
- patient-reported pain scores after the banding procedure
- Quality
- The evidence was rated low quality because of inconsistency between studies and imprecise, small sample sizes.
- Limitations
- small sample sizes and substantial heterogeneity across studies
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
adults undergoing haemorrhoid banding
- intervention
local anaesthetic
- comparator
no regional or local analgesia
- primaryOutcome
Primary outcomes were patient-reported pain scores.
- result
The mean difference in scores on a 10-point scale was at 1 h,-1.43 (95% CI-2.30 to-0.56, p < 0.01, n = 342 (175 in treatment group)); 6 h,-0.52 (95% CI-1.04 to 0.01, p = 0.05, n = 250 (130 in treatment group)); and 24 h,-0.31 (95% CI-0.82 to 0.19, p = 0.86, n = 247 (127 in treatment group)).
- n
n = 342 (175 in treatment group)
- qualityWhy
The quality of the evidence was rated down to 'low' due to inconsistency and imprecision.
Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 38436741 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Manaki et al. 2024
Aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA) sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Non-surgical injection may treat hemorrhoids effectively.Meta-analysisLow quality
4,249 peoplenot specified
Pooled recurrence rate was 10% and complication rate was 5.2%, with no significant link to disease grade
- Who was studied
- patients with hemorrhoidal disease (various grades)
- What they received
- ALTA (aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid) sclerotherapy injection
- Compared with
- none specified; pooled single-arm outcomes across studies
- Main outcome
- recurrence of hemorrhoids and treatment complications
- Quality
- The review pools mostly uncontrolled studies without a comparison group, so it cannot show how ALTA compares to surgery or other treatments.
- Limitations
- No control group comparisons reported; abstract calls for high-quality randomized controlled trials and longer follow-up
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Twelve studies with 4249 patients met all the inclusion criteria and were eventually included.
- population
patients with hemorrhoidal disease
- intervention
Aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA) sclerotherapy for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease
- comparator
Primary endpoints included overall recurrence and type of recurrence
- primaryOutcome
Primary endpoints included overall recurrence and type of recurrence while secondary endpoints included postoperative complications
- result
The crude and pooled estimates of the overall recurrence and complications by the end of follow-up were 10% (95% CI, 6.52%-14.08%) and 5.20% (95% CI, 2.59%-8.52%), respectively.
Acta Chir Belg · PMID 38428446 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Capece et al. 2024
Hemorrhoidectomy: Does Age Make a Difference?
Most grade II cases skipped surgery first.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
961 people2024
Grade III patients chose surgery first more often than grade II patients (27.6% vs 4.1%), and younger patients (18-30 and 31-50) chose surgery first more often than older patients (51-75) (23.5% and 22% vs 12.8%); among those who progressed to surgery after initial non-surgical treatment, time to surgery did not differ by age or grade
- Who was studied
- adults aged 18 to 75 with symptomatic grade II or III internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- surgical removal of hemorrhoids (hemorrhoidectomy)
- Compared with
- in-office procedures or medical management without surgery
- Main outcome
- whether patients chose surgery as initial treatment and how long it took to reach surgery, based on age and hemorrhoid grade
- Quality
- It is a retrospective study looking only at treatment choices and timing, not at whether surgery or non-surgical care actually worked better, and the authors note patient and surgeon bias could affect results.
- Limitations
- Data only looked at age groups and their treatment selection; personal biases of surgeon and patient may alter results.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A total of 961 patients met inclusion criteria for grade II (n = 442) and III (n = 519) hemorrhoids.
- population
Patients aged 18 to 75 years with grade II or grade III internal hemorrhoids between 2015 and 2020 were included.
- intervention
Treatments included hemorrhoidectomy, in-office procedures, and/or medical management.
- comparator
Treatments included hemorrhoidectomy, in-office procedures, and/or medical management.
- primaryOutcome
Baseline demographics, treatment choices, and time to hemorrhoidectomy (if applicable) were stratified and analyzed on the basis of hemorrhoid grade (grade II and III) and age groupings
- result
Patients with grade III versus grade II hemorrhoids were more likely to choose hemorrhoidectomy as the initial treatment management (27.6% vs 4.1%). Patients in the age groups of 18 to 30 and 30 to 50 years were more likely to choose hemorrhoidectomy as the initial treatment management compared to those in the age group of 51 to 75 years (23.5% and 22% vs 12.8%). In patients who were initially treated with medical management or office-based procedures and then progressed to hemorrhoidectomy, no significant differences in the length of time to hemorrhoidectomy were noted on the basis of hemorrhoid grade or age.
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 38408874 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Xu et al. 2024
Effect of lidocaine on postoperative analgesia of endoscopic rubber band ligation combined with injection sclerotherapy for treatment of internal hemorrhoids: A retrospective study (with video)
Less pain with added lidocaine.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
66 people1 month
lower pain scores and faster pain relief with lidocaine plus lauromacrogol, no difference in side effects or treatment success
- Who was studied
- patients with grade III internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- endoscopic rubber band ligation plus injection sclerotherapy using lidocaine plus lauromacrogol solution
- Compared with
- same procedure using lauromacrogol alone
- Main outcome
- postoperative pain level and pain relief time
- Quality
- This was a small, retrospective study comparing two non-surgical additive techniques, not surgery versus no surgery.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, small and unequal group sizes, short follow-up of only 1 month.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
grade Ⅲ internal hemorrhoids patients who underwent ERBL combined with IS
- intervention
lidocaine plus lauromacrogol group, 20 patients
- comparator
control group (lauromacrogol group, 46 patients)
- primaryOutcome
Postoperative pain (quantized by Visual Analogue Scale, VAS), pain relief time and postoperative adverse reactions were compared
- result
VAS of postoperative pain was 0.80 ± 0.42 points and pain relief time was 0.90 ± 0.56 days in the study group, while VAS of postoperative pain was 4.11 ± 1.37 points and pain relief time was 2.57 ± 0.83 days in the control group, there was statistical difference between them (P < 0.05)
- n
control group (lauromacrogol group, 46 patients) and study group (lidocaine plus lauromacrogol group, 20 patients)
Arab J Gastroenterol · PMID 38403495 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Xu et al. 2024
Evaluation of a novel disposable endoscope for retroflexed endoscopic rubber band ligation of internal hemorrhoids: a randomized pilot study
Disposable scope works as well as reusable one.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question
42 peoplepostoperative Day 30
both endoscope types were equally safe and effective, with similar therapeutic effects and complication rates
- Who was studied
- adults with Grade II and III internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- rubber band ligation using a new disposable endoscope
- Compared with
- rubber band ligation using a traditional reusable endoscope
- Main outcome
- safety and treatment effectiveness of the banding procedure
- Quality
- This was a very small pilot trial of only 42 patients comparing two devices for the same procedure, not surgery versus non-surgical treatment.
