How long does it take to recover after a pilonidal cyst is drained?
In patients with a pilonidal abscess treated by incision and drainage, what is the typical time to wound healing, return to normal activity, and recurrence, and how do these outcomes differ from other surgical approaches?
Compiled 2026-10-05 · checked 2026-10-05 · next 2026-11-05 · automated review, how it works
What the evidence says
Bottom line
Draining a pilonidal abscess relieves the acute infection quickly, but it doesn't reliably end the problem — in the studies that followed patients afterward, a sizeable share had the abscess come back or needed a second operation.
The one randomised trial that directly tested this compared drainage alone with drainage plus curettage (scraping out the cavity) and found more recurrences with drainage alone (42% vs 11%). Several other studies of people treated with incision and drainage alone found 21–29% had the disease return, and many of these needed further surgery. Because only one trial addresses this question directly and other studies disagree on how fast the wound heals, this evidence is low-certainty.
How certain
Low
One well-conducted randomised trial addresses this question directly. The studies disagree with one another, so the overall certainty is lower than any single one of them.
What it shows
Signal of harm
2 studies reported harm or tissue damage, including laboratory evidence.
- studies found
- 98studies found
- randomised trials
- 18randomised trials
- people studied
- 9,912people studied
- reviews of trials
- 5reviews of trials
- years covered
- 1956–2026years covered
- finished, never published
- 4finished, never published
Read this first
- Across studies of people treated with incision and drainage alone, the abscess or sinus came back in roughly a fifth to over two-fifths of patients, and most of these needed another operation to fix it.
- One study compared two approaches to managing a pilonidal abscess: early surgery (unroofing and curettage) done right away versus elective surgery (a Karydakis flap) done later, after initial drainage and antibiotics. The total time treatment took differed significantly between the two groups, but the abstract does not say which group took longer.
What the research shows
Time to complete wound healing
Studies that tracked healing after incision and drainage reported very different timelines — a median of 43 days in one large cohort, about 18 days in another, and only 58–79% of patients fully healed within 10 weeks in two others. The studies used different definitions of 'healed' and followed different populations, so no single recovery time can be given.[1,2,3,4]
Insufficient evidence
Time to return to work or normal activity
A few small studies reported people back to usual activity within about two weeks after a similar procedure (cystotomy), while another found incision and drainage let people return to work sooner than excision surgery done at the same time (about 26 days vs 35 days). These numbers come from different procedures and countries, so they don't add up to one clear answer.[1,2,3]
Insufficient evidence
Post-procedure pain scores
No study in this review measured pain scores specifically after simple incision and drainage of an abscess. Pain was measured for other things, like wound dressings after bigger excision surgery, but not for drainage itself.
Not studied
Wound discharge duration
No study directly measured how long a wound keeps discharging fluid after simple incision and drainage of an abscess.
Not studied
Need for further (definitive) surgery
Several studies suggest that a meaningful share of people treated with drainage alone later need further surgery. In one study of incision and drainage alone, later excision was necessary in under 40% of patients. In another, 29% of patients treated by incision and drainage alone had a recurrence that required a new operation.[1,2]
Possible harm
Possible harm
What it may help with
- Simple incision and drainage treats the acute infection quickly and can be done under local anaesthetic, without needing a bigger operation at that visit.[1,2]
- In studies that compared it with more extensive excision surgery done at the same visit, simple drainage let people return to work or normal activity sooner.[1,2]
Important limitations
- Only one randomised trial compares drainage alone against another approach using proper randomisation; most of the rest of the evidence comes from case series or retrospective reviews with no comparison group at all.[1]
- Studies span 1956 to 2026 and use different surgical techniques, different definitions of 'healed,' and different follow-up lengths, so their healing-time numbers cannot be directly combined.[1,2,3,4,5]
- Many studies lump incision and drainage together with other techniques (excision, flap surgery, marsupialization) in the same group of patients, making it hard to isolate what happens after simple drainage alone.[1,2]
- Follow-up was often incomplete — some studies only checked patients at an outpatient visit and lost a meaningful share to follow-up, so later recurrences may be undercounted.[1,2]
What the studies found
- Found a benefit50 · 51%
- Found no clear effect6 · 6%
- Mixed or unclear40 · 41%
- Found possible harm2 · 2%
What kind of studies
- Case series33 · 34%
- Retrospective22 · 22%
- Randomised trial18 · 18%
- Narrative review10 · 10%
- Prospective cohort9 · 9%
- Meta-analysis3 · 3%
- Systematic review2 · 2%
- Guideline1 · 1%
The studies that decided it
Huurman et al. 2024
Acute pilonidal abscess: Prospective nationwide audit in the Netherlands
Healing often slow, about 6 weeks.Prospective cohortModerate quality
205 people1 year
wound healing occurred in 42.2% at outpatient follow-up, with median time to closure of 43 days
- Who was studied
- patients with acute pilonidal abscess
- What they received
- incision and drainage of pilonidal abscess
- Compared with
- none (single-arm outcomes study)
- Main outcome
- wound healing and time to wound closure
- Quality
- it is a large multicenter prospective study but has no comparison group, so it only describes outcomes rather than proving what works best.
- Limitations
- no comparator group; only 77.1% completed 1-year questionnaires; wound healing assessed only up to outpatient follow-up
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Patients with pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) who underwent surgical treatment
- n
Incision and drainage (I&D) was performed in 205 of these patients (99%).
- intervention
Incision and drainage (I&D) was performed in 205 of these patients
- comparator
Incision and drainage (I&D) was performed in 205 of these patients (99%).
- primaryOutcome
Outcomes included symptoms, wound healing, time to resume daily activities and complications.
- result
The wound healing rate after I&D was 42.2% at the outpatient clinic, with a median time to closure of 43 days.
Colorectal Dis · PMID 39635960 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Mahjoubi et al. 2022
RADICAL VERSUS CONSERVATIVE METHODS IN ONE-STAGE PILONIDAL ABSCESS SURGERY: THE EXPERIENCE OF A TUNISIAN CENTER
Excision: slower recovery, fewer recurrences.RetrospectiveLow quality
57 people2022
excision took longer to return to activity but had fewer recurrences; incision healed the wound faster but recurred more often
- Who was studied
- adults with a pilonidal abscess needing surgery
- What they received
- complete excision (radical) surgery
- Compared with
- incision, drainage or curettage (conservative) surgery
- Main outcome
- time to return to normal activity, wound healing time, and recurrence
- Quality
- this was a small retrospective comparison of 57 patients without randomization, so differences could be due to other factors.
- Limitations
- small sample size, not randomized, relies partly on patient interviews and medical records
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
We analyzed 57 patients: 33 males and 24 females.
- population
patients operated on for pilonidal abscess, with a satisfactory postoperative follow-up
- intervention
The type of operation was excision in 46 (81%) cases
- comparator
incision in 11 (19%) cases associated with curettage in three cases and drainage in 1 case
- primaryOutcome
Excision of pilonidal abscess was significantly associated with a longer time to return to activity (p=0.04).
- result
Conservative surgery was significantly associated with faster healing of the surgical wound (p<0.001). The recurrence rate was 19% in radical surgery and 54% in conservative surgery.
Arq Bras Cir Dig · PMID 36542008 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Ciftci et al. 2014
A new approach: oblique excision and primary closure in the management of acute pilonidal disease
Drainage healed in 18 days.Prospective cohortLow quality
128 people2014
incision and drainage healed faster (18 days) but had a much higher rate of chronic sinus formation (78.8%) than oblique excision and primary closure (6.0%, 22 days healing)
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal abscesses
- What they received
- incision and drainage of the pilonidal abscess
- Compared with
- oblique excision with primary closure
- Main outcome
- rate of chronic pilonidal sinus development and time to healing/return to work
- Quality
- Patients were not randomly assigned to treatment groups (each surgeon used only one method), so other differences between groups could explain the results.
- Limitations
- Treatment was assigned by which surgeon saw the patient rather than randomization, raising risk of bias.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
patients presenting with pilonidal abscesses
- intervention
incision and drainage as the treatment method
- comparator
oblique excision and primary closure
- primaryOutcome
The rate of development of chronic pilonidal sinus and time to return to active work were assessed
- result
In Group A, the average healing time and time to return to active work were 18 and 25 days, respectively. In Group B, these times were 22 and 27 days, respectively (P < 0.001).
- n
Of the 128 patients, incision and simple drainage was applied to 69 patients and primary closure was applied to 59 patients.
Int J Clin Exp Med · PMID 25664095 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Kanat et al. 2014
Comparison of early surgery (unroofing-curettage) and elective surgery (Karydakis flap technique) in pilonidal sinus abscess cases
Early surgery took longer to heal.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
53 peoplean average of 14 months
a statistically significant difference in how long treatment took, favoring the elective Karydakis approach
- Who was studied
- patients treated for pilonidal sinus abscesses
- What they received
- early surgery (unroofing and curettage) right after abscess diagnosis
- Compared with
- elective surgery (Karydakis flap) done later, after initial drainage and antibiotic treatment
- Main outcome
- treatment duration, complications, and recurrence
- Quality
- it is a small retrospective comparison of only 53 patients from one clinic, so the findings are not very reliable.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, small sample size, single clinic.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Of the 53 patients included in the study, 28 were in Group S and 25 in Group K.
- population
The data of the patients treated for pilonidal sinus abscesses in our clinic between January 2012 and March 2013 were analyzed, retrospectively.
- intervention
Those who had early surgery were determined as Group S
- comparator
those who had elective surgery following drainage-antibiotic therapy were determined as Group K
- primaryOutcome
Patients in both groups were compared in terms of age, gender, complications, recurrence rate and healing time.
- result
there was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of treatment duration (p=0.02)
- followUp
Patients were followed for an average of 14 months.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg · PMID 25541849 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Webb et al. 2011
Does pilonidal abscess heal quicker with off-midline incision and drainage?
Off-midline drainage heals about 3 weeks faster.RetrospectiveLow quality
243 people2011
abscesses drained off the midline healed about three weeks faster than those drained through a midline incision
- Who was studied
- adults who had a pilonidal abscess drained in hospital
- What they received
- draining the abscess through a cut to the side of the midline (lateral incision)
- Compared with
- draining the abscess through a cut along the midline
- Main outcome
- how long the wound took to heal
- Quality
- it was a retrospective, non-randomised review of hospital records with a small matched subgroup, so it can't reliably prove cause and effect.
- Limitations
- retrospective study that did not capture patients whose abscess drained spontaneously or were drained in the emergency department
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Two hundred and forty-three pilonidal abscesses were drained
- population
patients who underwent incision and drainage for acute pilonidal abscess between January 2003 and February 2010
- intervention
lateral incision
- comparator
midline incision
- primaryOutcome
The main outcome measure was wound healing time.
- result
Abscesses that healed after midline incision took approximately 3 weeks longer than those drained via a lateral incision (P = 0.02).
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 21533783 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Vahedian et al. 2005
Comparison between drainage and curettage in the treatment of acute pilonidal abscess
Faster healing with curettage than drainageRandomised trialModerate quality
150 people65 months
curettage healed faster (96% vs 78.7% within 10 weeks) and had less recurrence (11% vs 42%) than drainage alone
- Who was studied
- patients with acute pilonidal abscess near the tailbone
- What they received
- curettage (scraping out) and drainage of the abscess
- Compared with
- simple drainage alone
- Main outcome
- time to wound healing and recurrence of the abscess
- Quality
- it was a randomized trial with a reasonable number of patients, but details on blinding and dropout handling are limited.
- Limitations
- not stated in detail beyond comparison methods; no mention of blinding
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
One hundred and fifty patients who had an acute sacrococcygeal pilonidal abscess were randomly assigned
- population
patients who had an acute sacrococcygeal pilonidal abscess
- intervention
curettage and drainage of the acute abscess of the pilonidal sinus
- comparator
Simple incision and drainage of a sacrococcygeal pilonidal abscess
- primaryOutcome
Hospital stay, wound healing, and recurrence were noted.
- result
Healing process in the curettage cases occurred more quickly than the drainage patients (96% versus 78.7%, p<0.001).
- result
Recurrence of disease was encountered significantly less in the curettage subjects than the drainage ones (11% versus 42%) (p<0.001).
- followUp
followed up to 65 months for the detection of recurrence
Saudi Med J · PMID 15900358 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Perruchoud et al. 2002
Pilonidal sinus: how to choose between excision and open granulation versus excision and primary closure? Study of a series of 141 patients operated on from 1991 to 1995
High recurrence after simple drainage.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
17 people37 months
Five recurrences (29%) were noticed, requiring a new operation in all the cases.
- Who was studied
- patients with an infected pilonidal sinus treated by incision and drainage alone
- What they received
- incision and drainage as sole treatment of an infected pilonidal sinus
- Compared with
- excision and open granulation versus excision and primary closure
- Main outcome
- recurrence rate and length of follow-up after treatment
- Quality
- This is a small, non-randomized subgroup of only 17 patients within a larger retrospective series, and the authors themselves say the series is too limited to draw firm conclusions.
- Limitations
- Retrospective, non-randomized design; small subgroup size for the drainage-only arm; no healing time reported for this group, only recurrence data; authors state series too limited for firm conclusions.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
17 patients by incision and drainage, as a unique treatment of an infected pilonidal sinus
- population
seventeen patients benefited from an incision and drainage as unique treatment
- intervention
incision and drainage, as a unique treatment of an infected pilonidal sinus
- comparator
excision and open granulation versus excision and primary closure
- primaryOutcome
The mean follow-up was 37 months.
- result
Five recurrences (29%) were noticed, requiring a new operation in all the cases.
Swiss Surg · PMID 12520844 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Jensen et al. 1988
Prognosis after simple incision and drainage for a first-episode acute pilonidal abscess
About half healed in 10 weeks; some recurred.Prospective cohortLow quality
73 peoplemedian follow-up period was 60 months, range 36-84 months
58% healed completely within 10 weeks, but 21% of those who healed later had the disease return, giving an estimated cure rate of 76% at 18 months
- Who was studied
- patients with a first-time acute pilonidal abscess
- What they received
- simple incision and drainage under local anaesthesia
- Compared with
- none (single group, no comparison treatment)
- Main outcome
- whether the wound healed completely and whether the disease came back
- Quality
- This was a small, single-group study without a comparison treatment, so it can't show whether another approach would have done better or worse.
- Limitations
- No comparison group; patients who healed poorly needed later surgery; follow-up time varied between patients.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
73 patients were treated consecutively
- population
patients were treated consecutively for a first-episode acute pilonidal abscess
- intervention
simple incision and drainage under local anaesthesia
- comparator
During a 3-year period 73 patients were treated consecutively for a first-episode acute pilonidal abscess with simple incision and drainage under local anaesthesia.
- primaryOutcome
Healing per primam occurred in 42 patients (58 per cent; 95 per cent confidence limits: 45-69) within 10 weeks after treatment.
- result
Nine patients (21 per cent; 95 per cent confidence limits: 10-37) with healing per primam developed recurrence of their pilonidal disease during the prospective follow-up period
- result
Actuarial analysis of the data revealed a constant cure rate of 76 per cent (95 per cent confidence limits: 57-95) after 18 months.
- followUp
median follow-up period was 60 months, range 36-84 months
Br J Surg · PMID 3337954 · Read it on PubMed ↗
All 98 studiesEvery study that answered the question, with its design, size and result.
The other 91 studiesEverything else the search returned, including anything retracted.
Hlaing et al. 2026
Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment Versus Excisional Surgery: A Retrospective Comparison at an Australian Tertiary Centre
Similar healing, but faster discharge with endoscopic surgeryRetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
180 people2026
Healing rates were similar between the two surgery types, and recurrence was similar overall, but in patients who had a prior abscess drainage, recurrence after healing was higher with the endoscopic treatment
- Who was studied
- patients aged 12 and older having planned pilonidal cyst surgery at an Australian hospital
- What they received
- endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT)
- Compared with
- traditional excisional surgery (flap closure, lay-open excision, or primary closure)
- Main outcome
- wound healing and recurrence after healing
- Quality
- This is a retrospective, non-randomized comparison at a single hospital, so differences between groups could be due to other factors rather than the treatment itself.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, single tertiary centre, not randomized, and the question of recovery time after simple drainage is not the focus — this study compares two different surgical techniques for pilonidal disease.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
The cohort included 180 elective operative episodes in 144 patients
- population
consecutive elective pilonidal operations in patients aged ≥ 12
- intervention
Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT)
- comparator
excisional surgery (off-midline flap closure, lay-open excision or primary closure)
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcomes were primary healing and recurrence after healing.
- result
Primary healing occurred in 158 episodes (87.8%) and did not differ between EPSiT and excision (89.6% vs. 84.6%; p = 0.330). Recurrence occurred in 26.6% and was similar between groups (29.1% vs. 21.8%; p = 0.322).
- result
recurrence after healing was higher following EPSiT (47.1% vs. 20.8%; p = 0.041)
ANZ J Surg · PMID 42112873 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Martins et al. 2026
Negative pressure wound therapy in primary closure surgeries for pilonidal disease: a meta-analysis
Faster return to activity, less pain.Meta-analysisLow qualityRelated question
479 people2026
NPWT linked to less pain at 24 hours and faster return to activities, but no difference in wound closure time, dehiscence, infection, recurrence, or hospital stay
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal cysts having surgical closure
- What they received
- negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) after primary closure surgery
- Compared with
- primary closure surgery without NPWT
- Main outcome
- pain, return to activities, wound closure time, and other recovery measures
- Quality
- Based on only six studies with limited patients, and the authors say more randomized trials are needed.