- Limitations
- Small pilot study size; compares two endoscope types rather than addressing whether surgery is needed versus non-operative treatment.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
This prospective randomized controlled trial involved 42 patients who underwent ERBL for Grade II and III internal hemorrhoids using either a disposable endoscope (n = 21) or a reusable endoscope (n = 21).
- population
ERBL for Grade II and III internal hemorrhoids
- intervention
using either a disposable endoscope (n = 21)
- comparator
or a reusable endoscope (n = 21)
- primaryOutcome
Safety was assessed by the incidence of equipment failure, device-related adverse events, and in-procedure stability of vital signs. Effectiveness was assessed by the postoperative therapeutic effect, feasibility of retroflexed ERBL, and incidence of complications.
- result
In terms of effectiveness, the therapeutic effects on postoperative Day 30 were similar in both groups.
- result
The incidence of complications on postoperative Days 1 and 10 was not significantly different between the two groups.
Postgrad Med J · PMID 38330500 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Gallo et al. 2024
Sclerotherapy for hemorrhoidal disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
Fewer complications, similar success rate.Meta-analysisModerate quality
9,729 people2024
similar success and recurrence rates, but fewer complications than comparator treatments
- Who was studied
- patients with hemorrhoidal disease, median age 52, mostly male
- What they received
- sclerotherapy (injection treatment, mainly with polidocanol)
- Compared with
- other conservative or surgical treatments
- Main outcome
- treatment success rate, recurrence rate, and complications
- Quality
- it pools many studies and randomized trials, but the included studies vary in design, severity of disease, and quality, so confidence is only moderate
- Limitations
- the abstract does not describe limitations of the individual studies in detail, though it calls for further research into long-term outcomes
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
44 studies met the inclusion criteria, involving 9729 patients
- population
The median age of participants was 52 years, and the majority were male.
- intervention
Sclerotherapy was predominantly administered through anoscopy, with polidocanol being the most commonly used agent.
- comparator
compared to other conservative or surgical approaches
- primaryOutcome
success rate (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.71-1.41) and recurrence rate (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.69-1.77), while resulting in fewer complications (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.92)
- result
sclerotherapy was not inferior to control interventions in terms of success rate (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.71-1.41) and recurrence rate (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.69-1.77), while resulting in fewer complications (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.92)
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 38261136 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Batra et al. 2025
Injection sclerotherapy for the treatment of haemorrhoids in anticoagulated patients
Symptoms resolved without surgery in most.RetrospectiveLow quality
20 peopleat least six months
90% of patients had their symptoms resolve using injection sclerotherapy while staying on their blood thinners, with no complications reported
- Who was studied
- patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids who are on blood-thinning medication
- What they received
- injection sclerotherapy (a non-surgical in-office treatment)
- Compared with
- no comparison group; some patients needed alternative procedures
- Main outcome
- symptoms (bleeding) going away for at least six months
- Quality
- This was a small retrospective case review with only 20 patients and no comparison group, so it can't prove the treatment works better than alternatives.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, small sample size, no control group, single center.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A total of 20 patients
- population
Symptomatic haemorrhoids (SH) are a common condition; however, conventional outpatient treatment, including rubber band ligation, is contraindicated in patients receiving concurrent anticoagulation.
- intervention
Injection sclerotherapy (IST) has been proposed as a treatment option for these patients.
- comparator
two (10%) patients requiring alternative interventions
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcome was symptom resolution, defined as no patient reporting bleeding for at least six months.
- result
Symptom resolution was achieved in 18 (90%) patients using IST while continuing anticoagulation treatment
- followUp
no patient reporting bleeding for at least six months
Ann R Coll Surg Engl · PMID 38174849 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Watson et al. 2024
Use of pudendal nerve blocks in rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids: an Australia-wide cross-sectional analysis
Nerve block use varies, outcomes not studied.RegistryLow qualityRelated question
346,542 people2024
4.04% of rubber band ligation admissions involved a pudendal nerve block, with use rising from 1.62% to 6.63% over the study period and much higher use in private hospitals
- Who was studied
- adults in Australia who had rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids
- What they received
- pudendal nerve block used during rubber band ligation
- Compared with
- rubber band ligation without a pudendal nerve block
- Main outcome
- how often pudendal nerve blocks were used, and whether use varied by patient and hospital factors
- Quality
- This is a registry analysis of practice patterns, not of whether the procedure or the nerve block actually improves pain or outcomes.
- Limitations
- Aggregate administrative data only, no outcome measures such as pain or complication rates reported, and no comparison of rubber band ligation to surgery.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Of the 346 542 admissions for RBL, 14013 (4.04%) involved a PNB.
- population
all admissions for RBL in Australia from 2012 to 2021
- intervention
pudendal nerve blocks (PNB) being one analgesic strategy
- comparator
with and without a PNB
- primaryOutcome
whether use varies by year and patient and hospital characteristics
- result
The proportion of patients receiving a PNB increased between 2012-2013 and 2020-2021, from 1.62% to 6.63%
ANZ J Surg · PMID 38174653 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Nada et al. 2024
Comparison between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy in the management of third- and fourth-degree piles: a randomized clinical trial
Harmonic scalpel surgery had fewer complications.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question
70 people1 year
HSH had less bleeding, lower recurrence at 1 year, and higher patient satisfaction than SH, though SH was faster
- Who was studied
- adults with grade III and grade IV hemorrhoids (piles)
- What they received
- harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy (HSH)
- Compared with
- stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH)
- Main outcome
- procedure time, postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, wound infection, bleeding, incontinence, and recurrence within 1 year
- Quality
- Small single-center trial comparing two surgical techniques, not addressing whether surgery is needed at all, with only 1-year follow-up.
- Limitations
- Single-center, single-blind design with modest sample size and short 1-year follow-up; study compares two surgical methods rather than surgery versus non-surgical treatment.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
included 50 (68.75%) male and 20 (31.25%) female patients with third- and fourth-degree piles
- intervention
group II underwent HSH
- comparator
Group I underwent SH
- primaryOutcome
This study compared the results of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) and harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy (HSH) in the management of grade III and grade IV piles regarding the time of the procedure, postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, wound infection, bleeding, incontinence, and recurrence within 1 year.
- result
There were 7 (20%) cases of recurrence at the 1‑year follow-up in group I and 1 (2.9%) case in group II (p = 0.024).
- n
included 50 (68.75%) male and 20 (31.25%) female patients
Chirurgie (Heidelb) · PMID 38157069 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Anorectal Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association et al. 2023
[Chinese expert consensus on the treatment of hemorrhoids by injection(2023 edition)]
Consensus guidance, no outcome data given.GuidelineLow quality
size not given2023
expert consensus recommendations on drug types and methods for hemorrhoid injection treatment, no outcome data reported
- Who was studied
- adults with hemorrhoids, usually aged 25-65
- What they received
- injection therapy for hemorrhoids
- Compared with
- no specific comparator stated
- Main outcome
- effectiveness and safety of injection treatment for hemorrhoids
- Quality
- this is an expert consensus statement summarizing recommendations rather than a study reporting trial results or outcome data
- Limitations
- no specific study data, outcomes, or comparative results are reported; it is a consensus/guideline document
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Hemorrhoids is a common anorectal disease, usually occurring in middle-aged people aged 25-65 years old
- intervention
Injection therapy with a history of more than 150 years is simple to operate, easy to popularize and apply in grass-roots units, causes less intraoperative bleeding and fewer complications, and has reliable efficacy.
- comparator
The treatment of hemorrhoids includes conservative, injection, ligation, and various surgical procedures.
- primaryOutcome
aiming to guide the reasonable selection of drugs and dosage forms for hemorrhoidal injection treatment, and to provide reference for standardizing the use of different drugs and dosage forms, so as to improve the effectiveness and safety of clinical application of hemorrhoidal injection treatment.
- result
This paper attempts to make detailed recommendations on the types and application methods of the preparations commonly used in the injection treatment of hemorrhoids at home and abroad, and form the Chinese Expert Consensus on the Treatment of hemorrhoids by anal injection (2023 edition)
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi · PMID 38110270 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Geraghty et al. 2024
Excisional haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease - is it time to question an old dogma?
Surgery seems safe in Crohn's patients.Systematic reviewLow qualityRelated question
67 people2024
no cases of proctectomy from poor wound healing; low rates of complications like bleeding, fissures, abscess, stricture
- Who was studied
- patients with Crohn's disease who had hemorrhoid surgery
- What they received
- excisional hemorrhoidectomy (surgical removal of hemorrhoids)
- Compared with
- no comparator; outcomes pooled across studies
- Main outcome
- complications including wound healing problems, proctectomy, bleeding, and other post-operative issues
- Quality
- Small combined patient numbers from only four studies, with no control group and no randomization.
- Limitations
- Small cohort size, review of existing studies rather than new trial, no comparator group, further prospective trials recommended.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A cohort of 67 patients across four studies was included in this review.
- population
Haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease is controversial due to fears over poor wound healing leading to proctectomy.
- intervention
excisional haemorrhoidectomy in Crohn's disease
- comparator
Review articles and case reports were excluded.
- primaryOutcome
There were no reported cases of proctectomy related to haemorrhoidectomy or poor wound healing.
- result
There were no reported cases of proctectomy related to haemorrhoidectomy or poor wound healing. One patient (1.5%) had a non-healing wound post-operatively. Four (6%) cases of post-operative bleeding were identified, two (3%) patients were diagnosed with anal fissures and two (3%) were treated after developing perianal abscess post-procedure.
- limitations
further prospective analysis is certainly warranted
Ir J Med Sci · PMID 37957477 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Puigdollers et al. 2024
Haemorrhoidal artery distribution in patients with grade III and IV haemorrhoids treated with artery ligation and rectoanal repair. Assessment of Doppler guidance
Mapped artery locations, no outcomes reported.Case seriesLow qualityRelated question
146 people2024
On average 7 ligatures and 3 mucopexies were needed per patient, with artery locations varying between patients, especially more on the right side of the rectum
- Who was studied
- Adults with grade III or IV hemorrhoids who had a Doppler-guided artery ligation procedure
- What they received
- Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair (a minimally invasive surgical technique)
- Compared with
- No comparison group; all patients received the same procedure
- Main outcome
- Number and clock-position locations of artery ligatures needed to stop blood flow (Doppler silence)
- Quality
- This is a single-group descriptive study of surgical technique with no comparison group, so it cannot show whether surgery works better than non-surgical treatment.
- Limitations
- No control or comparator group; focuses on anatomical/technical details of one surgical procedure rather than comparing surgery to non-surgical treatment or reporting symptom outcomes.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
In total, 146 patients were included
- population
consecutive patients diagnosed with Goligher grade III and IV haemorrhoids, who had undergone Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL) and rectoanal repair (RAR)
- intervention
Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL) and rectoanal repair (RAR)
- comparator
The study included consecutive patients diagnosed with Goligher grade III and IV haemorrhoids, who had undergone Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL) and rectoanal repair (RAR) at 2 medical centres in Spain.
- primaryOutcome
The main objective was to evaluate the number and 12-h clock locations of arterial ligatures necessary to achieve Doppler silence.
- result
The average number of ligatures per patient was 7 (range 2-12). Ligature percentages greater than 60% occurred at clock positions 7, 11, 10, 12, 9, and 1. The average number of mucopexies per patient was 3 (range 1-4).
Cir Esp (Engl Ed) · PMID 37949364 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Tsunoda et al. 2023
Mid-term outcome of a novel nonexcisional technique using aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid sclerotherapy with mucopexy on patients with grade III hemorrhoids
High success, low pain, few problems.RetrospectiveLow quality
size not givenfive years
cumulative success rates were 96.5% at one year, 85.3% at three years, and 85.3% at five years, with low pain scores, few complications (5.3%), and high satisfaction (≥9/10)
- Who was studied
- patients with grade III hemorrhoids
- What they received
- ALTA (aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid) sclerotherapy combined with rectal mucopexy, a non-excisional surgery
- Compared with
- none - no separate comparison group described in the methods
- Main outcome
- treatment success rate, postoperative pain, complications, and patient satisfaction
- Quality
- This was a retrospective single-group case series with no comparison group, so it cannot show whether this treatment works better than surgery or no treatment.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design using prospectively collected data from a single institution, no control or comparison group reported.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Patients with grade III hemorrhoids who underwent AM surgery were enrolled in this retrospective analysis
- intervention
ALTA therapy with rectal mucopexy (AM) is a new approach for treating hemorrhoidal prolapse
- intervention
AM surgery is an effective non-excisional surgery with satisfactory mid-term results for grade III hemorrhoids
- comparator
patients with grade III hemorrhoids who underwent AM surgery were enrolled in this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a single institution
- primaryOutcome
Cumulative success rates, postoperative symptoms, including pain scores, analgesic requirements, and postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction were assessed.
- result
Cumulative success rates at one, three, and five years were 96.5%, 85.3%, and 85.3%, respectively.
- result
Patient satisfaction scores, which were assessed using a 10-point scale, were ≥9 at each postoperative year.
- result
Six patients (5.3%) showed postoperative complications: five showed Clavien-Dindo (C-D) grade I and one showed C-D grade IIIa complications.