- Limitations
- Small number of included studies; authors call for more randomized clinical trials; wide confidence intervals on several outcomes.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Six studies with a total of 479 patients were included
- population
patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
- intervention
Primary closure with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)
- comparator
non-NPWT (control)
- primaryOutcome
lower pain score 24 h postoperative
- result
NPWT had an association with lower pain score 24 h postoperative (MD - 0.65 points; 95% CI - 0.81 to - 0.50), shorter return time to activities (MD - 2.57 days; 95% CI - 3.74 to - 1.4). However, there was no difference between groups in the time of wound closure
Updates Surg · PMID 41880146 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Stoeckel et al. 2026
In-Office Pit Excision for Pilonidal Disease Using Needle-Free Local Anesthesia: A Minimally Invasive, Non-Operative Treatment Approach
Fast healing after pit excision, not drainageCase seriesLow qualityRelated question
100 people6 to 8 weeks
60% of patients had all pits healed at initial follow-up, rising to 88% healed overall; no pain medication or disability was reported
- Who was studied
- young patients (average age 18) with pilonidal disease (gluteal crease pits)
- What they received
- in-office pit excision with needle-free local anesthesia (laser follicle ablation plus small punch excision), excluding tract removal
- Compared with
- none; single-arm study, no comparison group
- Main outcome
- whether all pits healed at follow-up
- Quality
- This was a single-arm study with no comparison group and 25 of 130 patients lost to follow-up, so it can't say how this compares to other treatments or confirm long-term results.
- Limitations
- No comparator group, 25/130 (19%) lost to follow-up, and the study explicitly excluded patients who needed incision and drainage of an abscess, so it doesn't address recovery after that procedure.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Mean age was 18.1 years; 50% were male.
- intervention
patients received 1% buffered lidocaine via pneumatic injection. Laser follicle ablation was followed by punch excision (1.5 or 2 mm) of full-thickness pit epithelium.
- comparator
Patients requiring nidus incision and drainage (I&D) were excluded.
- primaryOutcome
60% patients healed all pits, resolving their condition, with 64% (144/224) of all pits healed
- result
Ultimately, 88% of patients healed all of their pits.
- n
100 were included in the analysis (5 excluded for concurrent I&D, 25 lost to follow-up).
Eur J Pediatr Surg · PMID 41461191 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Garcia et al. 2026
Patient characteristics and microbiology in pilonidal abscesses in children
No data on recovery time reported.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
154 people2026
anaerobes and Streptococcus anginosus were most common bacteria found; no factors linked to recurrence were found
- Who was studied
- children with pilonidal abscesses
- What they received
- not applicable - observational study of abscess episodes
- Compared with
- not applicable
- Main outcome
- microbiology of abscesses and patient characteristics associated with recurrence
- Quality
- This is a retrospective chart review describing bacteria and recurrence risk, not recovery time after drainage, so it offers no evidence on the question asked.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design; does not report recovery time after drainage; abstract does not describe study limitations.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
216 pilonidal abscess episodes among 154 children
- population
216 pilonidal abscess episodes among 154 children over a 10-year period at a tertiary pediatric center
- primaryOutcome
assessed patient characteristics associated with recurrence
- result
Anaerobes and Streptococcus anginosus group were the most common organisms isolated from surgical cultures. No risk factors for recurrence were identified.
- intervention
microbiology of 216 pilonidal abscess episodes
- comparator
No risk factors for recurrence were identified.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc · PMID 41454773 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Ukleja et al. 2025
A Case Report of Wound-Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) Treatment Following Pilonidal Cyst Excision
Healed fully within about a month.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
1 peoplethree weeks
wound healed through secondary intention over about three to four weeks total, with granulation tissue forming by day eight and minimal pain, no complications
- Who was studied
- 28-year-old man with a recurring pilonidal cyst and chronic sinus tract
- What they received
- surgical removal of the cyst followed by vacuum-assisted wound closure (wound-VAC)
- Compared with
- none (single case, no comparison group)
- Main outcome
- time and process of wound healing after surgery
- Quality
- this is a single patient case report, so it cannot show whether this approach works better than others or is typical.
- Limitations
- only one patient, no comparison group, so results may not apply broadly
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
an otherwise healthy 28-year-old man
- population
an otherwise healthy 28-year-old man who presented with a recurrent pilonidal cyst with a chronic sinus tract despite previous repeat incision and drainage procedures
- intervention
underwent pilonidal cyst excision with vacuum-assisted wound closure (wound-VAC) placement to facilitate the healing process
- comparator
We report a case of an otherwise healthy 28-year-old man
- primaryOutcome
The wound size and the wound depth decreased, requiring no further need for wound-VAC dressing.
- result
Over the next three weeks, the wound healed via secondary intention with a simple dry-to-dry gauze dressing with minimal intermittent pain and without any complications.
Cureus · PMID 40821131 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Morais et al. 2025
What is the Impact of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Healing in Patients Post Excision of Pilonidal Sinus? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
No clear benefit, evidence very weakMeta-analysisVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2025
it is unclear whether NPWT makes any difference compared to other dressings on healing time, recurrence, pain or patient experience
- Who was studied
- people who had surgery to remove a pilonidal sinus (cyst)
- What they received
- negative pressure wound therapy (a vacuum dressing) on the wound
- Compared with
- other types of wound dressings
- Main outcome
- time to healing, wound recurrence, pain and patient satisfaction
- Quality
- the review graded the evidence as very low certainty, meaning the results could easily change with better studies
- Limitations
- studies were small (average 61 patients), mixed study designs, and certainty of evidence was rated very low
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
patients with pilonidal sinus following surgical excision
- intervention
negative pressure wound therapy
- comparator
any other dressings
- primaryOutcome
time to healing, recurrence, pain or patient's experience
- result
it is unclear whether NPWT makes any difference when compared to any other dressings, on time to healing, recurrence, pain or patient's experience
- n
mean sample size of 61 (SD: 33)
Int Wound J · PMID 40288765 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Hüseyin et al. 2025
Vacuum-assisted closure in secondary wound healing after pilonidal sinus surgery
Faster healing with vacuum dressing.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
60 people2025
wound healing took about 21 days with vacuum-assisted closure versus about 68 days with standard care
- Who was studied
- patients who had surgery for pilonidal sinus disease (excision lay-open technique)
- What they received
- vacuum-assisted closure wound care after surgery
- Compared with
- standard open wound care
- Main outcome
- time until the wound completely healed
- Quality
- This was a small retrospective study of only 60 patients, not a randomized trial, so it carries less weight.
- Limitations
- Retrospective analysis; small sample size; authors call for larger prospective studies to confirm findings.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
The experimental cohort included 60 patients.
- population
Patients with PSD who underwent standard pilonidal sinus excision-lay open technique/surgery
- intervention
vacuum-assisted closure group (n=30, postoperative vacuum-assisted closure application)
- comparator
control group (n=30, standard open wound care)
- primaryOutcome
wound healing times were compared between study groups
- result
The total recovery time (time to complete wound healing) was significantly shorter in the vacuum-assisted closure group compared with the control group (21.47±4.38 days versus 67.60±7.83 days, p=0.001).
J Wound Care · PMID 40056380 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Darnis et al. 2025
Management of pilonidal sinus and recurrences in 2025
No recovery time reported.Narrative reviewLow qualityRelated question
size not given2025
the abstract discusses treatment options and their trade-offs in recurrence and healing time but does not report a specific recovery time after drainage of an abscess
- Who was studied
- people with pilonidal sinus (a cyst/abscess at the top of the buttocks)
- What they received
- surgical removal (excision) with the wound left open to heal, or minimally invasive techniques
- Compared with
- primary closure after excision, or other surgical strategies
- Main outcome
- healing time, recurrence, and complications
- Quality
- this is a general narrative review summarizing treatment strategies rather than a study measuring recovery time after drainage
- Limitations
- abstract is a narrative review, not a study, and does not address recovery time after simple abscess drainage specifically
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Pilonidal sinus is a common pathology of the intergluteal cleft that can develop into abscess or suppuration.
- intervention
Radical excision followed by secondary healing is the most commonly performed option.
- comparator
Primary closure after excision can reduce the time for healing and convalescence, but at the cost of more frequent infectious complications.
- primaryOutcome
This strategy carries a risk of failure or recurrence for at least 10% of patients.
- result
Minimally invasive techniques are being developed that combine the extraction of foreign bodies and mechanical debridement or thermal or chemical cautery of the granulomatous walls.
J Visc Surg · PMID 39875233 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Ensor et al. 2024
Negative Pressure Dressing Versus Conventional Passive Dressing in Pilonidal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
No difference in recovery time.Randomised trialModerate qualityRelated question
50 people2-month postoperative online survey
no difference in wound reopening, healing time, or return to normal activities between the two dressing types
- Who was studied
- patients aged 12 to 40 with pilonidal sinus disease needing surgical removal and stitched closure
- What they received
- negative pressure wound therapy dressing
- Compared with
- conventional passive wound dressing
- Main outcome
- rate of wound reopening (dehiscence) after surgery
- Quality
- it was a randomized trial but small, so the results may not be very precise.
- Limitations
- abstract notes the limited population size
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
patients (12-40 y) with PSD, requiring excision and off-midline primary closure
- n
Fifty patients were recruited, 25 to NPWT & 25 to CP.
- intervention
NPWT (SNAP) dressing
- comparator
CP (Primapore or Opsite)
- primaryOutcome
Our aim was to investigate whether NPWT would reduce rates of SWD compared to conventional passive (CP) dressings
- result
Median duration to wound healing was equivalent in nondehisced wounds, (CP 21.0 [14.0-29.5] versus NPWT 21.0 [16.0-24.0] days, P = 0.7). There were no differences in mean time to the following: return to school/work (NPWT 26.1 ± 18.2 versus CP 29.3 ± 14.7 d, P = 0.6)
- followUp
Patients were sent a 2-month postoperative online survey to assess quality of life outcomes.
- limitations
Despite the limited population size, our results do not support its use as a routine preventative measure.
J Surg Res · PMID 39393119 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Liang et al. 2024
Management and outcomes of pilonidal patients with secondary sinuses-a cohort study
Drainage recurrence resolved in about 72 days.Prospective cohortLow qualityRelated question
105 people367.0 days
After surgery, 7.5% of patients had drainage come back from the secondary sinus site, taking a median of about 72 days to resolve; recurrent full pilonidal disease occurred in under 6% of patients
- Who was studied
- teenagers and young adults with pilonidal disease and a draining secondary sinus tract
- What they received
- surgical removal of the pilonidal tract (Gips procedure) along with excision of the secondary sinus
- Main outcome
- whether drainage or pain came back after surgery, and how long it took to resolve
- Quality
- This was a single-group follow-up study without a comparison treatment, so it can describe recovery time but not whether this approach works better than other options.
- Limitations
- No control group, single surgical technique (Gips procedure) studied, and the population already had a more severe form of disease (concurrent secondary sinus) which may not reflect typical pilonidal cyst drainage.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
One hundred and five patients (seventy-one males) with a median age of 17.2 years
- population
Patients with pilonidal disease (PD) can present with concurrent draining secondary sinus at the superior gluteal cleft.
- intervention
underwent Gips procedure with secondary sinus excision from 2019 to 2023
- primaryOutcome
drainage recurrence, symptom resolution, treatment, and follow-up period were recorded
- result
Eight patients (7.5%, six males, two females) had recurrent secondary sinus site drainage. Median time to recurrent drainage was 75.5 days (IQR: 65.2-216.2) after excision and for recurrent drainage to resolve was 72 days (IQR: 49-81).
- followUp
were followed for a median of 367.0 days (IQR: 173.2-658.8)
Pediatr Surg Int · PMID 39145895 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Retracted by the journal — not counted
Xu et al. 2024
Simplified and modified Limberg flap plus vacuum-assisted closure for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease
Resumed daily activities in about 26 days.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
96 people2024
average time to resume daily activities was 26.3 days, average hospital stay 19.4 days, no recurrences, and 6.3% had wound dehiscence
- Who was studied
- young adults (mostly male) with pilonidal sinus disease at the base of the spine
- What they received
- a modified flap surgery (Limberg flap) combined with vacuum-assisted wound closure
- Compared with
- none - all patients received the same surgery, no comparison group
- Main outcome
- time until patients returned to normal daily activities, plus wound healing complications and recurrence
- Quality
- This was a single-group study with no comparison treatment, and the publication has since been retracted, so it cannot reliably show how this treatment compares to anything else.
- Limitations
- No control group for comparison, single center, and the paper has been formally retracted.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
The 96 patients ranged in age from 15 to 34 years
- population
Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD), a chronic inflammatory disease, affects the sacrococcygeal soft tissue, especially in young adults
- intervention
simplified modified Limberg flap reconstruction with vacuum-assisted closure
- comparator
all patients underwent simplified modified Limberg flap reconstruction with vacuum-assisted closure
- primaryOutcome
time to return to normal life or work, wound infection, wound dehiscence and recurrence rate were recorded
- result
The mean time to the resumption of daily activities was 26.3 days.
- result
None of the patients experienced post-operative recurrence, wound infection, seroma or hematoma. Six patients (6.3%) experienced wound dehiscence at the flap tip around the natal cleft.
Int Wound J · PMID 37691134 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Liu et al. 2023
Effect of sinus resection combined with vacuum-assisted closure on sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
Faster recovery with wound vacuum therapy.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question
62 peoplesix months
the vacuum-assisted closure group had significantly shorter hospital stay and return time, less pain, and fewer complications, though the abstract gives contradictory statements about recurrence rates between groups
- Who was studied
- patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
- What they received
- sinus resection combined with vacuum-assisted closure (closed negative pressure drainage) of the wound
- Compared with
- simple sinus resection and suture
- Main outcome
- time to return to normal activity (return time), along with hospital stay, pain, complications, and recurrence
- Quality
- the abstract describes patients as 'randomly divided' but also calls the work a 'retrospective analysis', and it contains internally contradictory recurrence rate statements, making the findings hard to trust.
- Limitations
- small sample size, confusing/contradictory description of design (randomized vs retrospective) and contradictory recurrence data within the same abstract
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
62 patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus were treated and their information was collected
- population
patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
- intervention
sinus resection combined with closed negative pressure drainage of the wound
- comparator
simple sinus resection and suture
- primaryOutcome
Perioperative indicators, clinical efficacy, postoperative pain, complications, aesthetic effects, and satisfaction scores at six months after the operation were compared
- result
the observation group had significantly shorter surgery time, hospital stay, and return time compared with the control group (P < 0.05)
- result
there was no significant difference in the postoperative recurrence rate between the two groups (P > 0.05)
- result
the observation group had a higher overall recurrence rate (ORR) of 100.00%, which was significantly better than the control group's ORR of 86.67%
Int Wound J · PMID 37218401 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Karki et al. 2022
Surgical Outcome of Limberg's Flap Reconstruction in the Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease in a Community Hospital
Back to work in about 2 weeksCase seriesLow qualityRelated question
42 people2022
mean days for return to work was 14.5±5.7 days, with a 9.52% complication rate and no recurrence
- Who was studied
- young adults with pilonidal sinus disease, mostly male, aged 16-31
- What they received
- Limberg's flap reconstruction surgery
- Main outcome
- surgical outcomes including hospital stay, complications, and return to work
- Quality
- This is a small single-arm study of 42 patients with no comparison group, so it cannot show whether this procedure is better or worse than other treatments.
- Limitations
- No control or comparison group; small sample size; single hospital setting; studies a complex flap procedure rather than simple incision and drainage
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
forty-two patients
- population
ranging from 16-31 years with mean of 22.86 years
- intervention
Limberg's flap reconstruction
- primaryOutcome
To evaluate the efficacy and outcome of Limberg's flap reconstruction
- result
mean days for return to work was 14.5±5.7
- result
We had a complication rate of 9.52% out of which 4.76% had seroma, 2.38% hematoma, 2.38% wound infection, and there was no flap necrosis or recurrence
- n
Total of 42 patients were operated
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) · PMID 37017164 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Check et al. 2022
Resolution of Mild Pilonidal Disease in Adolescents Without Resection
Resolved after months of combined careCase seriesLow qualityRelated question
102 people30 ± 19 weeks
77 of 78 patients who continued care had resolution after a mean treatment duration of 30 ± 19 weeks
- Who was studied
- adolescents and young adults with mild pilonidal disease
- What they received
- improved hygiene, excision of pits under local anesthesia, and laser ablation of follicles
- Compared with
- none - no comparison group, single-arm case series
- Main outcome
- resolution of pilonidal disease
- Quality
- This is a single-arm case series with no comparison group and nearly a quarter of patients lost to follow-up, so it can't reliably show how this approach compares to simple drainage.
- Limitations
- 24 of 102 patients were lost to follow up; no control group; only 41% had prior incision and drainage, so most patients did not have simple drainage as their treatment.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
consecutive new patients presenting to an outpatient pilonidal care clinic with mild disease
- intervention
improved hygiene to limit debris in the gluteal crease, excision of midline pilonidal pits under local anesthesia to prevent intrusion of debris with drainage of any nidus present, and laser ablation of midline follicles to prevent new pits from forming
- comparator
an alternate approach directed toward source control
- primaryOutcome
resolution of their pilonidal disease
- result
77 of the 78 who continued care had resolution of their pilonidal disease after a mean of 3 ± 2.5 laser epilations and 1.3 ± 1 pit excisions during 4 ± 2 clinic visits over a treatment duration of 30 ± 19 weeks
- n
One hundred two patients presented
J Am Coll Surg · PMID 36102566 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Hannan et al. 2021
Negative pressure wound therapy following excision of pilonidal sinus disease: A retrospective review
Healed in about 4 weeks.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
61 people2021
all wounds healed, median healing time 28 days, 1.6% recurrence
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal sinus disease
- What they received
- complete surgical excision followed by negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)
- Compared with
- none reported; single group, no comparison treatment
- Main outcome
- wound recurrence and failure to heal
- Quality
- This was a retrospective study of one group of patients with no comparison treatment, so it can't show if this approach is better than others.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, single-arm with no comparator group, from one centre.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
patients with PSD
- intervention
complete surgical excision followed by the application of NPWT
- comparator
A retrospective observational cohort study of all patients with PSD managed by complete surgical excision followed by application of NPWT was performed
- primaryOutcome
The primary endpoints were PSD recurrence and failed wound healing.
- result
All patients' wounds healed successfully, with the median time to healing being 28 days. One patient (1.6%) developed recurrent PSD and required further surgery.
- n
Sixty-one patients underwent treatment during the study period.