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 37848640 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Cemil et al. 2024
Comparison of Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty and Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy Techniques in the Treatment of Grade 2 and 3 Hemorrhoidal Disease
No clear surgery advantage, laser vs cutting.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question
85 peoplewithin 10 days
Laser treatment caused less bleeding and lower pain scores right after surgery, but study authors concluded it was not more advantageous than standard surgery once pain is managed with simple painkillers
- Who was studied
- adults aged 18-70 with grade 2 or 3 hemorrhoids whose symptoms persisted despite at least one month of medical treatment
- What they received
- laser hemorrhoidoplasty
- Compared with
- Milligan-Morgan surgical hemorrhoidectomy
- Main outcome
- post-surgery pain, bleeding, and need for pain medication
- Quality
- small randomized trial comparing two surgical methods with only short-term follow-up, so it doesn't address whether surgery is needed at all.
- Limitations
- Only early/short-term results reported; unequal group sizes; compares two surgical techniques rather than surgery versus non-surgical care.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
total 85 patients aged 18-70 years old with symptomatic Grade 2 and Grade 3 hemorrhoidal disease whose symptoms persisted despite at least one month of medical treatment
- intervention
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty
- comparator
Milligan-Morgan (MM) hemorrhoidectomy
- primaryOutcome
Postoperative VAS score and complications were recorded within 10 days.
- result
The incidence of minor perioperative hemorrhage was significantly lower in Group L compared to Group M (P = .035). The postoperative 3rd-hour VAS scores were statistically significantly lower in Group L compared to Group (P < .001).
- result
We believe that it is not an advantageous method compared to MM hemorrhoidectomy, both in terms of patient comfort and cost-effectiveness
- n
total 85 patients aged 18-70 years old
- followUp
Postoperative VAS score and complications were recorded within 10 days.
Am Surg · PMID 37846728 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Onder et al. 2023
A retrospective comparative study of hemorrhoidal artery ligation versus ligasure hemorrhoidectomy for the third degree hemorrhoidal disease
Less pain, shorter stay with artery ligation.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
91 people2023
ADHL had shorter operative time, shorter hospital stay (1.5 vs 3.05 days), quicker resolution of bleeding (1.4 vs 4.9 days), and similar recurrence rates (4 vs 3 patients) compared to LH
- Who was studied
- patients with third degree hemorrhoidal disease
- What they received
- Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (ADHL)
- Compared with
- Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy (LH), a bipolar energy surgical removal method
- Main outcome
- operative time, hospital stay, postoperative pain, bleeding, and recurrence after surgery
- Quality
- This was a retrospective study comparing two surgical techniques without randomization, so it cannot reliably separate treatment effects from other differences between patients.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, no randomization, and the authors state prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm results.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is the most common disease of the anorectal region
- population
Patients treated with ADHL and LH for HD
- intervention
Doppler-guided ligation of the hemorrhoidal arteries (ADHL)
- comparator
Excision of pathological hemorrhoidal structures by providing bipolar energy transfer with Ligasure
- n
The number of patients included in the study was 91.
- result
The mean operative time was shorter in group 1.
- result
The mean hospital stay was 1.5 days in the ADHL-treated group, compared to. 3.05 days in the LH group.
- result
bleeding was not observed after an average of 1.4 days in group 1, while this period was 4.9 days in group 2
- result
recurrence occurred in 4 patients in the ADHL group, recurrence developed in 3 patients who underwent LH
- primaryOutcome
operation time, bleeding during and after the operation, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain scoring, and postoperative results
Asian J Surg · PMID 37659951 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Zhang et al. 2023
Positive efficacy of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum MH-301 as a postoperative adjunct to endoscopic sclerotherapy for internal hemorrhoids: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Probiotic helped recovery after hemorrhoid surgery.Randomised trialModerate qualityRelated question
103 people2023
87.8% improved in the probiotic group versus 70.2% in the placebo group, a significant difference
- Who was studied
- Adults with internal hemorrhoids (grade I-III) who underwent endoscopic sclerotherapy
- What they received
- Probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum MH-301 taken for 4 weeks after the sclerotherapy procedure
- Compared with
- Placebo after the same sclerotherapy procedure
- Main outcome
- Percentage of patients whose hemorrhoid symptom score dropped to zero after treatment
- Quality
- It was a well-designed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, but it was modest in size and only tested a probiotic add-on after surgery, not surgery itself.
- Limitations
- Abstract does not report blinding of outcome assessors beyond double-blind design, long-term follow-up, or whether findings generalize beyond this specific procedure and probiotic strain.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
patients (≥18 years) with internal hemorrhoids that conformed to Goligher's classification of grade I-III received administration of L. plantarum MH-301 for 4 weeks following endoscopic sclerotherapy
- intervention
administration of L. plantarum MH-301 for 4 weeks following endoscopic sclerotherapy
- comparator
51 in the LP group and 52 in the C group
- primaryOutcome
The primary clinical endpoint in this study was the improvement rate, which was defined as the percentage of patients whose n-HDSS score decreased to 0 following the procedure.
- result
The primary clinical endpoint showed a higher improvement rate in the LP group (87.8% vs. 70.2%, P = 0.045).
- n
A total of 103 participants (51 in the LP group and 52 in the C group) were recruited
Food Funct · PMID 37655699 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Giuliani et al. 2023
Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy Versus Dearterialization With Mucopexy for the Treatment of Grade III Hemorrhoidal Disease: The EMODART3 Multicenter Study
Fewer complications but more recurrence with artery ligation.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
1,681 people24 months
excisional surgery had more complications, but artery ligation had more recurrences at 24 months
- Who was studied
- adults with grade III hemorrhoids
- What they received
- artery ligation surgery with mucopexy (a less invasive technique)
- Compared with
- traditional excisional hemorrhoidectomy surgery
- Main outcome
- symptoms, postoperative complications, and recurrence at 24 months
- Quality
- This was a retrospective study pooling self-reported data from multiple centers, not a randomized trial, so it cannot reliably prove one surgery is better than the other.
- Limitations
- The retrospective design and the self-reported nature of data from different centers.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
patients with Goligher's grade III hemorrhoidal disease
- intervention
hemorrhoidal artery ligation
- comparator
excisional hemorrhoidectomy
- primaryOutcome
compare them in terms of symptoms, postoperative adverse events, and recurrences at a 24-month follow-up
- result
Patients who underwent excisional hemorrhoidectomy had a significantly higher risk of postoperative complication (adjusted OR = 1.58; p = 0.006).
- result
recurrence was significantly higher in the hemorrhoidal artery ligation group (adjusted OR = 0.50; p = 0.001)
- n
Data from 1681 patients were analyzed.
- limitations
The retrospective design and the self-reported nature of data from different centers.
- followUp
24-month follow-up period
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 37616177 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Fiordaliso et al. 2023
Treatment of haemorrhoids in pregnancy: A retrospective review
Non-surgical care usually enough; surgery for severe cases only.Narrative reviewVery low quality
size not given2023
conservative measures are generally safe; surgery reserved for severe complications like strangulation, thrombosis or intractable bleeding
- Who was studied
- pregnant women with hemorrhoids
- What they received
- non-surgical treatments like fiber supplements, stool softeners, laxatives, topical medication or oral phlebotonics
- Compared with
- surgery (hemorrhoidectomy)
- Main outcome
- appropriate management approach for hemorrhoids in pregnancy
- Quality
- This is a narrative literature review without systematic methodology or pooled data, so it cannot reliably establish whether one treatment works better than another.
- Limitations
- The abstract does not describe systematic review methodology, quality assessment of included studies, or report on study selection criteria beyond search terms used.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Haemorrhoids are common in young women and commoner during pregnancy and the puerperium.
- intervention
Fiber supplement, stool softener and mild laxatives are generally safe for pregnant women.
- comparator
Hemorrhoidectomy is reserved in strangulated or extensively thrombosed hemorrhoids, and hemorrhoids with intractable bleeding.
- primaryOutcome
we address the issue of the approach of the obstetrician and surgeons to haemorrhoids and their management
- result
Fiber supplement, stool softener and mild laxatives are generally safe for pregnant women. Topical medication or oral phlebotonics may be used with special caution because the strong evidence of their safety and efficacy in pregnancy is lacking.
- result
Hemorrhoidectomy is reserved in strangulated or extensively thrombosed hemorrhoids, and hemorrhoids with intractable bleeding.
Ann Ital Chir · PMID 37530049 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Solari et al. 2023
Laser technology in proctological diseases: is it really the wave of the future?
Less pain than surgery, but costly.Systematic reviewLow quality
size not given2023
Laser treatments for hemorrhoids require a shorter operative time and show less postoperative pain and bleeding compared to conventional hemorrhoidectomy, but are more expensive.
- Who was studied
- adults with hemorrhoids
- What they received
- laser treatment for hemorrhoids
- Compared with
- conventional hemorrhoidectomy
- Main outcome
- operative time, postoperative pain, bleeding, and cost
- Quality
- This is a scoping review with highly varied studies and only three randomized trials, so the findings are not very reliable.
- Limitations
- Studies are heterogeneous in design, endpoints, postoperative assessment, length of follow-up and outcome measures. Only 3 RCTs are available and only three studies evaluate long-term outcomes.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
55 studies were included for the final revision.
- result
Laser treatments for hemorrhoids require a shorter operative time and show less postoperative pain and bleeding compared to conventional hemorrhoidectomy, but are more expensive.
- primaryOutcome
require a shorter operative time and show less postoperative pain and bleeding
- intervention
Laser treatments for hemorrhoids
- comparator
compared to conventional hemorrhoidectomy
- population
Laser treatments for hemorrhoids
Updates Surg · PMID 37438655 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Kodilinye et al. 2023
Endoscopic approaches to the management of hemorrhoids
Nonsurgical options show promise but need more study.Narrative reviewLow quality
size not given2023
Endoscopic rubber band ligation works reasonably well but causes mild complications; other techniques are understudied and direct comparisons are lacking
- Who was studied
- people with internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- endoscopic treatments such as rubber band ligation, sclerotherapy, and coagulation
- Compared with
- different endoscopic techniques compared to each other
- Main outcome
- effectiveness and complications of endoscopic treatment for hemorrhoids
- Quality
- This is a narrative review of varied studies without pooled data, standardized comparisons, or patient numbers reported.
- Limitations
- Abstract notes lack of standardization of clinical trials, variation in techniques and hemorrhoid grading, and insufficient head-to-head comparisons.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
the endoscopic management of internal hemorrhoids
- intervention
cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES)
- intervention
Rubber band ligation has been adopted by the endoscopist as endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL)
- comparator
Data is needed on head-to-head comparisons between ERBL, endoscopic sclerotherapy, and CAES.
- primaryOutcome
current status and future perspectives of the endoscopic management of internal hemorrhoids
- result
demonstrating satisfactory results in treating symptomatic hemorrhoids, although mild postprocedure complications are common
- result
Other methods, such as coagulation, are understudied and should be explored further in the endoscopic setting.
- result
Meaningful comparisons between treatment methods for internal hemorrhoids have been difficult because of variations in interventional techniques and methods
Curr Opin Gastroenterol · PMID 37389425 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Pastor Peinado et al. 2023
Quality of life and outcomes after rubber band ligation for haemorrhoidal disease
Less pain and improved symptoms.Prospective cohortLow quality
100 people6 months
significant reduction in symptom and health scale scores, with 89% overall success and 76% patient satisfaction
- Who was studied
- adults with symptomatic grade II-III hemorrhoids that did not improve after 6 months of non-surgical treatment
- What they received
- rubber band ligation (RBL) of hemorrhoids
- Compared with
- no comparison group; scores measured before and after treatment in the same patients
- Main outcome
- change in quality of life using symptom and health scores (HDSS and SHS)
- Quality
- This was a single-group study without a comparison treatment, so it cannot show whether banding worked better than no treatment or surgery.
- Limitations
- No control group was used, so improvements cannot be directly attributed to the procedure alone; some patients needed repeat procedures and 12% had complications.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A total of 100 patients were finally included.
- population
patients with symptomatic grade II-III haemorrhoids who did not improve after 6 months of conservative treatment
- intervention
rubber band ligation (RBL)
- comparator
RBL was offered as first-line treatment in this group.
- primaryOutcome
Patient´s quality of life was assessed by scores: HDSS (Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score) and SHS (Short Health Scale).
- result
a significant reduction was found in the HDSS and SHS scores (p < 0.001)
- result
The overall success rate of banding was 89%.
- result
A high degree of satisfaction with the procedure was reported by 76% of patients.
Langenbecks Arch Surg · PMID 37349572 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Gachabayov et al. 2023
Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization With Mucopexy Versus Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy for Prolapsed Internal Hemorrhoids: A Multicenter Prospective Study
Less pain, similar recurrence between two surgeries.Prospective cohortModerate qualityRelated question
197 people3.1 (1.0-5.5) years
recurrence rates were similar between the two surgeries, but the newer technique caused less pain and higher patient satisfaction in the first weeks and months
- Who was studied
- patients with prolapsed internal hemorrhoids in at least 3 columns
- What they received
- transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) with mucopexy, a surgical technique
- Compared with
- Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy, a traditional surgical removal of hemorrhoids
- Main outcome
- rate of hemorrhoid prolapse coming back after surgery
- Quality
- it followed many patients over several years across multiple centers, but surgeons chose which operation to perform rather than patients being randomly assigned, which could bias results
- Limitations
- Surgeons performed the operation they knew best rather than being randomly assigned, so the comparison is affected by surgeon experience and preference rather than a controlled randomization.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Twenty surgeons enrolled 197 patients.