Colorectal Dis · PMID 34455675 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Chaffin et al. 2021
Surgical reconstruction of pilonidal sinus disease with concomitant extracellular matrix graft placement: a case series
Healed within 3 to 4 weeksCase seriesVery low qualityRelated question
6 people12 weeks
all but one patient fully healed by 3 weeks, the last by 4 weeks, and all remained healed at 12 weeks
- Who was studied
- patients with recurrent pilonidal sinus disease after failed prior surgery
- What they received
- surgical flap reconstruction with extracellular matrix graft implantation
- Compared with
- none, single-arm case series
- Main outcome
- time to full wound healing and recurrence
- Quality
- This was a tiny, uncontrolled case series of only six patients, so the results can't reliably predict what happens in other patients.
- Limitations
- Very small number of participants; retrospective design; no comparison group.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
The case series included six patients.
- population
recurrent PSD, where previously surgical intervention had failed due to wound dehiscence and/or recurrent disease
- intervention
surgical flap reconstruction with concomitant implantation of an ovine forestomach ECM graft under a fasciocutaneous flap with an off-midline closure
- comparator
We report a retrospective case series using a surgical flap reconstruction with concomitant implantation of an ovine forestomach ECM graft
- primaryOutcome
After three weeks, all patients except one were fully healed, and the sixth was fully healed by week 4; all wounds remained fully healed at 12 weeks.
- result
After three weeks, all patients except one were fully healed, and the sixth was fully healed by week 4; all wounds remained fully healed at 12 weeks.
J Wound Care · PMID 34256587 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Menegas et al. 2021
Abscess Management: An Evidence-Based Review for Emergency Medicine Clinicians
No recovery time reported.Narrative reviewLow qualityRelated question
size not given2021
Pilonidal abscesses have traditionally been managed with I&D, but needle aspiration with antibiotics may be a suitable alternative
- Who was studied
- people with abscesses treated in the emergency department, including pilonidal abscesses
- What they received
- incision and drainage, with alternatives like needle aspiration and antibiotics
- Compared with
- different abscess management strategies compared to each other
- Main outcome
- abscess management outcomes
- Quality
- This is a narrative review summarizing general abscess management, not a study measuring recovery time after pilonidal cyst drainage specifically.
- Limitations
- Abstract does not report recovery time, study design details, or sample sizes for pilonidal abscess management specifically.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Abscesses are commonly evaluated and managed in the emergency department
- intervention
incision and drainage (I&D)
- comparator
needle aspiration, and loop drainage are suitable alternatives to I&D of abscesses with certain characteristics
- primaryOutcome
This review provides emergency medicine clinicians with a summary of the current literature regarding abscess management in the emergency department
- result
Pilonidal abscesses have traditionally been managed with I&D, but needle aspiration with antibiotics may be a suitable alternative.
J Emerg Med · PMID 33298356 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Manigrasso et al. 2021
Early versus delayed endoscopic treatment of acute pilonidal abscess: a propensity score-matched analysis
Better satisfaction, similar recurrence, timing matters.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
82 people5-year
No difference in recurrence between groups, but early treatment gave better patient satisfaction and postoperative health status
- Who was studied
- patients with an acute pilonidal abscess
- What they received
- early video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus (VAAPS) performed immediately
- Compared with
- delayed VAAPS performed after initial incision and drainage
- Main outcome
- recurrence rate at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year follow-up
- Quality
- This was a retrospective, propensity-matched comparison of two surgical timings, not a randomized trial, so results are less reliable.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design with propensity score matching rather than randomization; studies a specific endoscopic technique (VAAPS) rather than standard incision and drainage recovery.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
82 patients were included in the final analysis (41 in each group)
- population
All consecutive patients with an acute pilonidal abscess
- intervention
the early VAAPS group
- comparator
the delayed VAAPS group
- primaryOutcome
Primary outcomes were recurrence rate at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year follow-up.
- result
No differences were found in terms of recurrence in the two groups. Early endoscopic approach was associated with a better patients' satisfaction (8.17 ± 1.2 vs 6.06 ± 1.48, p = 0.001) and a better postoperative health status (86.27 ± 6.54 vs 77.32 ± 5.85, p = 0.001).
Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 33011845 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Barrial et al. 2020
Pilonidal sinus in pediatric age: primary vs. secondary closure
Faster healing with stitched closure, more reopening.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
57 people2020
Immediate closure healed faster but more often partly reopened afterward; delayed closure needed more dressings and took longer to heal
- Who was studied
- Teenagers who had surgery to remove a pilonidal sinus
- What they received
- Closing the wound immediately after surgery (primary closure)
- Compared with
- Leaving the wound open to heal on its own (secondary closure)
- Main outcome
- Time to full wound healing, need for dressings, wound reopening, and recurrence
- Quality
- This is a small, non-randomized comparison of two surgical techniques, so differences could be due to other factors between groups.
- Limitations
- Not randomized, groups differed in age, and it studies wound closure method after surgical excision rather than simple drainage of a cyst.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Of the 57 patients (29 of whom women), 29 were treated using PC and 28 using SC.
- population
Pilonidal sinus (PS) is a highly frequent condition in teenagers.
- intervention
compare primary closure (PC) results
- comparator
with secondary closure (SC) or deferred closure results
- primaryOutcome
Presence of infection at removal, recurrence rate, pre- and postoperative antibiotic treat-ment, number of previous drainages, and sinus size were analyzed.
- result
The SC group re-quired more postoperative dressings [4 (0-6) vs. 8 (2-11) (p<0.01)] and longer time to healing [60 days (9-240) vs. 98 days (30-450) (p<0.01)].
- result
PC patients presented a postoperative partial dehiscence rate of 26%.
Cir Pediatr · PMID 32250067 · Read it on PubMed ↗
de Azevedo et al. 2019
Negative pressure wound therapy for skin graft closure in complex pilonidal disease
Recovery details not clearly reported.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2019
not clearly reported in the abstract
- Who was studied
- person with complex pilonidal disease
- What they received
- local excision plus negative pressure wound therapy followed by a skin graft
- Compared with
- no comparator described
- Main outcome
- wound healing after surgery
- Quality
- This is a single case report, so it cannot show how treatments compare or how long recovery usually takes.
- Limitations
- Only one patient described; no comparison group; no clear healing time or outcome data given.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
a case of complex pilonidal disease
- intervention
managed with local excision and negative pressure wound therapy followed by a split-thickness skin graft
- comparator
This study describes a case of complex pilonidal disease managed with local excision and negative pressure wound therapy followed by a split-thickness skin graft.
- primaryOutcome
decrease healing times and costs
- result
This study describes a case of complex pilonidal disease managed with local excision and negative pressure wound therapy followed by a split-thickness skin graft.
Br J Nurs · PMID 30925251 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Halleran et al. 2018
Recurrence of Pilonidal Disease: Our Best is Not Good Enough
High recurrence, not recovery time.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
307 people2018
33% of patients had disease recurrence, with 80% of recurrences happening within the first year
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal disease treated by pediatric surgeons
- What they received
- surgical excision or incision and drainage with/without antibiotics for pilonidal disease
- Main outcome
- recurrence of pilonidal disease requiring further treatment
- Quality
- single-center retrospective chart review without a control group, so it can describe recurrence patterns but not prove what causes them or how long healing takes.
- Limitations
- Retrospective single-center design; recurrence defined by need for further treatment, not by documented time-to-healing after drainage.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Among 307 patients treated for pilonidal disease
- population
patients with pilonidal disease evaluated by pediatric surgeons
- intervention
The initial treatment during the study period was surgical excision in two-thirds and incision and drainage and/or antibiotics in one-third.
- primaryOutcome
Recurrence of pilonidal disease was defined as an episode of active pilonidal disease that required medical or surgical intervention >30 days from the preceding treatment.
- result
The overall recurrence rate was 33%, with the majority of recurrences (80%) occurring within the first year.
J Surg Res · PMID 30463753 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Korenkov 2018
Video-Assisted Subcutaneous Destruction of the Sinus Tract with Vessel-Loop Drainage as Minimally-Invasive Surgical Treatment for Pilonidal Sinus Disease
Mostly no problems by eight weeks.Case seriesVery low quality
4 peopleeight weeks postoperatively
the three patients with simple pilonidal disease had no problems in the first eight weeks; the patient with an abscess developed a pus infection needing wider surgery with open healing
- Who was studied
- people with pilonidal sinus disease, including one with an acute abscess
- What they received
- video-assisted minimally-invasive destruction of the sinus tract with vessel-loop drainage (VADST)
- Compared with
- none
- Main outcome
- complications/adverse events after surgery
- Quality
- only four patients were treated, with no comparison group, so little can be concluded about typical recovery time.
- Limitations
- Due to the very small number of patients in this report, we were not able to asses this technique properly.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Three patients with simple forms of PSD, and one patient with an acute abscess formation, underwent the VADST procedure.
- population
Three patients with simple forms of PSD, and one patient with an acute abscess formation, underwent the VADST procedure.
- intervention
video-assisted subcutaneous destruction of the sinus tract (VADST) is a novel, minimally-invasive technique for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease (PSD)
- comparator
Three patients with simple forms of PSD, and one patient with an acute abscess formation, underwent the VADST procedure.
- primaryOutcome
The patients with simple forms of PSD had no adverse events during the first eight weeks postoperatively.
- result
The patients with simple forms of PSD had no adverse events during the first eight weeks postoperatively. The patient with an acute abscess formation developed a purulent inflammation that required a wide local excision with an open-wound healing.
- limitations
Due to the very small number of patients in this report, we were not able to asses this technique properly.
- followUp
no adverse events during the first eight weeks postoperatively
Surg Technol Int · PMID 29529705 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Lasithiotakis et al. 2018
Aspiration for acute pilonidal abscess-a cohort study
No recovery time reported; most avoided surgery.Prospective cohortLow qualityRelated question
100 people29 (47) months
83% of patients avoided needing incision and drainage, and overall satisfaction scores were high (median VAS 9 out of 10)
- Who was studied
- adults and teenagers with an acute pilonidal abscess
- What they received
- bedside aspiration under local anesthetic followed by oral antibiotics (cefalexin and metronidazole) for 7 days
- Compared with
- no direct comparison group; traditional open incision and drainage mentioned only as background
- Main outcome
- need for further surgical drainage and overall patient satisfaction
- Quality
- This was a single-group study without a comparison group, with selected patients and only just over half returning satisfaction questionnaires, so it can't reliably show how recovery compares to other treatments.
- Limitations
- No control group, exclusion of patients with diabetes or skin necrosis, and only 56 of 100 patients returned satisfaction questionnaires.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
a total of 100 patients were treated with aspiration and antibiotics
- population
All patients presenting with an acute pilonidal abscess
- intervention
treated with bedside aspiration under local anesthetic, followed by oral cefalexin and metronidazole for 7 days
- comparator
The traditional open incision and drainage of a pilonidal abscess is associated with slow healing and delayed return to normal daily activities.
- primaryOutcome
Long-term outcomes and overall patients' satisfaction were assessed with the use of mailed questionnaires and Visual Analogue Scales
- result
Aspiration of a pilonidal abscess in selected patients is effective in 83%, and it is associated with high overall satisfaction rates.
- followUp
after a median (IQR) follow-up time of 29 (47) months
J Surg Res · PMID 29433863 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Sewefy et al. 2017
Karydakis Flap With Compressing Tie-over Interrupted Sutures Without Drain versus Standard Karydakis for Treatment of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease
Faster recovery, fewer complications without drainRandomised trialModerate qualityRelated question
154 people2017
No-drain group left hospital same day vs 4.9 days average for drain group; less fluid buildup (0% vs 7.8%), less infection (1.3% vs 9.1%), faster return to work (10.2 vs 12.6 days), and no recurrences vs 2.6%
- Who was studied
- Adults with pilonidal sinus disease needing surgery
- What they received
- Karydakis flap surgery with tie-over compressing stitches, no drain
- Compared with
- Standard Karydakis flap surgery with a drain
- Main outcome
- Fluid buildup, wound problems, hospital stay length, time off work, and recurrence
- Quality
- It was a randomized trial but the authors say follow-up was too short to properly judge recurrence and they didn't measure pain or patient satisfaction.
- Limitations
- Postoperative pain and scar satisfaction were not measured; extent of disease was not compared between groups; follow-up duration too short to accurately assess recurrence.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
The study included 154 patients.
- population
Sacroccygeal pilonidal sinus disease is a worldwide health problem, affecting young adults, mainly males
- intervention
the patients in group 2 were operated on by the Karydakis procedure with tie-over compressing sutures without a drain
- comparator
The patients in group 1 were operated on by the standard Karydakis procedure
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcomes measured were the incidence of seroma formation, wound complications, length of hospital stay, off-work time, and recurrence rate.
- result
All patients were discharged on the same day of surgery in group 2 compared with a mean hospital stay of 4.9 ± 2.4 days in group 1. No patients developed seroma in group 2 compared with 7.8% in group 1. In group 2, 1.3% of patients developed wound infection compared with 9.1% in group 1. The average time for return to work in group 2 was 10.2 ± 1.4 days compared with 12.6 ± 4 days in group 1. No recurrences were noted in group 2 compared with 2.6% in group 1.
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 28383451 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Danne et al. 2017
A Retrospective Study of Pilonidal Sinus Healing by Secondary Intention Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Alginate or Gauze Dressings
No difference in healing time.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
73 people390 weeks for the DD group and 311 weeks for NPWT group
median healing time was 8 weeks with NPWT versus 10 weeks with daily dressings, not a significant difference
- Who was studied
- patients with symptomatic pilonidal sinus disease treated with open surgical wounds healing by secondary intention
- What they received
- negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT)
- Compared with
- alginate-based/gauze daily dressing changes
- Main outcome
- time in weeks to complete wound healing (epithelialization)
- Quality
- this was a small retrospective study without randomization, so differences in healing time could be due to other factors rather than the treatment itself
- Limitations
- retrospective design, small sample size, some patients lost to follow-up, no randomization
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
73 consecutive patients who had symptomatic natal cleft PS
- population
73 consecutive patients who had symptomatic natal cleft PS over a 10-year period
- intervention
compare use of NPWT to alginate-based/gauze daily dressing (DD) changes in terms of healing time and recurrence
- comparator
compare use of NPWT to alginate-based/gauze daily dressing (DD) changes in terms of healing time and recurrence
- primaryOutcome
time in weeks to achieving the endpoint (epithelialization)
- result
The median time to healing was 10 weeks (95% CI: 7-17) in the DD group and 8 weeks (95% CI: 7-9) in the NPWT group (not significantly different).
- followUp
The total time of follow-up was 390 weeks for the DD group and 311 weeks for NPWT group.
Ostomy Wound Manage · PMID 28355137 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Jain et al. 2017
Endoscopic pilonidal abscess treatment: a novel approach for the treatment of pilonidal abscess
Healed within 6 weeks, minimal pain.Prospective cohortLow quality
19 people6 weeks
complete wound healing achieved within 6 weeks in all patients, with minimal pain and immediate return to normal activities
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal abscess, median age 24
- What they received
- endoscopic pilonidal abscess treatment (EPAT), a minimally invasive technique
- Compared with
- none (no comparison group; compared to historical conventional incision and drainage)
- Main outcome
- time to complete wound healing and postoperative pain
- Quality
- Small, single-center study with no comparison group, so results may not hold up in larger trials.
- Limitations
- Small sample size, no control group, single center, need for larger multicentre studies as stated by authors.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Nineteen patients were included
- population
median age of the cohort was 24 years
- intervention
endoscopic pilonidal abscess treatment (EPAT)
- primaryOutcome
complete wound healing was achieved within 6 weeks
- result
In all patients, complete wound healing was achieved within 6 weeks; all reported minimal postoperative pain (median postoperative visual analogue scale score 1) and immediate return to the activities of daily life.
- comparator
Conventional treatment with incision and drainage is associated with significant postoperative morbidity.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl · PMID 27551895 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Korenkov 2016
Subcutaneous Destruction of Sinus Tract with Long-term Vessel Loop Drainage as a Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Primary Pilonidal Sinus
Healed by 3-4 weeks.Case seriesVery low quality
5 people28th postoperative day
complete healing with a good scar occurred by day 21 in 3 patients and by day 28 in 2 patients, with no abscess or recurrence
- Who was studied
- patients with a first-time, uncomplicated pilonidal sinus (cyst) near the tailbone
- What they received
- minimally invasive surgery destroying the sinus tract under the skin with long-term vessel loop drainage and repeated wound checks
- Compared with
- none (single-arm pilot study)
- Main outcome
- time to complete wound healing with good scar formation, and complications
- Quality
- This was an uncontrolled pilot study with only 5 patients, so it cannot reliably show how this compares to other treatments.
- Limitations
- Very small pilot study (5 patients), no comparison group, described as needing further systematic testing.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
5 patients with primary symptomatic pilonidal sinus underwent an operation as a pilot study
- population
5 patients with primary symptomatic pilonidal sinus
- intervention
a narrow excision of pilonidal orifices with the subcutaneous destruction of the sinus tract and the removal of hair as well as the long-term vessel loop drainage of the wound channel with repeated revisions of the wound channel for removing hair remnants
- comparator
5 patients with primary symptomatic pilonidal sinus underwent an operation as a pilot study
- primaryOutcome
The complete wound healing with the formation of a qualitative scar took place on the 21st postoperative day
- result
The complete wound healing with the formation of a qualitative scar took place on the 21st postoperative day (for 3 patients) and on the 28th postoperative day (for 2 patients).
Surg Technol Int · PMID 27042792 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Segre et al. 2015
The treatment of pilonidal disease: guidelines of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR)
No recovery time reported.GuidelineVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2015
no clear benefit of one surgical technique over another, and most nonoperative studies were small and low quality
- Who was studied
- people with pilonidal disease
- What they received
- various treatments for pilonidal disease, including nonoperative care and surgery
- Compared with
- different treatment techniques compared with each other
- Main outcome
- healing and recurrence after treatment
- Quality
- this is a guideline summarizing mostly small, low-quality studies rather than a single study measuring recovery time.