- population
Patients with prolapsed internal hemorrhoids in at least 3 columns were eligible.
- intervention
transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) with mucopexy
- comparator
Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy
- primaryOutcome
The primary endpoint was recurrence rates defined as prolapsing internal hemorrhoids.
- result
Recurrence rates did not differ between the study arms (5.9% vs 2.4%, P =0.253).
- result
THD patients had lower Visual pain scores at postoperative day (POD) 1 (6.2 vs 8.3, P =0.047), POD7 (4.5 vs 7.7, P =0.021), POD14 (2.8 vs 5.3, P <0.001)
- followUp
Median follow-up was 3.1 (1.0-5.5) years.
- limitations
Participating surgeons performed the operation they knew best enrolling 10 patients each.
Ann Surg · PMID 37325897 · Read it on PubMed ↗
van Oostendorp et al. 2023
Treatment of haemorrhoids: rubber band ligation or sclerotherapy (THROS)? Study protocol for a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial
No results yet; trial planned.Registered trial, no results postedLow quality
size not given2023
No results reported; this is a study protocol for a planned trial
- Who was studied
- adults with mild (grade 1-2) hemorrhoids
- What they received
- rubber band ligation
- Compared with
- sclerotherapy injection
- Main outcome
- symptom reduction, recurrence and complications
- Quality
- This is only a trial protocol with no outcome data yet, so it cannot show whether either treatment works.
- Limitations
- The abstract describes planned methodology only; no results, sample size outcomes, or follow-up data are yet available.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
symptomatic grade 1-2 haemorrhoids in adults (> 18 years)
- intervention
rubber band ligation (RBL)
- comparator
sclerotherapy (SCL)
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcome measures are symptom reduction by means of PROMs, recurrence and complication rates.
- result
This protocol describes the methodology of a non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised controlled trial comparing rubber band ligation and sclerotherapy
Trials · PMID 37270601 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Pfeil et al. 2023
[Hemorroids Therapy: a Tailored Approch]
Most cases improve without surgery.Narrative reviewVery low quality
size not given2023
Most patients improve with non-surgical treatment; surgery is reserved for cases where conservative treatment fails, with rare complications
- Who was studied
- people with symptomatic hemorrhoids
- What they received
- non-surgical treatments (conservative care and sclerotherapy)
- Compared with
- surgical treatments (various operations)
- Main outcome
- symptom control and quality of life
- Quality
- This is a narrative opinion-style review without study data, numbers, or methods, so it cannot reliably establish what works.
- Limitations
- No study design, sample size, or data are reported; this is a narrative summary of clinical practice.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
symptomatic haemorrhoids
- intervention
The vast majority of patients can be treated conservatively with excellent results in terms of quality of life.
- comparator
If conservative treatment fails, there are various surgical options.
- primaryOutcome
excellent results in terms of quality of life
- result
Sclerotherapy provides good control of symptoms at any stage of haemorrhoidal disease.
- result
Postoperative bleeding, pain and faecal incontinence are rare complications after surgery.
Zentralbl Chir · PMID 37267978 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Tian et al. 2023
Efficacy of two endoscopic rubber band ligation methods for symptomatic hemorrhoids: a randomized controlled trial
Banding works well, no surgery needed.Randomised trialModerate quality
70 people12 months
No significant difference in overall efficacy or recurrence between the two banding methods, but combined ligation caused more post-procedure pain
- Who was studied
- patients with symptomatic grade I to III hemorrhoids
- What they received
- rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids alone
- Compared with
- combined ligation (hemorrhoids plus proximal normal mucosa)
- Main outcome
- overall therapeutic success rate (complete and partial resolution)
- Quality
- It was a small, open-label randomized trial comparing two non-surgical techniques rather than against surgery itself, so results may not fully generalize.
- Limitations
- Open-label design, modest sample size, and only 62 of 70 patients completed 12-month follow-up.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Seventy patients with symptomatic grade I to III hemorrhoids were randomly assigned to the hemorrhoid and combined ligation groups (35 in each group).
- population
symptomatic grade I to III hemorrhoids
- intervention
ligation of hemorrhoids
- comparator
simultaneous ligation of hemorrhoids and proximal normal mucosa (combined ligation)
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcome was overall therapeutic success rate (complete resolution and partial resolution rates).
- result
No significant differences in overall efficacy, recurrence rate, or efficacy for each symptom (including bleeding, prolapse, pain, anal swelling, itching, soiling, and constipation) were observed between groups.
- result
The incidence of postoperative pain was higher in the combined ligation group (74.2% vs. 45.2%, P = 0.02).
- followUp
Patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months to assess symptom improvement, complications, and recurrence.
Surg Endosc · PMID 37188908 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Patel et al. 2023
HEmoRhoidal disease management with Band ligation versus polidocanol Sclerotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis (the HerBS Review)
Sclerotherapy may work better than banding.Meta-analysisLow quality
size not given2023
Sclerotherapy had a higher success rate (93%) than banding (75%); complication rates were not significantly different (8% vs 18%)
- Who was studied
- adults with grade I-III symptomatic internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- polidocanol sclerotherapy (injection treatment)
- Compared with
- rubber band ligation
- Main outcome
- treatment success and complications after the procedure
- Quality
- Most included studies were small, single-arm, or non-randomized, so the comparison between treatments is not very reliable.
- Limitations
- Only 3 of the included studies directly compared the two treatments; most were single-arm studies, and the abstract calls for randomized trials to confirm findings.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
adult (> 18 years) patients with grade I-III internal hemorrhoids
- intervention
polidocanol sclerotherapy
- comparator
rubber band ligation (RBL)
- primaryOutcome
Treatments were evaluated for therapeutic success and post-procedure morbidity.
- result
The patients undergoing sclerotherapy had a 93% (151/163) therapeutic success rate compared to 75% (68/91) in the RBL group (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.48-7.74, p < 0.01). The post-procedure morbidity was 8% (17/200) in the sclerotherapy group and 18% (23/128) in the RBL group (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.15-1.82, p = 0.31).
- limitations
Further evaluations in the form of randomized trials are required to evaluate patient populations, which may benefit more from sclerotherapy.
Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 37133577 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Ding et al. 2023
Rubber band ligation versus coagulation for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Both work similarly; banding hurts more.Meta-analysisModerate quality
size not given2023
No significant difference in efficacy, prolapse, recurrence or urine retention; rubber band ligation had more pain but less bleeding than coagulation
- Who was studied
- patients with haemorrhoids
- What they received
- rubber band ligation (a non-surgical treatment)
- Compared with
- coagulation therapy (a non-surgical treatment)
- Main outcome
- treatment success, prolapse, recurrence, pain, bleeding and urine retention rates
- Quality
- It pools nine randomized trials, but all were rated only moderate quality so the findings are not fully certain.