- Limitations
- abstract states most supporting studies are small series with low-quality evidence; no specific data on recovery time after drainage of an abscess is given.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
pilonidal disease, a very common condition, especially among young people
- intervention
Nonoperative management includes gluteal cleft shaving, laser epilation as well as fibrin glue and phenol injection
- comparator
excision of diseased tissue with primary closure using different techniques or excision with healing by secondary intention
- primaryOutcome
reported healing rates and recurrence incidence are satisfactory
- result
On the whole, no clear benefit is demonstrated for one technique over the other.
- result
the majority of studies are small series with low-quality evidence
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 26377583 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Woo et al. 2015
Topical Agents and Dressings for Pilonidal Sinus Wound Healing by Secondary Intention: A Scoping Review
Weak evidence some dressings help healing.Systematic reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2015
some evidence that certain topical agents may help healing, reduce bacteria, or ease pain, but evidence is weak
- Who was studied
- people with pilonidal sinus wounds healing by secondary intention
- What they received
- various topical agents and dressings (hydrogel, silver, honey, zinc, foam, negative pressure therapy, platelet rich plasma, plant extracts)
- Main outcome
- wound healing, bacterial burden, and pain
- Quality
- this is a scoping review of studies with methodological limitations and biases, so conclusions are uncertain.
- Limitations
- evidence remains insufficient in light of methodological limitations and biases of the studies
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
which topical agent or dressing is effective in promoting pilonidal wound healing by secondary intention
- intervention
topical applications of hydrogel, silver, honey, zinc, selected foam materials, negative pressure wound therapy, platelet rich plasma, and plant extracts
- primaryOutcome
map and summarize a wide range of evidence to examine which topical agent or dressing is effective in promoting pilonidal wound healing by secondary intention
- result
there is some evidence to suggest that topical applications of hydrogel, silver, honey, zinc, selected foam materials, negative pressure wound therapy, platelet rich plasma, and plant extracts may promote wound healing
- limitations
evidence remains insufficient in light of methodological limitations and biases of the studies
Surg Technol Int · PMID 26054992 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Dumville et al. 2015
Negative pressure wound therapy for treating surgical wounds healing by secondary intention
Not enough evidence to tell.Systematic reviewVery low qualityRelated question
69 people2015
too little data to judge if negative pressure therapy helps wounds heal, with no clear evidence of benefit or harm
- Who was studied
- people with surgical wounds left open to heal, including one study on wounds after pilonidal sinus removal
- What they received
- negative pressure wound therapy (a vacuum dressing system)
- Compared with
- alginate or silicone wound dressings
- Main outcome
- how well and how fast the wounds healed
- Quality
- only two small trials with very limited data were found, so no firm conclusions can be drawn.
- Limitations
- The trials reported limited outcome data on healing, adverse events and resource use, and only one of two studies involved pilonidal wounds, not drainage specifically.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
We located two studies (69 participants) for inclusion in this review.
- population
one study compared NPWT with a silicone dressing in the treatment of excised pilonidal sinus
- intervention
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is one treatment option for surgical wounds that are healing by secondary intention.
- comparator
One study compared NPWT with an alginate dressing in the treatment of open, infected groin wounds. and one study compared NPWT with a silicone dressing in the treatment of excised pilonidal sinus.
- primaryOutcome
To assess the effects of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on the healing of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention (SWHSI) in any care setting.
- result
There is currently no rigorous RCT evidence available regarding the clinical effectiveness of NPWT in the treatment of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention as defined in this review. The potential benefits and harms of using this treatment for this wound type remain largely uncertain.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev · PMID 26042534 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Biter et al. 2014
The use of negative-pressure wound therapy in pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing negative-pressure wound therapy versus standard open wound care after surgical excision
No faster healing or recovery.Randomised trialLow quality
49 people6 months
Median healing time was 84 days with vacuum therapy versus 93 days with standard care, not a significant difference; time to resume daily activities was 27 vs 29 days, also not significant
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal sinus disease after surgical excision
- What they received
- negative-pressure wound therapy (vacuum therapy) for 2 weeks after surgery
- Compared with
- standard open wound care
- Main outcome
- time to complete wound healing
- Quality
- Small trial of only 49 patients without blinding, so the no-difference result could be due to chance.
- Limitations
- small number of patients, lack of blinding to patients and doctors, and absence of patient quality-of-life evaluation
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Forty-nine patients were included in the study: 24 patients were treated with vacuum therapy, and 25 patients underwent standard open wound care.
- population
Pilonidal sinus disease is associated with significant morbidity after surgical treatment
- intervention
Patients were randomly assigned to either negative-pressure wound therapy for 2 weeks
- comparator
or standard open wound healing
- primaryOutcome
The primary end point of the study was the time to complete wound healing.
- result
Complete wound healing was achieved at a median of 84 days in the vacuum therapy group versus 93 days in control patients (p = 0.44).
- result
The time to resume full daily activities after surgery was 27 days in the patients undergoing vacuum therapy and 29 days in the control patients (p = 0.92).
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 25380007 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Jandík 2014
[Sinus pilonidalis - possibilities of surgical treatment]
Flap surgery healed faster.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
72 people2014
the flap method had significantly less infection, shorter drainage, shorter hospital stay, and faster overall healing
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal disease needing surgery
- What they received
- excision with rhomboid fasciocutaneous flap closure
- Compared with
- excision with primary suture closure
- Main outcome
- surgical site infection, drainage time, hospital stay, and overall healing time
- Quality
- This was a single surgeon's retrospective comparison of two time periods, not a randomized trial, so bias and confounding are likely.
- Limitations
- Abstract does not mention randomization, blinding, or control for other differences between the two time periods.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
in 72 cases, surgery was indicated because of chronic state or recurrence of the disease
- population
169 patients with symptoms of pilonidal disease were treated
- intervention
the defect after excision was closed by rhomboid fasciocutaneous flap
- comparator
radical excision of sinus with primary suture of the defect was performed in 42 cases
- primaryOutcome
the second method showed significantly less surgical site infections, shorter time of drainage and hospitalization and overall healing
- result
the second method showed significantly less surgical site infections, shorter time of drainage and hospitalization and overall healing
Rozhl Chir · PMID 25340864 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Aithal et al. 2013
Limberg flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus a safe and sound procedure
Back to work in three weeks.Prospective cohortLow qualityRelated question
30 people2013
patients had minimal pain, averaged 5 days in hospital, returned to work after 3 weeks, a few had flap edema or necrosis needing 2-3 extra weeks to heal, and no recurrences so far
- Who was studied
- adults with sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus, including new and recurrent cases and some who previously had incision and drainage
- What they received
- Limberg flap rotation surgery
- Compared with
- none (single group, no comparison treatment)
- Main outcome
- wound infection, pain, recurrence, and return to work after surgery
- Quality
- this was a small single-group study of only 30 patients with no comparison group, so it cannot show whether this surgery is better than other options.
- Limitations
- no control group, small sample size, surgery (flap) differs from simple incision and drainage, follow-up duration not clearly stated
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A total of 30 patients were operated by the same two surgeons from January 2009 to June 2011
- population
including both primary and recurrent diseases, and patients with previous incision and drainage done for the pilonidal abscess
- intervention
the Limberg flap rotation surgery for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus
- comparator
All patients successfully underwent surgery
- primaryOutcome
outcomes such as wound infection, postoperative pain relief, recurrence rates, and return to work
- result
All patients successfully underwent surgery, with very minimal postoperative pain, stayed in hospital for average 5 days, returned to work after 3 weeks, with 3 patients having flap edema, 2 having flap necrosis, and no recurrences so far.
- result
Patients with flap edema and flap necrosis took 2-3 weeks to heal with regular dressing and antibiotic usage.
Indian J Surg · PMID 24426457 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Fitzpatrick et al. 2014
Pilonidal disease in a military population: how far have we really come?
No recovery time reported.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
151 people2014
27.2% recurrence and 34.4% complication rates overall; no recovery time reported
- Who was studied
- military patients with pilonidal disease
- What they received
- surgical treatment for pilonidal disease, including excision, excision with closure, and incision and drainage
- Compared with
- different surgical methods compared to each other
- Main outcome
- recurrence and complications after surgery
- Quality
- This is a retrospective single-center study looking at recurrence and complication risk factors, not recovery time, and mixes different surgical methods together.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, single institution, military population only, and the study does not specifically track or report time to recovery after drainage.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A total of 151 patients with PD were identified
- population
Pilonidal disease (PD) has a long connection with military personnel
- intervention
who underwent excision (45.7%), excision with primary closure (29.8%), and incision and drainage (9.9%)
- comparator
Patient demographics, disease characteristics, and surgical methods were assessed for the primary outcomes of recurrence and morbidity
- primaryOutcome
assessed for the primary outcomes of recurrence and morbidity
- result
Overall recurrence and morbidity rates were 27.2% and 34.4%, respectively
Am J Surg · PMID 24239526 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Banasiewicz et al. 2013
Portable VAC therapy improve the results of the treatment of the pilonidal sinus--randomized prospective study
Faster healing, less pain with VAC.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question
19 people2013
wound healing time, recovery time, and pain on days 4-7 were reduced with VAC therapy compared to standard dressing
- Who was studied
- men with pilonidal sinus undergoing surgical removal
- What they received
- vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) wound therapy after cyst removal
- Compared with
- standard wound dressing after cyst removal
- Main outcome
- time to wound healing, time to recovery, and pain after surgery
- Quality
- This was a very small study with only 19 patients, all men, from one outpatient clinic.
- Limitations
- Very small sample size (9 vs 10 patients), all male, single outpatient setting.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
the control group (9 men)
- n
In the VAC group (10 men)
- population
After randomization in the control group (9 men) the simple excision of the pilonidal cyst was performed
- intervention
after the excision the VAC dressing with mobile VAC Freedom device was used
- comparator
the simple excision of the pilonidal cyst was performed with the standard wound dressing
- primaryOutcome
The wound size, time of surgery, time of wound healing time of recovery and pain after the surgery (VAS score) were compared
- result
Time of wound healing, recovery and the pain after surgery in days 4-7 were reduced in comparison to the standard treated group.
Pol Przegl Chir · PMID 23945113 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Afşarlar et al. 2013
Treatment of adolescent pilonidal disease with a new modification to the Limberg flap: symmetrically rotated rhomboid excision and lateralization of the Limberg flap technique
About 5 days in hospital after flap surgery.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
15 people4 months
Median hospital stay was 5 days, median drainage duration was 4 days, and no wound infection or recurrence occurred during follow-up
- Who was studied
- adolescents with pilonidal cyst disease
- What they received
- modified Limberg flap surgery (symmetrically rotated rhomboid excision with lateralized flap)
- Compared with
- none (single group, no comparison)
- Main outcome
- wound infection and recurrence after surgery, plus hospital stay and drainage duration
- Quality
- Only 15 patients were studied, there was no comparison group, and follow-up was short.
- Limitations
- Small number of patients and short follow-up period, as acknowledged by the authors; this describes a specific flap surgery, not simple incision and drainage.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A total of 15 adolescents (8 boys and 7 girls) were included in the study group.
- population
Pilonidal disease is a common and frustrating problem among adolescents
- intervention
symmetrically rotated (clockwise) rhomboid excision and lateralization of the Limberg flap
- comparator
descriptive prospective study to evaluate its efficiency
- primaryOutcome
we did not encounter any wound infection or recurrent disease during this period
- result
The median duration of hospitalization was 5 days, and the median duration of suction drainage was 4 days.
- followUp
The median postoperative follow-up period was 4 months (ranging from 1 to 12 months)
J Pediatr Surg · PMID 23932616 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Petrović et al. 2012
Minor vs complete excision of pilonidal sinus--early postoperative period
Smaller excision healed faster.RetrospectiveLow quality
127 people11.11 months
patients who had the less extensive excision healed in 2 to 5 weeks and returned to daily activities within 5 days, compared with 4 to 21 weeks healing time for midline excision/marsupialisation
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal sinus disease
- What they received
- minor (less extensive) excision of the pilonidal sinus
- Compared with
- complete (midline) excision or marsupialisation
- Main outcome
- time to heal and return to daily activities after surgery
- Quality
- This was a small, non-randomized comparison of two different time periods with short follow-up, so the results may not be reliable.
- Limitations
- No randomization, different time periods compared, small numbers in the minor excision group, short follow-up (11.11 months) for recurrence.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Pilonidal sinus arises in the natal cleft of the sacrococcigeal region either as a cyst or as an abscess collection containing hair.
- intervention
During the period may 2011-May 2012 we performed 17 less extensive excisions.
- comparator
Midline excision was performed in 75 (68.18%) patients and the rest had marsupielisation done.
- primaryOutcome
The shortest healing time was 4 weeks and longest 21 weeks.
- result
All the patients were discharged from the clinic within 23 hours and returned to their daily activities within 5 days. Healing time varied from 2 weeks to 5 weeks.
- n
In the 3 years period, from 2009-2011, 110 treatments of the pilonidal disease were performed on our department.
- n
During the period may 2011-May 2012 we performed 17 less extensive excisions.
Acta Chir Iugosl · PMID 23373363 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Baldelli et al. 2012
A short course of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor to accelerate wound repair in patients undergoing surgery for sacrococcygeal pilonidal cyst: proof of concept
Faster healing with added drug.Prospective cohortLow qualityRelated question
8 peopleuntil complete wound resolution (110-168 days)
median time to complete healing was 117 days with G-CSF versus 145 days in controls, a significant difference
- Who was studied
- patients with complex sacrococcygeal pilonidal cysts undergoing surgery
- What they received
- G-CSF injections (a drug to boost stem cells) plus surgery to remove the cyst
- Compared with
- surgery alone without G-CSF (control group)
- Main outcome
- time to complete wound healing after surgery
- Quality
- This was a very small, non-randomized study of only 8 treated patients compared with a separate control group, so the results are not very reliable.
- Limitations
- Very small sample size (8 patients), non-randomized comparison with a control group, proof-of-concept design
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Eight patients with complex SPC were included in this prospective trial.
- population
patients undergoing surgery for sacrococcygeal pilonidal cysts (SPC)
- intervention
Patients were treated with G-CSF (5 µg/kg b.i.d.) for 3 consecutive days; standard surgical exeresis of the pilonidal cyst was scheduled on day 2 of mobilization.
- comparator
a comparison with a control group receiving surgery without G-CSF was performed
- primaryOutcome
time to complete resolution
- result
the G-CSF group patients had a median time to resolution (117 days, range 110-130) significantly shorter than control patients (145 days, range 118-168) (P = 0.034)
Cytotherapy · PMID 22783986 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Hussain et al. 2012
Converting emergency pilonidal abscess into an elective procedure
Fast recovery after simple drainage.Prospective cohortLow quality
40 people2012
38 of 40 patients had the infection clear up and were back to normal activities the next day, with definitive surgery done later at a median of 9 weeks
- Who was studied
- adults who came to the hospital with an acute pilonidal abscess
- What they received
- needle aspiration of the abscess under local anesthetic plus oral antibiotics
- Compared with
- traditional incision and drainage (implied by contrast, not directly tested)
- Main outcome
- number of days to return to normal activities, response to treatment, and leftover inflammation
- Quality
- it was a small, single-center study with no comparison group, so it can't prove this approach is better than standard drainage.
- Limitations
- no control group, single center, and some patients had not yet completed definitive surgery at the time of reporting
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Forty patients met the criteria for aspiration and empirical antibiotic treatment.
- population
Patients presenting with acute pilonidal abscess, not septic, immune-compromised, or diabetic, and without skin necrosis, underwent aspiration on the surgical ward.
- intervention
Aspiration of pilonidal abscess under local anesthetic was performed with the use of a wide-bore needle.
- comparator
Traditional approaches to the management of acute pilonidal abscess have been associated with slow healing and significant loss of working time.
- primaryOutcome
The primary outcomes measured were the number of days required to return to normal activities, response to treatment, and any residual inflammation.
- result
Thirty-eight (38/40) patients demonstrated complete resolution of acute inflammation and were back to normal activities the following day. Fifteen patients subsequently underwent day-case excision and primary closure at a median of 9 weeks.
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 22595842 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Kirkil et al. 2011
The effects of drainage on the rates of early wound complications and recurrences after Limberg flap reconstruction in patients with pilonidal disease
Drain use didn't change healing.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question
60 people2011
similar rates of wound problems and recurrence whether or not a drain was used
- Who was studied
- people with pilonidal cysts having Limberg flap surgery
- What they received
- leaving a drain in the wound cavity after flap surgery
- Compared with
- no drain after flap surgery
- Main outcome
- wound complications and cyst coming back
- Quality
- it was a randomized trial but very small and looked at flap surgery drains, not simple cyst drainage or recovery time
- Limitations
- small sample size, some patients lost to follow-up, and it studied a specific surgical technique rather than simple cyst drainage
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Sixty patients with pilonidal disease in the sacrococcygeal region were randomized sequentially into 2 groups as drained or non-drained.
- population
patients with pilonidal disease
- intervention
Cavity drainage has been used routinely in Limberg flap repair for pilonidal disease
- comparator
randomized sequentially into 2 groups as drained or non-drained
- primaryOutcome
determine whether routine cavity drainage affects the rates of early wound complications and recurrences after rhomboid excision with Limberg flap repair for pilonidal disease
- result
Routine usage of drains for Limberg flap reconstruction in the sacrococcygeal region did not affect wound-related complications and recurrence rates.
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 22033544 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Soll et al. 2011
Sinusectomy for primary pilonidal sinus: less is more
Back to work within about a week.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
257 people3.6 years
7% of patients had the sinus come back, and people returned to work after a median of 7 days
- Who was studied
- patients operated on for pilonidal sinus
- What they received
- sinusectomy (minimally invasive removal of the sinus track)
- Compared with
- no control group; outcomes compared between local vs general anesthesia and outpatient vs inpatient setting
- Main outcome
- return of the sinus (recurrence) and time off work
- Quality
- This was a retrospective study without a comparison group, relying partly on patient questionnaires and phone surveys, so results could be biased.
- Limitations
- Retrospective data collection using questionnaires and telephone survey; no control group for comparison.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
long-term outcome of 257 patients operated between 2001 and 2010
- population
Wide excision with secondary wound healing is a frequently performed surgical procedure for pilonidal sinus.
- intervention
Sinusectomy consisted of a selective minimal invasive excision of the sinus after marking the track with methylene blue.
- comparator
The proportion of sinusectomies performed under local anesthesia increased from 59% to 93%.
- primaryOutcome
The main endpoints of the study were recurrence and time off work.
- result
the overall recurrence rate was 7%. The median time to return to work was 7 days.
- followUp
median follow-up of 3.6 years
Surgery · PMID 21911239 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Vaughn et al. 2011
The use of acellular dermal regeneration template for recalcitrant pilonidal disease
Both healed, no recurrence.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
2 people29 months
both patients healed completely and did not need further surgery after a median follow-up of 29 months
- Who was studied
- patients with chronic, recurring pilonidal sinus disease
- What they received
- wide surgical removal of the cyst plus placement of a dermal regeneration scaffold (Integra) and negative pressure wound therapy
- Compared with
- no comparison group
- Main outcome
- wound healing and whether the disease came back
- Quality
- this is a report on only two patients with no comparison group, so it cannot show what normally happens after simple drainage.
- Limitations
- only two patients, no control group, and the abstract itself says more research and longer follow-up are needed.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
This case report concerns two patients with chronic pilonidal sinuses
- population
two patients with chronic pilonidal sinuses
- intervention
underwent wide excision and placement of Integra with postoperative NPWT
- comparator
This case report concerns two patients with chronic pilonidal sinuses who underwent wide excision and placement of Integra with postoperative NPWT.
- primaryOutcome
the patients were assessed for complications and recurrence
- result
Both patients went on to heal and did not require further surgical treatment after a median follow-up of 29 months.
J Wound Care · PMID 21727876 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Milone et al. 2011
Effectiveness of a drain in surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Results of a randomized and controlled clinical trial on 803 consecutive patients
No difference in recovery time.Randomised trialModerate qualityRelated question
803 people2011
no significant difference between drained and non-drained wounds in time off work, time to pain-free walking, or time to pain-free sitting, though pain scores were slightly lower with a drain
- Who was studied
- adults having surgery for a pilonidal sinus at the base of the spine
- What they received
- placing a drain in the wound after surgical removal and closure
- Compared with
- no drain, just surgical removal and closure
- Main outcome
- time off work, time to walk without pain, and time to sit on the toilet without pain after surgery
- Quality
- large randomized trial with clear outcomes, but it studies drain use after excision surgery rather than simple cyst drainage, so it doesn't directly answer recovery time after drainage alone
- Limitations
- abstract does not report loss to follow-up, blinding, or exact numeric recovery times
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
803 patients randomized into two groups of respectively 401 and 402 patients
- population
surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinuses
- intervention
primary excision and closure were associated with drainage of the wound
- comparator
the wound was not drained
- primaryOutcome
time off work, time to walk without pain, time to sitting on the toilet without pain, recurrences, and wound infections
- result
there were no significant differences between the two groups
Int J Colorectal Dis · PMID 21573899 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Nasr et al. 2011
A pediatric surgeon's 35-year experience with pilonidal disease in a Canadian children's hospital
Packing wounds open healed much slower.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
121 people2011
wounds that were cut open and packed took about 75 days to heal, at least twice as long as the other two methods, but the chance of the cyst coming back was similar across all methods (about 22%)
- Who was studied
- teenagers and young adults with pilonidal cysts (ages 12-19) treated at a children's hospital
- What they received
- surgical removal of the cyst, either packed open, marsupialized, or stitched closed without drainage
- Compared with
- comparing the three different surgical approaches to each other
- Main outcome
- how long the wound took to heal and whether the cyst came back
- Quality
- this was a retrospective chart review of one surgeon's cases over decades, with the operation chosen arbitrarily rather than by a controlled method, so bias is likely.
- Limitations
- retrospective design, single surgeon, pediatric population only, operation type was arbitrarily chosen rather than randomized
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
121 adolescents with pilonidal disease (64 boys, 57 girls) with a mean age of 15 (range 12-19) years were evaluated
- population
121 adolescents with pilonidal disease (64 boys, 57 girls) with a mean age of 15 (range 12-19) years were evaluated at the same children's hospital
- intervention
all 107 pilonidal cysts were either excised and packed open, marsupialized or excised and closed primarily without drainage under general anesthesia; the operation performed was arbitrarily chosen
- comparator
The time for healing after the initial operation in the group whose cysts were excised and packed open was at least twice as long (75 d) as in the other 2 groups (p = 0.031).
- primaryOutcome
All patients were evaluated for age, sex, clinical diagnosis, infection, treatment, healing time, complications and results.
- result
The time for healing after the initial operation in the group whose cysts were excised and packed open was at least twice as long (75 d) as in the other 2 groups (p = 0.031). Disease recurred in 24 (22%) patients, 6 (25%) of whom experienced 2 recurrences.
Can J Surg · PMID 21251431 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Thompson et al. 2011
Simple day-case surgery for pilonidal sinus disease
Faster recovery with simple surgery.Narrative reviewLow qualityRelated question
size not given2011
more conservative, simple day-case procedures were associated with rapid return to work and fewer complications than wide excision
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal sinus disease
- What they received
- simple day-case surgery (removal of midline skin pits with lateral drainage of abscess/sinus)
- Compared with
- wide excisional surgery and non-surgical/expectant treatment
- Main outcome
- return to work, healing and complications after treatment
- Quality
- this is a general literature review without systematic quality grading or pooled data, so it carries less weight than a controlled study.
- Limitations
- abstract does not describe specific recovery times, is a narrative synthesis of varied studies, and excludes papers on new or modified techniques
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
patients with pilonidal sinus disease
- intervention
Simple removal of midline skin pits, the primary cause of pilonidal disease, with lateral drainage of the abscess and sinus is effective in most instances.
- comparator
Although wide excisional surgery has been common practice, there are more simple alternatives.
- primaryOutcome
associated with a rapid return to work
- result
These more conservative procedures are usually done as a day case, require minimal care in the community and are associated with a rapid return to work.
Br J Surg · PMID 21125608 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Sözen et al. 2011
Are postoperative drains necessary with the Karydakis flap for treatment of pilonidal sinus? (Can fibrin glue be replaced to drains?) A prospective randomized trial
More fluid buildup with glue, no recurrences.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question
50 people2011
fluid collection occurred more often with fibrin glue (24%) than with a suction drain (8%), and no patients had the cyst come back
- Who was studied
- male patients with pilonidal sinus who had Karydakis flap surgery
- What they received
- fibrin glue instead of a drain after surgery
- Compared with
- suction drain after surgery
- Main outcome
- fluid buildup at the wound site and recurrence
- Quality
- small study of only 50 patients looking at a flap surgery technique, not at drainage of the cyst itself.
- Limitations
- small sample size, single surgical technique (Karydakis flap) rather than drainage, all male patients, follow-up duration not specified.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
50 male patients with pilonidal sinus who underwent the Karydakis flap operation were evaluated prospectively
- intervention
Group 2 fibrin glue
- comparator
Group 1 with suction drain
- primaryOutcome
our aim was to evaluate the influence of routine cavity drainage in the Karydakis flap technique
- result
Fluid collection was encountered in 8 out of 50 patients (6.25%): 6 in Group 2 (24%) of which 4 experienced superficial, healed with simple dressing, the other 2 with substantial dehiscence healed with wound dressing; 2 in Group 1 (8%) were treated with wound punctures.There has been no recurrence in any of the patients during the follow-up period.
- n
50 male patients with pilonidal sinus who underwent the Karydakis flap operation were evaluated prospectively
Ir J Med Sci · PMID 20721696 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Gipponi et al. 2010
Tension-free primary closure with autologous platelet gel versus Vivostat- for the definitive treatment of chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease
Faster healing with Vivostat gel.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question
100 peoplemedian follow-up of 21 months (range: 4-40 months)
the Vivostat gel group healed faster and had fewer wound problems than the in-house gel group
- Who was studied
- adults with long-lasting or repeat pilonidal cysts at the base of the spine
- What they received
- wound closure after cyst removal using platelet gel made in the hospital
- Compared with
- wound closure after cyst removal using platelet gel made by the Vivostat system
- Main outcome
- how long the wound took to heal and time to return to normal activity
- Quality
- it is a randomized trial but it compares two surgical wound-sealant products after full cyst excision, not drainage, so it cannot answer how long recovery takes after simple drainage.
- Limitations
- compares two gel products after excisional surgery rather than studying drainage of an abscess, and does not describe blinding
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
patients with chronic or recurrent pilonidal sinus (PS)
- intervention
randomly given either the in house autologous platelet gel (Group 1)
- comparator
or the Vivostat- gel (Group 2)
- primaryOutcome
Group 2 patients had shorter wound healing time (8 vs. 10 days; p<0.0001), time to return to full activity (11 vs. 16 days: p<0.0001)
- result
Group 2 patients had shorter wound healing time (8 vs. 10 days; p<0.0001), time to return to full activity (11 vs. 16 days: p<0.0001), less uncomplicated fluid collections (120 vs. 190 ml: p<0.0001), and fewer postoperative wound complications (1/50=2% vs. 5/50=10%, p<0.001)
- n
100 patients (82 males, 18 females: median age 30 years; range, 16-51 years)
In Vivo · PMID 20668329 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Humphries et al. 2010
Evaluation and management of pilonidal disease
Recovery time not stated.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2010
Not reported numerically; abstract states disease can involve significant morbidity and prolonged wound healing after definitive surgery
- Who was studied
- people with pilonidal disease
- What they received
- surgical treatment of pilonidal disease
- Compared with
- nonoperative treatment options
- Main outcome
- wound healing and recovery after treatment
- Quality
- This is a narrative review describing treatment options without presenting specific study data or outcomes measurements.
- Limitations
- The abstract does not report specific recovery times, patient numbers, or comparative results; it is a general review article.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Pilonidal disease is a common condition, ranging from the routine cyst with abscess to extensive chronic infection and sinus formation.
- intervention
numerous nonoperative and operative treatment options currently available for it
- comparator
numerous nonoperative and operative treatment options currently available for it
- primaryOutcome
associated with significant morbidity and prolonged wound healing after definitive surgery
- result
It can be associated with significant morbidity and prolonged wound healing after definitive surgery.
Surg Clin North Am · PMID 20109636 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Krand et al. 2009
Management of pilonidal sinus disease with oblique excision and bilateral gluteus maximus fascia advancing flap: result of 278 patients
Back to work in about 12 daysCase seriesLow qualityRelated question
278 people66 +/- 32 months (range, 12 to 120)
average time off work was 12 days, complication rate 7.2%, recurrence rate 0.7%
- Who was studied
- people with pilonidal sinus disease without extensive gluteal involvement
- What they received
- oblique excision with bilateral gluteus maximus fascia advancing flap surgery
- Compared with
- none - no comparison group
- Main outcome
- complications, recurrence, and time off work after surgery
- Quality
- This is a case series with no comparison group, so we cannot tell if this technique is better than other options.
- Limitations
- No control group; abstract does not describe drainage (incision and drainage) specifically, only this flap surgery technique
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
was applied on 278 (89 percent) patients
- population
patients, who did not have extensive gluteal involvement, of the 312 patients who had pilonidal sinus disease
- intervention
An S-type incision together with a bilateral gluteus maximus fascia advancing flap was applied
- comparator
No drainage was performed on any patient.
- primaryOutcome
Total complication rate was 7.2 percent and recurrence rate was 0.7 percent.
- result
The mean time off from work was 12 +/- 2 days (range, 10 to 22).
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 19581864 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Colak et al. 2010
A randomized clinical study evaluating the need for drainage after Limberg flap for pilonidal sinus
Faster recovery without a drain.Randomised trialModerate qualityRelated question
101 people2010
patients without a drain had less pain, needed less pain medicine, had fewer complications, and shorter hospital stays; recurrence rates were the same
- Who was studied
- patients having surgery for pilonidal sinus (Limberg flap procedure)
- What they received
- no drain tube placed after flap surgery
- Compared with
- drain tube placed after flap surgery
- Main outcome
- pain, analgesic use, hospital stay, complications, and recurrence after surgery
- Quality
- it was a randomized trial but only looked at one surgical technique (flap repair) at a single center, not simple cyst drainage.
- Limitations
- studies a specific flap surgery (RELIF) with or without a drain tube, not simple incision and drainage of a pilonidal cyst/abscess
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
One hundred one patients undergoing the RELIF procedure were randomly treated with drainage or not.
- population
patients with pilonidal sinus
- intervention
randomly treated with drainage or not
- comparator
randomly treated with drainage or not
- primaryOutcome
Operating time, postoperative pain assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS), total amount of intramuscular analgesic administered, hospital stay, complications, recurrence rate, and patient satisfaction were assessed.
- result
VAS scores on postoperative day 0 (P = 0.039) and day 1 (P = 0.006), intramuscular analgesic requirement (P = 0.009), mean amount of intramuscular analgesic administered (P = 0.025), complication rate (P = 0.027), and mean hospital stay (P = 0.0001) were significantly reduced in the non-drained group.
J Surg Res · PMID 19394643 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Tocchi et al. 2008
Outcome of chronic pilonidal disease treatment after ambulatory plain midline excision and primary suture
Faster healing when wound drained.Randomised trialModerate qualityRelated question
103 people2008
Complete healing was fastest in patients in group A
- Who was studied
- patients with chronic, non-recurrent, quiet pilonidal sinus disease
- What they received
- surgical excision with primary closure plus wound drainage
- Compared with
- surgical excision with primary closure without wound drainage
- Main outcome
- wound healing time and complications after surgery
- Quality
- It was a randomized trial but fairly small and only from one center, with healing time not given precisely.
- Limitations
- Abstract does not report blinding, exact healing times, or statistical significance values.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A prospective study was performed on 103 patients with nonrecurrent quiescent chronic discharging sinus.
- population
103 patients with nonrecurrent quiescent chronic discharging sinus
- intervention
the excision was associated with drainage of the wound
- comparator
the wound was not drained
- primaryOutcome
Complete healing was fastest in patients in group A.
- result
Complete healing was fastest in patients in group A.
Am J Surg · PMID 18565338 · Read it on PubMed ↗
El-Tawil et al. 2009
Use of a double rhomboid transposition flap in the treatment of extensive complex pilonidal sinus disease
Quick recovery after flap surgeryCase seriesLow qualityRelated question
8 people33-month follow-up (range 8-41 months)
median drain time was 2 days and hospital stay was 2 days, with one wound infection and no recurrence over follow-up
- Who was studied
- patients with extensive, recurrent, complex pilonidal sinus disease
- What they received
- double rhomboid transposition flap surgery to close the wound after removing the sinus
- Compared with
- none (no comparison group)
- Main outcome
- time with drains in place, length of hospital stay, complications and recurrence
- Quality
- this is a small uncontrolled case series of only 8 patients with no comparison group, so it gives limited confidence about typical recovery.
- Limitations
- very small sample, no control group, and this describes a complex reconstructive flap operation for large recurrent disease rather than simple drainage of a pilonidal cyst
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Eight patients (seven males) were treated with this technique
- population
All had very extensive and recurrent disease, having had multiple previous procedures.
- intervention
Two rhomboid fasciocutaneous flaps are transposed to close this defect over suction-drains.
- comparator
It is a relatively simple and safe alternative to major plastic reconstruction which is often resorted to in such large-scale disease.
- primaryOutcome
Median drain-duration was 2 days (range 1-5 days) and postoperative stay was 2 days (range 0-5 days).
- result
Median drain-duration was 2 days (range 1-5 days) and postoperative stay was 2 days (range 0-5 days). One complication arose: a wound infection with partial dehiscence which healed with conservative treatment. No recurrence or further complication arose in a 33-month follow-up (range 8-41 months).
Colorectal Dis · PMID 18513189 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Akin et al. 2008
Rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for managing pilonidal sinus: long-term results in 411 patients
Back to work in about 12 days.Case seriesLow qualityRelated question
411 people109.2 +/- 4.5 months
average return to work was 12.4 days, pain-free walking took 13.4 days, pain-free sitting took 16.1 days, with a 2.91% recurrence rate
- Who was studied
- people with pilonidal sinus disease
- What they received
- surgical removal of the sinus with a rhomboid excision and Limberg skin flap repair
- Compared with
- none - single group of patients, no comparison treatment
- Main outcome
- time to return to normal activities after surgery (work, walking, sitting) and complication rates
- Quality
- This is a single-group case series without a comparison group, so it can only describe outcomes of this specific surgery, not prove it is better or faster than other treatments.
- Limitations
- No control or comparison group, retrospective record review, and the procedure (full excision with flap reconstruction) is different from simple incision and drainage of a pilonidal cyst.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
The records of 411 patients with pilonidal sinus disease
- population
patients with pilonidal sinus disease
- intervention
rhomboid excision and Limberg flap procedure
- comparator
The records of 411 patients with pilonidal sinus disease, who underwent rhomboid excision and Limberg flap procedure, were analysed.
- primaryOutcome
the average time of return to work was 12.4 days
- result
The average hospital stay was 3.2 days (range: 1-10 days), and the average time of return to work was 12.4 days (range: 7-18 days). The average time to walk without pain was 13.4 days (range: 10-28 days) and the average time to sitting on the toilet without pain was 16.1 days (range: 12-28 days).
- followUp
The mean follow-up period was 109.2 +/- 4.5 months (range: 12-183 months).
Colorectal Dis · PMID 18462233 · Read it on PubMed ↗
McCallum et al. 2007
Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus
Faster healing but more recurrence after closureMeta-analysisModerate qualityRelated question
1,573 people2007
Closing the wound healed faster and let people return to work sooner, but left-open wounds were less likely to come back
- Who was studied
- people with chronic pilonidal sinus needing surgery (not abscesses)
- What they received
- surgical excision of the sinus closed up (primary closure)
- Compared with
- surgical excision left open to heal on its own (secondary intention)
- Main outcome
- time to healing, infection and recurrence after surgery
- Quality
- It pools many randomized trials, but the included studies vary in technique and size, and some outcomes like pain and satisfaction had little usable data.