- Limitations
- All trials were of moderate methodological quality.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
compare rubber band ligation and coagulation treatments for haemorrhoids
- intervention
Rubber band ligation
- comparator
coagulation
- primaryOutcome
efficacy rate, postoperative prolapse rate, recurrence rate and postoperative urine retention rate
- result
No significant difference was found between rubber band ligation and coagulation in terms of efficacy rate, postoperative prolapse rate, recurrence rate and postoperative urine retention rate after treatment. Patients undergoing rubber band ligation had higher postoperative pain rate and lower postoperative bleeding rate than patients undergoing coagulation.
- qualityWhy
All trials were of moderate methodological quality.
Postgrad Med J · PMID 37117040 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Devi et al. 2023
Hemorrhoid Disease: A Review on Treatment, Clinical Research and Patent Data
No specific finding reported.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2023
The review discusses the need for new molecules but does not report specific outcome data
- Who was studied
- people with hemorrhoids
- What they received
- various hemorrhoid treatments and newer drug molecules
- Compared with
- not specified
- Main outcome
- safety and clinical efficacy of treatments
- Quality
- This is a narrative review summarizing literature without presenting specific study results, data, or methodology for pooling evidence.
- Limitations
- No specific study results, patient numbers, or outcome data are reported; it is a general literature summary.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Hemorrhoid disease (HD) is an anal-rectal ailment
- intervention
newer molecules to overcome hemorrhoids
- primaryOutcome
safety, clinical efficacy, and marketed formulation for the effective management of hemorrhoids
- result
The high incidence of hemorrhoids obliges the development of new molecules; therefore, safe and efficient drugs to confer protection against hemorrhoids are urgently needed.
- comparator
various studies carried out in the past
Infect Disord Drug Targets · PMID 37106517 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Dursun et al. 2023
Effectiveness of laser hemorrhoidoplasty in the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease
Low complications, but recurrence worse in severe cases.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
103 people6 months, 1 year, and 2 years
recurrence occurred in 17.6% of grade 2/3 patients and 50% of grade 4 patients, with minor complications in 2.9% and quick return to daily activity
- Who was studied
- adults with grade 2, 3, or 4 internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- laser hemorrhoidoplasty (a minimally invasive laser procedure)
- Compared with
- no comparison group; results tracked within the same patients over time
- Main outcome
- symptom recovery, recurrence, pain, and complications after treatment
- Quality
- this was a retrospective study of one clinic's patients with no comparison group, so it cannot show whether laser treatment works better or worse than surgery or no treatment.
- Limitations
- retrospective design, no control or comparator group, single center, higher recurrence in more severe (grade 4) disease
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
patients who underwent LHP due to Grades 2, 3, and 4 internal hemorrhoidal disease
- intervention
laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) method
- comparator
The data of patients who underwent LHP due to Grades 2, 3, and 4 internal hemorrhoidal disease in our clinic were reviewed retrospectively.
- primaryOutcome
symptomatic recovery and recurrence rates, post-operative pain levels, and complication rates
- result
Recurrence developed in 16 (17.6%) patients with Grades 2 and 3 disease and in 6 (50%) of 12 patients with Grade 4 disease (p = 0.019).
- n
A total of 103 patients were included in the study.
- followUp
followed for at least 6 months (6 months, 1 year, and 2 years)
Cir Cir · PMID 37084307 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Xiong et al. 2023
Comparison of the long-term efficacy and safety of multiple endoscopic rubber band ligations in a single session for varying grades of internal hemorrhoids
Band ligation relieved most hemorrhoid symptoms.Case seriesLow quality
120 people14.3 ± 7.9 (1.3-30.9) months
78.8% of patients had no symptoms at 6 weeks; grade II hemorrhoids responded better than grade III (87.8% vs 69.2%), and recurrence occurred in 25% overall, higher for grade III
- Who was studied
- adults with internal hemorrhoids
- What they received
- endoscopic rubber band ligation (bands placed in a single session)
- Compared with
- different hemorrhoid grades (II vs III) and different numbers of bands used
- Main outcome
- no hemorrhoid symptoms 6 weeks after treatment
- Quality
- This was a single-arm study without a comparison group or randomization, so it can't show whether banding is better than surgery or no treatment.
- Limitations
- No control group, no randomization, and follow-up time varied widely between patients.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
One hundred twenty-three eligible patients met the inclusion criteria, and 3 patients were excluded.
- population
Patients with IH were treated with ERBL.
- intervention
in a single session of endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL)
- comparator
grade II hemorrhoids required significantly fewer bands than grade III hemorrhoids
- primaryOutcome
The primary endpoint was no hemorrhoid symptoms 6 weeks after ERBL.
- result
78.8% of patients achieved the primary endpoint. The efficacy of grade II hemorrhoids was higher than that of grade III hemorrhoids (87.8% vs 69.2%).
- followUp
The median follow-up time was 14.3 ± 7.9 (1.3-30.9) months.
Ir J Med Sci · PMID 37059872 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Gambardella et al. 2023
Mid-term efficacy and postoperative wound management of laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) vs conventional excisional hemorrhoidectomy in grade III hemorrhoidal disease: the twisting trend
Less pain, but more recurrence.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
174 people25 ± 8 months
Laser treatment caused less pain and easier wound care but a higher rate of symptom recurrence than conventional surgery
- Who was studied
- patients with grade III symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease
- What they received
- laser hemorrhoidoplasty (diode laser shrinkage of hemorrhoids)
- Compared with
- conventional Milligan-Morgan excisional hemorrhoidectomy
- Main outcome
- postoperative pain, wound healing, symptom recurrence and quality of life
- Quality
- This was a retrospective, non-randomized comparison of two surgical techniques, so differences could be due to patient selection rather than the treatment itself.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design without randomization; abstract states larger comparative studies are needed.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
93 patients received conventional Milligan Morgan as control group and 81 patients received laser hemorrhoidoplasty treatment
- population
grade III symptomatic HD patients undergoing LHP vs MM
- intervention
laser hemorrhoidoplasty treatment using a 1470-nm diode laser
- comparator
conventional Milligan Morgan as control group
- primaryOutcome
Postoperative pain, wound care management, symptoms' resolution, patients' quality of life, and length of return to daily activity
- result
Laser hemorrhoidoplasty patients experienced lower postoperative pain score (p < 0.0001) and smoother wound management
- result
the recurrence of symptoms occurred in 8.1% after Milligan-Morgan and 21.6% after laser hemorrhoidoplasty (p < 0.05)
- followUp
After 25 ± 8 months follow-up
Langenbecks Arch Surg · PMID 37020091 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Laurain et al. 2023
French multicentre prospective evaluation of radiofrequency ablation in the management of haemorrhoidal disease
Fewer symptoms, better quality of life.Prospective cohortLow quality
129 people1 year
quality of life score improved significantly and symptoms like bleeding and prolapse decreased
- Who was studied
- adults with grade II-III hemorrhoids
- What they received
- radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hemorrhoids
- Compared with
- no comparison group (before-and-after same patients)
- Main outcome
- quality of life score related to hemorrhoid disease at 3 months
- Quality
- This study had no comparison group, so it can't show if results are better than doing nothing or another treatment.
- Limitations
- No control group to compare against; some patients needed repeat surgery for relapse or complications.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
outpatients with grade II-III haemorrhoids
- intervention
RFA (Rafaelo©)
- n
A total of 129 patients
- primaryOutcome
Primary endpoint was the evolution of a quality-of-life score adapted to the haemorrhoid pathology (HEMO-FISS-QoL) 3 months after surgery.
- result
Median HEMO-FISS-QoL score dropped significantly from 17.4/100 to 0/100 (p < 0.0001) at 3 months.
- comparator
This prospective multicentre study assessed RFA
- followUp
1 year's follow-up
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 37005961 · Read it on PubMed ↗
How we searchedThe exact query, the date it ran, and what came back — so you can run it yourself.
- Searched
- PubMed · ClinicalTrials.gov · Crossref on 2026-10-05
- The exact search — paste this into PubMed to repeat it
("Hemorrhoids/surgery"[Mesh] OR "Hemorrhoids/therapy"[Mesh]) AND ("Hemorrhoidectomy"[Mesh] OR "Sclerotherapy"[Mesh] OR "Ligation"[Mesh] OR "Laser Therapy"[Mesh] OR nonsurgical[tiab] OR "non-surgical"[tiab] OR "rubber band ligation"[tiab] OR "infrared coagulation"[tiab] OR "laser hemorrhoidoplasty"[tiab])- PubMed expanded that to:
("hemorrhoids/surgery"[MeSH Terms] OR "hemorrhoids/therapy"[MeSH Terms]) AND ("Hemorrhoidectomy"[MeSH Terms] OR "Sclerotherapy"[MeSH Terms] OR "Ligation"[MeSH Terms] OR "Laser Therapy"[MeSH Terms] OR "nonsurgical"[Title/Abstract] OR "non-surgical"[Title/Abstract] OR "rubber band ligation"[Title/Abstract] OR "infrared coagulation"[Title/Abstract] OR "laser hemorrhoidoplasty"[Title/Abstract]) - What came back
- 1452 records found · 200 read · 115 answered the question
- Included
- Human, animal or laboratory studies reporting an outcome relevant to the question
- Excluded
- Records about a different condition or intervention
- Records reporting no outcome
- Retracted publications, which are listed but excluded from every count
- Limits
- Details were read from abstracts, not full papers, so anything reported only in a paper's methods section is not captured here.
- Fields were read from abstracts, not full text, so detail reported only in a paper's methods section is not captured.
- Evidence strength is adapted from the GRADE framework. It is not a GRADE assessment and was not produced by a GRADE panel.
Automated evidence review — PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Crossref. Search strategy, grading rules and the checks that must pass before anything publishes were written by Allen Kamrava, MD, MBA, FACS, FASCRS, colon & rectal surgery, Beverly Hills. The pages themselves are compiled by software running that method and are not read one by one before publication — saying otherwise would be the one claim here that could not be checked.
- 1452records came back from the search
- 200were read
- 115actually answered the question
Why people try thisThe reasoning behind the question — not a claim that it works.
- Non-surgical options sound less frightening and don't require general anesthesia.
- People want to avoid the pain and time off work that often come with surgery.
- In-office procedures like banding can usually be done same-day without a hospital stay.
- Doctors often suggest starting with the least invasive option, like fiber or banding, before considering surgery.
Common questionsShort answers, drawn from the same studies.
- Will I definitely need surgery for my hemorrhoids?
- No. Most people, especially with milder hemorrhoids, are managed first with diet changes, creams, or office procedures like banding. Surgery is generally reserved for more severe or grade III-IV disease that hasn't responded to these.
- Is rubber band ligation as good as surgery?
- Not for grade III hemorrhoids, based on the trial that tested this directly. Banding caused less pain and let people return to activity sooner, but hemorrhoids came back much more often than after surgery (about 48% vs 6% within a year).
- Should I stop a non-surgical treatment if it isn't working?
- Yes. If office procedures or conservative measures aren't controlling your symptoms, guidance reviewed here suggests moving on to surgery rather than repeating the same approach indefinitely.
- What are the risks of non-surgical treatments like banding?
- Most side effects are mild and temporary, but rare serious bleeding has been reported after banding. Tell your doctor right away about any heavy bleeding after the procedure.
- What are the risks of surgery?
- Surgery causes more pain and a longer recovery than office procedures. Infection risk is higher in people who carry certain resistant bacteria, and like any surgery it carries a small chance of serious complications.
- Are there any safety risks I should watch for after a hemorrhoid procedure?
- Yes. Reported problems include delayed heavy bleeding after rubber band ligation, occurring about two weeks later in one case (32), and a serious bowel wall injury (rectal perforation) after laser hemorrhoidoplasty that required emergency surgery (76). People who carry drug-resistant bacteria in the rectum also had a much higher rate of wound infection after surgical hemorrhoid removal (97). These problems are uncommon, but if you develop new or worsening bleeding, fever, severe pain, or swelling in the days or weeks after any hemorrhoid treatment, contact your doctor or go to an emergency room right away rather than waiting it out. Choosing an experienced provider and asking what warning signs to watch for before your procedure is the best way to catch a problem early.
- Are there any serious risks I should know about before choosing a treatment?
- Yes, though they appear to be rare. Case reports describe a woman who had massive rectal bleeding two weeks after rubber-band banding, and another who developed a rectal perforation with sepsis and organ failure after laser hemorrhoidoplasty, needing emergency surgery; a separate study found that patients carrying drug-resistant bacteria had a much higher infection rate after hemorrhoid surgery, and laboratory modeling of laser heating showed how uneven heat could damage the layers of rectal tissue. These reports do not tell us how often such problems happen, but they are a reason to have any hemorrhoid procedure done by an experienced clinician. If you develop heavy bleeding, fever, severe pain, or are unable to pass urine or stool after a procedure, contact a doctor right away instead of waiting it out.
This is information, not advice
This page summarises published research. It cannot tell you what is happening in your own body, and evidence changes. If something is bleeding, painful, or new, it is worth being looked at — that is a different question from the one on this page, and a better one to bring to a consultation.
Contact the officeAutomated evidence review — PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Crossref. Search strategy, grading rules and the checks that must pass before anything publishes were written by Allen Kamrava, MD, MBA, FACS, FASCRS, colon & rectal surgery, Beverly Hills. The pages themselves are compiled by software running that method and are not read one by one before publication — saying otherwise would be the one claim here that could not be checked.