- Limitations
- Studies specifically on pilonidal abscess were excluded, and there was little data on pain, cost, or patient satisfaction.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Exclusion criteria were: non-RCTs; children aged younger than 14 years and studies of pilonidal abscess.
- intervention
excision of the sinus tracts followed by primary closure and healing by primary intention
- comparator
leaving the wound open to heal by secondary intention
- primaryOutcome
the outcomes of time to healing, infection and recurrence rate
- n
Eighteen studies were included (1573 patients).
- result
Evidence suggested more rapid healing after primary closure although there was no difference in the infection rate after wound closure. Recurrence was less likely to occur after open healing (RR 0.42; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.66)
- result
Patients returned to work earlier after primary closure (WMD 10.48 days 95% CI 5.75 to 15.21 days).
Cochrane Database Syst Rev · PMID 17943897 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Mentes et al. 2008
Limberg flap procedure for pilonidal sinus disease: results of 353 patients
Average hospital stay about 4.5 daysCase seriesLow qualityRelated question
353 people4 weeks and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months
average hospital stay was about 4.5 days and 3.1% had recurrence at end of follow-up
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal sinus disease (mostly young men)
- What they received
- Limberg flap surgery (rhomboid excision with skin flap reconstruction)
- Compared with
- none - single group followed over time
- Main outcome
- recurrence rate and healing after surgery
- Quality
- This is a case series without a comparison group, so it only describes outcomes after one type of surgery rather than proving an advantage.
- Limitations
- No control group for comparison; this describes a more extensive flap surgery, not simple drainage of a cyst.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
353 patients
- population
353 patients [335 male, 18 female; average age = 24.65 +/- 4.2 (range, 15-53) years] with primary or recurrent pilonidal sinus disease
- intervention
operated on under spinal anesthesia by rhomboid excision and Limberg flap
- comparator
We think using closed suction drain in Limberg flap operation is not necessary.
- primaryOutcome
evaluate advantages and long term results of Limberg flap surgical technique
- result
The mean duration of hospital stay was 4.51 +/- 2.85 (range, 2-19) days.
- result
Recurrences were observed in 11 patients (3.1%) at the end of the follow up period.
Langenbecks Arch Surg · PMID 17899165 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Bessa 2007
Results of the lateral advancing flap operation (modified Karydakis procedure) for the management of pilonidal sinus disease
Short hospital stay, low complications, no recurrence.Case seriesLow qualityRelated question
82 people20 +/- 6.8 months
average 2-day hospital stay, 7.3% complication rate, no recurrences over follow-up
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal sinus disease over the tailbone
- What they received
- modified Karydakis flap surgery to remove the pilonidal sinus
- Compared with
- none - all patients received the same surgery
- Main outcome
- hospital stay length, complications, and recurrence after surgery
- Quality
- This was a small single-group study with no comparison group, so it can't show whether this technique is better than other options.
- Limitations
- No control group, single-center series, outcome measured was recurrence/complications rather than detailed recovery timeline.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
The present study included 82 consecutive patients.
- population
sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease
- intervention
The modified technique was applied in all patients.
- comparator
The present study included 82 consecutive patients.
- primaryOutcome
The postoperative complications and hospital stay were recorded.
- result
The hospital stay was two days for all patients. Postoperative complications were encountered in six patients (7.3 percent).
- result
No recurrences were encountered throughout the 20 +/- 6.8 months mean follow-up duration.
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 17828399 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Kapp et al. 2007
[New concept in the treatment of the pilonidal sinus]
Good healing, low complications reported.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2007
the two-step approach gave low complication rates and a high healing rate; the flap approach gave good cosmetic results
- Who was studied
- people with an infected pilonidal sinus (cyst near the tailbone)
- What they received
- small drainage cut of the abscess followed later by removal of the fistula tract
- Compared with
- radical excision with reconstructive flap surgery for severe or recurrent cases
- Main outcome
- healing and complication rates after surgery
- Quality
- this is a review of a treatment concept based on the authors' experience and published studies, without patient numbers or measured recovery times.
- Limitations
- no participant numbers, no follow-up duration, and no objective measure of recovery time are reported.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- intervention
Infected pilonidal were first drained by a small excision of the abscess (if possible in local anesthesia) followed by a close fistula excision.
- comparator
In the case of extensive fistulating pilonidal sinus or recurrent disease we recommend radical excision and primary reconstructive flap what showed good aesthetic results.
- result
With this approach we were able to achieve a low morbidity and a high healing rate.
- population
Symptomatic pilonidal sinus is characterized by an acute or a chronic inflammation.
- primaryOutcome
we were able to achieve a low morbidity and a high healing rate
Praxis (Bern 1994) · PMID 17726856 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Bendewald et al. 2007
Using negative pressure wound therapy following surgery for complex pilonidal disease: a case series
Healed in about 12 weeks.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
5 people2007
mean time to complete healing was 12 weeks
- Who was studied
- patients with complex, recurrent pilonidal disease with branching sinus tracts
- What they received
- wide surgical excision followed by negative pressure wound therapy
- Compared with
- none (case series, historical comparison to moist saline dressings mentioned)
- Main outcome
- time to complete wound healing
- Quality
- This is a tiny case series of only five patients with no comparison group, so it cannot show whether this treatment is better than alternatives.
- Limitations
- Very small sample size, no control group, complex (not simple) pilonidal disease, one patient discontinued treatment due to skin irritation, and long-term follow-up for recurrence was not done.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
five patients (three men and two women, median age 21 years [range: 16 to 63 years]) with complex pilonidal disease
- population
five patients (three men and two women, median age 21 years [range: 16 to 63 years]) with complex pilonidal disease (symptom duration range 6 months to 30 years)
- intervention
Following wide excision under general anesthesia, a portable negative pressure wound therapy device was applied.
- comparator
negative pressure wound therapy after surgery for complex pilonidal disease may be a useful alternative to moist saline dressing treatments
- primaryOutcome
mean time to complete epithelialization was 12 weeks
- result
mean time to complete epithelialization was 12 weeks (range 9 to 22 weeks), including use of moist saline dressings post negative pressure wound therapy
Ostomy Wound Manage · PMID 17551174 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Altinli et al. 2007
Impact of fibrin sealant on Limberg flap technique: results of a randomized controlled trial
Shorter hospital stay with sealant.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question
32 people2007
fibrin sealant group had less drainage fluid and shorter hospital stay than the standard surgery group
- Who was studied
- male patients with pilonidal cyst disease having flap surgery
- What they received
- fibrin sealant added during Limberg flap surgery
- Compared with
- standard Limberg flap surgery alone
- Main outcome
- amount of fluid drained and length of hospital stay
- Quality
- very small single-center trial with only 16 patients per group, so results may not generalize.
- Limitations
- small sample size, abstract does not mention blinding or long-term follow-up
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
32 male patients with pilonidal disease
- intervention
the standard Limberg flap technique (n=16) alone or with fibrin sealant application (n=16) before drain insertion
- comparator
the standard Limberg flap technique (n=16) alone
- primaryOutcome
The total drainage volume was 64.4+/-28.0 ml in the control group and 16.2+/-13.6 ml in the fibrin sealant group
- result
hospitalization time was 3.9+/-0.6 days in the control group and 2.0+/-0 days in the fibrin sealant group (p<0.001)
- n
32 male patients with pilonidal disease were randomly assigned
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 17357862 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Rabie et al. 2007
Sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: sinotomy versus excisional surgery, a retrospective study
Shorter hospital stay with simpler surgery.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
81 people2007
Sinotomy had lower recurrence (12.5%) and shorter hospital stay (2.8 days) than the overall average (26.9% recurrence, 4.1 days stay)
- Who was studied
- Adults with pilonidal sinus or abscess treated at a Saudi Arabian hospital
- What they received
- Sinotomy (simply opening the sinus)
- Compared with
- Excisional surgery (several types, including incision and drainage of abscess)
- Main outcome
- Disease recurrence and length of hospital stay
- Quality
- This is a small retrospective chart review mixing several different surgery types without statistical comparison, so it only weakly supports any one conclusion.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design, small subgroup sizes, phone-based follow-up for recurrence, no statistical analysis reported, and procedures mixed together including drainage, excision, and flap surgery rather than isolating drainage alone.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Eighty-one patients were included in the study.
- population
Patients who were admitted to Aseer Central Hospital, Saudi Arabia with a pilonidal sinus or abscess
- intervention
sinotomy, that is, simply laying the sinus open
- comparator
the more popular radical surgery, where the sinus-bearing tissues are excised
- primaryOutcome
data related to the patient characteristics, disease process and the procedures carried out were noted
- result
Sinotomy had a low recurrence rate (12.5%) and a short hospital stay (2.8 days).
ANZ J Surg · PMID 17305995 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Rao 2006
Cutting seton for pilonidal disease: a new approach
Healed well, no recurrences, minimal careCase seriesVery low qualityRelated question
8 people22.5 months
all wounds healed by secondary intention with minimal wound care and no recurrences over an average of 22.5 months
- Who was studied
- adults with long-standing chronic pilonidal disease who had already had unsuccessful incision and drainage
- What they received
- a cutting seton (garrotte) placed under local anesthesia and tightened over two weeks
- Compared with
- no comparison group; compared informally with traditional surgical treatment
- Main outcome
- wound healing, recurrence and patient satisfaction after the procedure
- Quality
- This is a very small study of only 8 patients with no comparison group, so it can't reliably show how this treatment compares to others.
- Limitations
- Very small sample size, no control group, and the abstract itself calls these 'preliminary results' needing evaluation in a larger series with longer follow-up.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Satisfactory resection was achieved by means of a single cutting seton (garrotte) in 8 patients
- population
all of whom had had prior unsuccessful incision and drainage for long-standing disease with local abscesses and suppuration
- intervention
The seton was applied in an ambulatory care setting under local anesthesia. It was tied and progressively tightened over a period of two weeks.
- comparator
more traditional surgical treatment in the past
- primaryOutcome
There were no recurrences over an average follow-up period of 22.5 months. All patients were uniformly satisfied.
- result
Complete excision of the diseased area was achieved and revascularization of the wounds site occurred with optimum healing by secondary intention, leaving an acceptable scar. It required minimal wound care. There were no recurrences over an average follow-up period of 22.5 months.
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 16969609 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Schulze et al. 2006
Treatment of pilonidal disease with laser epilation
Laser hair removal cut recurrence.Case seriesLow qualityRelated question
23 people2006
all patients still being followed had no recurrence of folliculitis or need for more surgery
- Who was studied
- people with pilonidal disease who had recurrent folliculitis after prior drainage or excision
- What they received
- laser hair removal added after surgical excision of the pilonidal area
- Compared with
- no comparison group; outcomes compared before and after laser treatment
- Main outcome
- recurrence of folliculitis or need for further surgery
- Quality
- small uncontrolled case series without a comparison group, so it can't reliably show cause and effect.
- Limitations
- no control group, small number of patients, and some lost to follow-up
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Eighteen men and five women were treated with laser epilation
- population
All patients had experienced recurrent folliculitis and had undergone some form of drainage procedure or prior excision.
- intervention
After surgical excision of the affected area, a Vasculite Plus laser was used for the epilation treatments.
- comparator
Each session involved 9 to 12 treatments and the patients underwent an average of two sessions.
- primaryOutcome
All 19 of the patients that remain in follow-up report no recurrence of their folliculitis or need for further surgical procedures.
- result
All 19 of the patients that remain in follow-up report no recurrence of their folliculitis or need for further surgical procedures.
Am Surg · PMID 16808209 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Gurer et al. 2005
Is routine cavity drainage necessary in Karydakis flap operation? A prospective, randomized trial
Drain reduces fluid buildup after flap surgery.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question
50 people2005
no difference in hospital stay or recurrence, but fewer fluid collections with drain
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal sinus undergoing surgery
- What they received
- Karydakis flap surgery with suction drainage of the cavity
- Compared with
- Karydakis flap surgery without suction drainage
- Main outcome
- wound complications, hospital stay, and recurrence rate
- Quality
- Small trial of only 50 patients, and this addresses whether drains help after a specific flap surgery, not general recovery time after cyst drainage.
- Limitations
- Small sample size; studies drainage as an addition to flap surgery, not simple incision and drainage of a cyst.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Fifty patients with pilonidal sinus who underwent the Karydakis flap operation were evaluated prospectively.
- population
Fifty patients with pilonidal sinus who underwent the Karydakis flap operation
- intervention
with and without suction drainage of the cavity
- comparator
with and without suction drainage of the cavity
- primaryOutcome
the effects of drains were studied in terms of wound complications, hospital stay, and recurrence rate
- result
There was no significant difference between groups in term of length of hospital stay.
- result
There was a significant increase in the number of fluid collections in patents without a suction drain.
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 15981071 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Licheri et al. 2004
Radical treatment of acute pilonidal abscess by marsupialization
Healed in 4 to 10 weeksRetrospectiveLow quality
43 peoplenot specified beyond healing time of 4-10 weeks
complete healing took 4-10 weeks in 95.3% of patients, with recurrence in 14.6% of healed cases
- Who was studied
- patients with acute pilonidal abscess
- What they received
- drainage, curettage and marsupialization in one procedure
- Compared with
- no comparator (single group, historical reference to simple drainage then later surgery)
- Main outcome
- time to complete wound healing
- Quality
- This is a small retrospective study of one group without a comparison group, so it cannot prove marsupialization is better than other options.
- Limitations
- retrospective design, no comparison group, single center experience
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
43 consecutive patients underwent drainage, curettage and marsupialization for acute pilonidal abscess
- population
43 consecutive patients underwent drainage, curettage and marsupialization for acute pilonidal abscess
- intervention
drainage, curettage and marsupialization for acute pilonidal abscess
- comparator
Simple drainage is the most common treatment of pilonidal abscess, but later definitive surgery is often necessary.
- primaryOutcome
Complete healing required 4-10 weeks in 95.3% of the patients
- result
Complete healing required 4-10 weeks in 95.3% of the patients; a persistent chronic fistula was observed in 4.7%. During the follow-up, 6 recurrences (14.6%) were observed in the healed patients.
G Chir · PMID 15803819 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Lynch et al. 2004
Vacuum-assisted closure therapy: a new treatment option for recurrent pilonidal sinus disease. Report of three cases
Small case series, healing achieved.Case seriesVery low quality
3 people2004
two cases had excision plus skin graft with vacuum therapy applied for four days; the third case healed completely with vacuum-assisted closure therapy alone
- Who was studied
- people with pilonidal disease
- What they received
- vacuum-assisted closure therapy (with or without skin graft after excision)
- Compared with
- no comparison group
- Main outcome
- wound healing
- Quality
- Only three cases with no comparison group, so it cannot show how this treatment compares to others.
- Limitations
- Very small case series of only three patients with no control group and no long-term follow-up data reported.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
we have treated successfully three cases of pilonidal disease with vacuum-assisted closure therapy
- population
we have treated successfully three cases of pilonidal disease with vacuum-assisted closure therapy
- intervention
the pilonidal sinus was primarily excised, a split skin graft applied to cover the defect, and the vacuum-assisted closure pump applied over the skin graft for a period of four days on a continuous negative pressure of 50 mmHg
- comparator
No single treatment option available for symptomatic pilonidal disease is entirely satisfactory.
- primaryOutcome
The third case was treated and completely healed with vacuum-assisted closure therapy alone.
- result
The third case was treated and completely healed with vacuum-assisted closure therapy alone.
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 15129309 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Theodoropoulos et al. 2003
Modified Bascom's asymmetric midgluteal cleft closure technique for recurrent pilonidal disease: early experience in a military hospital
Back to duty in three weeksCase seriesLow qualityRelated question
24 peopleten months
full return to military duty in three weeks after surgery, one case of limited healing failure, no recurrences at a median follow-up of ten months
- Who was studied
- young male military service members with recurrent pilonidal disease
- What they received
- modified Bascom asymmetric midgluteal cleft closure surgery
- Compared with
- none (no comparison group)
- Main outcome
- time to return to military duty and recurrence after surgery
- Quality
- This is a small, uncontrolled case series with short follow-up, so it can't reliably show how well the technique works compared to other options.
- Limitations
- No control group, small number of patients with recurrent disease, short median follow-up of only ten months, and it studies a specific flap surgery rather than simple drainage.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
24 who presented with recurrent pilonidal disease eight months to four years after one to four operations each
- intervention
The modified Bascom technique was applied, which involved an asymmetric ellipse-like, gluteal fat-preserving excision of the affected skin, the pilonidal sinus, and lateral tracts, a thick skin and fat tongue of tissue mobilization, and finally, complete lateralization of wound closure and flattening of midgluteal groove.
- comparator
The suggested modified Bascom technique is an attractive, safe, easily performed operation with minimal morbidity and can be reliably used as a second-line surgical option for recurrent pilonidal disease.
- primaryOutcome
Full return to military duty was possible in three weeks after surgery.
- result
All patients tolerated the procedure well, with minimal to moderate postoperative discomfort. Full return to military duty was possible in three weeks after surgery. There was one case of limited primary healing failure. No recurrences have developed in a short median follow-up period of ten months.
- n
there were 24 who presented with recurrent pilonidal disease
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 12972977 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Benfatto et al. 2003
Drainage useful in the excision and closure "per primam" of pilonidal sinus: technical notes
Few complications, low recurrence.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
52 peopleuntil removal of the suture
only minor complications in 3 cases and one recurrence
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal sinus
- What they received
- surgical removal of the sinus with wound closure and drainage tube
- Compared with
- none
- Main outcome
- complications and recurrence after surgery
- Quality
- This is a small case series with no comparison group, so it can't reliably show how this method compares to others.
- Limitations
- No control group, small sample size, and the question asks about drainage of a cyst while this study describes surgical excision with drainage, not simple incision and drainage.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
series of 52 patients
- population
Pilonidal sinus treatment
- intervention
"en bloc" excision of all pathological tissue following closure "per primam" of the wound, after applying an aspirating drainage, which was then removed on day 2 or 3
- comparator
all the most commonly used methods cause the patients considerable discomfort ("open" method) or increase the recurrence rate ("closed" method)
- primaryOutcome
encouraging results (slight complications in 3 cases and only one recurrence)
- result
slight complications in 3 cases and only one recurrence
Chir Ital · PMID 12938615 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Hegele et al. 2003
[Reconstructive surgical therapy of infected pilonidal sinus]
Good healing, low complication rate.Case seriesLow quality
38 peoplemean 23 months, range 1-36
87% had an uneventful postoperative course, 2.6% had recurrence, and average hospital stay was 3.2 days
- Who was studied
- young adults with infected pilonidal sinus (abscess)
- What they received
- incision and drainage of the abscess followed by radical excision and Limberg flap reconstruction
- Compared with
- none (single treatment pathway, no comparison group)
- Main outcome
- long-term complications, recurrence, and hospital stay after treatment
- Quality
- This is a small, uncontrolled case series without a comparison group, so it can't reliably show how this approach compares to other treatments.
- Limitations
- No control group; small sample size; single-center retrospective-style review of one treatment protocol
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
38 patients (5 female, 33 male, mean age 27,mean BMI 26.7 kg/m(2)) suffering from infected pilonidal sinus
- population
Infected sinus pilonidalis is common in young patients, causing much discomfort.
- intervention
38 patients (5 female, 33 male, mean age 27,mean BMI 26.7 kg/m(2)) suffering from infected pilonidal sinus were first treated by incision of the abscess.
- comparator
The aim of this study was to evaluate the longterm results for infected pilonidal sinus disease after primary drainage of the abscess, secondary rhomboid excision, and Limberg flap procedure.
- primaryOutcome
RESULTS: Two patients (5.2%) developed seroma and two (5.2%) developed infected hematoma. During follow-up, one patient (2.6%) showed recurrence.
- result
In 33 (87%), postoperative course and follow-up were uneventful (mean 23 months, range 1-36). The mean length of hospital stay was 3.2 days (range 1-4).
Chirurg · PMID 12928797 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Eryilmaz et al. 2003
[The comparison of incision and drainage with skin excision and curettage in the treatment of acute pilonidal abscess]
Excision heals slower but recurs less.Randomised trialLow quality
size not given2003
skin excision and curettage took longer to heal (27 vs 19 days) and return to work (35 vs 26 days), but had lower chronic sinus rate (24% vs 76%)
- Who was studied
- patients with acute pilonidal abscess
- What they received
- skin excision and curettage
- Compared with
- incision and drainage
- Main outcome
- healing time, time returning to active work, and chronic pilonidal sinus development
- Quality
- small prospective comparative study with no reported patient numbers, randomization method, or blinding details.
- Limitations
- Abstract does not report sample size, randomization method, or blinding.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
patients with acute pilonidal abscess
- intervention
skin excision and curettage
- comparator
incision and drainage
- primaryOutcome
healing time, time of returning to active work and development of chronic pilonidal sinus rates
- result
Healing time and time of returning to active work were 27 and 35 days in skin excision and curettage group, 19 and 26 days in incision and drainage group, respectively (p<0.001).
- result
Development of chronic pilonidal sinus rate was 76% in incision and drainage group and 24% in skin excision and curettage group (p<0.001).
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg · PMID 12836108 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Chintapatla et al. 2003
Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review, pathological insight and surgical options
No specific recovery time reported.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given2003
the review states that primary closure with a lateral approach appears to give the best results, but gives no specific time frame for recovery after drainage alone
- Who was studied
- people with pilonidal sinus disease, from asymptomatic pits to painful draining lesions near the tailbone
- What they received
- drainage of an abscess (with or without curettage) as one treatment option
- Compared with
- other surgical approaches such as wide excision, primary closure, and limited excision
- Main outcome
- how quickly the wound heals and whether the sinus recurs
- Quality
- this is a general narrative review summarizing many past studies without new data, numbers of patients, or a systematic method for comparing outcomes.
- Limitations
- no original patient data, no stated follow-up duration, and no direct comparison of recovery time specifically after drainage versus other treatments.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Pilonidal sinus disease consists in a symptoms complex with presentations ranging from asymptomatic pits to painful draining lesions that are predominantly located in the sacrococcygeal region.
- intervention
Options for treatment of acute abscess include aspiration, drainage without curettage, and drainage with curettage.
- comparator
Conservative nonoperative management, closed methods, laying of track, wide excision and open drainage, wide excision and primary closure, and limited excision are the methods currently used.
- primaryOutcome
recurrence of sinus and a quick healing of resulting cavity or surgical wound
- result
Primary closure with a lateral approach appears to give the best results.
Tech Coloproctol · PMID 12750948 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Serour et al. 2002
Excision with primary closure and suction drainage for pilonidal sinus in adolescent patients
Quick healing, drain out within days.Case seriesLow qualityRelated question
34 people12-month follow-up
88.2% healed normally with no complications; drains were removed after 2 to 6 days (average 2.2 days); hospital stay averaged 2.3 days; 9.1% developed infections needing the wound reopened; one recurrence occurred at 3 years
- Who was studied
- Teenagers aged 13 to 18 with pilonidal sinus
- What they received
- Surgical excision of the sinus with the wound stitched closed and a suction drain placed
- Compared with
- No comparison group
- Main outcome
- Wound healing, complications, and recurrence after surgery
- Quality
- This was a small single-group study of only 34 patients with no comparison treatment, so it cannot show how this approach compares to other options.
- Limitations
- No control group for comparison, single-institution retrospective-style case series, and anesthesia type differed by age in a way not adjusted for.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
34 consecutive patients aged 13-18 years
- population
34 consecutive patients aged 13-18 years (mean 16.4) underwent PS excision
- intervention
excision with primary closure and suction drainage
- comparator
between 1990 and 1999, 34 consecutive patients aged 13-18 years (mean 16.4) underwent PS excision with primary closure and suction drainage
- primaryOutcome
Primary healing with no postoperative complications occurred in 30 patients (88.2%)
- result
The drain was removed on postoperative day 2 to 6 (average 2.2). Primary healing with no postoperative complications occurred in 30 patients (88.2%); 1 underwent partial opening of the wound because of rupture of the drainage tube during its removal. Postoperative infections requiring incision, drainage, and lay-open occurred in 3 cases (9.1%).
- followUp
No recurrence was found at 12-month follow-up.
Pediatr Surg Int · PMID 11956785 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Tritapepe et al. 2002
Excision and primary closure of pilonidal sinus using a drain for antiseptic wound flushing
Full healing, no recurrences long-term.Case seriesLow quality
243 people5 to 15 years
all patients healed without complications and had no recurrences over long-term follow-up
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal sinus
- What they received
- excision of pilonidal sinus with primary closure and drain flushing with antiseptic solution
- Compared with
- none reported
- Main outcome
- wound healing, complications, and recurrence after surgery
- Quality
- This was a single group of patients with no comparison treatment, so we can't tell if another method would have done better or worse.
- Limitations
- No control group; single surgical technique without comparison to other drainage/healing methods.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Two hundred and forty-three patients (173 men and 70 women) were treated
- population
Two hundred and forty-three patients (173 men and 70 women) were treated by excising the pilonidal sinus
- intervention
excising the pilonidal sinus and placing a 12F suction drain at the base of the wound, with its tip being brought out in the left gluteal region
- comparator
The procedure described here involves excision and primary closure, with a drain being used to flush the operative cavity with an antiseptic solution.
- primaryOutcome
Healing was always by first intention, with none of the 243 patients experiencing any complications.
- result
Healing was always by first intention, with none of the 243 patients experiencing any complications. The postoperative follow-up now ranges from 5 to 15 years, and there have not been any recurrences.
Am J Surg · PMID 11918891 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Akinci et al. 2000
Simple and effective surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus: asymmetric excision and primary closure using suction drain and subcuticular skin closure
Healed in about 13 days.Case seriesLow qualityRelated question
112 peoplefollowed up for a mean of 2.4 years
mean healing time was 13.2 days, mean time off work was 12.4 days, and complication rate was 7.14 percent
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal sinus (excluding pilonidal abscess or extensive gluteal involvement)
- What they received
- asymmetric excision and primary closure using a suction drain and subcuticular skin closure
- Compared with
- none (single-group study)
- Main outcome
- healing time, time off work, complications and recurrence after surgery
- Quality
- This was a single-group case series without a comparison treatment, so it cannot show whether this method is better than other options.
- Limitations
- No control or comparator group; abstract notes exclusion of pilonidal abscess cases, so findings may not reflect drainage of an active abscess.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
112 pilonidal sinus cases treated surgically
- population
All pilonidal sinus cases except pilonidal abscess and extensive gluteal involvement were treated surgically.
- intervention
asymmetric excision and primary closure with suction drain and subcuticular skin closure
- comparator
The procedure consists of an eccentric, elliptical excision of the affected tissue, mobilization of the flap to the sacrococcygeal fascia and the suturing of its edge to the lateral one.
- primaryOutcome
operation time and cost, hospital stay, return to normal activity, complications, pathologic and microbiologic examinations, and recurrences were noted
- result
The mean hospital stay was 2.6 days, and the mean time off work was 12.4 days. The average healing time was 13.2 days.
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 10826434 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Lee et al. 2000
Pilonidal disease in Singapore: clinical features and management
Healing took about 48 days.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
61 people2000
no difference between techniques in healing time, averaging 48 days, with wound dehiscence after primary closure and flap procedures
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal disease treated at a colorectal surgery unit
- What they received
- surgical treatment of pilonidal disease (various techniques including incision and drainage, laying open, marsupialization, primary closure, flap procedure)
- Compared with
- different surgical techniques compared with each other
- Main outcome
- time required for wound healing
- Quality
- this is a small retrospective database study comparing several techniques without randomization, so results are less reliable.
- Limitations
- retrospective design, small sample size, no randomization between treatment groups
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A prospectively collected computerized database of 61 consecutive patients
- population
61 consecutive patients admitted to a specialist colorectal unit
- intervention
The five methods of surgical treatment used during this period (incision and drainage; laying open; marsupialization; primary closure; and the flap procedure) were compared.
- comparator
There were no differences between the various surgical techniques employed with regard to the time required for wound healing
- primaryOutcome
the time required for wound healing (mean: 48+/-21 days)
- result
There were no differences between the various surgical techniques employed with regard to the time required for wound healing (mean: 48+/-21 days) and recurrence rates (4/61, 6.6%).
Aust N Z J Surg · PMID 10765903 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Erdem et al. 1998
Are postoperative drains necessary with the Limberg flap for treatment of pilonidal sinus?
No drain means shorter hospital stay.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question
40 people1998
no difference in wound complications or recurrence, but hospital stay was significantly longer when a drain was used
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal sinus having surgery to remove it
- What they received
- surgical removal with flap reconstruction and no wound drain
- Compared with
- same surgery but with a wound drain left in place
- Main outcome
- wound complications, length of hospital stay, and return of the cyst
- Quality
- this was a small trial of only 40 patients looking at a specific flap surgery technique, not at drainage of a cyst alone.
- Limitations
- small sample size; studies a specific flap reconstruction technique rather than simple incision and drainage of a pilonidal cyst
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Forty patients with pilonidal sinus undergoing radical excision and reconstruction with Limberg flap between 1994 and 1996 were evaluated prospectively.
- population
Forty patients with pilonidal sinus undergoing radical excision and reconstruction with Limberg flap between 1994 and 1996 were evaluated prospectively.
- intervention
Limberg flaps with no drains in place
- comparator
the effects of drains were studied statistically in terms of wound complications, hospital stay, and recurrence rate
- primaryOutcome
the effects of drains were studied statistically in terms of wound complications, hospital stay, and recurrence rate
- result
There was no significant difference between the groups in early wound complications (P > 0.05). The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in the drainage group (P < 0.001).
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 9823811 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Calbo et al. 1997
[Day-surgery treatment of pilonidal sinus]
Laser said to speed healing.Narrative reviewVery low quality
size not given1997
carbon-dioxide laser was reported to prevent complications and shorten healing time in the open method, and the closed method was said to have economic advantages
- Who was studied
- people with pilonidal sinus disease
- What they received
- open surgical treatment, closed surgical treatment, and carbon-dioxide laser
- Compared with
- open method versus closed method
- Main outcome
- healing time and complications
- Quality
- this is a discussion of historical background and author experience rather than a controlled study with measured outcomes.
- Limitations
- no study design, patient numbers, or measured outcomes are reported; conclusions are based on authors' general experience.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
pilonidal disease
- intervention
Open and closed treatment are reported on the acute and chronic phases
- intervention
Carbon-dioxide laser on Authors experience was very useful to prevent complications and to shorten healing time in open method.
- comparator
highlighting economical advantages of closed method
- primaryOutcome
to prevent complications and to shorten healing time in open method
- result
Carbon-dioxide laser on Authors experience was very useful to prevent complications and to shorten healing time in open method.
Chir Ital · PMID 12743878 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Berger et al. 1995
[Pilonidal sinus]
Recovery time not reported.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given1995
not clearly reported numerically; recurrence rate ranged from 5 to 40% regardless of technique, with high morbidity
- Who was studied
- people with pilonidal sinus/cyst disease
- What they received
- limited excision with immediate closure (non-infected cases) or exposure with immediate resection (abscess cases)
- Compared with
- wide excision and secondary closure techniques
- Main outcome
- complications and recurrence after surgery
- Quality
- this is a narrative review of the literature and the authors' own experience, without reported study numbers or recovery times, so it cannot reliably measure recovery.
- Limitations
- no patient numbers, no recovery time data, and treatment approach described as controversial with no statistical comparison
Taken word for word from the abstract
- intervention
we propose limited excision with immediate closure for non-infected operations and exposure with immediate resection for pilonidal abscesses
- comparator
between wide excision and limited excision and between primary closure and secondary closure
- population
Pilonidal sinus, acute or chronic suppuration of the sacrococcygeal region, is a common benign disease
- result
the morbidity is high, associated with a recurrence rate of between 5 and 40%
- primaryOutcome
the morbidity is high, associated with a recurrence rate of between 5 and 40%
Ann Chir · PMID 8787316 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Surrell 1994
Pilonidal disease
No recovery time data given.Narrative reviewVery low qualityRelated question
size not given1994
The abstract gives treatment recommendations but does not report healing or recovery time data
- Who was studied
- people with pilonidal cysts, including acute abscesses and chronic disease
- What they received
- incision and drainage followed by excision with marsupialization or beveling of skin edges
- Quality
- This is an expert opinion/narrative review with no study data, patient numbers, or outcome measurements reported.
- Limitations
- No original data, no patient numbers, no measured outcomes or follow-up times are given; it is author preference and recommendation only.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- intervention
an acutely infected pilonidal abscess be urgently drained with a simple incision and drainage procedure that is not necessarily viewed as definitive treatment
- intervention
excision of all infected tissue and sinus tracts through an elliptical incision with either marsupialization of the wound or beveling of the skin edges
- population
Pilonidal disease
- result
Weekly postoperative follow-up is strongly encouraged to assess progress and promote proper wound healing.
Surg Clin North Am · PMID 7985066 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Füzün et al. 1994
Which technique for treatment of pilonidal sinus--open or closed?
Faster return to work with stitched closure.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question
110 peoplefour months to three years
Primary closure led to longer hospital stays but earlier return to work; infection rates (3.6% vs 1.8%) and recurrence rates (4.4% vs 0%) were not significantly different between groups
- Who was studied
- adults with chronic pilonidal sinus
- What they received
- surgical excision with primary wound closure (stitched shut)
- Compared with
- surgical excision with wound left open (Obeid's open technique)
- Main outcome
- length of hospital stay, time to return to work, wound infection rate, and recurrence rate
- Quality
- It was a randomized trial but only 91 of 110 patients were followed, follow-up time varied widely, and the sample was small.
- Limitations
- Only 91 of 110 randomized patients were followed up, follow-up duration ranged widely (4 months to 3 years), and this studies surgical excision technique rather than simple incision and drainage.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
One hundred ten patients who had chronic-stage pilonidal sinus
- population
patients who had chronic-stage pilonidal sinus
- intervention
surgical excision and primary closure (closed technique, Group A)
- comparator
Obeid's surgical excision (open technique, Group B)
- primaryOutcome
compare length of hospital stay, length of time to return to work, wound infection rate, and recurrence rate
- result
patients with primary closure had significantly longer hospital stays (P < 0.05) than patients in the open group, they returned to work significantly earlier (P < 0.05)
- result
infection rates were 3.6 percent and 1.8 percent (P > 0.01), and recurrence rates were 4.4 percent and 0 percent (P > 0.01), respectively
- followUp
followed for a period four months to three years
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 7956585 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Armstrong et al. 1994
Pilonidal sinus disease. The conservative approach
Faster healing with conservative care.RetrospectiveLow qualityRelated question
330 people1994
conservative therapy led to much faster healing (83 bed-days in 101 patients) compared with excisional surgery (4760 bed-days in 229 patients)
- Who was studied
- patients treated for pilonidal sinus disease at army hospitals
- What they received
- conservative, nonexcisional therapy (hair removal, hygiene, limited incision and drainage)
- Compared with
- excisional surgery for pilonidal sinus disease
- Main outcome
- time to complete healing measured in occupied-bed days
- Quality
- The study was nonrandomized and combined a small pilot cohort with a retrospective review, so bias and confounding can't be ruled out.
- Limitations
- Nonrandomized, partly retrospective design comparing different time periods and institutions.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
101 consecutive cases managed during 1 year with the conservative method, whereas slower healing over 4760 occupied-bed days was observed in 229 patients undergoing 240 operative procedures during the preceding 2 years
- population
all patients treated for pilonidal sinus disease consecutively over 3 years at an Army community hospital
- intervention
Conservative, nonexcisional therapy (meticulous hair control by natal cleft shaving, improved perineal hygiene, and limited lateral incision and drainage for abscess)
- comparator
with initial comparison to excisional procedures
- primaryOutcome
Occupied-bed days for conservative vs excisional therapy during a 3-year pilot study
- result
Complete healing over 83 occupied-bed days was demonstrated in 101 consecutive cases managed during 1 year with the conservative method, whereas slower healing over 4760 occupied-bed days was observed in 229 patients undergoing 240 operative procedures during the preceding 2 years.
Arch Surg · PMID 8080372 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Williams 1990
A simple technique for successful primary closure after excision of pilonidal sinus disease
Most wounds healed after surgery.Case seriesLow qualityRelated question
31 people1990
28 of 31 patients healed with primary closure
- Who was studied
- patients having surgery for postanal pilonidal sinus disease
- What they received
- excision of the sinus with a new primary closure technique (antibiotics, iodine wash, suction drain)
- Main outcome
- wound healing by primary closure without breakdown
- Quality
- this is a small, uncontrolled case series without a comparison group, so it can't reliably show the technique caused the improvement
- Limitations
- no control group, small sample, single surgical technique described, no randomization
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Primary closure after excision of postanal pilonidal sinus disease
- intervention
Sepsis and haematoma formation, the causes of wound breakdown after pilonidal sinus excision, have been prevented by preoperative preparation, prophylactic antibiotic administration, wound irrigation with povidone-iodine and simple skin closure over a Redivac suction drain for at least 4 days.
- primaryOutcome
resulted in primary healing in 28 of 31 patients treated in a 5-year period
- result
resulted in primary healing in 28 of 31 patients treated in a 5-year period
- n
28 of 31 patients treated in a 5-year period
Ann R Coll Surg Engl · PMID 2221767 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Pozzi et al. 1989
[Primary therapy after radical removal of sinus pilonidal]
No recurrence after surgery.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
32 peopleTwo-year follow-up
no relapses in 29 of 32 patients followed for two years
- Who was studied
- patients who had surgery to remove a pilonidal sinus
- What they received
- surgical removal of pilonidal sinus with careful bleeding control, deep drainage, deep suturing, and tension correction
- Compared with
- none reported
- Main outcome
- return of the sinus (relapse) after surgery
- Quality
- This is a small, uncontrolled case series without a comparison group, so it can't show whether this approach is better than others.
- Limitations
- No control group, small number of patients, and three of the original patients were lost to follow-up.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
32 operated patients
- population
after removal of the Sinus pilonidalis
- intervention
careful haemostasis, 2) correct positioning of effective deep drainage with exit into the left gluteal region, 3) diligent suture of the deep layers, 4) correction of tension at operative wound level
- comparator
Two-year follow-up of 29 of 32 operated patients did not reveal relapses.
- primaryOutcome
did not reveal relapses
- result
Two-year follow-up of 29 of 32 operated patients did not reveal relapses.
Minerva Chir · PMID 2626198 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Salvati 1985
Symposium on outpatient anorectal procedures. Pilonidal disease
Heals on its own, rarely needs redo.Narrative reviewVery low quality
size not given1985
healing occurs by secondary intention and a second procedure is rarely needed, but no time to recovery is given
- Who was studied
- people with pilonidal disease, including abscess, recurrence, or chronic cases
- What they received
- incision and drainage of pilonidal abscess with excision of cavity edges, healing by secondary intention
- Main outcome
- need for repeat procedure and healing
- Quality
- this is an expert opinion/narrative description of office technique with no patient numbers, data, or comparison group.
- Limitations
- no study design, no patient numbers, no measured outcomes, no follow-up duration reported
Taken word for word from the abstract
- intervention
The midline orifice is incised and the incision carried into the abscess cavity. The edges of the cavity are excised.
- result
Healing takes place secondarily. A second procedure is rarely needed.
- population
pilonidal abscess, recurrent pilonidal disease following surgery and chronic pilonidal disease following spontaneous rupture of an abscess or secondary to incision and drainage
- primaryOutcome
A second procedure is rarely needed.
Can J Surg · PMID 3995420 · Read it on PubMed ↗
McLaren 1984
Partial closure and other techniques in pilonidal surgery: an assessment of 157 cases
Partial closure heals better than stitching.RetrospectiveLow quality
157 people1984
partial closure gave better results than excision and primary suture, and after incision and drainage later excision was needed in under 40% of patients
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal disease
- What they received
- incision and drainage followed by excision of granulation tissue and skin with partial closure
- Compared with
- excision and primary suture
- Main outcome
- healing time, wound breakdown and sinus recurrence rates
- Quality
- it is a retrospective review of 157 cases without randomization, so differences between techniques could be due to other factors.
- Limitations
- Retrospective design; no randomization; four different management methods compared without controlling for patient differences.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
a retrospective study of 157 patients with pilonidal disease
- population
157 patients with pilonidal disease
- intervention
Elective excision of the granulation tissue and skin, with partial closure of the defect
- comparator
excision and primary suture
- primaryOutcome
The period in hospital, the healing time, and the rates of wound breakdown and sinus recurrence were documented
- result
Elective excision of the granulation tissue and skin, with partial closure of the defect, gave better results than excision and primary suture.
- result
After incision and drainage of the pilonidal abscess, later excision was necessary in less than 40 per cent of patients.
Br J Surg · PMID 6733433 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Garcia et al. 1983
[Surgical treatment of pilonidal disease. A new simplified technic]
Fully healed within one monthCase seriesVery low quality
25 peopleone month
no recurrences, average hospital stay 3 days, out of bed after 24 hours, back to work after 2 weeks, fully healed in 1 month
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal sinus disease
- What they received
- new simplified surgical technique for pilonidal sinus
- Main outcome
- recovery time and recurrence after surgery
- Quality
- small uncontrolled case series of 25 patients with no comparison group
- Limitations
- no control group, small number of patients, short follow-up period described only as 'up to the present time'
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
employed in 25 patients
- population
treatment of pilonidal sinus has been employed in 25 patients
- intervention
A simplified technique for treatment of pilonidal sinus
- primaryOutcome
Mean duration of hospitalization was 3 days, patients can get out of bed after 24 hours, and work can be resumed after 2 weeks, complete healing requiring one month.
- result
Mean duration of hospitalization was 3 days, patients can get out of bed after 24 hours, and work can be resumed after 2 weeks, complete healing requiring one month.
J Chir (Paris) · PMID 6874765 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Hodgson et al. 1981
A comparative study between Z-plasty and incision and drainage or excision with marsupialization for pilonidal sinuses
Z-plasty cut need for repeat surgery.Randomised trialLow qualityRelated question
size not given1981
no further surgery was needed in the Z-plasty group, while 40% of the comparison group needed repeat surgery
- Who was studied
- people with pilonidal sinuses (cysts in the buttock crease)
- What they received
- Z-plasty (a plastic surgery flap technique)
- Compared with
- incision and drainage or excision with marsupialization
- Main outcome
- need for repeat surgical treatment
- Quality
- it is a randomized trial but does not report the number of patients, follow-up time, or other study details needed to judge its reliability
- Limitations
- no participant numbers given, no follow-up duration stated, and the outcome measured is repeat surgery rather than time to recovery
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
Pilonidal sinuses are acquired in the natal cleft as a result of dead hairs being pushed into skin abrasions by the movements of the buttock.
- intervention
Z-plasty
- comparator
incision and drainage or marsupialization
- primaryOutcome
no further surgical treatment was required in the Z-plasty group; in the control group, 40 per cent had repeated surgical treatment
- result
no further surgical treatment was required in the Z-plasty group; in the control group, 40 per cent had repeated surgical treatment
Surg Gynecol Obstet · PMID 7029758 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Bascom 1980
Pilonidal disease: origin from follicles of hairs and results of follicle removal as treatment
Healed in about 3 weeks.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
50 people1980
Disability averaged 1 day and healing time without disability averaged 3 weeks; recurrences healed in an average of 2 weeks
- Who was studied
- People with pilonidal disease (cysts near the tailbone)
- What they received
- Draining the abscess then removing hair follicles and cleaning out the cavity through side incisions
- Compared with
- No comparison group; all patients received the same treatment
- Main outcome
- Time to heal and days of disability after treatment
- Quality
- This is a single surgeon's uncontrolled case series of 50 patients with no comparison group, so it cannot show whether this approach is better than simple drainage alone.
- Limitations
- No control group, single office/surgeon, and the treatment combines drainage with additional follicle removal rather than drainage alone.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
Fifty patients were treated in the author's office under local anesthesia.
- population
Fifty patients were treated in the author's office under local anesthesia.
- intervention
the distended hair follicles are removed individually from the gluteal cleft
- comparator
Fifty patients were treated in the author's office under local anesthesia.
- primaryOutcome
Healing time, without disability, averaged 3 weeks.
- result
Disability averaged 1 day.
Surgery · PMID 7368107 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Weinstein et al. 1977
The dilemma of pilonidal disease: pilonidal cystotomy, reappraisal of an old technique
Healed within two months.Case seriesLow quality
126 people1977
healing in less than two months, back to work within two weeks, 20.9% recurrence
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal disease
- What they received
- pilonidal cystotomy under local anesthesia
- Compared with
- none
- Main outcome
- time to healing and recurrence
- Quality
- This is a small, single-group case series with no comparison group, so it can't prove the procedure works better than alternatives.
- Limitations
- No control group; retrospective review of a single technique.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
A series of 126 patients treated by inhospital pilonidal cystotomy is reviewed.
- population
A series of 126 patients treated by inhospital pilonidal cystotomy is reviewed.
- intervention
inhospital pilonidal cystotomy
- comparator
One hundred twenty-four were treated using local anesthesia with supplemental diazepam or Innovar.
- primaryOutcome
Most patients spent only three days in the hospital, with healing occurring in less than two months.
- result
Most patients spent only three days in the hospital, with healing occurring in less than two months. Recurrences occurred in 20.9 per cent of the patients.
- result
Most patients were pain-free and back to work within two weeks after operation.
Dis Colon Rectum · PMID 862487 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Abramson 1977
Excision and delayed closure of pilonidal sinuses
Good healing, low recurrence reported.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
78 people1977
compared favorably with marsupialization and semiprimary closure with regard to healing time and low recurrence rates
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal sinuses
- What they received
- excision of the sinus with delayed wound closure
- Compared with
- marsupialization and excision with semiprimary closure techniques
- Main outcome
- healing time and recurrence rate
- Quality
- This is a small case series with no randomization or control group and no specific numbers given for healing time or recurrence.
- Limitations
- No control group, no specific healing time or recurrence figures reported, and the procedure (excision with delayed closure) differs from simple incision and drainage.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
was used upon 78 patients
- population
the treatment of pilonidal sinuses
- intervention
a technique of excision and delayed closure for the treatment of pilonidal sinuses
- comparator
compared favorably with marsupialization as well as the excision and semiprimary closure technique
- primaryOutcome
with regard to healing time and low recurrence rates
- result
The procedure compared favorably with marsupialization as well as the excision and semiprimary closure technique with regard to healing time and low recurrence rates.
Surg Gynecol Obstet · PMID 835059 · Read it on PubMed ↗
Kam 1976
A simple surgical method of treating pilonidal sinus
Most healed in about 10 days.Case seriesLow qualityRelated question
63 peoplebetween 1 year and 6 years
93.6% of patients had primary healing with an average healing time of 10 days
- Who was studied
- patients with pilonidal sinus
- What they received
- surgical block excision of pilonidal sinus with primary wound closure
- Compared with
- none; single group followed after surgery
- Main outcome
- wound healing after surgery
- Quality
- This is a small, uncontrolled group of patients followed after one surgical technique, with no comparison group, so it can't show whether this is better than other options.
- Limitations
- No control group; only 6 of 63 patients had prior incision and drainage, so this mainly reflects excision surgery, not simple drainage.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- n
63 patients with pilonidal sinus
- population
A simple surgical method of treatment was used in 63 patients with pilonidal sinus.
- intervention
Adequate block excision with primary closure is the basis of this technique.
- comparator
A simple surgical method of treatment was used in 63 patients with pilonidal sinus.
- primaryOutcome
in 59 (93.6%) of 63 patients treated, primary healing was obtained
- result
in 59 (93.6%) of 63 patients treated, primary healing was obtained; in 4 (6.4%) disturbances of wound healing occured; and in 3 (4..8%) recurrences developed. The average stay in hospital was 10.4 days and the average healing time 10 days.
- followUp
The follow-up period was between 1 year and 6 years.
Arch Chir Neerl · PMID 938060 · Read it on PubMed ↗
ROSS 1956
Recurrent pilonidal cyst and sinus; a plan of preoperative preparation, operation and postoperative care
Good healing, few recurrences after surgery.Case seriesVery low qualityRelated question
50 peopleten years
nearly all wounds healed well, with only 3 of 33 patients followed having a recurrence after ten years
- Who was studied
- patients with recurrent pilonidal cysts and sinuses
- What they received
- radical surgical excision with primary wound closure
- Compared with
- none (no comparison group)
- Main outcome
- wound healing and recurrence of the cyst
- Quality
- this is an old, small case series without a comparison group, so it can't reliably show how drainage alone affects recovery time.
- Limitations
- No control group, long recall period, only 33 of 50 patients followed up, and the procedure (radical excision with closure) differs from simple drainage.
Taken word for word from the abstract
- population
recurrent pilonidal cysts
- n
In 50 patients operated upon
- intervention
radical excision and primary closure of recurrent pilonidal cysts
- comparator
Evaluation ten years following radical excision and primary closure
- primaryOutcome
Primary healing was achieved in all but one case
- result
Thirty-three of the 50 patients were located for appraisal at the end of ten years. Three had had recurrences.
- followUp
Evaluation ten years following radical excision
Calif Med · PMID 13356182 · Read it on PubMed ↗
How we searchedThe exact query, the date it ran, and what came back — so you can run it yourself.
- Searched
- PubMed · ClinicalTrials.gov · Crossref on 2026-10-05
- The exact search — paste this into PubMed to repeat it
("Pilonidal Sinus"[Mesh] OR pilonidal cyst[tiab] OR pilonidal abscess[tiab]) AND ("Drainage"[Mesh] OR incision and drainage[tiab] OR "I&D"[tiab]) AND (healing[tiab] OR recovery[tiab] OR "Wound Healing"[Mesh] OR "Time Factors"[Mesh] OR "Return to Work"[Mesh] OR recurrence[tiab])- PubMed expanded that to:
("Pilonidal Sinus"[MeSH Terms] OR "pilonidal cyst"[Title/Abstract] OR "pilonidal abscess"[Title/Abstract]) AND ("Drainage"[MeSH Terms] OR "incision and drainage"[Title/Abstract] OR "I&D"[Title/Abstract]) AND ("healing"[Title/Abstract] OR "recovery"[Title/Abstract] OR "Wound Healing"[MeSH Terms] OR "Time Factors"[MeSH Terms] OR "Return to Work"[MeSH Terms] OR "recurrence"[Title/Abstract]) - What came back
- 131 records found · 131 read · 98 answered the question
- Included
- Human, animal or laboratory studies reporting an outcome relevant to the question
- Excluded
- Records about a different condition or intervention
- Records reporting no outcome
- Retracted publications, which are listed but excluded from every count
- Limits
- Details were read from abstracts, not full papers, so anything reported only in a paper's methods section is not captured here.
- Fields were read from abstracts, not full text, so detail reported only in a paper's methods section is not captured.
- Evidence strength is adapted from the GRADE framework. It is not a GRADE assessment and was not produced by a GRADE panel.
Automated evidence review — PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Crossref. Search strategy, grading rules and the checks that must pass before anything publishes were written by Allen Kamrava, MD, MBA, FACS, FASCRS, colon & rectal surgery, Beverly Hills. The pages themselves are compiled by software running that method and are not read one by one before publication — saying otherwise would be the one claim here that could not be checked.
- 131records came back from the search
- 131were read
- 98actually answered the question
Why people try thisThe reasoning behind the question — not a claim that it works.
- It's usually the fastest way to relieve severe pain and pressure from an acute abscess.
- It can be done quickly in an emergency room or clinic under local anaesthetic, without a hospital stay.
- Many people hope draining the abscess will be the end of the problem and avoid a bigger operation.
- It's the traditional, most familiar first step doctors offer for a painful pilonidal abscess.
Common questionsShort answers, drawn from the same studies.
- How long will it take for the wound to heal after drainage?
- Studies disagree — reported healing times range from about 18 days to a median of 43 days, and in some studies fewer than 8 in 10 people were fully healed by 10 weeks. Expect several weeks, and check with whoever drained it for your specific wound-care plan.
- Will I need another surgery after drainage?
- It's common. In the studies reviewed, 21% to nearly 80% of people who had drainage alone later needed a further procedure, usually because the sinus came back or never fully closed. Ask your surgeon whether curettage (scraping the cavity) at the time of drainage, which lowered recurrence in one trial, is an option for you.
- Should I have the whole cyst removed instead of just drained?
- The studies here don't test 'drainage versus nothing' — they test drainage against curettage or excision done at the same time, and the more complete procedures had lower recurrence, though they sometimes took longer to heal. That trade-off is worth discussing with your surgeon.
- Should I avoid having it drained?
- No — simple drainage is still the standard, fast way to relieve an acute, painful abscess, and none of the studies suggest skipping it is better. The finding here isn't that drainage is dangerous, but that it may not be the last treatment you need; ask about adding curettage or planning a follow-up definitive surgery to lower the chance it comes back.
- What actually lowers the chance it comes back?
- The one randomised trial testing this directly found that adding curettage (scraping out the cavity) at the time of drainage lowered recurrence compared with drainage alone (11% versus 42%). Other studies found complete excision of the cyst also had lower recurrence than drainage alone, though it can take longer to heal.
This is information, not advice
This page summarises published research. It cannot tell you what is happening in your own body, and evidence changes. If something is bleeding, painful, or new, it is worth being looked at — that is a different question from the one on this page, and a better one to bring to a consultation.
Contact the officeAutomated evidence review — PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Crossref. Search strategy, grading rules and the checks that must pass before anything publishes were written by Allen Kamrava, MD, MBA, FACS, FASCRS, colon & rectal surgery, Beverly Hills. The pages themselves are compiled by software running that method and are not read one by one before publication — saying otherwise would be the one claim here that could not be checked.